One of our readers posted a link to a German blog — Verbotenesarchiv — or Archive Of Forbidden Knowledge — featuring the article Is God Racist? Some Thoughts On Christians For Truth — and we’d like to take this opportunity to respond to its assertions and the evidence they offer in attempting to disprove our anti-universalist position on the Bible, including the New Testament.
We would first like to make clear that we have read through some of their posted material — which includes links to some of our articles — and we would acknowledge that they are a sincere and surprisingly courageous Christian website, considering it appears to be run by Germans or German speakers — and much of their material could lead them to be prosecuted under German “hate crime” laws — if they reside either in Germany or many other western European nations.
They certainly deserve our encouragement and praise for their courage to defend their faith — and identify their enemies.
So please keep in mind that none of our comments on this particular article should be construed as a personal attack on the website or its writers — while we may have some scriptural and doctrinal disagreements with them, their overall work is excellent and worth reading — especially for German-speaking people who have been demoralized and alienated from their own race, history, and God.
The Verbotenesarchiv article is rather short — and their “evidence” amounts to a few cherry-picked verses taken out of context to support their belief in Christian Universalism — and our series on Charles Weisman’s book Is Universalism Of God would sufficiently answer all of their objections.
Simply enter “Charles Weisman” into our search engine to find those articles.
So here we will present that article point by point and then offer a response — however, we cannot possibly offer all the scriptural and historical evidence that support our views — there are over 2,000 articles on this website — so instead we will provide links to relevant essays we’ve written on relevant subjects.
We abbreviate Verbotenesarchiv below as VA.
‘Is God Racist?’ — Some Thoughts On Christians For Truth
[CFT Note: Right from the start, the writer poisons the well — using the modern Marxist trigger word — “racist” — a term that appears nowhere in the Bible. We have never written an essay which posed such a question for that very reason — and if we have ever used the term “racist”, we have done so strictly in an ironic sense — as it is a weapon to demonize only White people who have the audacity to believe that they have the right and necessity to preserve their own kind, their history, their heritage, and their unique faith.
And we should point out that before the nation-wrecking Marxist Jews poisoned the term “race”, English-speakers used the term to refer to one’s family or extended family of common descent.
By asking someone, “What is your race?“, you are asking them who their people are. Thus your race is your closely related kindred — which includes the entire White European people. To love them — your extended blood-related kindred — above all others is not “hate”. It’s not only natural, it’s common sense.]
VA writes,
“Christianity as it is represented by the mainstream-churches today has been highjacked by the enemy of Christ. Therefore, a false interpretation of the Gospel or, often, teachings that clearly are not in agreement with the Gospel are used to undermine Western society and Christianity itself.”
[CFT Note: We agree with this statement — however, we would go one step further and assert that one of the most pernicious “false interpretations of the Gospel” is Christian Universalism, which opened the door to the Jewish subversion not only of the original faith, but also of the Christ-bearing European race.]
VA continues,
“This is especially the case with the commandment of loving one’s neighbor, which is supposed to justify mass-immigration of mostly non-Christian third-world-materialists and jihadists, who come to Europe and the former European colonies to benefit from their wealth and generosity and, in the case of most Moslems, to colonize them and replace Christianity with Islam. In addition, the mainstream-version of alleged Christianity today not only condones but promotes all forms of sin such as homosexuality.”
[CFT Note: Jews have always been the primary agents who have used non-White “immigration” and invasions to destroy White civilizations — from ancient Persia, the Byzantine Empire, Spain, and now all of Europe.
In fact, former German Chancellor — Angela Merkel — admitted that she flooded Germany with Third World migrants “because of her commitment to Jews.”
However, we disagree that the Jews merely wish to replace Christianity with Islam — their goal is to Judaize, not Islamify — and Islam is merely a tool, a step along that path. The Jews want to replace the very real suffering of Jesus Christ on the cross with the ersatz “suffering” of Jews at Auschwitz™. “Holocaustianity” will become the only state religion for any of the surviving “goyim” in their New World Order.
And the ultimate purpose of non-White immigration into our nations is to destroy us racially through race mixing — and rule over the resultant mixed-race horde — as spelled out over 100 years ago in the Kalergi Plan.
And by destroying the European Christ-bearing race, the Jews hope to eliminate all Christianity, which they consider “idolatry” — and we firmly believe that Christianity cannot survive if the White race were to disappear and it were left to the non-White “Christians” to keep it alive — and oppose the Jewish onslaught.]
VA continues,
“The website Christians for Truth has the merit of exposing this falsehood, albeit based on an erroneous argument, i.e. that God only made a covenant with “Israel”, which they interpret as everlasting and rigorously in racial terms, with the conclusion that Christianity is a religion only for white (Aryan) people, who are the descendants of the true Israelites known as the protagonists from the Old Testament.”
[CFT Note: We rarely use the term “Aryan” to describe the White European kindred people — for the same reason we don’t use “racist” — as “Aryan” has become a pejorative trigger term used by Jews to demonize anyone who has the audacity to identify as White. Most White people today are afraid to even utter the word “Aryan” — for to do so is the equivalent of wanting to “kill 6 million Jews for No Reason Whatsoever™.”
However, we most certainly believe that the White European people are living descendants of the lost tribes of the House of Israel — and we have written numerous essays to support that position. Nowhere in this VA essay does the writer provide any evidence that this is not true. So we would like to see them address the evidence instead of merely stating that it isn’t true — or merely ignoring it.
And it’s a gross over-simplification to suggest that we believe in a “rigorous” racial covenant between God and His people, Israel. God has a spiritual covenant with one race or tribe of people, but that doesn’t mean it’s strictly a “racial covenant”.
We have stated repeatedly that we agree with the Apostle Paul — that merely being an Israelite according to the flesh does not guarantee salvation — either in the Old or New Testaments.
However, unlike most Christian Universalists, we do believe the words of the prophet Jeremiah when he said of the New Covenant:
“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.”
—Jeremiah 31:31-33
These words of Jeremiah are confirmed by Jesus Christ when He said in no uncertain terms,
“But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
—Matthew 15:24
And this New Covenant with Israel — as spelled out by Jeremiah — is repeated almost word for word in Hebrews:
“For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.”
—Hebrews 8:7-12
These verses are like kryptonite to any Christian Universalist — and they avoid them like the plague — or come up with some spurious idea that God somehow “changed His mind” when “the Jews” rejected Christ — and decided to ignore the words of both Jesus Christ and Jeremiah and make a “New” New Covenant with every biped hominoid on the planet.
Unlike fleshly humans, God does not change His mind:
“Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.”
–James 1:17
For a more in-depth refutation of Christian dispensationalism — which claims that when “the Jews” rejected Christ, God “changed His mind” and transferred His covenant to the entire general population on earth — read our three-part series, The Error Of Christian Dispensationalists: Did Israel Reject Jesus?
VA continues,
“The following considerations will critically place this assertion in context:
Before Jesus died on the cross and redeemed us of our sins, only a tiny minority was willing and able to obey the Lord as well as they could, while the rest of humanity surrendered themselves to evil by following a variety of satanic cults. Therefore, the Lord made a covenant with this tiny minority, a branch of the descendants of Noah (Gen. 6,18; 9,8-17), Abraham (Gen. 17) and Moses (Ex. 19,5f.).”
[CFT Note: This use of the term “tiny minority” here unwittingly smacks of Marxist phraseology — and amounts to a false appeal to the virtues of “democracy” — an egalitarian political ideology promoted by Jews because it allows them — as a tiny minority — to wield enormous power over the majority.
Minorities or not, Jesus Christ cannot “redeem” anyone who wasn’t His in the first place. The word “redeem” means to “buy back” what was formerly yours. God divorced Israel [Jeremiah 3:8-11] — and Jesus Christ came to “buy back” all of Israel — to remarry them and purchase them with His blood.
The English word “redeem” is translated from the Greek lutrósis [Strong’s 3085], meaning
“…(in the Old Testament: ransoming from imprisonment for debt, or from slavery, release from national misfortune, etc.), liberation, deliverance, release.”
And that’s exactly what Jesus Christ came to do — release Israel from its “national misfortune” — which was its divorce from their God. We can clearly see in the Gospels that “redeem” and “redemption” are used specifically in reference to the 12 tribes of Israel, as Luke attests,
“Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people”
–Luke 1:68
“But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.”
–Luke 24:21
We have shown in a number of essays that the Great Commission — to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ — was a command to His Israelite disciples to seek their fellow Israelites dispersed among the many nations and bring them to be redeemed through faith in Christ — their promised Messiah, as Acts 2 confirms,
“And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven….Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, Cretes and Arabians.”
–Acts 2:5-11
These words from Luke and Acts are confirmed and echoed in Revelation 5:
“And they sung a new song, saying, ‘Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation.’”
—Revelation 5:9
Christian Universalists will often bring up Paul’s epistle to Titus, where he writes,
“Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.”
–Titus 2:13-14
However, the phrase “a peculiar people” here refers only to Israel — a simple word search of the Bible will readily show that this phrase is used repeatedly to describe the Israelite people — and no one else.]
VA continues,
“As the laws regulating every aspect of life given to Moses demonstrate, staying loyal to God and His commandments was an effort that most people could only make within a rigid framework of rules and a cohesive and controlling community. In consequence, “Israel” in the Old Testament is a group of people with blood-ties, stemming from the same patriarchs.”
[CFT Note: God did not chose Israel for such practical reasons — allegedly because He thought only a closely related group of people could obey the rules and stay loyal to Him. Rather He chose them because He loved them [Deuteronomy 7:7-9] — from among all the peoples in the world:
“Hear this word which the LORD has spoken against you, sons of Israel, against the entire family which He brought up from the land of Egypt: You only have I chosen among all the families of the earth; Therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.”
—Amos 3:1-2
We find it interesting that Christians do not read the above verses and screech “Racism!” — but when God comes in the flesh as Jesus Christ and says he came only for Israel, they suddenly have to come up with some complicated explanation to explain it away — such as dispensationalism or supercessionism.
After all, to suggest that Jesus Christ — like His Father — favored one race or family of people would violate the first commandment of judeo-Marxism — that race does not exist — that it is irrelevant to a person’s worth — and that it’s merely a “social construct”.
VA continues,
“However, if we look at the patriarchs and their offspring, we see that crucial divisions among groups of people often go back to siblings. It begins with Cain and Abel, who represent worldly and godly life, and it continues with the descendants of Noah, among whom we know of several similar cases. God had made a covenant with Abraham, but already two generations after, Jacob, one of his two grandsons, confirms and renews the covenant, whereas Esau, the other, turns away from God, which is also reflected through his marriages to women from outside the covenant-people. Thus, the defining trait for an “Israelite” in the spiritual sense is the commitment to honor the covenant with God – which was hardly possible without the community of “Israel” – and not merely being a genetic descendant of Abraham.”
[CFT Note: So in other words, VA is actually agreeing with us — that a closely-knit kindred people is necessary to fulfill God’s Covenant.
But, again, that’s not why He chose Israel. That’s not why He chose Issac over Ishmael, or Jacob over Esau — or why Abraham’s promises passed from Jacob to his son Joseph and to not any of the other sons.
God chooses because that’s His sovereign prerogative — and we must submit to His will, regardless of whether or not we think His choices are “fair”. His reasons for His choices are His alone — nor does He need to justify those choices to us. He obviously has a reason for doing so — and we need to trust that He knows what he is doing.
If we question His choices — and “lean on our own understanding” — we do not recognize and submit to His sovereignty over us — and we cannot be His sons.
We accept God’s sovereign choice to have a covenant only with Israel — and we accept the punishment that only Israel will be subjected to for disobeying Him (Amos 3:1-2).]
For further reading on this subject, read our essay, Does God’s Law And Judgment Apply Universally To All People — Or Only To Israel?
VA continues,
“This situation changed radically when Christ came to earth. He taught:
“Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life” (John 5,24).
The option of opening oneself to God’s grace merely by believing in Christ and following His example did not exist before, but now, it is well possible to establish a close connection with God without being part of a tribal community such as the “Israelites” of the Old Testament. After all, God’s realm is not of the world but within us, and the decisive factor here is a heart devoted to Christ.”
[CFT Note: Again, VA unwittingly employs another Marxist buzz phrase — “radical change”. As we have already stated, Jesus Christ confirmed in the very first gospel of Matthew that He — like His Father — came only for the lost sheep of the House of Israel (Matthew 15:24).
VA quotes the Gospel of John here — but nowhere in that entire gospel are non-Israelites mentioned — except for when the Israelite John quotes the anti-Christ Pharisees who mistakenly believe that Jesus might go and hide among “dispersed” Israelites — and bring His message to the so-called “gentiles” [John 7:35].
VA continues,
“I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness. And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world. He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day” (John 12,46-48).
Now, the assumption of “Christians for Truth” seems to be that Christ’s words are only directed at the Israelites, but Jesus does not say so explicitly. In the teachings of Christ, there are no ethnic/racial conditions, we only are taught that believing in Christ and following Him leads to salvation. Also, the majority of Jews, or rather those among them who held power, the pharisees, rejected Christ, whereas many “gentiles” accepted Him as their Lord and Savior.”
[CFT Note: Quite the contrary — Jesus Christ explicitly states the only people He came for in Matthew 15:24,
“But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
And again in Matthew 19:28, Jesus makes the identity of those whom He will ultimately judge when He says to his disciples,
“Truly I say to you, that you who have followed Me, in the regeneration when the Son of Man will sit on His glorious throne, you also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”
This verse from Matthew echoes and confirms the words of Psalm 147:20,
“He has not dealt so with any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not known them.”
VA continues,
“If we look at who has been more willing and able to follow Christ, it indeed is the White, Aryan Europeans, as history confirms. This correlates with evidence for racial disparities: statistically, non-Whites perform poorly in comparison to Whites in all fields of civilization, but they excel in violence and crime. But does that allow us to make general assumptions about their potential to believe in God and do His will? Why should we?”
[CFT Note: It would seem that VA here answered his own question — a question that we’ve raised many times before, such as answering, Why The Apostle Paul Did Not Write An ‘Epistle To The Bantus’. Or why all attempts to bring real Christianity to Africa have been an absolute failure for the last 400 years.
We believe that White Europeans have been the willing and able Christ-bearing people not because they are “Aryans” but rather because they literally Christ’s “sheep” [John 10:27] in the flesh — and “sheep” is an exclusive term used in Scripture to describe only Israelites.
The non-White’s ability or desire to “believe in God” — or in “Jesus” — is not at issue. As James makes clear that even “demons” can believe:
“You believe that God is one. You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder.”
—James 2:19
Merely “believing in Jesus” guarantees nothing — as Jesus Christ makes very clear,
“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. “Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’”
–Matthew 7:21-23
Make no mistake — Luke warns that many who presume they are saved merely because they “believe in Jesus” will be in for a rude awakening:
“There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.”
—Luke 13:28
VA continues,
“After all, they too are God’s creatures. Why should God create human beings who, after all, would not be able to recognize and accept Him as their Father? Does the fact that some souls currently are unable to do so mean that God does not intend for them to be saved?”
[CFT Note: This is an emotional appeal based on our earthly ideas of “fairness” — the same question is posed in Malachi — by those who seek to squeeze Esau and his descendants into the Covenant with Israel:
“Have we not all one father? has not one God created us?”
—Malachi 2:10
Both Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal Man have gone extinct — and both were more advanced than sub-Saharan Africans — yet who mourns for them having never known God or having the chance for salvation? Why did God create them if they couldn’t be saved?
Homo Erectus — an extinct race of ancient, pre-Adamic “people” whose DNA can be found in every sub-Saharan African lineage — also could not be saved or recognize God, yet we are to believe the people who still carry this archaic DNA today magically can be saved?
God has created many primitive peoples who lacked the ability to recognize Him and accept Him. Before the White man showed up, the Australian Aborigines were a Stone Age people who did not even understand that sexual intercourse lead to pregnancy and birth.
Without the intervention of White people, early European explorers — who first witnessed these God-forsaken, savage people — believed that sub-Saharan Africans could eventually become extinct.
As we have stated many times, we do not believe that all “people” on the planet could possibly have descended from Adam and Eve — in fact, as the Bible makes clear from the beginning, it is the story of Israel — written by Israelites for Israelites — and Genesis is the story of their unique origins — from their patriarch, Adam:
“This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day when God created man, He made him in the likeness of God.”
—Genesis 5:1
This verse suggests that the “generations of Adam” were indeed a unique creation — made “in the likeness of God” — unlike other creations — such as pre-Adamic Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal Man — who were not created “in the likeness of God.” In fact, both archeologists and anthropologists believe that the Africa and Asian races easily pre-date the Adamic creation by tens of thousands of years.
And in Genesis 10, we are given the identity of the unique “generations of Adam” who descended from Noah — the so-called “Nations” — but there is no logical way that anyone could argue that in such a short period of time that all the races of people could have “evolved” from these tribes.
It would seem that even in the time of Jesus, Peter spoke of people on the level of “animals” who were part of God’s creation yet who were destined to be destroyed from birth:
“But these, like unreasoning animals, born as creatures of instinct to be captured and killed, reviling where they have no knowledge, will in the destruction of those creatures also be destroyed.”
—2 Peter 2:12
By today’s standards of political correctness, this verse should be targeted as racist “hate speech” — and a violation of judeo-Marxism and its step-child, Christian Universalism.
For further reading, we recommend our critique, Debunking Abdu Murray’s ‘Ethnic Mosaic’ Of Christian Racial Universalism.
AV continues,
“But before all: “Do not judge…” (Matt. 7,1-20) – “…the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day” (John 12,48). Just as God lets shine the sun for the good and the evil alike, we should do good even to our enemies.”
[CFT Note: We do not judge anyone — we have repeatedly stated that we do not sit in the Judgment Seat — nor do we presume to know who will or will not achieve salvation.
However, we must interpret the scriptures and the gospels according to what they actually say — and not by what we want them to say — and what we think they should mean, especially when we are under the influence of the judeo-Masonic cult of “fraternity, equality, and liberty” which has no place in the Bible.
Whatever our interpretations are, we cannot make one verse contradict another — especially when we are motivated to impose our very fallible human desire for “fairness” upon the Bible. These Marxist concepts of “equal opportunity” and “equal outcome” appear nowhere in Scripture from the beginning.]
VA continues,
“Jesus gave us the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10,30-37), who did not make a distinction concerning the ethnic and spiritual identity of the person who needed help. A heart full of love will be kind and provide help to everyone.”
[CFT Note: We would strongly recommend that VA read our essay, How Christians Misuse ‘The Good Samaritan’ To Promote False Universalism Of The Gospels, which is based on the work of Charles Weisman.
Weisman clearly shows that there were, in fact, racial Israelites dispersed among the Samaritans — and explains why Jesus told His disciples not to go to the cities of the Samaritans — because of a long-standing animosity between the “believing” Israelites in Judea and those uncircumcised “lost” Israelites in Samaria — the northern kingdom of Israel.
Recall in John 4:12 that the Samaritan “woman at the well” tells Jesus that she knows Jacob was “our father” — proof that there were “lost” Israelites among them. Again, this verse confirms that Jesus did not contradict Himself when he stated unequivocally, “I am not sent but to the lost sheep of the House of Israel” [Matthew 15:24].
VA concludes,
“This being said, the truth is as important as love, and as explained at the beginning of this article, it is true that the commandment of loving one’s neighbor is being abused to implement the agenda of our enemies, i.e. the modern “Jews”, who know well that they thrive and remain undetected best within a broken, multicultural society, i.e. one without identity, religion and morals.
But nothing prevents us from speaking the truth and, at the same time, being kind and helping anybody truly in need, be it our enemy or an undesired invader who is a pawn of our enemy. The most valuable help, after all, is bringing the Gospel to everybody who still ignores or wrongfully rejects it. Anything beyond that concerns the wisdom, grace and judgement of our Lord and should not hamper our efforts to change ourselves until we receive a perfect heart by God’s grace.”
[CFT Note: Truth and Love are inseparable. True Christians cannot love a lie, just as we cannot love a false Jesus preached to us by pastors who tickle our ears and please our earthly desires.
We would strongly recommend that VA read our essay, How The Error Of Unconditional Love Of ‘Thy Neighbor’ Subverts Christianity, which is based on a sermon by Sheldon Emry.
As Emry shows with numerous examples from Scripture, nowhere are true Christian followers of Christ commanded to help enemies of Christ — and enemies of His followers — regardless of whether or not they are unwitting “pawns” of the anti-Christ Jews.
Paul warns us against having any sort of relationship with “unbelievers” — or “infidels”:
“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness?”
—2 Corinthians 6:14
And John confirms exactly how we should treat these racial alien invaders:
“If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into [your] house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.”
—2 John 1:10-11
And as Jude makes clear, we have no business extending our “charity” to these anti-Christ racial aliens:
“These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots.”
—Jude 1:12
CFT Conclusion:
To conclude, we hope that anyone reading this will see that our views opposing the Christian Universalism espoused by Verbotens Archiv are entirely based in Scripture — and what we’ve presented here barely scratches the surface.
It has been the anti-Christ Jews — and the “judaizers” within our churches going back to the very foundations of Christianity — who have promoted — and benefited from — Christian Universalism.
Up until recently — that is, well into the 20th Century — the term “Christian” was synonymous with “White man” — as anyone from the Third World will tell you. Thanks to Jewish taboos against “racism”, that intimate connection between our race and faith is no longer allowed — in fact, it is strictly “verboten” to suggest such a marriage — a covenant if you will.
We believe it is impossible to separate Christianity from its Christ-bearing race — the European Israelite peoples — and if they are ever successfully separated by the anti-Christ Jews — which would never happen — neither will survive.]
https://christiansfortruth.com/a-response-to-is-god-racist-some-thoughts-on-christians-for-truth/
