“Conspiracy
Theorists” Now A Majority
Paul
Craig Roberts
TruePublica, a British website
that has avoided the 9/11 issue, has had its fill of ignorant journalists at
the BBC, Huffington Post and other propagandists for the military/security
complex. The constant, shrill demeaning of experts and distinguished people who
have raised questions about the official story has convinced TruePublica that
skeptics who need so much shouting down must have a point.
The media
has NEVER EXAMINED the evidence or explained the analysis provided by
scientists, architects, engineers, pilots, and the first responders who
experienced the explosions of the World Trade Center twin towers. The media has
never asked for the release of the multiple videos that recorded whatever
struck the Pentagon. The media has never investigated whether cell phones
worked in 2001 from the altitudes at which the official story claims calls were
made.
Instead
two-bit punk presstitutes, such as the BBC’s Chris Bell and the Huffington
Post’s Jess Brammer andl Chris York, label experts with knowledge and integrity
“conspiracy theorists.” These presstitutes knowingly use a cover-up term that
the CIA put into use via its media assets to discredit the expert skeptics of
the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of President Kennedy.
The fact
that the carefully presented evidence is NEVER ENGAGED EXCEPT WITH NAME-CALLING
is a strong indication that the evidence is true and cannot be refuted.
TruePublica
is such a mainline site that, in its own words, it does not even “publish news
sourced by RT,” a far more reliable source of news than the BBC, CNN, or New
York Times. However, it has dawned on TruePublica that after 18 years an ad hominem
attack remains the only defense of the official story. The
official account has NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. It rests entirely on the AVOIDANCE
OF EVIDENCE and on unverified assertions.
The
success of the 9/11 Lawyers’ Committee in obtaining the consent of the US
Attorney for the Southern District of New York to “comply with the provisions
of 18 U.S.C. 3332,” which requires the convening of a federal grand jury to
examine the unexamined 9/11 evidence, has impressed TruePublica as no US
attorney would convene a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Clearly
compelling evidence has been presented to the US Attorney.
Obviously,
Washington expects the Justice (sic) Department to escape from the bind into
which it has been put by the Lawyer’s Committee, an escape that the presstitute
media will aid and abet. Nevertheless, the escape will likely reinforce the
public’s view that the government is afraid of the evidence and is no more
likely to follow it than in the case of President Kennedy’s assassination,
Robert Kennedy’s assassination, the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty and a
large number of other officially covered up crimes.
More and
more people will come to realize that ad hominem name-calling is not an
acceptable response to evidence.
Some
Interesting New Information About 9/11
TruePublica.org.uk
TruePublica
Editor: We have published almost nothing about 9/11 on TruePublica.
When independent news outlets do, they are immediately branded by the
mainstream media and so-called ‘fact-checkers’ as conspiracy theorists. The BBC
makes this point precisely in a 2018 article that starts like this – “On 11 September 2001, four
passenger planes were hijacked by radical Islamist terrorists – almost 3,000
people were killed as the aircraft were flown into the World Trade Centre, the
Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field. Just hours after the collapse of New York’s
Twin Towers, a conspiracy theory surfaced online which persists more than 16
years later.”
The
entire article is dedicated to all the ‘conspiracy theories’ involved in 9/11
and makes a mockery of anyone or anything that questions the official
government line. They even heavily mock the brother of one man killed in 9/11
and frankly, true or not, the BBC’s report itself is rather sickening to read.
And yet,
here we are, all these years later and it’s hardly surprising the theories of a
conspiracy continue.
A 2016
study from Chapman University in California, found more than half of the
American people believe the government is concealing information about the 9/11
attacks. This is in part because, large sections of the official US
government report were redacted for years – and is still missing to
this day.
The big
problem is that the government is withholding crucial evidence. And then
there’s other evidence the state and mainstream media refuse to even consider.
Paul Craig Roberts is an American economist and former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Reagan. Roberts was an associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business Week and has received the Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism. In 1993 the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of the top seven journalists in the United States.
Paul Craig Roberts is an American economist and former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Reagan. Roberts was an associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business Week and has received the Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism. In 1993 the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of the top seven journalists in the United States.
Roberts
wrote this really interesting piece of information just a few days ago that the
mainstream media has been completely silent about: “Although the United States is
allegedly a democracy with a rule of law, it has taken 17 years for public
pressure to bring about the first grand jury investigation of 9/11. Based on
the work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth led by Richard Gage,
first responder and pilots organizations, books by David Ray Griffin and
others, and eyewitness testimony, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry has
presented enough hard facts to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New
York to force his compliance with the provisions of federal law that require
the convening of a federal grand jury to investigate for the first time the
attacks of September 11, 2001. https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
This puts the US Justice (sic) Department in an
extraordinary position. There will be tremendous pressures on the US Attorney’s
office to have the grand jury dismiss the evidence as an unpatriotic conspiracy
theory or otherwise maneuver to discredit the evidence presented by the
Lawyers’ Committee, or modify the official account without totally discrediting
it.
“What
the 9/11 truthers and the Lawyers’ Committee have achieved is the destruction
of the designation of 9/11 skeptics as “conspiracy theorists.” No US Attorney
would convene a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Clearly, the
evidence is compelling that has put the US Attorney in an unenviable position.”
If
the Lawyers’ Committee and the 9/11 truthers trust the US Attorney to go
entirely by the facts, little will come of the grand jury. If the United States
had a rule of law, something as serious as 9/11 could not have gone for 17
years without investigation.”
Three weeks before Roberts’ made this statement a letter was published by Off-Guardian about a Huffington Post hit piece about an academic teaching journalism. Its first paragraph explains entirely its own position.
Three weeks before Roberts’ made this statement a letter was published by Off-Guardian about a Huffington Post hit piece about an academic teaching journalism. Its first paragraph explains entirely its own position.
“An
academic teaching journalism students at one of the UK’s top universities has
publicly supported long-discredited conspiracy theories about the 9/11 terror
attack, HuffPost UK can reveal.”
This
entire article, like that of the BBC’s, vigorously attacks any individual or
organisation that has the temerity to question the ‘official’ narrative on any
major incident as offered up by the state, such as the Skripal poisonings,
Syria’s chemical weapons, Iraq and Chilcot Report.
HuffPost
even uses an unnamed former head of MI6 and an unnamed former Supreme Commander
of Nato to dispel such challenges to this narrative and then attacks other
sources of news such as RT as nothing more than Russian propaganda irrespective
of the source. As a rule, TruePublica does not publish news sourced by RT but
that does not make all of its content propaganda.
David Ray
Griffin, a retired American professor and political writer who founded
the Center for Process Studies which seeks to promote the common good
by means of the relational approach found in process thought was the
co-author of the book ‘9/11 Unmasked’ – part of the attack piece was centered
on by the HuffPost hit piece.
The head
of the 9/11 Consensus Panel, the other co-author, responded to the
HuffPost. For information, the goal of the Consensus Panel is to “provide
a ready source of evidence-based research to any investigation that may be
undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body
or institution.”
That
letter is as follows:
Jess Brammer, UK Huffington Post
Chris York, UK Huffington Post
Jess Brammer, UK Huffington Post
Chris York, UK Huffington Post
Dear Ms.
Brammar and Mr. York:
I was the
head information specialist serving the Medical Health Officers of British
Columbia, Canada, for 25 years.
Your attack
piece on Professor Piers Robinson and on the scholarly work of Dr. David Ray
Griffin is the least accurate and the lowest quality published article I
have ever seen.
I have
assisted Dr. Griffin with 10 of his investigative books into the events of
9/11. In 2011 we decided to create the international 9/11 Consensus Panel to
review and evaluate the official claims relating to September 11, 2001. The
Panel we formed has 23 members, including people from the fields of physics,
chemistry, structural engineering, aeronautical engineering, piloting, airplane
crash investigation, medicine, journalism, psychology, and religion.
In
seeking a consensus methodology, I was advised by the former provincial
epidemiologist of British Columbia to employ a leading model that is used
in medicine to establish the best diagnostic and treatment evidence to
guide the world’s doctors using medical consensus statements.
The Panel
methodology has produced, seven years later, 51 refutations of the official
claims, which were published as 911 Unmasked: An International Review
Panel Investigation in September, 2018.https://www.amazon.com/11-Unmasked-International-Review-Investigation/dp/1623719747
Each
Consensus Point, now a chapter in this book, was given three rounds of review
and feedback by the Panel members. The panelists were blind to one another
throughout the process, providing strictly uninfluenced individual feedback.
Any Points that did not receive 85% approval by the third round were set aside.
The
Honorary Members of the Panel include the late British (and longest-serving)
parliamentarian Michael Meacher, the late evolutionary biologist Lynn Margulis,
and the late Honorary President of the Italian Supreme Court, Ferdinando
Imposimato.
The Huffington
Post drastically lowered its standards to publish this hit piece, and what
influenced it to do so is a question worth pursuing.
Yours truly,
Elizabeth Woodworth, Co-author with Dr. David Ray Griffin of 9/11 Unmasked
Yours truly,
Elizabeth Woodworth, Co-author with Dr. David Ray Griffin of 9/11 Unmasked
TruePublica
continues:
It is over 18 years now since the world-changing event of 9/11. One wonders when the information held by the American government, that continues to anger so many people affected by it will ever emerge.
It is over 18 years now since the world-changing event of 9/11. One wonders when the information held by the American government, that continues to anger so many people affected by it will ever emerge.
However,
one reason why such questions persist is precisely that of the actions of the
US government itself. One should not forget those so-called ‘conspiracy
theories’ that actually came true that continues to pour petrol on the flames
of doubt.
For
example, the American government killed thousands by poisoning alcohol to prove
its point that alcohol was bad for the general public during prohibition. This
was a ‘conspiracy theory’ that went on for decades – until it was proven to be
true. https://slate.com/technology/2010/02/the-little-told-story-of-how-the-u-s-government-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibition.html
Then, you
can take your pick of the lies government tells when it comes to starting wars
– how about the lie the Saddam Hussain and Iraq had WMD ready to fire at
Western targets. Total deaths exceeded 1 million. Yet another classic American
lie was the Gulf of Tonkin incident in August 1964, as a pretext for escalating
the country’s involvement in the Vietnam War that killed 60,000 American
soldiers. Total deaths racked up 1.35 million, all based on a lie. That
incident only came about because of an unintentional declassification of
an NSA file in 2005.
Edward
Snowden proved with his revelations in 2013 that the government was spying on
everyone when the government had denied they had ever done so. It took a
whistleblower to let us all know. The UK government has been found by the
highest courts in the land to have broken numerous privacy and surveillance
laws as a result of mass civilian surveillance systems.
Operation
Mockingbird was a US government operation where journalists were paid to
publish CIA propaganda, only uncovered by the Watergate scandal. It took a thief
to unknowingly capture secret documents and recordings for the public to find
out.
The list
goes on and on – just as 9/11 will, so it will be interesting to see how the US
Attorney, presented with evidence from so many prominent professionals will bury
yet more 9/11 evidence. Don’t hold your breath though, the same questions will,
no doubt, still be being asked in another 18 years time.
