The Lies of Judeo Peterson - Vox Popoli - (As only Vox Day can summarize it - made my day! - CL)

READ IT ALL: https://voxday.net/2026/07/15/the-lies-of-judeo-peterson/ 

Jordan Peterson has set aside the apple cider and the meth long enough to delve into Judeo-Christian mythology.

With regard to “Judeo Christian”:

The 10 Commandments are Jewish.

The great stories of the Old Testament are Jewish.

The Jews developed the idea of subsidiarity as the alternative to tyranny and slavery.

The Jews established the cultural preconditions for the rise of universal literacy.

The fate of Israel at the hands of the Islamists is the fate of the West.

This rising tide of anti-semitism sickens me. Those of you engaging in it for your oh-so-moral reasons—you’re despicable.

And remember, you proud “Christians” objecting in all your purity to the term:

Christ Himself was a Jew.

First, the 10 Commandments are not, and have never been, Jewish. They are divine. Even if we credit them to Moses, Moses was not of the tribe of Judah. Moses was a Levite.

Second, a few of the great stories of the Old Testament are Jewish, but most of them are not. In fact, the first two Jewish stories from the Bible involve a) slavery, and b) incest. Judah was the one who convinced his brothers to sell Joseph into slavery rather than killing him and was later seduced by his daughter-in-law and had not one, but two sons by her.

Third, Jews were the biggest slave owners in American history and the primary owners of the New World slave trade. They have never had any moral problem with slavery, and some of them still believe that their satanic god is going to provide each of them with more than two thousand slaves apiece when they rule the world.

Fourth, Gutenberg wasn’t a Jew. Also, what universal literacy? Literacy rates have been falling in the West for decades.

Fifth, Israel is currently a significant problem for the West. The West’s fate is not tied to Israel’s in any way, shape, or form.

Sixth, anyone who believes that anti-satanism is anti-semitism is a satanist. Repent.

And finally, Jordan Peterson has absolutely no standing to say anything whatsoever about Christianity. He is, quite literally, on the other side and a servant of evil, both material and spiritual. He is an occultist and a blasphemer, and his own books indicate that he is at least demonically-oppressed, if not actually possessed.

Jesus Christ of Nazareth was a Nazarene and possibly of the tribe of Judah, although the Bible never identifies to which tribe Mary belonged. We know that Joseph was of the tribe of Judah, but Jesus was not his son. The Romans have a better documented claim to him. Regardless, Jesus Christ does not appear to have ever been a member of the satanic Babylonian religious group that hated him and demanded his death; at that time the Pharisees were mostly, though not exclusively, Levites. It is blasphemy to claim that Jesus Christ was a Jew; he was the Son of God, not a son of the Father of Lies.

Now at that feast the governor was wont to release unto the people a prisoner, whom they would. And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas. Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ? For he knew that for envy they had delivered him.

When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him. But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus. The governor answered and said unto them, Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas. Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified. And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.

When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it. Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

The word “judeo-christian” is a satanic rhetorical lie concocted by a small number of Jewish leaders after WWII in order to better help them integrate and gain influence in what was then Christian America. The Chosen, a great novel by Chaim Potok, describes that era. Prior to WWII, the term indicated a former Jew who had converted to Christianity.

This was my direct response to Peterson’s tweet, in addition to the Stonetoss comic.

You’re a satanic liar, Judeo-Peterson. I called you out about your lies concerning Jewish IQ years ago, and now you’re lying about Jesus Christ himself. Also, Moses was a Levite, you apple cider-addled moron. The Old Testament isn’t “Jewish” at all.

Those who lie about the past always rely upon the amphibolic redefinition. It should be no surprise that it was the specific tactic utilized here.

DISCUSS ON SG

(Also, Crush calls out all the tens of millions Evangelical Zionist or Smart Boy Theologian servants of Satan morons who insist on Jews being DaChosen - unless you REPENT! It took me a while to get it through my thick skull, but thank God I eventually did REPENT! - CL)

Should Christians Be Meek? - By Ed Mullen

Take the Money

In 1954, Senator Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas – then embroiled in a contentious reelection campaign in which tax-exempt organizations were supporting his opponent – proposed an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that prohibited all 501(c)(3) organizations, including churches, from participating in or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. The penalty for churches that disobeyed this rule was the loss of their favorable tax status. Churches that refused to self-censor would have to pay taxes. The amendment was slipped into the tax code without a single hearing, without a single minute of floor debate, and without a single recorded vote. It passed in silence – and the churches received it in silence.

If the Pharisees had offered Jesus money in return for his agreement to stop criticizing them, how would he have reacted? The word ‘fury’ and ‘anger’ do not do justice to the outrage he would have expressed. Now fast forward to 1954. American churches were given the same choice: stay true to the word of God – or take the money.

They took the money.

Not one major denominational body objected. Not one prominent Christian leader raised a public alarm. Not one organized campaign of resistance materialized. A provision that effectively placed a gag order on the pulpits of America – prohibiting pastors from speaking to the important issues of the day in the way that ministers had done for centuries – was accepted without so much as a murmur of dissent. The message to the people was clear – the secular state was higher, more powerful, and superior to the church. And by example, the church taught its people that, when faced with the choice between money and the word of God, take the money. The irony is staggering: for the first 165 years of the American republic, pastors had spoken freely on all important and relevant matters of the day. Now they quietly accepted censorship in return for tax breaks.

The churches’ acquiescence to the Johnson Amendment was not a one-time failure. It established a pattern of self-censorship and subservience to the state that deepened with each decade. Pastors learned to avoid all topics that could even remotely be connected to politics. Congregations learned not to expect moral leadership from the church on the urgent questions of the day. The separation was so thorough that when the Alliance Defending Freedom began organizing “Pulpit Freedom Sunday” in 2008 – encouraging pastors to deliberately violate the amendment by preaching political sermons – the IRS did not even bother to comment, so accustomed had everyone become to the silence. The gag was no longer necessary. The churches had internalized it.

Full text: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/07/no_author/should-christians-be-meek/ 

A faith that presents itself as timid, that refuses to engage with the moral and political questions of its day, that teaches its adherents that strength and courage are somehow un-Christian, will inevitably lose the respect of the very people it seeks to attract. Young people in particular – precisely the demographic most alienated from the institutional church – are not drawn to weakness and cowardice. They are drawn to conviction, to courage, to leaders and communities willing to stand for something. When the church chose the path of passivity, weakness, being inoffensive and unwilling to make waves – it made itself irrelevant to the Western world. And so, the Western world abandoned it.

This is the tragic irony at the heart of the misrepresentation. Jesus did not call his followers to be passive. He called them to be gentle in the real sense, to possess power and wield it with wisdom, to stand firm without being cruel, to engage the world with strength under control. The very quality that should have made Christianity formidable in every era – a disciplined, purposeful force that could confront injustice without becoming unjust – was reinterpreted, through the slow drift of a single English word, as a mandate for withdrawal. And the church withdrew. From the political arena. From the public schools. From the great moral debates of the twentieth century. It withdrew not because Christ told it to, but because it chose to.

With the Christian church in decline, the Christian world soon followed. Today we find the West in the midst of mass societal suicide. As Muslims flood into Europe at the invitation of European leaders and the rest of the world is invited to march across America’s southern border by America’s own politicians, the West is committing suicide at a frenetic pace. The momentum of this trajectory is so powerful, so widely embraced by the media, and so well funded by Western elite that it is hard to imagine it reversing. The timidity of the Western church became the timidity of the Western world. Today the West is dying because the Christian church, the foundation of the West, has died.

Russia = Charlie Brown - Vox Popoli

 The Foreign Minister says that this time, for sure, Russia will stop believing that Clown World is going to pull the football away:

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has announced that Russia will no longer believe the West when it claims to seek “negotiated solutions on Ukraine”.....

https://voxday.net/2026/07/15/russia-charlie-brown/ 

.....With all due respect to Mr. Lavrov, once you’ve determined that a party is “agreement incapable” then if you choose to believe anything that party says going forward, it’s really on you. I frankly have no idea why Russia or Iran continue to entertain “negotiations” with any of the Clown World entities at this point nor do I see what positive purpose any pretense at believing in the legitimacy of the fake negotiations serves their interests.

Granted, attrition is on the side of both Russia or Iran, so perhaps they’re simply playing along with Clown World’s desire to postpone its collapse in order to reduce any risks to the process. But if so, then what is the point of publicly declaring, again, that you don’t believe them.

Offload Risks onto the Bottom 90% and Immiseration Follows - C H Smith - (And it requires an ignorant populace - mission accomplished! - CL)

 The underlying story of the past 50 years has been the offloading of risk onto workers and consumers.

On my map of how the world works, we start with structures of control that distribute the good stuff–resources, assets, income and power–and the bad stuff: costs, losses and risks. As I explained in The US Economy In a Nutshell: Privatize the Gains, Socialize the Costs, the current arrangement distributes the gains to the top 10% and the costs and risks to the bottom 90% via privatizing the gains and socializing–i.e. dumping them onto the biosphere and the public–the costs and losses.

This follows a power-law distribution: the few at the top reap most of the gains, and the leftovers, scraps and crumbs are distributed in descending order, with most of what’s left going to the top 9.5% and a diminishing dribble is scattered over the lower 90%, so that by the time we get to the bottom half of households, 170 million people own a grand total of 2.5% of the nation’s financial assets, while the top 0.1% own 16.6%–6.6X the bottom 50%.

A key mechanism in this wildly asymmetric distribution of gains and costs is the system favors capital over wages. As the charts below illustrate, the financial gains go to the owners of capital, and since ownership of capital is highly concentrated, these few owners siphon up the vast majority of the gains.....

Full text:

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/07/charles-hugh-smith/offload-risks-onto-the-bottom-90-and-immiseration-follows/ 

Congress Moving Bill To Criminalize Criticizing Israel - By Chuck Baldwin

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

Attributed to Voltaire

Our federal government—especially under Donald J. Trump—is doing everything it can to suppress free speech in the United States, particularly speech that is critical of Israel. Under Trump, public colleges and universities are under duress and threat of federal sanction if they allow public criticism of Israel by professors, teachers or students. Students—especially foreign students here legally—are threatened with expulsion from the United States if they criticize Israel, even on social media.

You’ve got to give it to MAGA: They LOVE totalitarianism.

Now, however, it is the Congress of the United States that is in the process of attempting to pass a bill that would criminalize criticizing the Zionist state by the People of the United States.

Full text: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/07/chuck-baldwin/congress-moving-bill-to-criminalize-criticizing-israel/ 

Track AIPAC - Follow Israel lobby spending in U.S. politics

Track Your congressmembers

Are your representatives working with the Israel lobby?

Follow the money and find out:

Members of Congress

https://www.trackaipac.com/ 

No Path to Surrender - Vox Popoli - (Sort of reminds me of living in USRAEL - will WeDaPeople allow it? DaJury might still be out! - CL)

 A Swiss journalist travels to Kiev to take the measure of the popularity of the regime that rules the remnants of Ukraine, and what he finds there is not really encouraging for anyone.

There are countless radio and television stations, but they all present a single point of view. All opposition stations in Ukraine have been shut down. Even a completely harmless discussion about the causes of the conflict can lead to criminal prosecution and actual prison sentences. Some journalists have managed to flee and are now operating from outside Ukraine. But they have only very limited influence on the people inside the country; I explained the reasons for this earlier.......

https://voxday.net/2026/07/14/no-path-to-surrender/ 

.....Based on what I was able to gather during my few days there, the regime does not enjoy broad support. It is perceived as a small group of criminals who, with the help of the West, have a firm grip on the structures of power, know how to exploit them brutally, and base everything else on that.

Unfortunately, this leaves Russia with no choice but to end this conflict on the battlefield by military means—a conflict that should never have started in the first place.

The problem, of course, is that the leadership isn’t Ukrainian. The regime is foreign, and is observably less interested in the wellbeing of the Ukrainian people than the Russian leadership is.

This is why empire is a short-sighted endeavor and why permitting foreigners to join the national elite is always a stupid and fatal mistake for a nation. Foreign rulers always come to view the nations over which they rule as tools to be utilized as they please, and will never hesitate to destroy the people if they happen see their destruction as being in their own interest.