Unassimilated for thousands of years, Jews remain aloof and adversarial within host societies, subtly undermining local cultures as if guided by an invisible hand. Consider a European in China or a Chinese in Europe refusing assimilation: naturally, they would seek to weaken the dominant culture and manipulate political structures for self-preservation. Similarly, an unintegrated, adversarial teenager adopted into a family would likely pit members against each other to gain influence.
Historically, elite Jewish groups were granted unique privileges to immigrate in exchange of serving as exploitative intermediaries between ruling elites and the populace—roles such as slave traders, tax farmers, monopoly bankers, monopolist merchants and state advisors. They may have been pivotal in the emergence and expansion of Western statism following the Roman Empire’s collapse, countering the decentralizing tendencies of Germanic and Celtic societies through financial and administrative support to medieval states.
Libertarians like Ralph Raico and Hans-Hermann Hoppe attribute the European Miracle—marked by greater freedom and the Industrial Revolution—to political decentralization, enabling mobility of people and capital. They highlight medieval Europe’s natural order and decentralization that in some areas like Iceland and Ireland even led to the withering away of the state. However, they overlook why statism ultimately always prevailed over natural decentralist and secessionist forces. Jewish elite’s financial and administrative contributions may have been not only necessary but sufficient to tip the balance.
Exploitation services
Under a natural order of liberty and voluntary cooperation, peaceful producers seek the highest price, while peaceful consumers pursue the lowest, yielding mutually beneficial trade. Under statism, providers of exploitation services seek the highest price, whereas victims influence prices only through active or passive resistance. During the Middle Ages, the alien Jewish elite offered services, such as slave trading, tax farming, monopoly banking, monopoly trade, tariff collection, regulation enforcement, war financing and intelligence networks to ruling elites. By leveraging Europe’s decentralization, they sought the highest exploitation price. When population resistance grew too formidable, eroding profits, the Jewish elite could persistently explore new strategies in various jurisdictions until they refined the formula for state formation. Ultimately, nearly all rulers found it essential to have their own Hofjude (court Jew) to remain competitive with their peers.
In a natural order characterized by liberty and voluntary cooperation, culturally hostile and unassimilable groups are not permitted to immigrate. Hans-Hermann Hoppe explains:
Under the scenario of a natural order, then, it can be expected that there will be plenty of interregional trade and travel. However, owing to the natural discrimination against ethno-cultural strangers in the area of residential housing and real estate, there will be little actual migration, i.e., permanent resettlement. And whatever little migration there is, it will be by individuals who are more or less completely assimilated to their newly adopted community and its ethno-culture. (Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Natural Order, the State, and the Immigration Problem. Journal of Libertarian Studies. Volume 16, no. 1. Winter 2002.)
In a natural order, hostile and non-assimilable groups would not be permitted to shop around offering exploitation services, particularly since the populace would strongly reject such conduct. Indeed, for centuries the Catholic Church frequently stood with the people against exploitative statist rulers and their agents. However, the alien Jewish elite managed to navigate various regions, refining the blueprint for state formation by leveraging Muslim countries as their operational base. Indeed, the Jewish elite provided similar exploitation services to Arab and Turkish rulers, who initially governed Christian subjects and later ordinary Muslim populations. Christian countries were thus imperiled by aliens from within and without, undermining the natural forces of decentralization and secession.....
Full text: https://www.unz.com/article/libertarians-jewish-dilemma-fuels-genocide-and-nuclear-war/
Zionist imperialism now holds a dominant position in global geopolitics, bolstered by the alignment of British and U.S. foreign policy, which increasingly functions as a proxy for Israel’s interests. Jewish elite is now even ready to risk the fate of the petrodollar by provoking other countries with massive sanctions. Various intelligence activities are also escalated now that Mossad dominates both CIA and MI6. The Jewish-led neoconservatives and neoliberals have intensified their assaults on Russia’s Vladimir Putin and China’s Xi Jinping, who openly lead the Axis of Resistance and the BRICS nations. However, these attacks have proven unsuccessful, serving only to strengthen both Russia and China. In desperation, the Jewish elite has pursued dangerous strategies of encirclement, dismemberment, assassination attempts and other regime change strategies, including attempts at color revolutions. Adhering to the principle that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” they have even formed alliances with Nazis in Ukraine, ISIS in Asia, and triads in China. They may also have strategically placed individuals susceptible to extortion—such as Macron, Starmer, and Charles III, long rumored to have unusual sexual proclivities and sham marriages—to lead the nuclear powers France and Britain.
When regime change efforts proved unsuccessful, the Jewish elite supported and armed Ukraine against Russia, Taiwan against China, and launched an overt genocide in Gaza while waging war against the Shia Crescent. The unspoken term linking the Jewish elite’s three-front war is the word “Jew,” as explored in the article “World War Jew?”
Escalating regression
These developments were entirely predictable. Intelligent, adversarial, and unassimilated groups have little option but to continually raise the stakes. This begins with forming an alliance with the state, progresses to a divide-and-rule strategy, then secures dominance first over monetary systems then media and finally foreign policy, and ultimately seeks to dominate geopolitics through proxies. The most dangerous facet of this escalating regression is that both divide et impera strategies and the use of proxies allow the Jewish elite to operate largely unnoticed and persist in their efforts repeatedly. This recurring pattern of escalation has persisted across millennia, yet it proves especially hazardous in geopolitics, where proxy states facilitate the easy and even profitable initiation of never ending wars.
This does not imply that the Jewish elite desires war. Rather, it reflects the inherent instability of all cartels—be they economic or political—which drives them toward monopoly. Failure to vie for supremacy within the power cartel risks swift decline, compelling the Jewish elite to struggle for dominance. However, this pursuit is far more challenging and perilous for the Jewish elite, as, unlike other cartel members, they lack a strong power base. As Jews are a tiny nation, the only means to engage in the power cartel game is through proxies, a strategy fraught with danger, especially when those proxies outnumber them by dozens or even a hundredfold. It seems only a matter of time before these proxies turn against the Jews repeating the historical cycle of the Fatal Embrace.
The Rockefellers and WASP elites also seek to dismantle Russia, China, and Iran by fragmenting them into smaller entities, thereby securing the dominance of the Western ruling elite. However, like their Russian and Chinese counterparts, the WASPs and Rockefellers command vast geographic and high-IQ demographic power bases, allowing them to adopt a patient approach. They resent the Jewish elite’s impulsive, aggressive and genocidal tactics. In particular, the Rockefellers and their proxy, the Trump dynasty, are cautious about starting a three-front war. While content to capture especially European energy markets from Russia and Iran, they strive to avoid escalating conflicts with nuclear powers. The Rockefellers and WASPs are also willing to wait a decade for leaders like Putin, Xi and Khamenei to weaken or pass from power due to age.
In contrast, the Jewish elite, driven by an urgent need to capitalize on their influence while it endures, lack such patience. They feel compelled to raise the stakes swiftly to defeat their formidable adversaries, establish Greater Israel, and shape a global order that ensures their security. They have to win the cartel game and soon.
Conclusion
The Jewish elite has now intensified its actions with its latest escalation: intensifying genocide in Gaza and provoking “limited” nuclear strikes in Russia and Iran. Yet, American libertarians opt to remain silent on the ruling elite and the escalating regression toward war, restricted by the pivotal Overton window shaped by Jewish dominance in American media and even academia. Although many nations prohibit critical discourse about the Jewish elite, U.S. free speech protections endure, yet American libertarians exhibit pronounced self-censorship. To avoid offending Jewish sensitivities, American libertarians choose to remain silent, risking a police-warfare state, genocide, nuclear war and global holocaust.
