A review of Cuckservative
anticipates, correctly, I suspect, that it is Christians who will find it most
difficult to give up their extra-Biblical Good Samaritanism:
The chapter on Christianity and cuckservatism is perhaps the
most devastating in the book, and will be the most difficult pill to swallow
for those at whom it is aimed. Your ordinary political cuckservative is, at
some level, aware of his own pusillanimity and bad faith. Christian
cuckservatives are, generally speaking, much more naive, good-hearted and truly
well intentioned. For them, looking in the mirror that Vox Day and Red Eagle
hold up will be extremely difficult. I would not be surprised if the loudest
condemnations of this book come from Christian cuckservatives. Ordinary
political conservatives reading this book may reproach themselves for their
former credulousness and lack of good judgment, but they may more easily and
readily be won over to the worldview that Vox and Red Eagle advocate since they
can place the blame on the leaders of the movement. The Christian will have to
go through a complete paradigm shift over his basic understanding of his own
religion before he will be capable of making that same leap.
I've seen this repeatedly
in Churchians. Their religion consists of equating "love" with
"being nice". It puts a premium on whatever makes them feel good
emotionally; they are essentially emotional hedonists rather than physical
ones.
Churchians can no more accept the concept of a God who is intolerant, or a Savior who does not save everyone (except, perhaps, for the intolerant), any more than an inveterate deviant can accept the concept of a God who considers sexual deviance to be abomination. It is not an accident that they are so easily subverted by the wolves in sheep's clothing, who use the intolerance intrinsic in the concept of a fallen state of Man requiring salvation to deny the Cross, deny the Resurrection, deny Hell, and finally, deny Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
Churchians can no more accept the concept of a God who is intolerant, or a Savior who does not save everyone (except, perhaps, for the intolerant), any more than an inveterate deviant can accept the concept of a God who considers sexual deviance to be abomination. It is not an accident that they are so easily subverted by the wolves in sheep's clothing, who use the intolerance intrinsic in the concept of a fallen state of Man requiring salvation to deny the Cross, deny the Resurrection, deny Hell, and finally, deny Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/RQXF5JPZA2GFO/ref=cm_cr_pr_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B018ZHHA52
