Some are puzzled by the dishonesty, lack of character and sheer stupidity
of many people in the media. But seeing as most of them are college graduates,
they don't bear the full blame. They are taught by dishonest and irresponsible
academics. Let's look at it.
"A Clash of Police Policies," a column written by Dr. Thomas
Sowell, presents some readily available statistics: "Homicide rates among black males went down by 18
percent in the 1940s and by 22 percent in the 1950s. It was in the 1960s, when
the ideas of Chief Justice (Earl) Warren and others triumphed, that this long
decline in homicide rates among black males reversed and skyrocketed by 89
percent, wiping out all the progress of the previous 20 years."
Academics and the media blame poverty and discrimination for today's crime.
No one bothers to ask why crime was falling in the 1930s, '40s and '50s, when
blacks faced far greater poverty and discrimination.
The 1960s riots were blamed on poverty and discrimination. Poverty and
discrimination were worse in the South than in the rest of the country, but
riots were not nearly so common there. Detroit's deadliest riot occurred at a
time when the median income of black families in Detroit was 95 percent of
their white counterparts, plus the black unemployment rate was 3.4 percent and
black homeownership was higher than in other major cities.
Academics teach that the breakdown of
the black family is the legacy of slavery and discrimination. They ignore the following facts. In 1950, 72 percent of black men and
81 percent of black women had been married. Also, only 17 percent of black
children lived in single-parent households; today it's close to 70 percent.
Every census from 1890 to 1950 showed that black labor force participation
rates exceeded those of whites. During the late 1940s, the unemployment rate
for black 16- and 17-year-olds was less than that for white teens.
According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social
Sciences, that year 11 percent of black children and 3 percent of white
children were born to unwed mothers. Before 1960, the number of teenage pregnancies
had been decreasing; both poverty and dependency were declining; and black
income was rising in both absolute and relative terms to white income. As late
as 1965, 75 percent of black children were born to married women. Today over 73
percent of black babies are born to unwed mothers. Again, so much for the
"legacy of slavery" argument.
Academics teach that school integration is a necessary condition for black
academic excellence. Blacks, their logic implies, cannot achieve academic
excellence unless they go out and capture a white kid to sit next to their
kids. Public charter schools such as those in the Knowledge Is Power Program,
or KIPP, and Success Academy Charter Schools are having some successes without
race mixing. Sowell points out that only 39 percent of
students in New York state schools who were tested recently scored at the
"proficient" level in math, but 100 percent of the students at the
Crown Heights Success Academy scored at that level in math. Blacks and
Hispanics are 90 percent of the students in the Crown Heights Success Academy.
More than 43,000 families are on waiting lists to get their children into
charter schools. Teachers unions are opposed to any alternative to public
education and contribute to politicians who place obstacles and restrictions on
the expansion of charter schools. The NAACP, at its 2016 national convention in
Cincinnati, voted to support "a moratorium on the proliferation of
privately managed charter schools."
It's easy to understand why the NAACP
is against any alternative to public schools. Many of its members work in
public education. However, many of those people do want alternatives for
themselves. In Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, 25 percent of public-school
teachers send their children to private schools. In Philadelphia, 44 percent of
teachers send their children to private schools. The percentages are similar in
several other cities: Cincinnati, 41 percent, Chicago, 39 percent and
Rochester, New York, 38 percent. This demonstrates the dishonesty, hypocrisy
and arrogance of the elite. They effectively say, "One thing for thee and
another for me."
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George
Mason University.
