The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated
50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19. What if the story we
have been told about this pandemic isn’t true?
What if, instead, the killer infection
was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin?
Newly analyzed documents reveal that
the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry.
In looking back on the 100th
anniversary of the end of World War I, we need to delve deeper to solve this
mystery.
Summary
- The
reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer
influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the
killer.
- More
soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.
- The
pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were
caused by bacterial pneumonia, not influenza/a virus.
- The
pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918
trace back to a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas.
- From
January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine
cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in
New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.
- During
the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under
poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread
bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in
France.
- One
study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their
noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were
profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs
by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
- The
“Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial
pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and
immunocompromised.
- When
WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries
and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.
- During
WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent the antimeningococcic serum to
England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the
epidemic worldwide.
During the pandemic of 1918-19, the
so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers.
Many people do not realize that
disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas
or anything else typically associated with WWI.
I have a personal connection to the
Spanish Flu. Among those killed by disease in 1918-19 are members of both
of my parents’ families.
On my father’s side, his grandmother
Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918. Sadie was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy.
Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised
by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also joined the Navy. She died from
“the influenza” in 1919.
On my mother’s side, two of her
father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family members who died lived in
New York City.
I suspect many American families, and
many families worldwide, were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious
Spanish Flu.
In 1918, “influenza” or flu was a
catchall term for disease of unknown origin. It didn’t carry the specific
meaning it does today.
It meant some mystery disease which
dropped out of the sky. In fact, influenza is from the Medieval Latin
“influential” in an astrological sense, meaning a visitation under the
influence of the stars.
WHY IS WHAT HAPPENED 100 YEARS AGO IMPORTANT NOW?
Between 1900-1920, there were enormous
efforts underway in the industrialized world to build a better society. I
will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society which
occurred in NY during that time and their impact on mortality from infectious
diseases.
1. Clean Water and
Sanitation
In the late 19th century through the
early 20th century, New York built an extraordinary system to bring clean water
to the city from the Catskills, a system still in use today. New York
City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat waste, which
protects the drinking water. The World Health Organization acknowledges the
importance of clean
water and sanitation in combating infectious diseases. (2)
2. Electricity
In the late 19th century through the
early 20th century, New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was
available in every home. Electricity allows for refrigeration.
Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health benefit. When food is
refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected from potential
infectious diseases. Cheap renewable energy is important for many
reasons, including combating infectious diseases.
3. Pharmaceutical
In the late 19th century through the
early 20th century, New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute for
Medical Research (now Rockefeller University). The Institute is where the
modern pharmaceutical industry was born. The Institute pioneered many of the
approaches the pharmaceutical industry uses today, including the preparation of
vaccine serums, for better or worse. The vaccine used in the Fort Riley
experiment on soldiers was made in horses.
US Mortality Rates data from the turn
of the 20th century to 1965 clearly indicates that clean water, flushing
toilets, effective sewer systems and refrigerated foods all combined to
effectively reduce mortality from infectious diseases BEFORE vaccines for those
diseases became available.
Have doctors and the pharmaceutical
manufacturers taken credit for reducing mortality from infectious disease which
rightfully belongs to sandhogs, plumbers, electricians and engineers?
If hubris at the Rockefeller Institute
in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which killed millions of people, what lessons
can we learn and apply to 2018?
THE DISEASE WAS NOT SPANISH
While watching an episode of American
Experience on PBS a few months ago, I was surprised to hear that the
first cases of “Spanish Flu” occurred at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1918. I
thought, how is it possible this historically important event could be so badly
misnamed 100 years ago and never corrected?
Why “Spanish”?
Spain was one of a few countries not
involved in World War I. Most of the countries involved in the war
censored their press.
Free from censorship concerns, the
earliest press reports of people dying from disease in large numbers came from
Spain. The warring countries did not want to additionally frighten the
troops, so they were content to scapegoat Spain. Soldiers on all sides would be
asked to cross no man’s land into machine gun fire, which was frightening
enough without knowing that the trenches were a disease breeding ground.
One hundred years later, it’s long
past time to drop “Spanish” from all discussion of this pandemic. If the
flu started at a United States military base in Kansas, then the disease could
and should be more aptly named.
In order to prevent future disasters,
the US (and the rest of the world) must take a hard look at what really caused
the pandemic.
It is possible that one of the reasons
the Spanish Flu has never been corrected is that it helps disguise the origin
of the pandemic.
If the origin of the pandemic involved
a vaccine experiment on US soldiers, then the US may prefer calling it Spanish
Flu instead of The Fort Riley Bacteria of 1918, or something similar. The
Spanish Flu started at the location this experimental bacterial vaccine was
given making it the prime suspect as the source of the bacterial infections
which killed so many.
It would be much more difficult to
maintain the marketing mantra of “vaccines save lives” if a vaccine experiment
originating in the United States during the years of primitive manufacturing
caused the deaths of 50-100 million people.
“Vaccines
save lives … except we may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19” is a
far less effective sales slogan than the overly simplistic “vaccines save
lives.”
THE DISEASE WHICH KILLED SO MANY WAS NOT FLU OR A VIRUS.
IT WAS BACTERIAL.
During the mid-2000’s there was much
talk about “pandemic preparedness.” Influenza vaccine manufacturers in
the United States received billions of taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines to
make sure that we don’t have another lethal pandemic “flu,” like the one in
1918-19.
Capitalizing on the “flu” part of
Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion dollar checks from
governments, even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia
was the real killer.
It is not my opinion that bacterial
pneumonia was the real killer – thousands of autopsies confirm this fact.
According to a 2008 National Institute
of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of
the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed. It is likely higher than 92.7%.
The researchers looked at more than
9000 autopsies, and “there were no negative (bacterial) lung culture results.”
“… In
the 68
higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative
cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1
bacterium. … in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from
clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers
obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or
streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples.
There
were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci
were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22
that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms
(prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded
nonhemolytic streptococci alone. There were no negative lung culture results.”
(3)
Pneumococci or streptococci were found
in “164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples” autopsied. That is 98.2%.
Bacteria was the killer.
WHERE DID THE SPANISH FLU BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA OF 1918-19
ORIGINATE?
When the United States declared war in
April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never
had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US
military’s first draft.
Pre-war in 1917, the US Army was
286,000 men. Post-war in 1920, the US army disbanded, and had 296,000 men.
During the war years 1918-19, the US
Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas.
The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new
pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.
A REPORT ON ANTIMENINGITIS VACCINATION AND OBSERVATIONS ON
AGGLUTININS IN THE BLOOD OF CHRONIC MENINGOCOCCUS CARRIERS
by Frederick L. Gates
From the Base Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas, and The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York.
Received 1918 Jul 20
by Frederick L. Gates
From the Base Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas, and The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York.
Received 1918 Jul 20
(Author note: Please read
the Fort Riley paper in its entirety so you can appreciate the
carelessness of the experiments conducted on these troops.)
Between January 21st and June 4th of
1918, Dr. Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers were given 3 doses of a
bacterial meningitis vaccine. Those conducting the experiment on the
soldiers were just spitballing dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses.
The vaccination regime was designed to
be 3 doses. 4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd
dose (down 11%), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%).
A total of 1,090 men were not there
for the 3rd dose. What happened to these soldiers? Were they shipped East
by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe? Were they in the Fort
Riley hospital? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t tell us.
An article accompanying the American
Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might
be. Gates began his experiments in January 1918.
By March of that year, “100 men a day”
were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley.
Are some of these the men missing from
Dr. Gates’ report – the ones who did not get the 2nd or 3rd dose?
“…
Shortly before breakfast on Monday, March 11, the first domino would fall
signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza.
Company
cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “bad
cold.”
Right
behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints.
By
noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over
100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same
malady…” (5)
Gates does report that several of the
men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms: coughs, vomiting and diarrhea
after receiving the vaccine.
These symptoms are a disaster for men
living in barracks, travelling on trains to the Atlantic coast, sailing to
Europe, and living and fighting in trenches.
The unsanitary conditions at each step
of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial
pneumonia to spread.
From Dr. Gates’ report:
“Reactions.–
… Several cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted.
This symptom had not been encountered before. Careful inquiry in individual
cases often elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of
vaccination were suffering from mild coryza, bronchitis, etc., at the time
of injection.”
“Sometimes
the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men
complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night.
Next in
frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general “aches
and pains” in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially
localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few
injections were followed by diarrhea.
The
reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis
and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for
diagnosis.”(4)
According to Gates, they injected
random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers.
Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which “simulated” meningitis, but
Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn’t actual meningitis.
The soldiers developed flu-like
symptoms. Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic
flu-like symptoms. (6)
Perhaps the similarity of early
symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia to symptoms of flu is
why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as
a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting.
HOW DID THE “SPANISH FLU” SPREAD SO WIDELY SO QUICKLY?
There is an element of a perfect storm
in how the Gates bacteria spread. WWI ended only 10 months after the
first injections. Unfortunately for the 50-100 million who died, those soldiers
injected with horse-infused bacteria moved quickly during those 10 months.
An article from 2008 on the CDC’s
website describes how sick WWI soldiers could pass along the bacteria to others
by becoming “cloud adults.”
“Finally,
for brief periods and to varying degrees, affected hosts became “cloud adults” who
increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria, particularly
pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus.
For
several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as
hospital wards, military camps, troop ships, and mines (and trenches)—some
persons were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from
infections with influenza virus.
Persons
with active infections were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their
noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were
profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by
their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
Three times in his report on the Fort
Riley vaccine experiment, Dr. Gates states that some soldiers had a “severe
reaction” indicating “an unusual individual susceptibility to the vaccine”.
While the vaccine made many sick, it
only killed those who were susceptible to it. Those who became sick and
survived became “cloud adults” who spread the bacteria to others, which created
more cloud adults, spreading to others where it killed the susceptible,
repeating the cycle until there were no longer wartime unsanitary conditions,
and there were no longer millions of soldiers to experiment on.
The toll on US troops was enormous and
it is well documented. Dr. Carol Byerly describes how the “influenza”
traveled like wildfire through the US military. (substitute “bacteria”
for Dr. Byerly’s “influenza” or “virus”):
“… Fourteen of the
largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March,
April, or May, and some of the infected troops carried the virus with them
aboard ships to France …
As
soldiers in the trenches became sick, the military evacuated them from the
front lines and replaced them with healthy men.
This
process continuously brought the virus into contact with new hosts—young,
healthy soldiers in which it could adapt, reproduce, and become extremely
virulent without danger of burning out.
…
Before any travel ban could be imposed, a contingent of replacement troops
departed Camp Devens (outside of Boston) for Camp Upton, Long Island, the
Army’s debarkation point for France, and took influenza with them.
Medical
officers at Upton said it arrived “abruptly” on September 13, 1918, with 38
hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and 193 the next.
Hospital
admissions peaked on October 4 with 483, and within 40 days, Camp Upton sent
6,131 men to the hospital for influenza. Some developed pneumonia so quickly
that physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than
listening to the lungs…” (7)
The
United States was not the only country in possession of the Rockefeller
Institute’s experimental bacterial vaccine.
A 1919
report from the Institute states: “Reference should be made that before the
United States entered the war (in April 1917) the Institute had resumed the
preparation of antimeningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests of England,
France, Belgium Italy and other countries.”
The
same report states: “In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for
the curative serums worked out at the Institute, a special stable for horses
was quickly erected …” (8)
An experimental antimeningoccic serum
made in horses and injected into soldiers who would be entering the cramped and
unsanitary living conditions of war … what could possibly go wrong?
Is the bacterial serum made in horses
at the Rockefeller Institute which was injected into US soldiers and
distributed to numerous other countries responsible for the 50-100 million
people killed by bacterial lung infections in 1918-19?
The Institute says it distributed the
bacterial serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries during WWI.
Not enough is known about how these countries experimented on their soldiers.
I hope independent researchers will
take an honest look at these questions.
THE ROAD TO HELL IS PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS
I do not believe that anyone involved
in these vaccine experiments was trying to harm anyone.
Some will see the name Rockefeller and
yell. “Illuminati!” or “culling the herd!”
I do not believe that’s what happened.
I believe standard medical hubris is
responsible – doctors “playing God”, thinking they can tame nature without
creating unanticipated problems.
With medical hubris, I do not think
the situation has changed materially over the past 100 years.
WHAT NOW?
The vaccine industry is always looking
for human test subjects. They have the most success when they are able to
find populations who not in a position to refuse.
Soldiers (9),
infants, the disabled, prisoners, those in developing nations – anyone not in a
position to refuse.
Vaccine experimentation on vulnerable
populations is not an issue of the past. Watch this video clip of Dr.
Stanley Plotkin where he describes using experimental vaccines on orphans, the
mentally retarded, prisoners, and those under colonial rule.
The deposition was in January 2018.
The hubris of the medical community is the same or worse now than it was 100
years ago.
Watch as Dr. Plotkin admits to
writing:
“The
question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning
adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to
perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in
social potential.”
In part because the global community
is well aware of medical hubris and well aware of the poor record of medical
ethics, the Universal
Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed international
standards regarding the right to informed consent to preventative medical procedures
like vaccination.
The international community is well
aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes mistakes and is always on the
lookout for human test subjects. The Declaration states that individuals
have the human right to consent to any preventative medical intervention like
vaccination.
Article 3 – Human dignity and human rights
1. Human dignity, human rights and
fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.
2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.
2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and
therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free
and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. T
he consent should, where appropriate,
be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any
reason without disadvantage or prejudice. (11)
Clean water, sanitation, flushing
toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more
to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.
Doctor and the vaccine industry have
usurped credit which rightfully belongs to plumbers, electricians, sandhogs,
engineers and city planners.
For these reasons, policy makers at all
levels of government should protect the human rights and individual liberties
of individuals to opt out of vaccine programs via exemptions.
The hubris of the medical community
will never go away. Policy makers need to know that vaccines like all medical
interventions are not infallible.
Vaccines are not magic. We all have
different susceptibility to disease. Human beings are not one size fits
all.
In 1918-19, the vaccine industry
experimented on soldiers, likely with disastrous results.
In 2018, the vaccine industry
experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as
it is given. The results of the experiment are in: 1
in 7 American children is in some form of special education and over
50% have some form of chronic illness. (12)
In 1918-19, there was no safety follow
up after vaccines were delivered.
In 2018, there is virtually no safety
follow up after a vaccine is delivered.
Who exactly gave you that flu shot at
Rite Aid? Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes
wrong?
In 1918-19, there was no liability to
the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines.
In 2018, there is no liability for
vaccine manufacturers for injuries or death caused by vaccines, which
was formalized in 1986. (13)
In 1918-19, there was no independent
investigative follow up challenging the official story that “Spanish Flu” was
some mystery illness which dropped from the sky. I suspect that many of
those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened, and that many of the
doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened, but
those people are long dead.
In 2018, the Pharmaceutical industry
is the largest campaign donor to politicians and the largest advertiser in all
forms of media, so not much has changed over 100 years.
This story will likely be ignored by mainstream
media because their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising.
The next time you hear someone say
“vaccines save lives” please remember that the true story of the cost/benefit
of vaccines is much more complicated than their three word slogan. Also
remember that vaccines may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19. If
true, those costs greatly outweighed any benefit, especially considering that
plumbers, electricians, sandhogs and engineers did, and continue to do, the
real work which reduces mortality from disease.
Vaccines are not magic. Human
rights and bioethics are critically important. Policy makers should
understand the history of medical hubris and protect individual and parental
human rights as described in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human
Rights.
——
Kevin Barry is the President of First
Freedoms, Inc. a 501.c.3. He is a former federal attorney, a rep at the
UN HQ in New York and the author of Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing
Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Please support our work at www.firstfreedoms.org
Please direct media inquiries to kb151@protonmail.com.
Originally published at FirstFreedoms.org.
Reprinted with permission.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
References
1. Deaths from Bacterial Pneumonia
during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic
John F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article
John F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article
2. World Health Organization:
Unsafe drinking water, sanitation and waste management
http://www.who.int/sustainable-development/cities/health-risks/water-sanitation/en/
http://www.who.int/sustainable-development/cities/health-risks/water-sanitation/en/
3. J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 1; 198(7):
962–970.
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/
4. PDF of Fort Riley Study (1918)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf
5. American Experience, “The First
Wave”,
PBS
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza-first-wave/
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza-first-wave/
6. Mayo Clinic: Meningitis
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/meningitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350508
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/meningitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350508
7. Public Health Rep.
2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91.
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/
8. Rockefeller Institute
pamphlet PDF (1919)
https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=rockefeller-institute-descriptive-pamphlet
https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=rockefeller-institute-descriptive-pamphlet
9. Is Military Research
Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century, A Staff Report
Prepared for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, United States Senate, December
1994
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835
10. Dr. Stanley Plotkin: vaccine
experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and others (January 2018)
https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw
https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw
11. Universal Declaration on
Bioethics and Human Rights (19 October 2005)
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
12. CDC Offers New Stats On Disability
Prevalence
https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-prevalence/22034/
https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-prevalence/22034/
13. 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation
Act
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-vaccine-injury-act-protect/
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-vaccine-injury-act-protect/
Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every
Vaccine Produces Harm
eBook –
Available for immediate download.
Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden
provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to
a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by
the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless,
his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who
stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the
Earth.
Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in
November of 2013 at age 49.
Because of the strong opposition from
big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name
of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from
the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning
and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book
summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the
“other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.
Read Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every
Vaccine Produces Harm on your mobile device or computer by ordering
the eBook!