Too many people believe that slavery is a “peculiar
institution.” That’s what Kenneth Stampp called slavery in his book, “Peculiar
Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South.” But slavery is by no means
peculiar, odd or unusual. It
was common among ancient peoples such as the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians,
Hittites, Greeks, Persians, Armenians and many others. Large numbers of
Christians were enslaved during the Ottoman wars in Europe. White slaves were
common in Europe from the Dark Ages to the Middle Ages. It was only after A.D. 1600 that
Europeans joined with Arabs and Africans and started the Atlantic slave trade.
As David P. Forsythe wrote in his book, “The Globalist,” “The fact remained
that at the beginning of the nineteenth century an estimated three-quarters of
all people alive were trapped in bondage against their will either in some form
of slavery or serfdom.”
While slavery constitutes one of the grossest encroachments on human
liberty, it is by no means unique or restricted to the Western world or United
States, as many liberal academics would have us believe. Much of their
indoctrination of our young people, at all levels of education, paints our
nation’s founders as racist adherents to slavery, but the story is not so
simple.
At the
time of the 1787 Constitutional Convention, slaves were about 40 percent of the
population of the Southern colonies. Apportionment in the House of
Representatives and the number of electoral votes each state would have in
presidential elections would be based upon population. Southern delegates to
the convention wanted slaves to be counted as one person. Northern delegates to
the convention, and those opposed to slavery, wanted only free persons of each
state to be counted for the purposes of apportionment in the House of
Representatives and the Electoral College. The compromise reached was that each
slave would be counted as only three-fifths of a person.
Many criticize this compromise as proof of racism. My question to these grossly
uninformed critics is whether they would have found it more preferable for
slaves to be counted as whole persons. Slaves counted as whole persons would
have given slaveholding Southern states much more political power. Or,
would the critics of the founders prefer that the Northern delegates not
compromise and not allow slaves to be counted at all. If they did, it is likely
that the Constitution would have not been ratified. Thus, the question emerges
is whether blacks would be better off with Northern states having gone their
way and Southern states having gone theirs, resulting in no U.S. Constitution
and no Union? Unlike today’s pseudointellectuals, black abolitionist Frederick
Douglass understood the compromise, saying that the three-fifths clause was “a
downright disability laid upon the slaveholding states” that deprived them of
“two-fifths of their natural basis of representation.”
Douglass’
vision was shared by Patrick Henry and others. Henry said, expressing the
reality of the three-fifths compromise, “As much as I deplore slavery, I see
that prudence forbids its abolition.” With this union, Congress at least had
the power to abolish slave trade by 1808. According to delegate James Wilson,
many believed the anti-slave-trade clause laid “the foundation for banishing
slavery out of this country.” Many of the founders abhorred slavery. Their
statements can be read on my website, walterewilliams.com.
The most unique aspect of
slavery in the Western world was the moral outrage against it, which began to
emerge in the 18th century and led to massive elimination efforts. It was
Britain’s military sea power that put an end to the slave trade. And our
country fought a costly war that brought an end to slavery. Unfortunately,
these facts about slavery are not in the lessons taught in our schools and
colleges. Instead, there is gross misrepresentation and suggestion that slavery
was a uniquely American practice.
Walter E.
Williams is the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics at George
Mason University, and a nationally syndicated columnist. To find out more about
Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and
cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page.
Copyright © 2017 Creators.com
Previous
article by Walter E. Williams: Horrific Cruelty
