Why has the murder of counter-liberal politicians and public figures been normalised in the West?
In this post I explore the killing of right wing figures such as Ann Widdicombe, Charlie Kirk, David Amess MP as a product of a process of character assassination. This process is part of our political system, and is a function of the social algorithm by which we are ruled.
CONTENTS
The penalty for blasphemy is death by Social Contract Killing
Killing in the name of Utopia
Hope Not Hate - State Partners in Crime
Radical Propaganda as UK Government Policy
Inventing the threat of the “far right”
The British State - Enemy of Civilisation
THE PENALTY FOR BLASPHEMY IS DEATH
If you prominently speak out against the Liberal State Religion of open borders, net zero and the rainbow flag you can expect to be demonised, deplatformed and killed.....
Britain has a State which refuses to see the obvious evil of the terror in its midst, as every Islamist terror attack from the Manchester Arena bombing to the beheading of Fusilier Rigby was carried out by persons known to and ignored by the authorities.
It would be racist to notice this threat.
It is a State which frees convicted paedophiles and imprisons native British people who speak against the crimes we suffer as a result of State policy.
It would be paedophobic to jail child predators.
If you speak against any or all of the destructive totems of the differently saned they will curse you into unpersonhood, and celebrate when you’re murdered.
This is the State we are in today. It is not an ally of the US, as it is the enemy of its own people. The Social Contract it defends with propaganda, lies and death sentences democratised through sanctioned hate speech is a contract to kill our nation and our entire way of life.
The supreme virtue of this social contract is to end anyone who will not sign their lives away to it.
If we submit to this, we are finished anyway. If we get old, as Ann Widdicombe grew old, we may simply be ended in our dotage in the same way, in a sacrificial homage to the Enemy of all mankind.
This is not a matter of political debate. It is a matter of life and death. Ours.
Those who would take everything from us to secure their own are bewitched by the diabolical belief that the defence and commission of evil is a duty to the public good.
These people are dangerous.
Proceed with caution, and wherever you can, try to help them detransition from this morally inverted cult which equates sanity with a death threat.
