Labels

Saturday, August 1, 2026

The bigger the organization - the more inept they are - but they steal quite well...especially government - by Steve Penfield - The Unz Review

 The R&D departments at GM, Ford and Chrysler were so inept they couldn’t figure out intermittent wiper blades despite decades of automotive dominance. No problem. They just “swiped” them from small inventor Robert Kearns starting in 1969. His lawsuits against Ford and Chrysler were dragged out from 1978 to 1990 and from 1982 to 1992, respectively, letting the crooks cash in on technology they stole. Automatic transmission and power steering were other big fails for Big Auto, with independent inventor Oscar H. Banker providing the creative brilliance to keep American cars moving.

The poster child for “IP theft” is not China (who innovates tremendously in high-speed rail, high tech weapons and elsewhere) but the sloths of Microsoft Corp. who can’t do anything original. The Seattle-based software blob copied Windows from Xerox, word processing from WordStar and WordPerfect, spreadsheets from VisiCalc and Lotus, data compression from Stac Electronics and an internet browser from Netscape. Microsoft still attempts to replicate Google’s web search with their lackluster Bing. And before all that, they trotted out a DOS operating system strangely similar to Gary Kildall’s pioneering CP/M software. Other than that… those computer geeks in Washington sure know their coding! And Bill Gates, the son of a lawyer who briefly enrolled himself as pre-law at Harvard, also knows how to use federal lawfare to prevent anyone else from doing the same.


https://www.unz.com/article/what-caused-the-post-ww2-decline-of-urban-america-part-1-setting-the-stage/ 

Would You Like To Know How Forest Fires Are Made? - LewRockwell

 We are not there yet.

Watch this brief video to understand how sophisticated destructive technology has become.

A few years ago, they used helicopters flying over vulnerable forest areas, shooting fire-beams at them. Today’s drone technology is much more discrete and effective.

There is a Spanish voice-over the English original version. The video clip explains how chemical capsules are filled into a special compartment of drones designed for the purpose of delivering these “balls” to particular forest areas and then let them drop to earth, where by touching the ground, they catch fire and – bingo- the brushfire is fabricated. It gives plenty of arguments for the scary “climate change” narrative.

Anybody in their clear mind knows that the climate changes all the time, has done so since the existence of Mother Earth for over 4.5 billion years, but slowly and gradually in different regions, so that people and other sentient beings may adapt. “Sudden” changes as in Agenda 2030 are as unrealistic as growing square apples, so to better fit them into commercial agendas.

“Wildfires” – there is nothing wild about them. They are deliberately planted, causing uncounted deaths, destroyed properties, public infrastructure and enormous personal, societal and economic damages, including the burned forests.

National Geographic Ro...National Geographic MapsCheck Amazon for Pricing.

Yes, the infamous “climate change.” That is where the World Health Organization (WHO) comes in, by integrating wildfires and heat risks into national health emergency plans; enhancing the arguments for the amended International Health Regulations (IHR 2005), including the Pandemic Treaty – not yet validated. There is a reason for putting WHO in charge of “climate change”; it can legalize any disease and p(l)andemic, thus, justifying a Global Health Order, erasing national health sovereignties. This is the goal that hasn’t been achieved yet.

In short, the WHO is treating Europe’s current wildfire crisis not just as a disaster response issue, but as a climate‑driven health emergency that requires sustained investments and preventive actions, like the revised 2005 IHR, with Pandemic Treaties, aiming at global health‑systems adaptation.


https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/07/no_author/would-you-like-to-know-how-forest-fires-are-made/ 

Is this a video of two two schoolboys in DaPrincipal's office?

 https://x.com/TCNetworkFans/status/2082209830597439988

What Fauci’s Diary Reveals About America’s Health Care Apparatus

 

Numerous lines of evidence show Fauci lied to us about the pandemic's biggest questions — origins, severity, lockdowns, and masks — all of which was just exposed at an explosive hearing.


Story at a Glance:

•Throughout his career, NIAID director Anthony Fauci has been involved in unscrupulous activity which put America’s health at risk, with much of what he did through COVID building upon a successful blueprint he created decades ago during the AIDS crisis (at a now surreal time when Democrats like Pelosi grilled him during a 1988 hearing).

•As part of Senator Rand Paul’s six year quest to hold Fauci accountable for his role in creating COVID-19 and putting an end to gain of function research, Fauci recently was forced to testify in front of a Senate committee in an unusually candid and contentious hearing where Fauci took the unusual tactic of refusing to testify by pleading the Fifth on every question. This article will summarize the key highlights of that hearing.

•Immediately prior to hearing, private diary entries were released that Fauci had been keeping on a nearly daily basis that explicitly showed many of the public statements he made (and forced us to go along with) contradicted his actual beliefs.

•They also paint a unique picture into his personality, as the saint much of the world came to worship during the pandemic (despite him failing to provide any substantive results) was not at all focused on the science or wellbeing of the country, and instead was a petty man who was obsessed with the fame and media attention he got and using that fame to influence the media’s coverage of the pandemic (and hence the course of it).

•Many of the almost unbelievable revelations about Fauci’s personality and conduct mirror what two White House insiders witnessed as they tried to stop Fauci’s senseless pandemic policies—including his profound lack of scientific literacy Scott Atlas observed throughout the pandemic.

•Collectively, these events illustrate an unfortunate reality—the loudest “follow the science” voices are often the most illiterate grifters. Fortunately, as the hearing showed, public opinion is turning against this paradigm and now that the unconditional trust medicine relies upon has been broken, there is a real window for alternatives to the existing paradigm to flourish.


https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-faucis-diary-reveals-about-americas?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=748806&post_id=209118427&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email 

The Gut Microbiome and Cancer: What This New Study Tells Us—and Why It Matters

 Gut Microbiome Alterations in Cancer and Non-cancer Adults: A Cross-Sectional Metagenomic Study. (1)

Interest in the gut microbiome has exploded over the past decade. We now appreciate that the trillions of microorganisms inhabiting the human gastrointestinal tract are not innocent bystanders but active participants in immune regulation, metabolism, inflammation, and even cancer biology. The study by Hazan and colleagues adds another piece to this rapidly evolving puzzle.

The investigators performed a cross-sectional metagenomic analysis of stool samples from 60 adults, including 20 healthy controls, 15 patients with non-aggressive cancers, and 25 patients with aggressive cancers. Rather than focusing on one cancer type, the study included a broad spectrum of malignancies including breast, colorectal, ovarian, prostate, lymphoma, lung, bladder, thyroid, leukemia, and others.

Major findings

Patients with aggressive cancers demonstrated a characteristic pattern of gut dysbiosis:

  • Markedly reduced Bifidobacterium

  • Reduced Faecalibacterium

  • Reduced Collinsella

  • Increased Bacteroides

These differences reached statistical significance. Patients with less aggressive cancers showed a similar trend, although most comparisons did not reach significance, likely because of the small sample size.

Perhaps the most striking observation was the profound reduction in Bifidobacterium, falling from approximately 6.5% of the gut microbiome in controls to only 1.2% in aggressive cancers.


https://paulmarik.substack.com/p/the-gut-microbiome-and-cancer-what?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=5737269&post_id=208260168&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email 

Heritage History | Nameless War by Archibald Ramsay

 https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=ramsay&book=nameless&story=russian 

The Russian Revolution

Monsieur Francois Coty, the celebrated scent manufacturer, wrote in Figaro on 20th February, 1932:

"The subsidies granted to the Nihilists at this period (1905-1917) by Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn Loeb and Co., New York, were no longer acts of isolated generosity. A veritable Russian terrorist organization had been set up at his expense. It covered Russia with its emissaries."

This creation of terrorist formations by Jews within a country marked down for revolution, whether they be called Nihilists or as in France in 1789, "Sacred Bands," or "Marseillais"; or "Operatives," as in the Britain of Charles I, now stands revealed as standard technique.

Jacob Schiff also financed Japan in her war against Russia 1904-5, as we learn from the Jewish Encyclopedia. This war was immediately followed by an attempt at revolution on a considerable scale in Russia, which, however, proved abortive. The next attempt, during the Great War, met with complete success.

On the 3rd January, 1906, the Russian Foreign Minister supplied to Emperor Nicholas II a report on this revolutionary outbreak, which, as revealed in the American Hebrew of July 13th, 1918, contained the following passages:

"The events which took place in Russia in 1905 . . . plainly indicate that the revolutionary movement . . . has a definite international character . . . the revolutionaries possess great quantities of arms imported from abroad and very considerable financial means . . . one is bound to conclude that there are foreign capitalists' organizations interested in supporting our revolutionary movement. If we add to the above that, as has been proved beyond any doubt, a very considerable part is played by Jews . . . as ring-leaders in other organizations as well as their own . . . always the most bellicose element of the revolution . . . we may feel entitled to assume that the above-mentioned foreign support of the Russian revolutionary movement comes from Jewish capitalist circles." [Jews should be read as International Zionists, Ed.]

The assumption in the foregoing report was indeed well justified. It was to be confirmed by an even more important official document penned at the height of the revolution itself, in 1918, by Mr Oudendyke, the representative of the Netherlands Government in St. Petersburg, who was in charge of British interests in Russia after the liquidation of our Embassy by the bolsheviks.

So important indeed was this report of Mr. Oudendyke's held to be by Mr. Balfour, to whom it was addressed, that it was set out in a British government white paper on bolshevism issued in April 1919. (Russia No. 1.) In it I have read the following passage:

"I consider that the immediate suppression of bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe, and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."

A still clearer light is thrown on these happenings by an article written on 12th April, 1919, in a paper called The Communist, at Kharkov, by one M. Cohen:

"The great Russian revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of Jews. There are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as privates are concerned, but in the Committees, and in the Soviet organization as Commissars, the Jews are gallantly leading the masses. The symbol of Jewry has become the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the five-pointed star, which in former times was the symbol of Zionism and Jewry."

Mr. Fahey, in his important and authenticated work, The Rulers of Russia, is more specific, stating that in 1917 of the 52 persons who took over the direction in Russia, all but Lenin were Jews.

So thorough was the mass liquidation of all but hewers of wood and drawers of water in Russia, that this Jewish grip remained unaltered. Dr. Fahey tells us that in 1935 the Central Executive of the Third international, which ruled Russia "consisted of 59 men, of which 56 were Jews. The other three, including Stalin, were married to Jewesses. Of 17 principal Soviet ambassadors, 4 were Jews." (The Rulers of Russia, pages 8 and 9.)

The Rev. George Simons, who was Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in St. Petersburg from 1907 to October 1918, appeared before a Committee of the United States Senate on the 12th February, 1919, and gave them a report of his personal knowledge of the happenings in Russia up to the time he left. Dr. Fahey quotes him as saying during this evidence:

"In December, 1918, out of 388 members of the revolutionary government, only 16 happened to be real Russians; all the rest were Jews with the exception of one U.S. Negro. Two hundred and sixty-five of the Jews come from the Lower East Side of New York."

Such has been the condition of affairs in the U.S.S.R. from that day to this.

Though a number of Jews were liquidated in the so-called "Moscow Purge," this affected the situation in no way. It merely signified that one Jewish faction had triumphed over, and liquidated, another. There has never been anything in the nature of a Gentile revolt against the Jewish domination.

The fact that some Jews were liquidated by winning factions behind the iron curtain could be used to deceive the world outside into thinking that this was the result of an anti-Semitic revolt, and from time to time a hoax of this kind has been systematically propaganded.

As world opinion gradually turned hostile to the U.S.S.R. important Jews began to fear, that this feeling, combined with a gradual realization that bolshevism is Jewish, might have unpleasant reactions for them. About 1945, therefore, a further powerful campaign was organized from influential Jewish circles, notably in the U.S.A., to put out the story once again that Russia had turned on the Jews. They evidently failed, however, to advise their lesser brethren of this move; and indignant and informed denials were soon forthcoming. A journal called Bulletin, the organ of the Glasgow Discussion Group, wrote in June 1945:

"Such rubbish as is now being spread as to the growth of anti-Semitism in Russia is nothing but malicious lies and pure invention."

On 1st February, 1949, the Daily Worker carried an article in which a Mr. Parker gave a few names and figures of Jews in high office in the U.S.S.R., from which he had evidently recently returned, for he wrote:

"I never heard a breath of criticism over this state of affairs," and stated later in the same article "anti-Semitism would render a Soviet official liable to prosecution in the same way that a private citizen may be brought before the courts for anti-semitism."

On the 10th November, 1949, the Daily Worker, that constant and burning champion of the Jews, printed an article by Mr D. Kartun, entitled "Stamping Out anti-semitism," which shows the complete Jewish control behind the iron curtain when he writes:

"In Poland and the other people's democracies anti-Semitism in word or deed is most heavily punished."

Between 1945 and 1949 the propaganda to convince Gentiles outside the iron curtain, that within that area anti-Semitism was rampant, and the Jews driven from high office everywhere was energetically pursued. It began to be believed by quite a number of people, who would have known better; so much so, that in the autumn of the latter year I thought it worth while to get out a list showing the number of vital positions held by Jews behind the iron curtain. Here is an extract from those lists.

U.S.S.R.:

  • Premier — Stalin Married to a Jewess
  • Vice-Premier — Kaganovitch Jew
  • Ministry of State Control — Mekhlis Jew
  • Military & Naval Construction — Ginsburg Jew
  • Minister Cominform Organ — Yudin Jew
  • Chief Publicist Abroad for U.S.S.R. — Ilya Eherenburg . . .Jew
  • Ministry of Building Enterprises Machinery — Yudin Jew
  • Foreign Minister — Molotoff Married to a Jewess

POLAND:

  • Virtual Ruler — Jacob Bergman Jew
  • Public Prosecutor — T. Cyprian Jew
  • O.C. Youth Movements — Dr. Braniewsky Jew

HUNGARY:

  • Virtual Ruler — Mathias Rakosi Jew

ROUMANIA:

  • Virtual Ruler — Anna Pauker Jewess (Since removed for "deviationism" but replaced by another Jew.)

YUGOSLAVIA:

  • Virtual Ruler — Moishe Pyjede Jew

In May 1949, the Daily Worker, which is, of course, consistently and ardently pro-Jewish, printed an article by Mr A. Rothstein praising the U.S.S.R. to the skies; and about the same time another article on similar lines about the paradise behind the iron curtain by Mr Sam Aronvitch.

On the 10th November the same paper printed an article in which D. Kartun, writing of the "People's Democracies" and the stamping out of anti-semitism there, wrote:

"No one could dream of making an anti-semitic speech or writing an anti-semitic article in any of these countries. If they did their jail sentence would be both immediate and lengthy."

In the last few years we have been supplied with further dramatic proof of the vital inter-relation between Jews and the U.S.S.R. From the Canadian spy trials, which focused the spotlight on atom spying for the U.S.S.R., with the conviction and imprisonment of Frank Rosenberg (alias Rose), the Canadian Jew Communist Member of Parliament, and several Jews, to the conviction and imprisonment of many others of the same gang in Britain and the U.S.A., including Fuchs, Professor Weinbaum, Judith Coplon, Harry Gold, David Greenglass, Julius Rosenberg, Miriam Moskewitz, Abraham Brothanz, and Raymond Boyer, who, though a Gentile by birth, married a Jewess and, I believe, adopted the Jewish creed on that occasion.

Finally, we had the flight to the U.S.S.R. with atom secrets also of the Jew Professor Pontecorvo, who had been working in close association with Fuchs.

No doubt we shall continue to be regaled with plausible stories proving that Russia has gone anti-semitic; but it is not hard to realise that such a Jewish grip backed by the most elaborate spy and liquidation squads known to man, would cause a convulsion which would shake the world before its grip could be broken.


The 2000 Year War Between Judaism & Christianity, Told Through TONS of Old Books

 One of the biggest tricks played on Western society is the idea of "Judeo-Christian values." This duped Christians into thinking their ancient enemy is their ally - but these books prove otherwise.

https://catodezorra.substack.com/p/the-2000-year-war-between-judaism 

In this video, I tackle one of the most controversial subjects affecting Western society today, not to mention one of the most urgent - confronting the political, social, and economic takeover of Western nations, particularly the United States, by Israel-aligned interests and Jewish-controlled interests.

But while there are a lot of people “waking up” to all this and complaining about present-day political events, very few people realize that this is not a new phenomenon - not even remotely.

In fact, there has been a civilization-level conflict going on between Western Christian society and Jewish revolutionary activity for almost two thousand years. And though its been documented by both sides for many centuries, the Western Christian side lost touch with all that history, while the Jewish side has absolutely not.

This will be a mind-blowing claim to most people, even those who perceive themselves to be well-informed or as having a strong grasp on Western history, and it has angered many people (mainly Christian Zionists) in the past. But this dynamic only exists because of centuries of highly successful narrative warfare - in particular, by rewriting history about major historical events - and concentrating control of media, academia, and the establishment press to present only the Zionist perspective to the last four generations.

To support my claim, I explain the framework I’ve developed for organizing a large body of what is normally blacklisted as “antisemitic” historical literature that spans multiple centuries (and is remarkably consistent across them. The goal isn’t simply to discuss individual books or authors, but to provide a roadmap that helps viewers understand how different periods of history relate to one another and support my theory of this “2000 Year War” explaining where Western Christian civilization finds itself today.

One major theme I have identified in this “narrative warfare” that will make better sense of this to viewers is the stark difference between pre- and post-World War II scholarship. So here I explain how the historical record changed radically after the war, how only Jew-centric and Israel-friendly narratives became dominant, and how that shift influenced the kinds of questions researchers feel comfortable asking today.

I also break down all of this scholarship into FOUR distinct phases of history to help wrap your minds around the evolution of this moral, cultural, and even spiritual war:

  • The Post-War Era (1946 - current)

  • The World Wars and the Inter-War Period (1914 - 1945)

  • The Rise of International Jewish Power (1791 - 1913)

  • The Renaissance and Jewish Crackdown in Europe (late 1400s to late 1700s)

I reference a wide range of books, political writings, religious texts, and historical works that have shaped my own research over the past several years, this video also serves as a kind of guided reading list. But rather than reviewing every source individually (which I will do in later videos for subscribers - please consider joining!), here I explain why I believe it’s valuable to understand the historical context in which they were written, and how they fit into a broader overall agenda.

Whether you agree with my conclusions or not, my hope is that, at a minimum, this discussion encourages viewers to think critically about counter-narrative sources that get hidden and suppressed, and explore history from multiple perspectives. This is some of the most important intellectual and academic work that can be done by thinking people in the West at this time.

Finally, I want to sincerely thank everyone who supports this work through your subscription. Your support makes it possible for me to devote the time required to read difficult historical material, travel for my projects, and continue producing independent research and long-form analysis. I’m deeply grateful for your trust and encouragement, and I hope that in return resources like this serve you well!