Anyone who reads a report from
The Washington Post notices there’s an unmistakable flavor of anti-Trump
bias within its stories.
American Lens has confirmed
with multiple reputable inside sources that The Washington Post is
being paid a “significant” sum of money by a donor with ties to the Clinton
Global Initiative (CGI) to run disparaging reports on President
Trump and the Republican-led Congress.
Multiple sources within the
organization have come forward to state that a significant amount of money is
being spent by the paper to run anything it can find against President Trump
whether it is true, or not. They further confirmed that Hillary Clinton is a
long-time friend of the contributor in question.
Executives at the post have
mandated each edition of the paper must contain negative Trump reporting. This
has led to “a deep mistrust” by many of the journalists in the organization
another source said. “No one can tell the lies from the truth anymore,” our
source confirms.
Democracy Dying
“The climate of
hyper-partisanship has made some of our journalists regret their decision to
stay with the paper,” said a senior staffer. “It’s like a bad smell you can’t
wash off, nobody wants to be around you and no one will hire you away.”
“The Washington Post is
engaging in overt malice,” said another source familiar with the matter, “it’s
as if The Post is pursuing and rooting for America’s failure.”
“Trust within the paper
is at an all-time low,” said another source.
This revelation comes as The
Post ran another report on Monday, citing an unprovable source about
national secrets being revealed to the Russian Federation by President Trump.
“Many journalists within the
organization are doubting the credibility of these leaks, the innuendo they
convey, and they are placing every journalist at risk who works for the paper,”
said one insider.
To add insult to Fake News
injury, buried several paragraphs in The Washington Post admits
that even if the claims are true – and that’s looking like a weak IF – the
President has the authority to share such information.
“As president, Trump has broad authority to declassify
government secrets, making it unlikely that his disclosures broke the law.”
One of the only named sources
in The Post article who actually attended the meeting with the
Russian Foreign Minister and Ambassador was National Security Adviser, Army Lt.
Gen. H.R. McMaster.
McMaster blasted The
Post’s report as “false” and told media in a press conference that, “I
was in the room, it didn’t happen.”
American Lens has withheld the
names of our sources just as The Washington Post has from its
stories.
We encourage The
Washington Post to take an honest and accurate assessment of its
current direction and review the sacred trust of journalism. The entire news
profession is greater than the egos of the Post, its owner,
editors, and journalists.
