This is an immutable fact: You never gain title or a right of possession, whether the thing is tangible or not, to something you never lawfully had, no matter how long you have it or how you launder it.
To have a right to possess something you must come to have it through lawful means.
But you cannot be deprived of what you never lawfully possessed in the first place; you never acquire rightful possession or title to a stolen or unlawfully-acquired thing irrespective of the amount of time that has passed.
Since you never had a right to liberty in the United States if you enter the nation illegally you are not entitled to anything other than immediate forcible removal as your entry was criminal in the first instance and, if you had previously been deported it is a felony. Now if we're going to prosecute and imprison you here in the US for that criminal act then yes, you're entitled to due process before we throw you in prison because now we're retaining you here in the US against your will and thus Constitutional protections apply but in the alternative we can simply eject you from the United States on a summary basis as you have no right to be here and thus no liberty interest in taking so much as one step on our soil that you can be deprived of.
PERIOD.
I'm done with sophistic bull**** and the government, including judges and their overseers up to the USSC can either start enforcing the Constitution within its limits which means no illegally-present person has a right to prevent their own summary removal from the US, irrespective of the passage of time or any other consideration, as they never possessed a liberty interest in the United States in the first place, or I'm perfectly fine with any individual here in the United States deeming that every single judicial body member cannot have a criminal offense committed against them as they have self-declared themselves and their families to be outside the boundaries of law in all respects -- up to and including the Constitution.
