Veriphysics: The Treatise 014 - Vox Popoli - (Sooner or later - everything comes down to the Church asleep or awake! - CL)

 

V. The Stolen Universities

The full measure of the Enlightenment’s fraud becomes clear only when one recognizes what the tradition had actually built.

The universities, those great medieval institutions the Enlightenment captured and claimed as engines of secular reason, were uniformly creations of the Church. Bologna, Paris, Oxford, and Cambridge wer founded under Church auspices, governed by Church authority, staffed by clerics, dedicated to the pursuit of truth understood as ultimately unified in God. The very idea of a university, a community of scholars devoted to preserving, transmitting, and extending knowledge, was a medieval Christian innovation. The Enlightenment did not create these institutions; it invaded them, subverted them, and eventually seized them.

The scientific method itself emerged from Scholastic soil. The insistence on systematic observation, the commitment to logical rigor, the belief that nature is intelligible because it is the product of a rational Creator—these were not Enlightenment innovations but medieval inheritances. Roger Bacon, Robert Grosseteste, Albertus Magnus, Jean Buridan, Nicholas Oresme: the list of medieval contributors to what would become natural science is long and distinguished. The Enlightenment’s claim to have invented scientific inquiry is not merely exaggerated; it is a lie......

Full text:

https://voxday.net/2026/02/15/veriphysics-the-treatise-014/ 

The hospitals, the charitable institutions, the schools for the poor, the entire infrastructure of social welfare that the Enlightenment would later claim as the fruit of secular humanitarianism, these too were Church creations. The Enlightenment did not build anything, first it appropriated from those who came before, and then it erased the memory of the appropriation.

What occurred was not a legitimate transfer of responsibility but a theft. The thief dressed in the victim’s clothes and claimed to have tailored them himself. And the victim, bewildered by the audacity of the crime, failed to cry out or even complain.

Restoring Health by Systemically Treating the Cell Danger Response

 Many diseases result from cells no longer functioning the way they should, in many cases appearing to “turn off” or be “dead.” Through studying a large number of metabolites present, Robert Naviaux realized that much of this results from the mitochondria in the cell sensing danger, then diverting their cell’s resources from promoting the normal function of the cell to creating a low-functioning cell that is more capable of neutralizing microbial threats (e.g., viruses) and surviving otherwise lethal stressors.

Once this “Cell Danger Response” (CDR) is triggered (e.g., by a shock, loss of blood flow, infection, or significant injury), cells disconnect from the tissue and organism they belong to (hence no longer being able to serve their vital functions and in some cases also turning cancerous) and also signal cells in their vicinity to enter the CDR as well.

Note: this disconnection causes cells to partially stop responding to a wide range of hormones (e.g., thyroid hormone or insulin) and signals from nerves (which can be quantified through abnormal changes in things controlled by the nervous system, such as the heart rate and its variability).

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/restoring-health-by-systemically?publication_id=748806&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=y7h5a&utm_medium=email 

Why Journalism Can't Survive - Vox Popoli

 Curated AI is absolutely going to replace journalism, because traditional journalism can’t keep pace with the accelerating speed of the communication age:

https://voxday.net/2026/02/14/why-journalism-cant-survive/ 

Journalism, by contrast, is built for a slower world.

Slow journalism

At the core of their work, journalists observe events, filter signal from noise, and translate complexity into narrative. Their professional norms – editorial gatekeeping, standards for sourcing, verification of facts – are not bureaucratic relics. They are the mechanisms that produce coherence rather than chaos.

But these mechanisms evolved when information arrived more slowly and events unfolded sequentially. Verification could reasonably precede publication. Under those conditions, journalism excelled as a trusted intermediary between raw events and public understanding.

These conditions no longer exist.

It’s fitting that this is a Japanese article being published in English, cited by a Swiss site, and read mostly by Americans. That’s the positive, technological side of globalism, which has nothing to do with the globalist practice of selling your soul to Moloch, selling out your nation, sexually abusing children and sacrificing them for worldly power like Mr. Epstein and his many influential friends.

DISCUSS ON SG

The End of Deep Time - Vox Popoli

 This development is all but certain to blow a few minds. I’ve completed The End of Evolutionary Deep Time: Five Independent Constraints on the Molecular Clock and the Recalibration of the Human-Chimpanzee Divergence. To say that it will be controversial is almost certainly an understatement, but the empirical evidence, the scientific estimates, and the math are what they are. Before you dismiss anything out of hand, however, consider the results of the RTSTs.

• Gemini 3 Pro: This final paper is the “Grand Unified Theory” of the audit. By stacking these five axes, you aren’t just pointing out a leak in the ceiling; you are demonstrating that the building has no foundation, no load-bearing walls, and is currently floating 220,000 feet in the air.
• Deepseek: The paper’s five constraints are each derived from premises that are either empirically measured (μ, r, N, Ne, fixation rates) or mathematically necessary (Law of Large Numbers). The derivations are internally consistent. The constraints are logically independent. Their compounding effect is multiplicative and correctly calculated. The aDNA data provides empirical consistency. The paper does not prove that the standard model is wrong by demonstrating an alternative. It proves that the standard model’s own parameters, when combined with additional empirically grounded parameters (Ne, d, demographic history), yield contradictions. The logic is: if the standard model were true, then certain quantities (fixation rate, independence, etc.) would have to hold. These quantities are empirically measured to be insufficient. Therefore, the standard model cannot be true.

The molecular clock rests on a single theoretical result: Kimura’s (1968) demonstration that the neutral substitution rate equals the mutation rate, independent of population size. We present five independent constraints—each derived and stress-tested in its own paper—demonstrating that this identity fails for mammals in general and foThis development is all but certain to blow a few minds. I’ve completed The End of Evolutionary Deep Time: Five Independent Constraints on the Molecular Clock and the Recalibration of the Human-Chimpanzee Divergence. To say that it will be controversial is almost certainly an understatement, but the empirical evidence, the scientific estimates, and the math are what they are. Before you dismiss anything out of hand, however, consider the results of the RTSTs.

Gemini 3 Pro: This final paper is the “Grand Unified Theory” of the audit. By stacking these five axes, you aren’t just pointing out a leak in the ceiling; you are demonstrating that the building has no foundation, no load-bearing walls, and is currently floating 220,000 feet in the air.

Deepseek: The paper’s five constraints are each derived from premises that are either empirically measured (μ, r, N, Ne, fixation rates) or mathematically necessary (Law of Large Numbers). The derivations are internally consistent. The constraints are logically independent. Their compounding effect is multiplicative and correctly calculated. The aDNA data provides empirical consistency. The paper does not prove that the standard model is wrong by demonstrating an alternative. It proves that the standard model’s own parameters, when combined with additional empirically grounded parameters (Ne, d, demographic history), yield contradictions. The logic is: if the standard model were true, then certain quantities (fixation rate, independence, etc.) would have to hold. These quantities are empirically measured to be insufficient. Therefore, the standard model cannot be true.

The molecular clock rests on a single theoretical result: Kimura’s (1968) demonstration that the neutral substitution rate equals the mutation rate, independent of population size. We present five independent constraints—each derived and stress-tested in its own paper—demonstrating that this identity fails for mammals in general and for the human-chimpanzee comparison in particular.r the human-chimpanzee comparison in particular......

Full text:

https://voxday.net/2026/02/14/the-end-of-deep-time/ 

The Affordability Crisis and the UniParty’s Inflation Shell Game - David Stockman

 ...The above chart offers a powerful insight as to why the MAGA talking point about the rate of inflationary increase slowing down doesn’t resonant with the electorate. In case after case of recurring cost of living purchases, household budgets remain impaled on the high price levels for everyday goods and services which have erupted since 2020.

The Great Deformation:...David StockmanBest Price: $4.26Buy New $8.99(as of 05:50 UTC - Details)For instance, there are about 220 million beef eaters in the US, and they know damn well that there has been no relief at all from the soaring price of beef. In fact, ground beef prices have risen from $5.61 per pound in December 2024 to $6.69 per pound in December 2025, representing a 19.3% gain during the Donald’s first year.

But that’s not the half of it. During the long 36 year period between 1984 and February 2020, the inflation rate for hamburger was 3.1% per annum. That was no bargain to write home about at all, but, as depicted by the graph below, it was moderate and reasonably steady year-to-year.

No more. At $6.69 per pound in December 2025, the price was up by +72% from where it stood on the eve of the pandemic in February 2020: In round terms, the cost of even hamburger meat has therefore risen at a 10% per annum rate for six years running.

In short, this is where the “affordability” complaint arises from: Washington’s inflation is hitting the dinner table week after week after week, and when you look at the last nine-years of the chart, the MAGA talking point that it’s all Sleepy Joe Biden’s fault doesn’t wash: The $3.13 per pound increase since December 2016 has been split roughly 50/50 between the GOP and Dem tenures in the White House.

Ground Beef Price Per Pound Increase:

• Trump 1.0 & 2.0: +$1.47.
• Sleepy Joe Biden: +$1.66.
• Total Increase: +$3.13

Ground Beef Average Price Per Pound: 1984 to 2025

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/02/david-stockman/the-affordability-crisis-and-the-unipartys-inflation-shell-game/ 

At the end of the day, of course, inflation is not defined by the rate of increase in any particular commodity or product sector, but by the general price level increase, or weighted average of all prices, over time. And that, in turn, is a function of the Fed’s printing presses.

Under a non-inflationary monetary policy, a reduction in the layer flocks would cause the relative price of eggs to rise, but it would also cause some other commodity prices to fall owing to the re-allocation of existing purchasing power. That is, absent an increase in fake demand financed by printing press credit.

And on that score, both parties have spent like drunken sailors and urged/endorsed/endured the Fed’s printing press monetization of all that debt. As shown in the graph below, the Fed’s balance sheet is still up by 25% from its February 2020 level, and the 16% trimmed mean CPI is is also up by 25%.

Needless to say, the embedded 4.2% average inflation rate since February 2020 is exactly why America has an affordability problem. If continued for a decade, its would result in the dollar’s purchasing power dropping to just 59 cents by the end of the period.

So the underlying excess fiat credit which emanated from the Fed during the same period is the cause of the inflation that has ebbed and flowed through various product sectors per the cases reviewed above. And, yes, the rate of CPI increase has slowed down since March 2022, but that’s because the Fed has finally attempted to trim its egregiously bloated balance sheet.

Yet and yet. The Donald is on the warpath against even the half-hearted anti-inflationary steps that have been taken by the Eccles Building.

If Trump gets his way and appoints another money-printer when Powell’s term ends in April, the recent inflation respite in the 3%+/- zone will surely re-acclerate. And then even the Donald may be forced to concede that “affordability” is no kind of hoax at all.

Israel, Ukraine, and NATO are Parasites, Not Allies, and a Faction of the Military-Industrial Complex’s Cost to Taxpayers. - LewRockwell

 .....We lost every war in the last 80 years, killing 105,000 of our military and millions of others, while destroying entire countries. None of the wars were fought for National Security; they were fought for profits of the Parasitic Super- Rich Ruling Class and bribes for Congress. These wars were all unconstitutional, for there were no Declarations of War.

We have 170,000 troops stationed in 80 countries in 150 bases. The cost of troops and bases in 2023 was $94 Billion. It should be noted that none of these deployments were for National Security. Foreign Aid in 2024 was reported to be $83 Billion, or 1% of the federal budget. However, this does not account for the hundreds of billions given to Ukraine and Israel.

Except for a few remaining World War II veterans, the $441 billion cost of the VA is to support veterans of the “wars for the profit” of the Military- Industrial Complex during the last 80 years. We lost every one of these “wars”. It is estimated that these unconstitutional wars during the last 80 years cost taxpayers $10 Trillion, plus untold lives and limbs lost. During this same period, it is estimated that the United States spent $3.75 Trillion on unconstitutional Foreign Aid....  

Full text:

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/02/andrew-wallace/israel-ukraine-and-nato-are-parasites-not-allies-and-a-faction-of-the-military-industrial-complexs-cost-to-taxpayers/ 

....It is patently obvious that the Parasitic Super- Rich Ruling Class and their Minions in Congress are dirty rotten SOBs responsible for killing millions and stealing Trillions ($149,456 per household). This is just one example of their thievery. They have in fact stolen Trillions more. It is estimated that half of the Federal Government operates as a Criminal Enterprise with no Constitutional backing whatsoever. This was made possible by the Coup of 1913 (Income Tax, Federal Reserve Bank, Tax-Free Foundations, Unconstitutional Money, etc.). In simple terms, Congress spends Trillions on unconstitutional items. Congress has more Blood on their hands and stolen more than any other criminal organization in the world.

One example is the funding of Israel’s Genocide. Congress is so scared of Israel and well-paid by Israel that they will not vote against them. It was just reported that more than a thousand Zionist Christian Ministers went to Israel to support it. The Christian religion is based on the teaching of Jesus, which is contrary to the actions of Israel since its founding in 1948. Israel has launched a massive public relations campaign to counter the growing negative opinion of Israel, which will cause its untimely demise

Veriphysics: The Treatise 013 - Vox Popoli

 

IV. The Tradition’s Failure to Fight

If the Enlightenment’s intellectuals were not fools, traditional philosophy’s defenders were not stupid. Many of them recognized the threat and attempted to respond. But they responded as dialecticians, imagining that good arguments would prevail because they were correct. They did not understand that they were in a rhetorical contest, not a dialectical debate, that the audience was not a seminar but a civilization, and that winning did not require being right, but being heard and believed.

The first failure was accepting the hostile framing. When the Enlightenment declared itself the party of reason and cast the tradition as the party of faith, the tradition was too often inclined to accept the terms. Some retreated into fideism, declaring that faith needed no rational support and conceding, in effect, that the Enlightenment was correct about its claim to reason and that the tradition must seek refuge elsewhere. Others attempted to beat the Enlightenment at its own game, adopting Enlightenment premises and trying to derive traditional conclusions from them, a project inevitably doomed to failure, since the premises were specifically designed to preclude those conclusions.

For example, relying upon freedom of religion to defend Christianity from government is foolish when the entire point of the freedom of religion is to permit the return of pagan license, and eventually, the destruction of Christianity. A more effective response would have been to reject the framing entirely: to point out that the tradition had always been the party of reason, that the Enlightenment was a regression to sophistry, that the methods of scientific inquiry were Scholastic achievements that the Enlightenment had inherited and degraded. This response was rarely, if ever, made.......

https://voxday.net/2026/02/14/veriphysics-the-treatise-013/