Nailed
them, with their own words.
In this article, I’ll present quotes from
official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus. I’m
talking about fatal flaws in the test.
Because case numbers are based on those
tests (or no tests at all), the whole “pandemic effect” has been created out of
fake science.
In a moment of truth, a propaganda pro
might murmur to a colleague, “You know, we’ve got a great diagnostic test for
the virus. The test turns out all sorts of results that say this person is
diseased and that person is diseased. Millions of diseased people. But the test
doesn’t really measure that. The test is ridiculous, but ridiculous in our
favor. It builds the picture of a global pandemic. An excuse to lock down the
planet and wreck economies and lives…”
The widespread test for the COVID-19 virus is called the PCR. I have
written much about it in past articles.
Battlefield America: T...John
W. WhiteheadBest Price: $10.95Buy New $18.80(as
of 10:15 EST - Details)
Now let’s go to published official
literature, and see what it reveals. Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and
shortcomings of the test are devastating.
From
“CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [1]:
“Detection
of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that
2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
Translation: A positive test doesn’t
guarantee that the COVID virus is causing infection at all. And, ahem, reading
between the lines, maybe the COVID virus might not be in the patient’s body at
all, either.
From
the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical
guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans” [2]:
“Several
assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development,
both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus
[COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are
genetically similar.”
Translation: Some PCR tests register
positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVID—including
plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold.
The
WHO document adds this little piece: “Protocol use limitations: Optional
clinical specimens for testing has [have] not yet been validated.”
Translation: We’re not sure which
tissue samples to take from the patient, in order for the test to have any
validity.
From
the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary: ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE
AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF
AMERICA)” [3]:
“…The
SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens
during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the
presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other
diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE
AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine).
Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to
report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”
Translation: On the one hand, we claim
the test can “generally” detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient.
But we admit that “the agent detected” on the test, by which we mean COVID,
“may not be the definite cause of disease.” We also admit that, unless the
patient has an acute infection, we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of
“asymptomatic patients” confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a
positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all
positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “COVID cases.”
Regardless.
From
a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2
Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [4]:
“Regulatory
status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”
Translation: Don’t use the test result
alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.
“non-specific
interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata),
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7),
Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae,
etc.”
Translation: Although this company
states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY
positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his
body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.
“Application
Qualitative”
Translation: This clearly means the
test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. I’ll
cover how important this admission is in a minute.
“The
detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should
not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The
clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their
symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests and treatment responses. The
detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical
diagnosis, and are only for the reference of clinicians.”
Translation: Don’t use the test as the
exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID. And yet, this is exactly
what health authorities are doing all over the world. All positive tests must
be reported to government agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.”
Those
quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole
“scientific” basis of the test.
And
now, I’ll add another, lethal blow: the test has never been validated properly
as an instrument to detect disease. Even assuming it can detect the presence of
the COVID virus in a patient, it doesn’t show HOW MUCH virus is in the body.
And that is key, because in order to even begin talking about actual illness in
the real world, not in a lab, the patient would need to have millions and
millions of the virus actively replicating in his body.
Proponents of the test assert
that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body. To which I reply: prove it.
Prove it in a way it should
have been proven decades ago—but never was.
Take five hundred people and remove
tissue samples from them. The people who take the samples do NOT do the test.
The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they’re in.
The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say
which virus they found and HOW MUCH of it they found.
“All
right, in patients 24, 46, 65, 76, 87, and 93 we found a great deal of virus.”
Now
we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have so much
virus replicating in their bodies. Are they sick? Are they running marathons?
Let’s find out.
This
OBVIOUS vetting of the test has never been done. That is an enormous scandal.
Where are the controlled test results in 500 patients, a thousand patients?
Nowhere.
The test is an unproven fraud.
And, therefore, the COVID pandemic, which
is supposed to be based on that test, is also a fraud.
“But…but…what about all the sick and
dying people…why are they sick?”
I’ve written thousands of words
answering that question, in past articles. A NUMBER of conditions—none involving
COVID, and most involving old traditional diseases—are making people sick.
Reprinted with permission
from Jon
Rappoport’s blog.
Jon
Rappoport runs No More Fake News. The author of an explosive
collection, The Matrix Revealed, Jon was a candidate for a
US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA
Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe.
Copyright
© Jon
Rappoport’s blog
