More information is
supporting the
theory that the current big Justice Department
"investigations" are actually functioning as big cover-up operations. Robert Mueller's team is effectively hiding key
evidence related to serious crimes committed by government
officials. Mueller has nearly complete control over what the public
or any investigator can see. He has control over what witnesses can
talk about.
This
means that the Huber and Horowitz investigations exist to make you think
something is being investigated when it is not. That is why
Representatives Doug Collins, Mark Meadows, and Jim Jordan sent a letter to
Huber, the U.S. attorney, this week that essentially exposes the fraud.
The
letter begins, "We write to request an update on the progress of your
review of irregularities involved with the Department of Justice's (DOJ) and
Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) actions during 2016 and
2017[.]" The letter then points to facts that indicate that there
has been no real investigation. None of the many key witnesses has
been interviewed. Huber refused to testify at a recent congressional
hearing about the Clinton Foundation. The letter then asks for
information in four areas where Huber cannot reply without further
demonstrating that this is a fake investigation.
There
is also mounting evidence that hiding facts is common in deep state political
crusades. A recent column by
Marty Watters and Lee Cary exposes Mueller's long history of improperly hiding
evidence. The column begins, "During his twelve-year reign as
FBI Director, Robert Mueller not only protected his criminal friends by
silencing those who could expose their bad acts, he projected his friends'
crimes onto others."
One
example cited is the case of William Campbell, who infiltrated Russia's State
Nuclear Energy Corporation, Rosatom, for the FBI. Over a period of
eight years, he documented the bribery and money-laundering involved in
Russia's effort to get access to U.S. uranium assets. Massive
donations were made to the Clinton Foundation, and absurdly high speaking fees
were given to Bill Clinton by those who planned to profit from the deal.
The reason you have not heard Campbell's story is that FBI
director Mueller forbade him to go public. Attorney General Loretta
Lynch threatened Campbell with jail if he told the truth. The truth
was hidden, and the deal went through.
You
will remember the case of Valerie Plame, where a special counsel was empowered
to find out who "outed" supposed covert agent Plame. It
was known early in this politically motivated investigation that the chosen
target, Dick Cheney's top aide, Scooter Libby, was not the person who had
leaked Plames name. There were two earlier leakers whom Mueller's
FBI knew about. But the special counsel did not want to let a good
investigation go to waste, so he prolonged it for maximum political
effect. Sound familiar?
We
know that the person who leaked Plame's name to Robert Novak was Richard
Armitage. The Watters-Cary column added a new twist to the story by
introducing an earlier leaker, who was hidden by Mueller. An FBI
employee, Sibel Edmonds, did not like the extensive illegal surveillance she
was witnessing. She wanted to expose the criminal actions of the
FBI. Director Mueller intervened on two occasions to silence
her. Some of the information from the surveillance related to
Plame. Watters and Cary write:
One
of the "secrets" that Mueller did not want Edmonds to expose was that
the FBI has a 2001 recording of Under Secretary of State Marc Grossman outing
Plame's identity as a CIA employee to a Turkish diplomat. This was
long before Richard Armitage claimed he "accidently" [sic] outed
Plame to Robert Novak.
Silencing
Edmonds enabled Mueller to position his protégé, Deputy Attorney General James
Comey, to eventually appoint their mutual, close friend, U.S Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald,
as the Special Counsel tasked to discover who leaked Plame's identity as a CIA
employee. Everyone with a need to know already knew the original
leaker was Grossman. But the public didn't need to know, and so the
spin-up to the lengthy Plamegate puppet show began.
Scott
Johnson of Powerline has three posts about "Mueller's
Cone of Silence" that relate to Mueller attempting to hide evidence in
his Russian troll case. In February of last year, Mueller indicted
Russian social media actors (some of whom do not even exist) for some trivial
actions not aimed at any particular candidate. The apparent purpose
of the indictment was to feed the Trump-Russia collusion fable by creating news
stories containing the word "Russia." Mueller surely had
no expectation that the Russians would answer the charges, but Concord
Management did just that.
Concord's
attorney has asked to see the evidence against its people. Mueller
has essentially told the judge that the evidence is "sensitive," and
he doesn't want to show it. Openly telling the defendant he can't
see the evidence is one step more brazen than simply hiding the
evidence. The Concord attorney responded this way in his
motion to Judge Dabney Friedrich:
In
this first-of-its-kind prosecution of a make-believe crime, the Office of
Special Counsel maintains that it can unilaterally – and for secret reasons
disclosed only to the Court – categorize millions of pages of
non-classified documents as "sensitive," and prohibit defense counsel
from sharing this information with Defendant[.]
It is interesting that Judge Friedrich is
married to Matthew Friedrich, who is tied directly to Mueller in some well
documented cases of hiding evidence from defendants. Sidney Powell's
great book, Licensed
to Lie, describes the extreme corruption of Mueller's prosecutors in
the cases of Ted Stevens, Merrill Lynch, and Enron. Evidence was
hidden in these cases on a grand scale. Later, after the damage was
done, higher courts overturned verdicts and strongly rebuked the dishonest
prosecutors.
In
2014, Sidney Powell wrote a column about what Eric Holder had done to four of
the corrupt and discredited prosecutors described in Powell's
book. Holder did the same thing that our current "dirty
cops" expected from President Hillary Clinton. Holder
"honored, promoted and protected" them.
Matthew
Friedrich was one of the four, and Andrew Weissmann was another. Matthew
Friedrich "personally told the jury facts that were directly refuted by
[evidence he withheld][.] ... Mr. Friedrich rushed the indictment of Senator
Stevens and micromanaged that corrupted prosecution, which cost the citizens of
Alaska their senior Senator, changed the balance of power in the Senate, and
facilitated the enactment of Obamacare. "
Judge
Friedrich is a Trump appointee. Her rulings so far indicate that she
may be just as effective for Trump as Jeff Sessions was.
Look at the big picture. Those
in power regularly hide evidence of their crimes and get
away with it. From Lois Lerner to Hillary Clinton to Strzok and
Page, the dreaded "glitch" eats the most important
evidence. From "Fast and Furious" to Benghazi to Comey's
fake investigation of Hillary to Rosenstein's stonewalling to Mueller's
"insurance policy" cover-up, hiding the facts is the primary
goal.
Joseph Stalin is quoted as
saying, "The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The
people who count the votes decide everything." It is also true
that the actual evidence decides nothing. The people who control the
evidence decide everything.
