Labels

Friday, August 7, 2026

Emasculism is the Male Feminism - by Vox Day - Sigma Game

 There is no doubt that the legal deck is stacked against men in the modern West. There is no doubt that Western society has been riddled with the feminist cancer, that many women have been possessed by a spirit of Lilith, and that the USA has been transformed from the New Rome into the New Carthage.

None of this changes anything with regards to a man’s duty to himself, to God, and to his ancestors.

MGTOW is the same sort of stupid, self-destroying psychological operation as feminism, only aimed at men. It should be called “emasculism” because it is a philosophy for frightened, conflict-avoidant men who are psychologically incapable of rising to the challenge of difficult times. It is a defensive, self-protective mentality for soft men in hard times meant to allow them to protect their fragile egos, their delicate emotions, and their tender hearts from the increased likelihood of failure in difficult times.

Think about how stupid and short-sighted emasculism is. It’s quite literally the child’s tactic of throwing down his toys and running back into the security of his bedroom upon discovering that the game he’s playing isn’t fair.

Never mind that life isn’t, and will never be, fair.....

Full text:
https://sigmagame.substack.com/p/emasculism-is-the-male-feminism?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2265630&post_id=210206677&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email 

...Whether you call it MGTOW, emasculism, or otaku, what it amounts to is a retreat to Omega. It requires giving up every ounce of your masculine self-respect, all of your accumulated status in every male hierarchy, and accepting an end to your genetic line, all in the name of your fear of the possible.

The truth is that the MGTOW isn’t a man at all. He is a psychological self-castrate.

Neocons Scurry for Cover - Vox Popoli

 Even Robert Kagan, the King Neocon himself, is not so much walking back his bellicose imperialism as running away from it:

In 1997, Kagan co-founded Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative think tank that lobbied for a muscular foreign policy and the maintenance of U.S. global hegemony. The group exercised its considerable influence to push regime change in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Kagan’s advocacy has always been based on a belief that the world would collapse into disorder without American leadership, even though U.S. military misadventures have repeatedly destabilized parts of the world.....


https://voxday.net/2026/08/07/neocons-scurry-for-cover/ 

....Di Caro: Do you reject the neoconservative label?

Kagan: I do reject it, not only because it has taken on connotations that I think are frankly antisemitic, but because it’s just a bad description of what I am. What I am is a liberal. Lib-er-al. My foreign policy is liberal. If you look back on the history of American foreign policy, the people who have pursued the policies that I favor have always tended to be progressive and liberal. And conservative foreign policy in America has always tended to be in the direction of restraint. I worked for the neoconservatives. I worked for Irving Kristol. They were called neoconservatives because they had been on the left and then they were newly on the right.

Now, all of this is absolutely absurd, as Simplicius notes.

Someone is extremely defensive over the repudiation of what is essentially his life’s work. This is nothing more than a desperate attempt to salvage credibility. In accordance with the extremely tetchy tenor of his responses, Kagan again reverts to knee-jerk defensiveness… It’s clear he realizes how bad he looks in hindsight and can’t help but adopt an almost whiny tone in attempting to rewrite his key role in America’s geopolitical depletion.

I’ve read Kagan’s books, and he’s been methodically retreating from the idea that America’s military can impose satanic imperialism on the world for nearly 20 years now, despite his previous advocacy of it. The jungle, as he calls it, has proven to be significantly more resistant to the order he wishes to impose out of the chaos that he, his wife, and the other neocons have been causing for at least the last 40 years.

Mises Institute's 5 Purges: Omitting Jewish Bankers, by Marco de Wit - The Unz Review

 https://www.unz.com/article/mises-institutes-5-purges-omitting-jewish-bankers/ 


Conclusion

The Ludwig von Mises Institute has performed monumental work in introducing the writings of Mises, Rothbard, and other prominent Austro-Libertarians to a global audience. However, in the decades following Rothbard’s passing, the Institute has progressively sanitized his legacy by censoring his analysis of the ruling elite, particularly its Jewish faction. Ironically, as the Jewish faction of the ruling elite has grown increasingly powerful and warmongering, the Mises Institute has accelerated its efforts to conceal and memory-hole that very influence.

Fortunately, artificial intelligence is advancing at a rapid pace. Hopefully, all of Murray Rothbard’s writings will soon be easily accessible. Perhaps he will even speak from the grave through a genuinely honest, uncensored ‘Rothbot.’

Things Will Change Only When the People Learn to Recognize How Power Actually Works - LewRockwell

The naive public remains in the dark because it insists on viewing Washington as it should be, and not how it actually is.


https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/08/no_author/things-will-change-only-when-the-people-learn-to-recognize-how-power-actually-works/ 

We suffer enormously in life from our expectation that people—and especially politicians—be steadfast, faithful, and virtuous in their conduct. A better way to live is accept that people are self-serving, hungry for gain, and avoidant of principled conduct that comes at a personal cost or impediment to the gain they seek. This isn’t cynicism—it’s absolute realism. In my opinion, Machiavelli was not a wicked man, but one of the wisest men who has ever lived.

The US government is NOT in the business of serving the interests of We the People. It IS in the business of protecting and advancing the interests of the powerful oligarchs—the great lords of this earth—that it serves and enriches.

For a decade I was under the mistaken impression that Donald Trump had arrived a point in his life in which he genuinely wanted to serve and to protect “We the People”—that is, the working and middle classes of this country who are not represented by a lobby or interest group in Washington.

Since he was reelected for his second term, he has revealed himself to be—without a doubt—what you might call the “Oligarchian Candidate” or the “Epstein Class Candidate.” The fact that the Democrats challenged him with the raving imbecile Kamala Harris should be regarded as strong circumstantial evidence that they are in on the act.

Kamala played a key role in the “race to the bottom” drama that led us to believe that Donald Trump was our only hope. Now that he is in office for his second term, we are facing major wars on multiple fronts, a doubling of the federal money sent to the military-industrial complex, accelerating national debt, unqualified support for the Great Lords of Tech who are rolling out AI with reckless abandon, and still no removal of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from the market.

Anthony Fauci’s entire mission during the pandemic was to serve as the midwife of bringing mRNA technology into use on a global scale. This was the entire point of Operation Warp Speed in all of its wild extravagance.

Until President Trump publicly revises his assessment of Warp Speed and declares that it was the work of an organized crime syndicate (of which Fauci was the public face), there is no way his administration could even consider bringing Fauci to justice.

This is the way things are, not how they should be, and until people recognize this, they will remain confused about how the US government actually works.

This article was originally published on The Focal Points.

Who Canceled the Oil Apocalypse?

 

Someone quietly absorbed the biggest supply shock in oil market history. It wasn't who or why you think.....


In normal times, China buys more crude from abroad than India, Japan, and South Korea combined. So when it pulled back its imports after the Strait of Hormuz closed, the effect was enormous. JPMorgan found that China alone accounted for 74% of the entire global decline in crude trade.

And of course, every barrel China didn’t buy was a barrel freed up for everyone else.

Remember our doomsday arithmetic? The world was short 5.5 million barrels a day. China cut 4.9. Just like that, the gap was all but gone.

Which is how, without announcing a thing, China saved the world from $200 oil.....


https://www.snafuinvesting.com/p/who-canceled-the-oil-apocalypse 

...To appreciate just how extraordinary that is: if India had to fill a hole that size from its strategic reserve, it would run dry in about a week. America’s (the envy of the world, built up over decades) would last under five months. Most countries measure their emergency reserves in days or weeks. China measures them in years.

So if you were wondering why everyone (but China) spent the first month of the war convinced the sky was falling, that’s why.

The world genuinely did need saving.

Now you know who saved it, and how.

As for why they did it... well, that’s next week’s Part 2. As you probably suspect, it wasn’t out of the goodness of their hearts.

What the War on Chlorine Dioxide Reveals About Medicine

 Story at a Glance:

  • Modern medicine is built around costly, narrowly approved drugs that treat (but rarely cure) specific disease franchises, with regulatory approval correlating more strongly with money spent than with real therapeutic value.

  • To enforce this, for over a century the same institutions, backed by vast fortunes, have repeatedly sidelined broader or cheaper therapies that threatened those franchises.

  • The same playbook is used again and again—once a therapy threatens a market, claims of “no evidence” or doctored research amplified by the media will allow regulators to clamp down on the “dangerous and unproven” therapy until it becomes forgotten to history.

  • In this article, I will illustrate how the exact same playbook was used again and again on numerous transformative medical discoveries endorsed by leading physicians of the era, resulting in nearly every one (e.g., UVBI and numerous cancer treatments) becoming largely forgotten despite immense evidence behind them.

  • This same playbook was used throughout COVID-19 to eliminate the off-patent therapies that threatened the boondoggle. One of these, chlorine dioxide, was not only repeatedly shown to eliminate COVID outbreaks, but also to do the same with malaria, where it likewise was banned.

  • Pierre Kory and Jenna McCarthy’s recent book The War on Chlorine Dioxide provides a critical body of evidence that chlorine dioxide has treated a myriad of challenging conditions, and that each time it did, a robust censorship apparatus erased those discoveries and retaliated against the discovers—providing a poignant illustration of the medical monopoly in action.


https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=748806&post_id=209856343&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email 

Why Single Women Need to Stay Off the Apps - by Vox Day

Social media is now negative social proof for women

https://sigmagame.substack.com/p/why-single-women-need-to-stay-off?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2265630&post_id=210044870&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


 This is why it is important for a young woman who wants to get married to stay off the dating apps, and, unless she is very self-disciplined, she should probably avoid social media engagement as well.

Only a woman who isn’t on the dating apps and can honestly say that she’s never been on them is going to be fully trusted by the average young man, and it’s very, very difficult for young women to resist the dopamine addiction offered by all of the affirmation available on social media.

If you have real-world objectives, the less time you spend in the imaginary world, the more likely you are to achieve them.