US officials and the
presstitutes tell us that the illegal US missile attack on Syria destroyed
chemical weapons sites where chlorine and sarin are stored/manufactured. If
this were true, would not a lethal cloud have been released that would have
taken the lives of far more people than claimed in the alleged Syrian chemical
attack on Douma? Would not the US missile attack be identical to a chemical
weapons attack and thus place the US and its vassals in the same category as
Washington is attempting to place Assad and Putin?
What about
it, you chemical weapons experts? Do chemical weapons only release their
elements when they explode from intended use but not when they explode from
being militarily attacked?
There is no evidence in Syria of
chemical residue from the chemical weapons facilities allegedly destroyed by US
missiles. No dead victims. No reports of hospitals treating Syrian casualties
of the American chemical attack. How can this be if such sites were actually
hit?
When I was a Wall Street Journal editor
newspapers had competent journalists to whom such a question would occur. But
no more. Stephen Lendman takes the New York Times to task for its
unprofessionalism. The NY Times is no longer a news source. It is a propaganda
megaphone.
