So as the partly Jewish Vladimir Lenin asked “What is to be done?”
A direct and explicit attack on Jewish power — at this point — would be no more likely to succeed than a frontal attack on Verdun in 1918. However admirable this direct approach is, it is unlikely alone to make a significant change.
Is there any indirect approach which could significantly weaken the power of the Jewish nation over the US?
To analyze this, we need to examine the environment the Jewish Nation creates for itself in order to effectuate its goals.
First, some underlying principles:
(a) Jews hate democracy. They feel that the vast majority of people hate them (generally wrongly at first, correctly at the end) . So, from the days of the favorite Jewish King of Spain — Pedro the Cruel — they have LOVED the most vicious, tyrannical, and worthless dictators; in contrast, they have hated popular control unless they felt they could control the people through media. This gives you an idea of what they want to do with our country. We are not even close to the end-game.
(b) Jews do business everywhere, even in the most unlikely goy-centered places. Accordingly, they need “protection” from democracy everywhere, not just in the locations (NYC and LA) where most of them live. So having Jew-friendly policies in two cities and nowhere else does them no good. They have to control everything, everywhere to feel secure. For example, in “wild west” bastion, Dallas, Texas, in 1963, hardly a center of US Jewry, there were a number of extremely powerful and rich Jews, who composed a substantial part of the Dallas business leadership.
(c) Because of (a) and (b), Jews love centralization and hate local self government, since they are unable to influence a multiplicity of governmental units as easily as one central unit. If they can have a federal agency mandate, backed up by the FBI, once that agency — as it has been — becomes indirectly controlled by them through congressional and presidential campaign contributions over many years, to prevent local, small town businesses, governments, or schools from so much as saying “boo” to a local Jew, that is much easier than trying to construct safe zones in each of 100,000 separate dinky towns where only 7 Jews live but where those 7 own the department store and most of the office buildings. Ditto the schools; ditto the media (Jews love media chains, since one or two timely purchases can put hundreds of local town newspapers and TV stations under their editorial control.)
The basic rule is that what Jews centralize, they will buy, bribe and/or infiltrate. What they buy, bribe and infiltrate, they will control.
So the basic countermeasure is to deprive the Jewish Nation of the tools it needs to succeed, much like the indirect military operation of destroying rail lines through which front-line troops received materiel and food.
The main indirect attack would be decentralization or, where that is impossible due to technological factors (such as the natural monopolies of Google and Facebook), neutralization.
In this light, the following neutral-sounding, counter measures suggest themselves.
Decentralize All Levels of Government. First, massively decentralize government. Both at the Federal and at the State level. This will involve the elimination of laws that, by their very nature, demand centralized control of ordinary citizens and small institutions.
Repeal the all Civil Rights including and those enacted after the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
Eliminate the Department of Education and virtually all of the Department of Justice.
Massively restrict the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Likewise the state courts.
Eliminate all federal and state law enforcement agencies. They are not needed for the crimes most people care about, and they will always be used against White interests. As part of this, eliminate all federal and state criminal laws except those in existence, say, in 1800.
Eliminate all state or federal control over education. Control should be at the local school board level and the school boards should encompass no more than say, 1,000 students at a crack. All school funding should be local. At the local level, revise zoning and other codes to permit anyone to start a school in their house. End mandatory education in the sense that towns would still be required to provide schools for those who wished to attend, but no one would be required to go to school. At that point all regulatory pressure on private schools would end.
Eliminate almost all state-level executive officers, except the Governor himself; any significant law enforcement or school officer(s) should be local only and elected at the local level.
Eliminate any credentialing requirements for law, school teaching, medicine that are not done at the local level; and permit very few professions to require credentialing at all.
Decentralize Other Institutions. Decentralize as many institutions as possible, even if not governments.
Media. Decentralize — to the extent possible — media. Go back to the original Federal Communications Act of 1924 and massively reduce the permitted power of broadcasting devices, so that each broadcast station reaches only a truly miniscule areas. Prohibit any cross ownership. Require that at least one station be owned by the relevant town. Prohibit any “network” — make any such arrangements a per-se anti trust violation.
Amend the antitrust laws to prevent the ownership of more than one newspaper by any set of related parties.
Massively shorten copyright times. Copyright, through its centralized ownership, is a massive tool of central control, permitting “unwanted” narratives to be removed from public dissemination on copyright and purported “financial” grounds. Thus, for entertainment copyrights, shorten terms to perhaps 10 years. And copyrights owned by any news outlets, visual or written, permit only a two-day copyright period; thereafter any news organization’s product is public material with, at most, an ASCAP-like fee to the writers (not the News organizations). Re-use where the re-user gets no monetary compensation would in be royalty free.
Banking. Repeal all laws permitting branch banking. One branch per bank please, and no related ownership. Forget about interstate banking.
Currency. Permit local commodity based currencies and permit gold, silver, and diamonds to act as currencies in any local areas if desired. (This goes to Anonymity as well (see below))
Neutralize; If Possible, Decentralize.
Media. Where media cannot be decentralized, regulate it so as to make its application as neutral as the “Ma Bell” telephone lines of yore. Require that any internet company, bank, airline, train, bus system, or other business with a greater than a 20% market share nationally (or in a local community) may not discriminate in the provision of service based on the speech or ideology of the customer or up-loader. Put in rules demanding all media outlets permit free speech; no hate speech or “group libel” laws.
Banking. Force all credit card consortia or businesses — think Visa or American Express — which in a sense need a nationwide scale to be useful at all — to operate like AT&T: each must serve all without any regard to the political views or speech of customers — card users or card takers.
Currency. No restrictions may be put on the use of currency; to the extent it is not anonymous, use must be without regard to the political views of the user.
Anonymity (a form of neutralization). Wherever possible promote the ability to operate — online and offline — with anonymity.
Banking. Permit anonymous bank accounts to be established without personal identifying information.
Internet. Work on a regulatory regime for the internet demanding that all platforms permit use of their services anonymously, without giving one’s name or other identifying information. Make taking a plane like taking an NYC cab in 1965. Work with DARPA and institutions like Cal Tech to develop an anonymous internet — one in which the user of a site could not be tracked or even recorded.
Money: promote the use of cash. Permit local and commodity-based (e.g., gold-based) currencies in localities. Commission the US Treasury to develop anonymous cash cards to be used on the internet. Bring back bearer securities, both for government issues and private debt, so that income can be received simply by clipping coupons. Require all corporations to have a certification option and a bearer certificate option. Require all employers to pay in dollars or in gold if so requested by their employees.
Tax. Repeal all the information reporting requirements enacted since 1940, including wage withholding.
Campaign Financing. Limiting spending simply will not work. Instead, eliminate most of the things on which campaign media is spent, which almost uniformly is television. How? Require that every broadcast media go to C-span mode, such that for the three months before every election, primary and general, each of, say, the top 6 candidates by polling or other interim data have their speeches broadcast continuously, with no third party commentary, and no advertisements. The flood of primary data via broadcast will crowd out any ads and will overwhelm the effect of advertising by any other media, as well as prejudiced mainstream media on-air editorials and “talking heads.”
If possible by statute or constitutional amendment, prohibit any funding by any person not resident in the relevant political district or state where the elections are being held. No more field trips to New York where pledges to Israel must be taken, please.
Politics. Limit by statute if possible or constitutional amendment if necessary the holding of elective or appointive office by any person not resident in the relevant district and/or state for at least ten years. No interlopers from Goldman Sachs, please.
Borders. Suspension of All Undesirable Immigration. Ideally, all immigration by persons other than Christian Whites would be suspended for a period of, say, 20 years, with very limited or no such immigration thereafter. Since Jews will be more likely to see this as an attack on them, start with simply a suspension of all immigration for 20 years. Phrase this as a neutral protection for the hard-pressed working class, a purported favorite of left-wing Jews everywhere. Quote the previous statements of Jewish politicians — such as Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders, each of whom had pretty good statements on this back in the day — to defuse charges of anti-Semitism. In this regard, permit state and local governments, as well as private citizen groups, to protect the border without federal involvement, all exempt from any civil or criminal liability for any damage caused.
Military. Jews hate serving in the military, hate the outdoors, hate farm and wild animals, and hate camping. Thus the main infantry will never be overrun with Jews. However, just as with the FBI, the military can be — and is now being — corrupted from above to serve Jewish interests. The solution is to essentially disband the federal Army except for a training force of 50,000 or so men, prohibited by statute from engaging in force anywhere in the U.S. without a two-thirds vote of Congress and a two-thirds vote of the State legislature in any state where the US Army intends to operate.. Instead require towns to field and pay for local militia. The militia can be centrally trained to high and uniform standards, but they cannot be called out except by vote of the local towns or, perhaps, the State legislature by a two-thirds vote which would lapse automatically at the end of each six month period. Every male would have military training, so that this reserve force would constitute, say, 12 million men. These men would be fully armed with the most modern Army equipment, which each would keep in special storage lockers in their homes, essentially like the Swiss, or, for the largest weapons, at local town armories. So much for attempts to get rid of the Second Amendment. Militia would have legal precedence over (a) local police and (b) any state or federal police, armed agents, or army personnel. They would thus be entitled to defend their own and neighboring towns from state or federal incursion with lethal force without any legal ramifications. Jews will hate this. But, on its face, it is neutral.
Eliminate. Eliminate foreign relations. Given its recent track record, it is not clear that the US should be allowed to have a foreign policy, given that it has done so much damage to itself and the rest of the world in the last 30 years. Of course the reason is that our foreign policy has been delegated to the Jewish Nation. It would be better to have no foreign policy at all than one controlled by enemies of our country, enemies that undercut our interests at every turn.
Bricker Amendment. At long last, pass the Bricker Amendment to the Constitution, reversing an ill-advised Supreme Court decision effectively holding any international treaty will override the Constitution. If the power to override the Constitution via treaties is left in the hands of the Senate, it will defeat every proposal set forth above simply by way of a web of nefarious treaties. This has been, and is being, done at every turn.
Treaties. A massive withdrawal from most US treaties is in order. Top of the list:
(a) Every extradition treaty. Under these treaties US citizens can be extradited to barbarous foreign judicial systems. This treaty network is the product of our police elites — read the FBI and DEA — that feel more comfortable with their “cop-counterparts” in foreign nations than they do with the American people and that, in any case are now fully controlled by the Jewish nation.
(b) NATO, SEATO, and the defense treaties with Japan and South Korea. Recognize North Korea and Iran and be done with it.
(c) Selected trade treaties, including possibly the WTO. In essence get out of every treaty that puts restrictions on the on-shoring of our manufacturing capacity.
(d) All human rights treaties.
(e) All asylum or other treaties compelling us to accept immigrants, temporary or otherwise. These treaties were a Jewish thing from the beginning. End it.
Adopt a policy of peace and non-involvement, along with a massive draw down of our international armed forces deployments. The more toys a centralized government has to play with, the more toys for the Jewish National toy box. Not good.
It will not have escaped the reader’s attention that most of these measures — though not all, e.g., campaign financing — are libertarian and De Toqueville-esque. The beauty of this is that libertarianism is effectively a Jewish movement! Think Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman, Alan Greenspan, and Murray Rothbard. Thus, the bulk of these proposals use Jewish momentum against itself. Much like a Judo throw. In any case, at least initially, if skillfully presented, they will not immediately attract the combined rage of the Jewish establishment.
John B. Connolly, World War II combat veteran, confidante of Lyndon Baines Johnson, former Governor of Texas (remember Dealy Plaza?) and U.S. Secretary of the Treasury — no inexperienced student of power — stated that if he were to take over a country he would go immediately to control three institutions: the banks, the media, and the military.
Funny how our proposals above puts each of these institutions back to the local level, effectively under local control. Under the control, that is, of the people of the United States.
So that we may, at long last, have a government by, for, and of the people, which may not perish from the earth.
Here’s to John Bricker. May his soul rest in peace.
1/ The fall off in numbers when one travels up the bell curve is nothing short of astounding. Non-Ashkenazi whites have a mean IQ of 100. On this basis, a standard deviation is about 15 IQ points. Only 2% of the population has an IQ 2 standard deviations above the mean (IQ 130 or above); Only 1% has in IQ of 135 or above; and, only 0.13% of the population has an IQ at or above 3 standard deviations above the mean (an IQ of 145 or higher). Since the Ashkenazim have a mean IQ of about 111, the entire Ashkenazi bell curve is shifted up by close to a standard deviation as compared to goyim Whites. Accordingly, while only 0.13% of non-Ashkenazi whites have an IQ at or above 145, about 2% of Ashkenazi do. Applied to estimated population numbers in the United States of 5 million for Ashkenazy Jews and 200 million for non-Ashkenazi whites, the result is that about 100,000 Ashkenazim should have an IQ at or above 145, and about 260,000 non-Ashkenazi whites would be expected to have an IQ of 145 or greater. Of this total of 360,000, therefore, the Ashkenazie constitute almost 30% of the “top end” intellects in the country. Accordingly, they are overrepresented by almost a factor of 6 compared to their actual numbers in the population. And then, there’s ethnic networking and concentrating in particular sectors, like media, law, social sciences….