This new Chinese law regulating CEO romance dramas is only the first step in attempting to prevent women from destroying the Chinese social fabric in the way that it has been destroyed in the West by Alpha-chasing women unwilling to settle for lower-status men.
Chinese authorities have recently released guidelines to regulate CEO romance micro dramas, emphasizing the need to avoid promoting ideals that glorify marriage with the powerful, wealthy individuals or families. Additionally, they warned against the intentional creation of eye-catching content by flaunting wealth and showcasing power, as Guangdianshijie, a WeChat account affiliated with China Press and Publishing Media Group Co. Ltd reported on Monday.....
“Of course, there is a degree to which many females will not like this – they’d prefer to be in the harem of a very high status male – so patriarchy will introduce controls on their behaviour and lots of social shaming, and it will repress sexuality in general.” (Unwin, 1936).
Conservatives like to say that “equality of opportunity is not equality of result”. But there is nothing conservative about the results of intimacy inequality, as it is even more societally destabilizing than the income inequality that cliodynamicist Peter Turchin and other historical experts have identified as one of the key contributors to societal collapse.
The reason the human race continually returns to inequalitarian structures that the feminists complain are “patriarchal” is that it is the only societal structure that is capable of surviving over time while maintaining advanced civilization. It is utterly foolish to experiment with altering these structures in the name of any philosophy or ideology, because the negative consequences are both predictable and inevitable.
It’s interesting that it should be an officially equalitarian society, which in feminist terms was well in advance of the Western world back in the 1970s, that has recognized the SSH-related element of the problem of intimacy inequality first.
