After reading Ron Unz’s intriguing post about making use of Deep Research’s enhanced capabilities to critique articles and arguments, I thought I’d try it out. On tonight’s Darkstream, I’ll be taking everyone through Deep Research’s detailed critique of MITTENS, specifically, the Maximal Mutations post from 2019, and show how I convinced the AI to completely change its mind concerning the viability of the argument for the mathematical impossibility of evolution by natural selection.
This was its initial conclusion, which relied upon two absolutely false assumptions and one incorrect estimate, all three of which are a part of the current standard model of evolution by natural selection and the various other mechanisms.......
Therefore, within empirically grounded evolutionary biology, the Maximal Mutations argument exposes not just a tension but a fundamental impossibility in molecular evolution as currently understood.
One has to be very careful when utilizing AI as a fact-and-logic checker because although its processes are fair and objective, it is still subject to the Garbage In Garbage Out principle. Which is why if you receive a result that diverges dramatically from the one you are anticipating, it is a good idea to closely review the various factors going into the analysis.
And now we can cite Deep Research in observing that the theory of evolution by natural selection is nothing more than an irrelevant, outdated, and mathematically-impossible model constructed and refined by innumerate biologists.
