The So-called “Spanish
Influenza Epidemic of 1918” and the Rockefeller Institute’s Crude Bacterial
Meningitis Vaccination Experiment on US Troops
The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine
experiment may have killed 50-100 million people
“The
first casualty of war is truth.” – US
Senator Hiram Warren Johnson,Progressive Republican from
California – 1918
“The
question is whether we are to have (vaccine) experiments
performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially
contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults
(and soldiers?) who are human in form but not in social potential.”
– Dr Stanley Plotkin, virologist who spent years
working at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and the University of
Pennsylvania, associate of Paul Offit, credited with inventing the rubella
vaccine and an advisor to pharmaceutical corporations
“During
the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000
men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research
took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine
experiments.”
“The
American Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and its
experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine may have killed 50-100
million people in 1918-19” is a far less effective sales slogan than the overly
simplistic ‘vaccines save lives’.”
“The
crude vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in
horses.”
“According
to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the
killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 Pandemic autopsies reviewed.”
“Clean
water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have
done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than
any vaccine program.
“In
1918, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers…with disastrous results—but
in 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine
schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the
experiment are in: 1 in 7 American children is in some form of special education and over 50% have some form
of chronic illness.”
The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated
50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19. What if the story we have been
told about this pandemic isn’t true?
What if, instead, the killer infection
was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin?
Newly analyzed documents reveal that
the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry.
In looking back on the 100th
anniversary of the end of World War I, we need to delve deeper to solve this
mystery.
Summary
The
reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza
strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer.
More
soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.
The
pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by
bacterial pneumonia, not influenza/a virus.
The
pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace
back to a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas.
From
January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine
cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New
York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.
During
the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor
sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at
every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.
One study describes soldiers
“with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized
their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing
spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through
their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
The
“Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia
attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and
immunocompromised.
When
WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and
colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.
During
WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent the anti-meningococcal serum to
England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the
epidemic worldwide.
During
the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million
people, including many soldiers.
Many
people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than
machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.
I
have a personal connection to the Spanish Flu. Among those killed by
disease in 1918-19 are members of both of my parents’ families.
On my
father’s side, his grandmother Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918. Sadie
was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy. Her death left my grandmother Rosemary
and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also
joined the Navy. She died from “the influenza” in 1919.
On my
mother’s side, two of her father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family
members who died lived in New York City.
I suspect
many American families, and many families worldwide, were impacted in similar
ways by the mysterious Spanish Flu.
In
1918, “influenza” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin.
It didn’t carry the specific meaning it does today.
It meant
some mystery disease which dropped out of the sky. In fact, influenza is
from the Medieval Latin “influential” in an astrological sense, meaning a
visitation under the influence of the stars.
Why is What Happened 100 Years Ago Important Now?
Between 1900-1920, there were enormous
efforts underway in the industrialized world to build a better society. I
will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society which
occurred in NY during that time and their impact on mortality from infectious
diseases.
1. Clean Water and Sanitation
In the late 19th century
through the early 20th century, New York built an extraordinary system to bring
clean water to the city from the Catskills, a system still in use today.
New York City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat
waste, which protects the drinking water. The World Health Organization
acknowledges the importance of clean water and sanitation in combating
infectious diseases. (2)
2. Electricity
In
the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built a power
grid and wired the city so power was available in every home. Electricity
allows for refrigeration. Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health
benefit. When food is refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected
from potential infectious diseases. Cheap renewable energy is important
for many reasons, including combating infectious diseases.
3. Rockefeller’s Pharmaceutical
Industry
In
the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York became the home
of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University).
The Institute is where the modern pharmaceutical industry was born. The
Institute pioneered many of the approaches the pharmaceutical industry uses
today, including the preparation of vaccine serums, for better or worse.
The vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in
horses.
US
Mortality Rates data from the turn of the 20th century to 1965 clearly
indicates that clean water, flushing toilets, effective sewer systems and
refrigerated foods all combined to effectively reduce mortality from infectious
diseases BEFORE vaccines for those diseases became available.
Have
doctors and the pharmaceutical manufacturers taken credit for reducing
mortality from infectious disease which rightfully belongs to sandhogs,
plumbers, electricians and engineers?
If
hubris at the Rockefeller Institute in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which
killed millions of people, what lessons can we learn and apply to 2018?
The Disease Was Not Spanish
While watching an episode of American
Experience on PBS a few months ago, I was surprised to hear that the first
cases of “Spanish Flu” occurred at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1918. I thought,
how is it possible this historically important event could be so badly misnamed
100 years ago and never corrected?
Why “Spanish”?
Spain was
one of a few countries not involved in World War I. Most of the countries
involved in the war censored their press.
Free from
censorship concerns, the earliest press reports of people dying from disease in
large numbers came from Spain. The warring countries did not want to
additionally frighten the troops, so they were content to scapegoat Spain.
Soldiers on all sides would be asked to cross no man’s land into machine gun
fire, which was frightening enough without knowing that the trenches were a
disease breeding ground.
One
hundred years later, it’s long past time to drop “Spanish” from all discussion
of this pandemic. If the flu started at a United States military base in
Kansas, then the disease could and should be more aptly named.
In
order to prevent future disasters, the US (and the rest of the world) must take
a hard look at what really caused the pandemic.
It is
possible that one of the reasons the Spanish Flu has never been corrected is
that it helps disguise the origin of the pandemic.
If
the origin of the pandemic involved a vaccine experiment on US soldiers, then
the US may prefer calling it Spanish Flu instead of The Fort Riley Bacteria of
1918, or something similar. The Spanish Flu started at the location this
experimental bacterial vaccine was given making it the prime suspect as the
source of the bacterial infections which killed so many.
It
would be much more difficult to maintain the marketing mantra of “vaccines save
lives” if a vaccine experiment originating in the United States during the
years of primitive manufacturing caused the deaths of 50-100 million people.
“The
American Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and its
experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine may have killed 50-100
million people in 1918-19” is a far less effective sales slogan than the overly
simplistic ‘vaccines save lives’.” – Kevin
Barry
The Disease Which Killed so
Many was not Flu nor was it a Virus. It was Bacterial
During
the mid-2000’s there was much talk about “pandemic preparedness.”
Influenza vaccine manufacturers in the United States received billions of
taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines to make sure that we don’t have another
lethal pandemic “flu,” like the one in 1918-19.
Capitalizing
on the “flu” part of Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure
billion-dollar checks from governments, even though scientists knew at the time
that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer.
It is
not my opinion that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer – thousands of
autopsies confirm this fact.
According
to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the
killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed. It is
likely higher than 92.7%.
The
researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies, and “there were no negative
(bacterial) lung culture results.”
“…
In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could
be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. …
in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical
presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained,
with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164
of 167 lung tissue samples.
“There
were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci
were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22
that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms
(prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded
nonhemolytic streptococci alone. There were no negative lung culture results.”
(3)
Pneumococci
or streptococci were found in “164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples” autopsied.
That is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer.
Where Did the Spanish Flu
Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918-19 Originate?
When
the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical
industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test
subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft.
Pre-war
in 1917, the US Army was 286,000 men. Post-war in 1920, the US army disbanded,
and had 296,000 men.
During
the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000
men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research
took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine
experiments.
A Report on Anti-meningitis Vaccination and Observations on
Agglutinins in the Blood of Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates, MD in 1918 From the Base Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas and The
Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York. Received July 20, 1918
(Author note:
Please read the Fort Riley paper in its entirety
so you can appreciate the carelessness of the experiments conducted on these
troops.)
Between January 21st and June
4th of 1918, Dr. Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers were given 3
doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine. Those conducting the experiment
on the soldiers were just spit-balling dosages of a vaccine serum made in
horses.
The
vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses.
4,792
men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11%), and
only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%).
A
total of 1,090 men were not there for the 3rd dose. What happened to
these soldiers? Were they shipped East by train from Kansas to board a ship to
Europe? Were they in the Fort Riley hospital? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t
tell us.
An
article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some
light on where these 1,090 men might be. Gates began his experiments in
January 1918.
By
March of that year, “100 men a day” were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley.
Are
some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates’ report – the ones who did not get
the 2nd or 3rd dose?
“…
Shortly before breakfast on Monday, March 11, the first domino would fall
signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza.
“Company
cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “bad
cold.”
“Right
behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints.
“By
noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on
his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady…” (5)
Gates
does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms:
coughs, vomiting and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine.
These
symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks, travelling on trains to the
Atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, and living and fighting in trenches.
The
unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for
a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread.
From
Dr. Gates’ report:
“Several
cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted. This symptom
had not been encountered before. Careful inquiry in individual cases often
elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of
vaccination were suffering from mild coryza, bronchitis, etc., at the time
of injection.
“Sometimes
the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men
complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night.
“Next
in frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general “aches
and pains” in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially
localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few
injections were followed by diarrhea.
“The
reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis
and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for
diagnosis.” (4)
According
to Gates, they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis
vaccine into soldiers. Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which
“simulated” meningitis, but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it
wasn’t actual meningitis.
The soldiers developed
flu-like symptoms. Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic flu-like symptoms. (6)
Perhaps
the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial
pneumonia to symptoms of flu is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have
been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100
years and counting.
How did the “Spanish Flu”
Spread so Widely and so Quickly?
There
is an element of a perfect storm in how the Gates bacteria spread. WWI
ended only 10 months after the first injections. Unfortunately for the 50-100
million who died, those soldiers injected with horse-infused bacteria moved
quickly during those 10 months.
An
article from 2008 on the CDC’s website describes how sick WWI soldiers could
pass along the bacteria to others by becoming “cloud adults.”
“Finally,
for brief periods and to varying degrees, affected hosts became “cloud adults” who increased the
aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria, particularly pneumococci,
hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus.
“For
several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as
hospital wards, military camps, troop ships, and mines (and trenches)—some
persons were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from
infections with influenza virus.
“Persons
with active infections were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their
noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were
profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by
their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
Three
times in his report on the Fort Riley vaccine experiment, Dr. Gates states that
some soldiers had a “severe reaction” indicating “an unusual individual
susceptibility to the vaccine”.
While
the vaccine made many sick, it only killed those who were susceptible to it.
Those who became sick and survived became “cloud adults” who spread the
bacteria to others, which created more cloud adults, spreading to others where
it killed the susceptible, repeating the cycle until there were no longer
wartime unsanitary conditions, and there were no longer millions of soldiers to
experiment on.
The toll on US troops was
enormous and it is well documented. Dr. Carol Byerly describes how the
“influenza” traveled like wildfire through the US military. (substitute
“bacteria” for Dr. Byerly’s “influenza” or “virus”):
“… Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March, April, or May, and some
of the infected troops carried the virus with them aboard ships to France …
“As
soldiers in the trenches became sick, the military evacuated them from the
front lines and replaced them with healthy men.
“This
process continuously brought the virus into contact with new hosts—young,
healthy soldiers in which it could adapt, reproduce, and become extremely
virulent without danger of burning out.
“…
Before any travel ban could be imposed, a contingent of replacement troops
departed Camp Devens (outside of Boston) for Camp Upton, Long Island, the
Army’s debarkation point for France, and took influenza with them.
“Medical
officers at Upton said it arrived “abruptly” on September 13, 1918, with 38
hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and 193 the next.
“Hospital
admissions peaked on October 4 with 483, and within 40 days, Camp Upton sent
6,131 men to the hospital for influenza. Some developed pneumonia so quickly
that physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than
listening to the lungs…” (7)
“The
United States was not the only country in possession of the Rockefeller
Institute’s experimental bacterial vaccine.
“A
1919 report from the Institute states: “Reference should be made that before
the United States entered the war (in April 1917) the Institute had resumed the
preparation of anti-meningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests of
England, France, Belgium Italy and other countries.”
“The
same report states: “In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for the
curative serums worked out at the Institute, a special stable for horses was
quickly erected …” (8)
An
experimental anti-meningoccic serum made in horses and injected into soldiers
who would be entering the cramped and unsanitary living conditions of war …
what could possibly go wrong?
Is
the bacterial serum made in horses at the Rockefeller Institute which was
injected into US soldiers and distributed to numerous other countries
responsible for the 50-100 million people killed by bacterial lung infections
in 1918-19?
The
Institute says it distributed the bacterial serum to England, France, Belgium,
Italy and other countries during WWI. Not enough is known about how these
countries experimented on their soldiers.
I hope
independent researchers will take an honest look at these questions.
The Road to Hell is Paved with
Good Intentions
I do
not believe that anyone involved in these vaccine experiments was trying to
harm anyone.
Some
will see the name Rockefeller and yell. “Illuminati!” or “culling the herd!”
I do
not believe that’s what happened.
I
believe standard medical hubris is responsible – doctors “playing God”,
thinking they can tame nature without creating unanticipated problems.
With
medical hubris, I do not think the situation has changed materially over the
past 100 years.
What Now?
The
vaccine industry is always looking for human test subjects. They have the
most success when they are able to find populations who not in a position to
refuse.
Soldiers (9), infants, the disabled,
prisoners, those in developing nations – anyone not in a position to refuse.
Vaccine
experimentation on vulnerable populations is not an issue of the past.
Watch this video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin where he describes using
experimental vaccines on orphans, the mentally retarded, prisoners, and those
under colonial rule.
The
deposition was in January 2018. The hubris of the medical community is the same
or worse now than it was 100 years ago.
Watch
as Dr. Plotkin admits to writing:
“The
question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning
adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to
perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in
social potential.”
In part because the global
community is well aware of medical hubris and well aware of the poor record of
medical ethics, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed
international standards regarding the right to informed consent to preventative
medical procedures like vaccination.
The
international community is well aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes
mistakes and is always on the lookout for human test subjects. The
Declaration states that individuals have the human right to consent to any
preventative medical intervention like vaccination.
Article 3 – Human Dignity and
Human Rights
1.
Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be
fully respected.
2.
The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority
over the sole interest of science or society.
Article 6 – Consent
1.
Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be
carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned,
based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be
express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any
reason without disadvantage or prejudice. (11)
Clean water, sanitation,
flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do
far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.
Doctor
and the vaccine industry have usurped credit which rightfully belongs to
plumbers, electricians, sandhogs, engineers and city planners.
For these reasons, policy makers at all
levels of government should protect the human rights and individual liberties
of individuals to opt out of vaccine programs via exemptions.
The hubris of the medical community will
never go away. Policy makers need to know that vaccines like all medical
interventions are not infallible.
Vaccines are not magic. We all have
different susceptibility to disease. Human beings are not one size fits
all.
In 1918-19, the vaccine industry
experimented on soldiers, likely with disastrous results.
In 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The
vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the
experiment are in: 1 in 7 American children is in some form
of special education and over 50% have some form of chronic illness. (12)
In 1918-19, there was no safety follow
up after vaccines were delivered.
In 2018, there is virtually no safety
follow up after a vaccine is delivered.
Who exactly gave you that flu shot at
Rite Aid? Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes
wrong?
In 1918-19, there was no liability to
the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines.
In 2018, there is no liability for vaccine manufacturers for injuries
or death caused by vaccines, which was formalized in 1986. (13)
In 1918-19, there was no independent
investigative follow up challenging the official story that “Spanish Flu” was
some mystery illness which dropped from the sky. I suspect that many of
those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened, and that many of the
doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened, but
those people are long dead.
In 2018, the Pharmaceutical industry is
the largest campaign donor to politicians and the largest advertiser in all
forms of media, so not much has changed over 100 years.
This story will likely be ignored by
mainstream media because their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising.
The next time you hear someone say
“vaccines save lives” please remember that the true story of the cost/benefit
of vaccines is much more complicated than their three word slogan. Also
remember that vaccines may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19. If
true, those costs greatly outweighed any benefit, especially considering that
plumbers, electricians, sandhogs and engineers did, and continue to do, the
real work which reduces mortality from disease.
Vaccines are not magic. Human
rights and bioethics are critically important. Policy makers should
understand the history of medical hubris and protect individual and parental
human rights as described in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human
Rights.
——
Originally
published at FirstFreedoms.org. Reprinted with permission.
Comment on this article
at VaccineImpact.com.
References
1. Deaths
from Bacterial Pneumonia during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic
John F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article
John F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article
2. World
Health Organization: Unsafe drinking water, sanitation and waste management
http://www.who.int/sustainable-development/cities/health-risks/water-sanitation/en/
http://www.who.int/sustainable-development/cities/health-risks/water-sanitation/en/
3. J
Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 1; 198(7): 962–970.
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/
4. PDF
of Fort Riley Study (1918)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf
5. American
Experience, “The First Wave”, PBS
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza-first-wave/
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza-first-wave/
6. Mayo
Clinic: Meningitis
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/meningitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350508
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/meningitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350508
7. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91.
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/
8. Rockefeller
Institute pamphlet PDF (1919)
https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=rockefeller-institute-descriptive-pamphlet
https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=rockefeller-institute-descriptive-pamphlet
9. Is
Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a
Century, A Staff Report Prepared for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, United
States Senate, December 1994
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835
10.
Dr. Stanley Plotkin: vaccine experiments on orphans, the
mentally retarded, and others (January 2018)
https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw
https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw
11.
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (19
October 2005)
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
12.
CDC Offers New Stats On Disability Prevalence
https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-prevalence/22034/
https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-prevalence/22034/
13.
1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-vaccine-injury-act-protect/
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-vaccine-injury-act-protect/
Kevin Barry is the President of First Freedoms, Inc. a 501.c.3.
He is a former federal attorney, a rep at the UN HQ in New York and the
author of Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the
CDC. Please support our work at www.firstfreedoms.org
Copyright © FirstFreedoms.org
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/03/no_author/did-a-vaccine-experiment-on-u-s-soldiers-cause-the-spanish-flu/
Copyright © FirstFreedoms.org