Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States”
The hits keep coming. The CDC used an
arbitrary computer “tinker-toy” process to invent a description of the virus.
The virus that no one has proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr.
Tom Cowan.
The CDC article was discovered by Sally
Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr. Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s
article is titled, “Only Poisoned Monkey Cells
‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.”
Dr.
Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original
publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about
20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation,
purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to
share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of
this important paper reveals some shocking findings.”
“First, in the section titled
‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus
and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from
unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out
of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome
of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a
computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”
Bhakdi MD, SucharitBuy New $13.46(as of 04:26 EDT - Details)
Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation
step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an
equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they
found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then
add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn,
and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course,
they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its
genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves
and horn.”
“The researchers claim they decided which
is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again,
different computer programs will come up with different versions of the
imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the
real imaginary unicorn.”
As I’ve been stating,
the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the foisting of a
PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or believable about it.
But
once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.
Dr.
Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the ASSUMED new
virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove it is harmful by
injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab:
Cowan: “The real
blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had
to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote
the passage intact:”
“’Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”
“What
does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of
all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection,
they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test…”
“The
third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method
they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto
a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such
inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue
is first starved and poisoned.”
“The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using
their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 —
even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three
human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on
their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It
is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent
drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”
“My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”
So first…use a process of genetic
sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program…
The existence and structure of the “new
virus”…
And then, taking a soup that the
researchers claim contains the virus, in an un-isolated state, inject the soup
into several types of cells in the lab…
And discover the prime target—human
cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus.
And after this good day’s work, walk away
and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened.
And oh yes, lock down the planet based on
this “science.”
Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine
that prevents non-infection by the non-virus.
Reprinted with permission
from Jon
Rappoport’s blog.
Jon
Rappoport runs No More Fake News. The author of an explosive
collection, The Matrix Revealed, Jon was a candidate for a
US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly,
Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.
Copyright © Jon Rappoport
