Part Of The War Our Government Declared....on you has now been disclosed. There are multiple reports -- now confirmed, not suspected -- of law enforcement officers and others in positions of public trust (e.g. School Administrators) where the employee ...

 .... on you has now been disclosed.

There are multiple reports -- now confirmed, not suspected -- of law enforcement officers and others in positions of public trust (e.g. School Administrators) where the employee in question was both an illegal alien and passed E-Verify.

Which means the system is intentionally corrupt in that those people are using stolen credentials......

......Therefore that lack of investigation and prosecution is intentional and I remind you that when it comes to firearms mere possession by an illegal alien is a felony.  Not a single federal official, past or present, gives a wet **** about all the illegals here using stolen credentials.  Not one -- including the entire Trump Administration up to and including Trump himself, despite the fact that every single stolen identity screws the American who has their identity stolen and such is a felony so spare me the lie about all those illegal aliens doing so "didn't commit any crimes."  Each and every one of them committed a federal felony and nearly all States also make identity theft a felony as well (its a Class "D" felony in Tennessee, for example, for the person who does it and a Class "C" felony for those who traffic in said documentation.)

America's government and the entire medical and illegal alien employers have declared war on all United States citizens.  Each and every Senator, Representative, Executive Agency employee and office-holder has taken an oath to faithfully execute the laws and each and every one has willingly and knowingly not done so...

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=254903 

ALL IS WELL, OR IS IT? – The Burning Platform

 My government overlords and their legacy media propaganda outlets tell me the economy is booming because GDP is between 4% and 5%, the stock market is near all-time highs, inflation is declining, unemployment is low, and AI is going to transform our world for the better. According to their narrative, All is Well. Meanwhile, all hell is breaking loose in every facet of our everyday lives. We are seeing 6 sigma (once in 500 million) events in multiple markets (gold, silver, JPY bonds) within one week. Well functioning non-manipulated markets based on price discovery do not crash by 40% in one day, like silver did last week.

Government shutdowns, ICE shootings, massive welfare program fraud, passing more bloated spending bills, fake staged shutdowns, violent upheaval in Democrat run urban shitholes, uncovering and ignoring the 2020 election fraud, Democrats (with RINO support) desperately trying to stop the SAVE Act voter ID bill to continue their election fraud scheme, and Trump tariffing and threatening every country on earth if they don’t do what he says, makes every day seem like an exhausting slog towards perdition.

And now we know for a fact the world is run by Satan worshiping, vile, child molesting pedophiles, powerful sadistic billionaires, who use politicians, bankers, and their propaganda media whores to coverup their crimes against humanity. The information which has seen the light of day is revolting, disgusting, criminal, and makes any normal person physically ill. Imagine the material they haven’t released or have already destroyed. The evilness, degeneracy, and immorality of their acts is incomprehensible to the average person trying to live a moral life, earn a living and raise a family....

...When you hear the bubble headed bimbos on CNBC cackle like Kamala about the all-time high in the S&P 500, you might want to keep the chart below in mind. The stock market measured in gold is at a 12 year low and is exactly where it was during the 2008 Great Financial Crisis. Those vacuous nitwits will never tell you gold has been the investment of the 21st century, going up by a factor of 17.5 versus a factor of 5 for the S&P 500. Gold isn’t really going up, the value of your perpetually printed fiat is going down.

If you want to know the real reason gold and silver have soared and inflation numbers have begun to go higher, look no further than Powell and his Fed cronies firing up the old fiat printer by printing like we are in a financial crisis. Why would the Fed need to rapidly expand the money supply, cut rates by 175 basis points, and begin new QE bond purchases if ALL WAS WELL? Because all is unwell. This Potemkin economy is nothing but kabuki theater smoke and mirrors, with the average person struggling to survive, seeing utility, food, rent, insurance, taxes, tolls, and all daily living expenses continuing to outpace their income.

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/02/05/all-is-well-or-is-it/ 

...The real question in my mind is whether they “pull it” before or after the mid-terms. Based on Trumps actions, totally contrary to what he campaigned on and promised his voters, I have begun to believe he was installed to usher in another global financial collapse, with his “solution” being totalitarian government control of everything and everyone. The First and Second Amendment will be discarded. When the financial system enters collapse mode, they will bail-in (take) your 40lks, investment accounts and bank accounts in order to “Save the System”. All good patriots will go along, just like they did during the Covid plandemic. Your beloved overlords will dole out a certain amount of CBDC tokens to replace the money they stole from you.

Trump is one of them, as revealed by the Epstein files. When your government redacts the names of the pedophiles who raped children rather than the victims, you know your government does not represent you. The release of these monstrously despicable documents, with no effort to prosecute or arrest anyone, is meant to make us feel helpless and powerless to hold these fiends accountable. We are ruled by demonic, child sacrificing, satanists and we are not voting our way out of this. They seem to want violent upheaval, war, and chaos across the globe because they think it will benefit them. No one is coming to rescue us, because they are all in on it. After listening to Putin’s assessment of the West, you know why they are trying to destroy Russia.

“The West is being run by satanic pedophiles. They want to normalize pedophilia. They got accustomed for centuries to filling their bellies with humans flesh and their pockets with money. But the vampire ball is coming to an end.” – Vladimir Putin

We are truly in an existential battle between good and evil. The sinister  psychopaths and their fiendish acolytes wield their power and wealth like a cudgel against the common man. They take joy in the misery and suffering of others. This is nothing but a game to them, and we are all expendable pieces on their board. Time is growing short and trust in any and all politicians, bankers, academics, and media personalities has dissolved. Our future as a country and a people will depend on the individual choices of millions of good people over the next few years. We outnumber these Satan worshiping deviants by millions. The law does not matter, because they wrote the law. They need to pay for their crimes by any means necessary. Buy more guns and ammo. Prepare for the ultimate battle.

Lincoln’s Union Army Was More Evil Than the Israeli Defense Force - Paul Craig Roberts

 Recently someone sent me a copy of Walter Brian Cisco’s book, War Crimes Against Southern Civilians. Until I began reading this book, I had regarded Israel’s “defense force” as the ultimate in barbarism. The Israelis justify shooting mothers and babies in the head on the grounds that all Palestinians are terrorists, and that the babies will grow up to be terrorists and that the mothers will have more babies that will grow up to be terrorists, and that is better to kill the mothers and the babies before this happens.

The Israelis acknowledge this, but if gentiles repeat it, they are dismissed as antisemites. So it remains knowledge that we know, but are not permitted to repeat.

Apparently, historians have the same policy toward the war crimes inflicted on Southern civilians by Lincoln’s Union Army that was nothing but an organized gang of plunderers, murderers, and rapists who make the Israeli “Defense Force” look like benevolent Christians.

Until Lincoln’s invasion of the Confederate States of America, war in the civilized Western world was confined to combatants. Lincoln broke the code of civilized warfare and conducted war against the civilian population of the South. The Americans and the British followed this practice in the war against Japan and Germany. The nuclear weapons of today mean that war is total and is conducted against all of humanity.....

.....In New Orleans, General Benjamin Butler, one of Lincoln’s many incompetent and hate-filled political appointees who had never commanded soldiers, responded to women who complained of the mistreatment of fathers, husbands, sons, and brothers by declaring the women “to be treated as a woman of the town plying her advocation.” Butler’s invitation to his troops to rape southern women astounded the British Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, who condemned it in a speech before the British Parliament.

Just as all Palestinians are terrorists, Southern men in towns under Union Army jurisdiction were shot or hung on the grounds that all Southern men were bushwackers aiding and abetting the Confederacy’s resistance.

When Union soldiers appeared in a Southern town, the town could expect to be totally looted and burnt to the ground. Cisco provides example after example.

When Lincoln’s army appeared on a plantation, the black slave women were mercilessly raped for the failure of slaves to revolt against their masters, thereby supporting the South’s war effort.

Lincoln’s war against the South was a war of hate. Many Union officers and generals were indoctrinated products of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, a propaganda publication that demonized the South as a society of slave owners mistreating slaves, as Union soldiers actually did. The hatred generated by Northern abolitionists resulted in the worst war crimes in human history.....

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/02/paul-craig-roberts/lincolns-union-army-was-more-evil-than-the-israeli-defense-force/ 

......When the extraordinary war criminal Abraham Lincoln went to war against the Confederacy, he went to war against the American Constitution. It was Lincoln who destroyed the United States that was created by the founding fathers as a union of sovereign states who had under the Constitution most of the governing powers.

As Lincoln repeated over and over and over, his war against the South was a war to make the South pay the tariff necessary to finance the industrialization of the north. Lincoln never said that he went to war to free slaves, at least not during his war. The Emancipation Proclamation was a war measure designed to produce a slave rebellion that would result in Southern troops leaving the front lines and returning to their homes to protect their families. The proclamation only applied to slaves in areas under Southern control. As Lincoln’s Secretary of State noted, the proclamation did not apply to any areas under Union control.....

....I have always thought that the collapse of American morality occurred in the 20th century, but Cisco’s book makes it clear that American morality collapsed during  1860-1865 and the following decade of Reconstruction during which everything in the South of value was stolen by the North.

The South did not recover from its looting and gratuitous destruction until after World War II.

In view of the unprecedented harm Washington inflicted on Southern people, it is extraordinary that the military of the United States would not exist were it not for the voluntary enlistment of Southern men. These are men who know nothing of their history, or of the torment of their ancestors by the government to which they give their lives. If this is not the total failure of a historical consciousness, what is it?.....

.....A Union soldier from Illinois wrote home that the Union soldiers had so abused the Southern blacks that “many of them have learned to hate the Yankees as much as our Southern brethren do.  The army is becoming awfully depraved. How the home folks will ever be able to live with them after the war, is, I think, something of a question. If we don’t degenerate into a nation of thieves, it will not be for lack of the example set by the Union army.”

The only civilization that existed in North America in the 19th century was in the South, and the evil war criminal Abraham Lincoln destroyed it.

And the monument to Lincoln has not been taken down.

Veriphysics: The Treatise 006 - Vox Popoli

 

VII. The Scientific Failures

Science was the Enlightenment’s proudest achievement. Here, at last, was a method that worked: systematic observation, controlled experiment, mathematical formalization, rigorous testing. The results were undeniable. Physics, chemistry, medicine, engineering—the sciences transformed human life and demonstrated the power of disciplined reason applied to nature.

The prestige of science was not unearned. But the Enlightenment made a subtle and consequential error: it confused the success of scientific method within its proper domain with the sufficiency of scientific method for all domains. If physics could explain the motions of the planets, perhaps it could also explain the motions of the soul. If chemistry could analyze the composition of matter, perhaps it could also analyze the composition of morality. The success of science in one area became an argument for its supremacy in all areas.

This confidence has not aged well.

The institution of science, as distinct from the method, has proven vulnerable to precisely the corruptions that the Enlightenment imagined it would transcend. The guild structure of modern academia—tenure, peer review, grant funding, journal publication—was designed to ensure quality and independence. In practice, it has produced conformity and capture. The young scientist who wishes to advance must please senior scientists who control hiring, funding, and publication. Heterodox views are not refuted; they are simply not funded, not published, not hired. The revolutionary who challenges the paradigm does not receive a hearing and a refutation; he receives silence and exclusion.

The replication crisis has revealed the extent of the rot. Study after study, published in prestigious journals, approved by peer review, celebrated in the press, has proven impossible to replicate. The effect sizes shrink, the p-values evaporate, the findings dissolve upon examination. In psychology, in medicine, in nutrition science, in economics, the literature is contaminated with results that are not results at all but artifacts of bad statistics, selective reporting, and the relentless pressure to publish something—anything—novel and significant.

Peer review, that supposed guarantor of quality, has been exposed as inadequate to its function. The peers are competitors; the reviews are cursory; the incentives favor approval over scrutiny. Fraud, when it is detected, is detected years or decades after the damage is done. The process filters for conformity to existing paradigms, not for truth. The Enlightenment imagined science as a self-correcting enterprise; the corrections, it turns out, are slow, partial, and fiercely resisted by those whose careers depend on the errors.

It is in biology that the Enlightenment’s scientific project reaches its apex—and its most consequential failure.

https://voxday.net/2026/02/07/veriphysics-the-treatise-006/ 

Veriphysics: The Treatise 005 - Vox Popoli

 

VI. The Usury Revolution

The failures of Enlightenment philosophy examined thus far—political, juridical, economic, scientific—share a common feature: they all represent the systematic failure of ideas. The social contract is a logical fiction. The law of supply and demand does not describe real markets. The theory of evolution by natural selection cannot survive the genetic arithmetic required. These are intellectual errors, and intellectual errors can, at least in principle, be corrected by the presentation of better arguments and more predictive models.

But the Enlightenment itself did not triumph through better arguments. It triumphed through rhetoric and institutional capture, and institutional capture requires resources. Ideas need patrons, publishers, platforms, and time. The philosophers needed salons; the salons needed hosts; the hosts needed wealth. The question of how the Enlightenment acquired the resources to propagate itself across centuries is not peripheral to its success; it is central. And the answer lies in a revolution that preceded and enabled all the others: the revolution in usury.

The Ancient Prohibition

The prohibition on usury is older than Christianity. It is older than Rome. The condemnation of lending at interest appears in the earliest legal codes of civilization and persists across cultures that had no contact with one another.

In Rome, the Twelve Tables—the foundation of Roman law, dating to approximately 450 BC—restricted interest rates and imposed severe penalties for usurious lending. The Lex Genucia of 342 BC banned interest entirely, though enforcement proved difficult. Cato the Elder, asked what he thought of lending at interest, replied: “What do you think of murder?” The Roman tradition understood usury as a form of theft—the extraction of wealth without the creation of value, the exploitation of necessity, the conversion of time itself into a commodity to be sold.

Long before Rome, the Greek philosophers concurred. Aristotle, in the Politics, condemned usury as the most unnatural form of wealth-acquisition. Money, he argued, is a medium of exchange, a measure of value, a tool for facilitating transactions. It is sterile; it does not breed. To charge for the use of money over time is to treat money as though it could generate offspring—to pretend that a tool has become a living thing. The unnaturalness of usury, for Aristotle, was not merely economic but metaphysical: it violated the nature of what money is.

The Jewish tradition prohibited usury among Israelites while permitting it in dealings with foreigners, a distinction that would later have significant historical consequences. The relevant passages in Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy are unambiguous: “If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not treat it like a business deal; charge no interest.” The prohibition was grounded in the covenantal relationship among the people of Israel and the recognition that interest charges exploit vulnerability.

Christianity universalized the prohibition. The Fathers of the Church—Clement of Alexandria, Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa, Ambrose, Augustine, Jerome—condemned usury without exception. The medieval canonists developed the prohibition into a sophisticated legal and theological framework. The Third Lateran Council (1179) declared that manifest usurers should be denied Christian burial. The Second Council of Lyon (1274) prohibited rulers from permitting usury in their territories. Thomas Aquinas, in the Summa Theologica, provided the definitive philosophical analysis: to charge for the use of money is to sell what does not exist, to charge twice for the same thing, to violate both justice and the nature of money itself.

This was not arbitrary religious scruple. The prohibition rested on reasoned analysis of what money is and what lending involves. It reflected practical observation of what usury does to communities: concentrating wealth, dispossessing debtors, converting productive economies into extractive ones, transferring resources from those who labor to those who lend. The ancient and medieval world understood what the modern world has forgotten: that unrestricted usury is a solvent that dissolves social bonds and a weapon that transfers power from the many to the few.

The Erosion

The prohibition held for over a millennium. But it eroded, gradually, under the pressure of commercial expansion and the ingenuity of those who wished to circumvent it......

Fill text: https://voxday.net/2026/02/06/veriphysics-the-treatise-005-2/ 

.....The Inversion Complete

The trajectory is now complete. What was prohibited has become mandatory. Modern economies do not merely permit usury; they require it. The entire financial system rests on debt: consumer debt, corporate debt, government debt. Money itself is debt—a liability of the central bank, created through lending, destroyed through repayment. An economy that repaid its debts would be an economy without money. The system requires perpetual expansion of debt to function; deleveraging is not an option but a crisis.

What was vice has become virtue. Borrowing is “investment.” Saving is “hoarding.” The debtor is a contributor to economic growth; the saver is an obstacle to prosperity. The moral vocabulary has been inverted along with the practice. Prudence, the ancient virtue of providing for the future, is now deemed to be an economic drag. Profligacy, once considered the ancient vice of consuming beyond one’s means, has become the primary engine of economic growth through consumer and government spending.

The Enlightenment’s intellectual victory was underwritten by this financial revolution. The ideas could not have propagated without the resources; the resources could not have been generated without the legitimization of usury; the legitimization of usury required the abandonment of the tradition’s moral and economic framework. The battles were connected. The tradition lost on multiple fronts simultaneously, and the losses reinforced one another.

Understanding this history is essential for any project of renewal. The tradition was not merely out-argued; it was out-spent. Any attempt to recover what was lost must reckon with the material conditions of intellectual life. Ideas need institutions; institutions need funding; funding, in the modern world, is controlled by those who control credit. The tradition cannot simply reassert its truths and expect them to prevail. It must build alternative structures, cultivate alternative resources, play the long game with the same patience and persistence that its opponents displayed.

The usury revolution was not incidental to the Enlightenment’s triumph. It was foundational. And the financial, social, and moral consequences of its acceptance remain with us, shaping the conditions under which any attempt at civilizational renewal must operate.

DISCUSS ON SG

Veriphysics: The Treatise 004 - Vox Popoli

 

V. The Economic Failures

The Enlightenment extended its confidence to the economic realm. Just as reason could discern the laws of nature and the principles of just government, so too could it uncover the mechanisms by which wealth is created and distributed. The result was classical economics, with its promise of prosperity through rational organization of production and exchange.

Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, published in 1776, became the founding text of this enterprise. At its heart lay the law of supply and demand: the elegant mechanism by which prices adjust to balance what producers offer and what consumers desire. Let the market operate freely, Smith argued, and an invisible hand would guide individual self-interest toward collective prosperity. The baker bakes not from benevolence but from self-love, and yet we all have bread.

The law of supply and demand became the bedrock of economic reasoning. It appeared in every textbook, was taught in every university, and informed the policy of every nation that aspired to modernity. For two centuries, it seemed as solid as Newton’s laws.

It was an illusion......

https://voxday.net/2026/02/05/veriphysics-the-treatise-005/ 

.....No one who has watched the hollowing-out of the American industrial heartland, the stagnation of Western wages, the rise of the Chinese export machine, can believe that free trade has delivered on its promises. The economists who assured the public that the gains would be shared, that the dislocations would be temporary, that retraining would absorb the displaced, these economists were not necessarily all lying. But they were reasoning from simplified models that did not describe reality and mistook the coherent elegance of their mathematics for the truth.

And finally, for three hundred years, we have been assured by the economists that debt did not matter. They even omitted it from their most complicated equations and declared that it did not matter if Peter owed Paul or Paul owed Peter, that debt was just a variable on both sides of the equation that cancelled itself out. Now the entire Western world awash in debts it cannot pay and institutional investors now own 20 million private homes, 15 percent of the total housing stock in the United States.

This, too, is a consequence of the Enlightenment’s successful war on the laws that once prevented people from falling into debt servitude. Now debts are increasingly noncancelable even by bankruptcy, the total U.S. debt is $106 trillion, and each and every native-born U.S. citizen’s share of that debt is $365,500. Instead of making everyone wealthy as was promised, the economics of the Enlightenment have turned a once-free people into a collection of debt slaves.

DISCUSS ON SG

Veriphysics: The Treatise 003 - Vox Popoli

IV. The Inversion of Rights

No concept is more central to the Enlightenment’s self-understanding than the idea of natural right, the inherent entitlements that belong to every human being by virtue of reason and nature, prior to and independent of any government. Life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness: these were to be the inviolable foundations upon which a just, rational, and enlightened society would be built.

The subsequent history of human rights demonstrates something the Enlightenment philosophers clearly did not anticipate and never discussed: a right without a sound basis is a right that can be redefined, expanded, contracted, and ultimately inverted by a government deemed capable of granting and defining them.

Consider the fate of intellectual freedom, that most cherished of Enlightenment values. J.B. Bury, in his 1913 History of the Freedom of Thought, offered a confident chronicle of humanity’s liberation from the shackles of religious and political censorship. The trajectory seemed clear: from the persecution of Socrates, through the medieval suppression of heresy, to the hard-won victories of the modern age, mankind was progressing toward ever-greater liberty of mind. A great scholar and the editor of The Cambridge Medieval History series, Bury wrote as a true believer in Enlightenment ideals, and his beliefs were representative of educated opinion in his time.

The subsequent century has not vindicated his optimism.

https://voxday.net/2026/02/04/veriphysics-the-treatise-003/ 

.....Even as the scope of the freedom was expanded, the Enlightenment tradition also expanded the domain of regulating speech. Once expression is the category, expression can be parsed, distinguished, and classified. Some expressions are protected; others are not. And who determines the boundaries? Those with the power to enforce them.

The terminus of this progression is now visible. In the nations most committed to Enlightenment values, the ones that pride themselves on their liberal traditions and constitutional protections, speech is criminalized today to a degree that would have astonished Bury. In Britain, in Germany, in France, in Canada, and increasingly in the United States, one may not express, and in some cases may not be permitted to hold, certain prohibited thoughts. “Hate speech” codes, “anti-discrimination” requirements, “anti-extremism” measures: the vocabulary varies, but the effect is consistent. The freedom of thought that Bury celebrated has become the regulation of expression that his heirs enforce.

The right, unmoored from any transcendent ground and no longer endowed by Man’s creator, transmogrified into anything those in power declared it to be or not to be. The freedom to think became the freedom to speak, became the freedom to express, and became the freedom to express only what is permitted, which is to say, no freedom at all. The Enlightenment’s signature achievement consumed itself through its own warped logic, and those who enforced the final inversion did so in the name of the very values they were negating.

Nor was this the only right that was modified over time. The right of free association transformed into the crime of racism. The right to worship the Christian God was reduced to the right to pray in silence so long as no one noticed. The right of self-defense was inverted into an obligation to retreat. Even the marital rights of a man to his wife and children, honored throughout the centuries, were reduced to nothing more than financial obligations.

The is not a corruption of Enlightenment principles by its enemies. To the contrary, it is the application and extension of those principles by their truest believers.

DISCUSS ON SG