Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. It is therefore futile and foolish to make appeals to Constitutional arguments in an immoral and atheistic society. Our enemies have disregarded what the Constitution says for half a century. It is a mistake continuing to play by a set of rules that our enemies no longer obey. Worse yet, turning a piece of paper into an idol and elevating it to some pseudo “holy” status in our minds.
Andrew Torba is correct. The power is not in the paper, the power is in the ideas and those ideas have been adulterated and perverted wherever they haven’t been abandoned. Neither the words nor the ideas have ever applied in any way to newcomers, immigrants, citizens, illegals, invaders, foreigners, or the children of those diverse peoples, they only ever applied to the Posterity of the Founders, the direct genetic blood descendants of the men who fought the American Revolution against their British brethren for independence from the King of England.
The Constitution was written to safeguard the liberties of the sons and daughters of the American Revolution and no one else. That’s what the Preamble to it says and that’s literally what Posterity meant. And that’s what it still means today, the legalistic fantasies of the would-be inclusive midwits who overrate the importance of their credentials and their own cognitive capabilities notwithstanding.
The words of the U.S. Constitution have never applied in any way to most of the “Americans” who are reading this now. So to fetishize it, to place any trust whatsoever in it, is to fundamentally fail to understand what it is, why it was written, and why it is no longer even remotely applicable to the United States of America in the Year of Our Lord 2024.
No damage therefore, that men in the state of nature suffer from one another, can give a conqueror power to dispossess the posterity of the vanquished, and turn them out of that inheritance, which ought to be the possession of them and their descendants to all generations. The conqueror indeed will be apt to think himself master: and it is the very condition of the subdued not to be able to dispute their right. But if that be all, it gives no other title than what bare force gives to the stronger over the weaker: and, by this reason, he that is strongest will have a right to whatever he pleases to seize on. – John Locke, Of Conquest, Second Treatise on Civil Government, 1690
Last Sunday’s sermon (3/10/2024) at our church was from Mark 15. Verse 21 caught my attention: “They pressed into service a passer-by coming from the country, Simon of Cyrene (the father of Alexander and Rufus), to bear His cross.” Biblical skeptics call for historical proof that Jesus existed and that the NT record is authentic. Many of these critics contend that the Gospels were written very late into the first century. These same critics dismiss Jesus’ prophecy about His coming before that Apostolic generation passed away. In fact, they go so far to say that Jesus was mistaken about His coming (Matt. 24:34). If the gospels were written post-AD 70, why would the supposed inventors of the Christian religion—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—include a blatantly false prophecy in their accounts? It makes no sense.
Some argue that there are no records outside the NT books that authenticate the life, ministry, and work of Jesus. There are 27 historical records that make up the NT. There are no comparable historical records from that era with that much corroborating source material. Luke did a thorough investigation from eyewitnesses:
Since many have undertaken to compile an account of the things accomplished among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word, it seemed fitting to me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in an orderly sequence, most excellent Theophilus; so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught (Luke 1:1-4)
Paul makes a similar argument based on eyewitness accounts (1 Cor. 15:3-8).
You can’t do much better than multiple eyewitnesses: “Every fact is to be confirmed by the testimony of two or three witnesses” (2 Cor. 13:1; see Num. 35:20; Deut. 17:6; 19:15; Matt. 18:16). We know about Roman history by Roman historians who wrote histories of that era. Tacitus wrote the Annals and the Histories that examine the reigns of the emperors Tiberius, Claudius, Nero, and those who reigned in the Year of the Four Emperors (AD 69). These two works span the history of the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus (AD 14) to the death of Domitian (AD 96). Tacitus was born in AD 56, and his Histories was written around AD 100-110. Suetonius wasn’t born until a year before the AD 70 destruction of Jerusalem. The letters (c. AD 61-113) of Pliny with Trajan are the earliest surviving Roman documents to refer to early Christians. These letters prove that Christianity was an early and rapidly growing force in the Roman Empire.
Josephus (c. AD 37- c.100) chronicled the Wars of the Jews. How many contemporary historical works authenticate the works of Josephus or those of Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny, and Plutarch?
Mark’s mention of Simon of Cyrene, “the father of Alexander and Rufus,” is not an insignificant addition to the narrative when it comes to historical authenticity since it tells us something about the time and reliability of Mark’s gospel. These men were known by Mark’s intended audience! They might still have been alive when Mark penned his gospel.
The historicity of the Bible is of vital importance to Christians in that it’s linked to the growth of Christendom and the ultimate meaning of life that begins when we are brought into this world. If the Bible isn’t true, then we are, to use Walker Percy’s book title, Lost in the Cosmos. What we are and how we got here is a speculative mystery that will never be solved. It’s one of the reasons scientists send out probes throughout our galaxy and build high-powered telescopes to search for our cosmic origins. They are trying to find the meaning destroyed with their matter-only cosmos. Carl Sagan defined such a world: “The universe is all that is or ever was or ever will be.”[1] To the Saganites, our planet is nothing more than a revolving “pale blue dot” bobbing in the vacuum of space.
The question of the lack of self-knowledge of the enlightened self, Carl Sagan comes up in Percy’s two-part explanation of “the lonely self.” The first part explains the loneliness of “the autonomous self.” We sometimes experience ourselves these days as “autonomous” or on our own without any guidance in figuring out who [we] are and what we’re supposed to do. The downside of being autonomous is being alone. And the autonomous self can’t help but experience him- or herself not only as all alone in the world of other people, but all alone in the Cosmos that is indifferent to his or her singular existence. For our transhumanists, for example, the fundamental situation seems to be ME vs. the Cosmos (or the nature that is out to extinguish forever MY very being).[2]
Last Days Madness
In this authoritative book, Gary DeMar clears the haze of "end-times" fever, shedding light on the most difficult and studied prophetic passages in the Bible, including Daniel 7:13-14; 9:24-27; Matt. 16:27-28; 24-25; Thess. 2; 2 Peter 3:3-13, and clearly explaining a host of other controversial topics.
Not to go too far afield, but at times Christians seem lost in the cosmos or viewed as barely important interlopers in a world that belongs to pagans. Why did God bother to create the world and put us in it if this world is insignificant or the legitimate domain of kingdom rebels? Why redeem the elect and leave them here? What are we supposed to do post-redemption? Wait for some new directive? Look for the “blessed hope” (Titus 2:13)[3] in something called “the rapture of the church”?[4] (I deal with the meaning of the “blessed hope” in my book Last Days Madness.) Jay Rogers comments:
We ought to be concerned with revival among the churches and world evangelization because it is the commandment of the Lord, not because a famous Christian leader has promoted his evangelistic campaign as a “significant end-times move of God.” It is self-centered and elitist to believe that our generation alone possesses this “blessed hope” (Titus 2:13). In fact, the “blessed hope” does not refer to the Second Coming of Jesus, but to “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Colossians 1:27). It is better to show we love God by obeying His commandments than to gear our lives toward a mad rush to the end times.[5]
Dave Hunt, who was representative of many Christians who hold to a similar rapture-oriented future, wrote the following in his article “Looking for the Blessed Hope”:
Our hope is not in taking over the world, but in being taken to heaven by our Lord, to be married to Him in glory and then to return with Him as part of the armies of heaven to rescue Israel [after what’s left of Israel after two-thirds of Jews living in Israel during the Great Tribulation are slaughtered: Zech. 13:8-9],[6] destroy His enemies and participate in the Millennial reign.[7]
The “great prophetic disappointment” of 1988 and the winding down of the Left Behind franchise do not mean that many formerly “rapture-ready”[8] Christians have abandoned a belief in the return of Christ, but it has led to a fundamental reassessment of the interpretive methodology that has been used to make repeated dogmatic arguments for an imminent end-time event. Many Bible-believing Christians who cut their teeth on the works of notable prophecy prognosticators have questioned the popular end-time paradigm to such an extent that they “are not awaiting [Jesus’] return at the Rapture”[9] but instead are focusing on John Winthrop’s “city upon the hill” metaphor adopted from his “Model of Christian Charity” (1630). They have come to realize that the version of the end times that defined the twentieth century and continues to hold sway in this new century is a prophetic anomaly that had no history prior to 1830:
Pre-Civil War Evangelical eschatology was largely postmillennial, expecting Christ to return in judgment after a millennial reign of one thousand years. Post-Civil War Evangelical eschatology was dominated by a new doctrine of premillennialism. This view expected Christ to return before the millennium to take the saints out this world in an event called the “rapture.”[10]
The Reduction of Christianity
A number of valiant defenders of historical Biblical orthodoxy have risen to the challenge of unbelief. Unfortunately, while ably sounding the alarms and capably rousing the troops, some have reduced the breadth and depth and power of the Faith once for all delivered to the saints. Unwittingly, they have offered the Church a shrunken and truncated version of the Gospel. But we don't have to accept reduction in order to avoid seduction. We can contend for the Faith without condensing or abbreviating it.
After the Civil war, the optimistic worldview espoused by the earlier civilization builders “was replaced by an eschatology that looked for the return of Christ to rescue the ‘saints’ out of this world. Premillennial teaching implied that the world was in such bad shape that it would only get worse until the return of Christ. Some even argued that efforts to ameliorate social conditions would merely postpone the ‘blessed hope’ of Christ’s return by delaying the process of degeneration.”[11]
Christians who are rethinking the sensationalism of contemporary apocalyptic rhetoric have come to realize that America would never have been founded if today’s rapture version of eschatology had been prevalent in the seventeenth century. Where there had been an emphasis on “the propagation and advance of the gospel of the kingdom of Christ,”
[t]he vision was now one of rescue from a fallen world. Just as Jesus was expected momentarily on the clouds to rapture his saints, so the slum worker established missions to rescue sinners out of the world to be among those to meet the Lord in the air. Evangelical effort that had once provided the impulse and troops for reform rallies was rechanneled into exegetical speculation about the timing of Christ’s return and into maintenance of the expanding prophecy conferences.
The extent to which this shift in eschatology was felt throughout Evangelical life and thought is difficult to overestimate. One of the most striking contrasts between pre-Civil War revivalists and those after the war is that the former founded liberal arts colleges while the latter established Bible schools. To the post-war premillennialist the liberal arts college involved too much affirmation of the cultural values of this world and took time away from the crucial task of getting minimal knowledge of the Bible before rushing into the inner cities or the mission fields to father as many souls as possible before the imminent return of Christ. In the late nineteenth century the Bible school movement picked up the message of the prophecy conferences and trained a whole generation of Evangelicals in the new doctrines.[12]
Os Guinness writes that “dispensational premillennialism . . . has had unfortunate consequences on the Christian mind,” including reinforcing an already developing “anti-intellectualism” and a “general indifference to serious engagement with culture.”[13]
The Rapture and the Fig Tree Generation
For decades Christians have been enticed with the belief that they would be taken to heaven before a coming tribulation period in an event called the “rapture.” Since the national reestablishment of Israel in 1948, countless books and pamphlets have been written defending the doctrine assuring readers that it could happen at any moment. Some prophecy writers claimed the “rapture” would take place before 1988. We are far removed from that date. Where are we in God’s prophetic timetable?
[3] Take note of Colossians 1:3-6: “We give thanks to God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, praying always for you, since we heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and the love which you have for all the saints; because of the hope reserved for you in heaven, of which you previously heard in the word of truth, the gospel which has come to you, just as in all the world also it is bearing fruit and increasing, even as it has been doing in you also since the day you heard it and understood the grace of God in truth.” See Gary DeMar, Last Days Madness, updated and revised ed. (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 2020), 223-226.
[4] “[L]ooking for the blessed hope (here, as in Gal. v. 5, Col. i. 5 al., nearly objective,—the hope, as embodying the thing hoped for), and manifestation (hope and manifestation belong together) of the glory (Chrysostom says, “He speaks here of two manifestations; the former of grace, the latter of glory.” Nothing could be more unfortunate than the rendering of the A.V., “glorious appearing,” by which the whole sense is obscured) of the great God (the Father: see below) and of our Savior Jesus Christ (as regards the sense, an exact parallel is found in Matt, xvi. 27, “The Son of man is about to come in the glory of His Father,” compared with Matt. xxv. 31, “When the Son of man shall come in His glory.” See also 1 Pet. iv. 13.” Henry Alford, The New Testament for English Readers, 3 vols.(London, 1865), 2:586.
[5] Jay Rogers, The Days of Those Kings: The Book of Daniel in Preterist Perspective (Clermont, FL: Media House International, 2017), 253.
[6] “For the premillenarian, the massacre of Jewry expedited his blessed hope. Certainly he did not rejoice over the Nazi holocaust, he just fatalistically observed it as a ‘sign of the times.’” Dwight Wilson, Armageddon Now!: The Premillenarian Response to Russia and Israel Since 1917 (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1977), 95.
[7] Dave Hunt, “Looking for that Blessed Hope,” Omega Letter (February 1989), 14.
[8] Todd Strandberg and Terry James, Are You Rapture Ready? Signs, Prophecies, Warnings, Threats, and Suspicions that the Endtime is Now (New York: Dutton, 2003).
[9] Jeff Sharlet, “God Blessed America: How the Christian Right is Reinventing U.S. History,” Harper’s Magazine (December 2006), 14.
[10] Donald Dayton, Discovering an Evangelical Heritage (New York: Harper & Row, 1976), 125.
[11] Dayton, Discovering an Evangelical Heritage, 126
[12] Dayton, Discovering an Evangelical Heritage, 127-128.
[13] Os Guinness, Fit Bodies, Fat Minds: Why Evangelicals Don’t Think and What to do About It (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1994), 63-65.
The saga of Bundeswehr officers plotting to blow up the Kerch bridge with Taurus missiles and getting away with it is a gift that keeps on giving.
The Four Stooges saga of Bundeswehr officers plotting to blow up the Kerch bridge in Crimea with Taurus missiles and getting away with it is a gift that keeps on giving.
President Putin, in his comprehensive interview to Dmitry Kiselev for Russia 1/RIA Novosti, did not fail to address it:
“They are fantasizing, encouraging themselves, first of all. Secondly, they are trying to intimidate us. As for the Federal Republic of Germany, there are constitutional problems there. They correctly say: if these Taurus hit that part of the Crimean Bridge, which, of course, even according to their concepts, is Russian territory, this is a violation of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany.”
Yet it gets curioser and curioser.
When the transcript of the Taurus leak was published by RT, everyone was able to hear Brigadier General Frank Gräfe – head of operations of the German Air Force – speaking with Lieutenant Colonel Fenske from the German Space Command Air Operations on the plan to deploy Taurus systems in Ukraine.
A key point is that during the plotting, these two mention that plans were already discussed “four months ago” with “Schneider”, the successor of “Wilsbach”.
Well, these are German names, of course. Thus it did not dawn on anyone that (Kevin) Schneider and (Kenneth) Wilsbach could instead be… Americans.
Yet that did raise the eyebrows of German investigative journalist Dirk Pohlmann – who I had the pleasure to meet in Berlin years ago – and his fellow researcher Tobias Augenbraun.
They found out that the German-sounding names did identify Americans. Not only that: none less than the former and the current Commanders of the U.S. Pacific Air Forces.
The Four (actually Six) Stooges element gets an extra boost when it is established that Liver Sausage Chancellor Scholz and his Totalenkrieg Minister Pistorius learned about the Taurus plan no less than four months later.
So here apparently we have a clear cut case of top German military officers taking direct orders regarding an attack on Crimea – part of the Russian Federation – directly from American officers in the Pacific Air Forces.
That in itself opens the dossier to a large spectrum ranging from national treason (against Germany) to casus belli (from the point of view of Russia).
Of course none of that is being discussed on German mainstream media.
After all, the only thing that seems to disturb Brigadier General Gräfe is that German media may start seriously prying on the Bundeswehr’s Multiple Stooges methods.
The only ones who actually did proper investigation were Pohlmann and Augenbaun.
It would be too much to expect from German media of the “Bild” type to analyze what would be the Russian response to the Multiple Stooge shenanigans against Crimea: a devastating retaliation against Berlin assets.
It’s so cold in Alaska
During the jolly Bundeswehr conversation yet another “plan” is mentioned:
“Nee, nee. Ich mein wegen der anderen Sache.” (“No, no. I mean the other matter.”) Then: “Ähm … meinst du Alaska jetzt?” (“Ahm, you mean Alaska now?”)
It all gest juicier when it is known that German Space Command Air Operations Centre officer Florstedt will meet none other than Schneider next Tuesday, March 19, in Alaska.
And Gräfe will also “have to go back to Alaska” to explain everything all over again to Schneider as he is “new” in the post.
So the question is: Why Alaska?
Enter American shadowplay on a lot of “activities” in Alaska – which happen to concern none other than China.
And there’s more: during the conversation still another “plan” (“Auftrag”, meaning “mission”) also surfaces, bearing a not clearly understandable code name sounding like “Kumalatra”.
What all of that tells us is that the Crash Test Dummy administration in the White House, the CIA and the Pentagon seem to betting, in desperation, on Total War in the black soil of Novorossiya.
And now they are sayin’ it out loud, with no shadow play, and coming directly from the head of the CIA, William Burns, who obviously sucks at secrecy.
This is what Burns told the members of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee earlier this week:
“I think without supplemental assistance in 2024, you’re going to see more Avdeevkas, and that – it seems to me – would be a massive and historic mistake for the United States.”
That spells out how much the Avdeevka trauma is impressed on the psyche of the U.S. intel apparatus.
Yet there’s more: “With supplemental assistance, Ukraine can hold its own on the front lines through 2024 and into early 2025. Ukraine can continue to exact costs against Russia, not only with deep penetration strikes in Crimea, but also against Russia’s Black Sea Fleet.”
Here we go: Crimea all over again.
Burns actually believes that the humongous $60 billion new “aid” package which must be approved by the U.S. Congress will enable Kiev to launch an “offensive” by the end of 2024.
The only thing he gets right is that if there’s no new package, there will be “significant territorial losses for Ukraine this year.”
Burns may not be the brightest bulb in the – intel – room. A long time ago he was a diplomat/CIA asset in Moscow, and seems to have learned nothing.
Apart from letting cats and kitties galore out of the bag. It’s not only about attacking Crimea. This one is being read with surpreme delight in Beijing:
“The U.S. is providing assistance to Ukraine in part because such activities help curb China.”
Burns nailed his Cat Out of the Bag Oscar win when he said “if we’re seen to be walking away from support for Ukraine, not only is that going to feed doubts amongst our allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific; it’s going to stoke the ambitions of the Chinese leadership in contingencies ranging from Taiwan to the South China Sea”.
The inestimable Andrei Martyanov perfectly summed up the astonishing incompetence, peppered with tawdry exceptionalism, that permeates this performance by Burns.
There are things “they cannot grasp due to low level of education and culture. This is a new paradigm for them – all of them are ‘graduates’ of the school of ‘beating the crap from defenseless nations’ strategic ‘studies’, and with the level of economic ‘science’ in the West they cannot grasp how this all unfolds.”
So what is left is panic, as expressed by Burns in the Senate, mixed with the impotence in understanding a “different warrior culture” such as Russia’s: “They simply have no reference points.”
Even as the acronym fest of the CIA and 17 other U.S. intel agencies have concluded, in a report shown to Congress earlier this week, that Russia is “almost certainly” seeking to avoid a direct military conflict with NATO and will calibrate its policies to steer clear of a global war.
After all the Empire of Chaos is all about Forever Wars. And we are all in the middle of a do or die affair. The Empire simply cannot afford the cosmic humiliation of NATO in Novorossiya.
Still every “plan” – Taurus on Crimea-style – is a bluff. Russia is aware of bluff after bluff. The Western cards are now all on the table. The only question is when, and how fast will Russia call the bluff.
Whatever happened to the war to defend Taiwan against Big Bad China? CSIS ~ ”China’s defense industrial base is operating on a wartime footing, while the U.S. defense industrial base is largely operating on a peacetime footing.” A. US is at war against Palestine. B. US is at war against Russia. C. US is asking for MONEY to combat the rise of China & Russia in Africa. D. US is still at war with Syria stealing all their oil while periodically lobbing bombs. E. US is now bombing Yemen. F. Congress asking for MONEY to build up Taiwan’s military.
I don’t know if these Spy NGO’s that Taxpayers fund are really that ignorant or if they really think lying is just the new normal. The US spends $800 billion on the books for War. Another $1.6 trillion has gone missing in the FY 2023 Budget. That funds 2 additional militaries. Or a whole lot of Bribes, Blackmail, Child Trafficking, and the losses incurred by Soros as a direct result of Ukraine refusing PEACE. Ukraine has 2 last bastions: Kyiv and Lviv. Should those go – the Soros pawns have declared WWIII.
CSIS ~ “China is heavily investing in munitions and acquiring high-end weapons systems and equipment five to six times faster than the United States. China is also the world’s largest shipbuilder and has a shipbuilding capacity that is roughly 230 times larger than the United States. One of China’s large shipyards, such as Jiangnan Shipyard, has more capacity than all US shipyards combined.” The fact that China’s population is 4.25 times that of the US is lost on these neocons of nongenius expertness.
In 2021, China spent $270 billion for all its defense needs – nearly 300% LESS than the US. As a result, the US has bestowed sanctions on every weapons manufacturer in China. That’ll show them! US Blinkens are telling the Saudi Crown Prince, Bin Salman, not to buy weapons from China even though they are half the price of their counterparts – Made in America. IF the Middle East dares to buy weapons from China, then the White House handlers are prepared to punish the Middle East. I remember when we had more allies than enemies…
Remember when Egypt was romanticized? Dr. Zhivago. We were friends with Iran, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, most of Africa, etc … But all that was upsided when the US Coup Program became common knowledge and sovereignty became colonization. Where will all these Zions go when they have finished their task of destruction?
Supressing a giggle, The Atlantic queries, “How has America slid into its current age of discord? Why has our trust in institutions collapsed, and why have our democratic norms unraveled? Despite every historian declaring that ancient societies routinely collapsed due to Climate Change, The Atlantic proposes the cause is The Elite. Apparently, there are too many wealthy and educated persons in America and not enough peasants. Hence the import of uneducated immigrants to do the bidding of The Elite ~ according to an elite research team employed by The Atlantic in data searching variables from 10,000 years of societal collapse.
There are too many qualified people for elite spots in America. As such education must decline radically, IQ’s must stagnate in the 70 range. Worker bees must allow the Elites to hold onto their coveted status in order for America to survive… The Atlantic. The essence of this way of thinking is that – what creates a thriving peaceful society is Communist control via Stalinesque diplomacy. And this, The Atlantic learned by studying the Fall of every civilization.
Of course, the reality is that the Elites studied what caused societies to FAIL and devised The Protocols as the blueprint for assuring this outcome in Europe and America.
Preferred Destinations for the wealthy include: Australia, UAE, Singapore and Switzerland.
Australia is notable for their strict stance on immigrants. Only the wealthy need apply. Those that make it past the barriers are relegated to live on an island penal colony for two years before they can even consider coming to the mainland. Australia’s economy has slowed to a halt. They currently risk a recession with growth on par with the recession of 2008. Why? Because Australia is a mini-me US – they do what they are told and are controlled by the Zion crown in the UK.
Singapore: The current President of Singapore is a UK, London School of Economics, and Harvard grad installed by the Cartel. President Tharman is a member of the G20, the IMF, The UN Development Program, the Group of thirty, and sits on the Board of Trustees for the World Economic Forum. He is ‘well-entrenched’ in the Cartel Club.
The previous president was Halimah Yacob, the first female to ‘win the election’ because all opponents were declared ineligible. She was highlighted for stating she is no longer associated with ISIS upon her uncontested run for president. 83% of her constituents disliked her.
Switzerland is the home of Klaus Schwab and his minions.
And the UAE is a Middle Eastern nation that supports Netanyahu and does the bidding of the US Cartel. Dubai was built on the backs of Indian labor while US and UK oilmen helped cover the real jobs. UAE citizens pay no taxes, healthcare is free, education is free, and a stipulated monthly wage is given to every citizen. 90% of citizens who do work, work for the Emirates government. The UAE is playing chess by formalizing ties with the BRICS while maintaining Western Cartel relations.
Those are the four highest choices for elite immigration. Not necessarily stellar for the plebes and peasants. But clean, vastly drug free, clear distinctions between the rulers and everyone else, and wealthy by default.
Of course, should the UAE decide that China is a good investment, they risk being defriended and subject to sanctions. There is also the issue of a closed Monarchy that cannot be couped. Australia is following the lead of destruction. Which leaves Switzerland and Singapore. Both highly advanced and open to western Cartel control.
China isn’t going to war. Russia has no need or aspirations to colonize. Water may end up the deciding factor as its scarcity becomes an issue with agriculture, cattle, and poultry farms. Singapore, like the Middle East relies on desalinization. 68% of the world’s freshwater is locked up in glaciers and ice. 30% of freshwater is in the ground – where Switzerland derives its source. Rivers and lakes provide less than 1% of freshwater needs. Singapore is out.
Antarctica has garnered quite a bit of attention and conspiracies as of late. The continent contains 90% of the world’s ground freshwater and 60% of all freshwater… Its land is covered by a treaty of 12 nations. While that land might not seem a good investment today, when the magnetic north continues its flip southward, Antarctica will warm. The ice will melt. And perhaps, a new rainforest will emerge…
NOTHING is ever done by The Cartel unless it provides them with abundant control and wealth. NOTHING.
(Israel365News) Couched in a Talmudic twisting of Old Testament prophecy, Jews have revealed their plans for the destruction of Christian America — whom they believe is “Amalek” or “Edom” — the ancient enemies of Israel — by luring America into an unwinnable war against modern ersatz Israel’s greatest existential threat — Iran — a plan that has been in the making for decades:
“On Monday, Houthi rebels fired two anti-ship ballistic missiles from their bases in Yemen into the Red Sea toward merchant vessel Pinocchio, a Singaporean-owned, Liberian-flagged ship. The US navy responded harshly.
“United States Central Command conducted six self-defense strikes destroying an unmanned underwater vessel and 18 anti-ship missiles in Houthi controlled areas of Yemen”, CENTCOM announced.
“It was determined these weapons presented an imminent threat to merchant vessels and U.S. Navy ships in the region,” officials said. “These actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S. Navy and merchant vessels.”
Despite the US navy’s response, the Houthi attacks continued and two drones were shot down by an Italian warship in the Red Sea in what was described as an act of self-defense
On Saturday, Centcom said US and coalition warships had “downed a total of at least 28” drones in what appeared to be a large attempted attack by the Houthis.
On Wednesday, a Houthi attack off the port of Aden killed three crew of the Barbados-flagged, Greek-operated True Confidence. On February 18, a Houthi missile sank the cargo ship Rubymar.
Since the US began its campaign of airstrikes in January, the U.S. military says it has shot down and destroyed more 100 Houthi missiles, according to an Associated Press analysis of its statements.
Claiming to stand with Hamas in its war against Israel, the Houthis have launched attacks against civilian vessels in the Red Sea that have disrupted global shipping, forcing firms to re-route to longer and more expensive journeys around southern Africa. This has stoked fears that the Israel-Hamas war could spread to destabilize the wider Middle East.
During its first weeks in office the Biden administration chose to unconditionally revoke Trump’s decision to classify the Houthis as a terrorist organization but reclassifieed the organization as terrorists in January.
As the Middle East heats up, the US is encountering Yemenite Houthis and other Iranian proxies in hostile encounters.
The US military is even coming close to putting boots on the ground in Gaza as it airdrops humanitarian aid. A US naval vessel is en route, carrying equipment to build a temporary pier off the coast of Gaza.
Hamas has been accused by Israel of violently hijacking trucks carrying humanitarian aid into Gaza, raising the possibility they will be in conflict with US troops distributing food, fuel, and medical equipment to Gaza’s civilians.
Analysts have also noted that Iran is intensifying efforts to expel US forces from northeastern Syria and Iraq by leveraging Hezbollah and various militias. Over 170 missile and drone attacks from October 17 to the end of January targeted coalition bases across northeastern Syria.
After one such attack killed three US servicemen and wounded 25 more, a bipartisan group of Senators called for President Biden to take direct military action against Iran.
The US is finally waking up to the very real threat posed by Iran. Last week, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, publicly released an unclassified version of its yearly report, “Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community,” and senior intelligence officials testified about it before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). The report listed Iran as the third largest threat to US security, after Russia and China, citing decades-long support for proxy groups as a major threat that allows Tehran to assume an aggressive posture “while shielding Iranian leaders from significant consequences.”
This brings to mind a verse in the Book of Jeremiah makes a prophecy that in the end-of-times, the Edom will fight a war against Yemen which it will lose.
“Hear, then, the plan which Hashem has devised against Edom, and what He has purposed against the inhabitants of Teman [Yemen] : Surely the shepherd boys Shall drag them away; Surely the pasture shall be Aghast because of them.” Jeremiah 49:20
The Talmud (Yoma 10a) interprets this verse, explaining that in the future, Rome, descended from Edom/Esau, is destined to fall into the hands of Yemen, as it is stated in this verse by the Prophet Jeremiah. Jeremiah describes that this violent encounter will have global repercussions:
At the sound of their downfall The earth shall shake; The sound of screaming Shall be heard at the Sea of Reeds. Jeremiah 49:21
The Talmud then explains that Jeremiah’s prophecy verse was not referring to Teman/Yemen but that the term “the youngest of the flock” was actually referring to Persia, as per a verse in the Book of Daniel:
“The two-horned ram that you saw [signifies] the kings of Media and Persia; (Daniel 8:20)
The Talmud also identifies ”the shepherd boys” as Persia, the descendants of Japheth, the youngest son of Noah. .
The Talmud then draws an a fortiori inference from the two Temples in Jerusalem which implies that Rome will fall to Persia.
“Just as the First Temple, that the descendants of Shem built it and the Chaldeans destroyed it, and in turn the Chaldeans, ruled by Belshazzar, fell to Persians, ruled by Darius the Mede and his son-in-law Cyrus the Persian; the Second Temple, that the Persians built it and the Romans destroyed it, is it not right that the Romans will fall into the hands of the Persians?” the Talmud concludes.
Rabbi Mendel Kessin, a prominent lecturer, connects Esav throughout history to Edom, Rome, Christianity, Western civilization and, ultimately, to the United States.
According to Rabbi Kessin, America represents the good of Esav. At the End of Days, Rabbi Kessin contends that the sins of Esav will be removed and Esav will become God-fearing. Rabbi Kessin explains that, although Esav has traditionally been associated with oppressing, persecuting and afflicting the Jews, at the End of Days, he will undergo a fundamental change in his character.
Rather than harming Jews, Esav will turn toward serving the Jews, assisting them in doing God’s will in the form of mitzvot (Biblical commandments).
As a result, Esav will be rehabilitated and will earn a place in the World to Come. Further, since Rabbi Kessin believes that spiritual tasks of Esav are being completed by the United States today, he sees the destiny of the United States at the End of Days as a positive one.
This connection between the modern United States and ancient Rome was even noted by the popular political pundit, Tucker Carlson in a video clip.
In the video, Carlson suggested that like Rome, which he claimed fell because its military “became dominated by non-citizens”, the open southern border and shortfalls of military recruitment could combine to pose an existential crisis for the US. A recent House proposal, ironically titled the Courage to Serve Act, would allow the military to recruit qualified migrants who crossed the border illegally.”
Rome simply cannot be Esau/Edom — and to make this spurious claim requires ignoring both the Bible and historical facts.
In fact, during the revolt against Roman rule in Judea, the Edomites (Idumeans) revolted alongside the “Jews” who sought to overthrow Roman rule — and lead to the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD.
This alliance between “the Jews” and the Edomites continued in the second uprising against Rome during the Bar Kokhba revolt in 132 AD which resulted in the final destruction of “the Jews” in Judea — after which they were scattered to the wind.
So please explain — oh, “learned rabbis” — how the Romans battled against both the Edomites and the “Jews” and yet at the same time be identified as “Edom/Esau” themselves.
This makes no sense whatsoever.
The reality is that these rabbis appropriate the concept of Esau/Edom — one of the enemies of the ancient Israelites — as a blanket term to describe any White racial group that opposes their plans for world domination.
These rabbis have called the Romans, the “Nazis”, Christendom — and now the entire White race as “Esau/Edom” — which is quite ironic considering all of these groups are the true Christian-Israel.
As far as the prophecy of Jeremiah is concerned, one again the rabbis twist it to merely justify their current political agenda — the destruction of America, the only White nation left which stands in the way of the ersatz state of modern Israel becoming the only world superpower left standing.
In fact, if you look at a modern map, you will readily see that where ancient Teman was located is approximately 1,200 miles north of modern day Yemen, which lies at the southern end of the Red Sea on the Saudi Arabian peninsula.
Regardless of whether the ancient Persian-Medean Empire was comprised of the descendants of Japheth or Shem through his son Elam is irrelevant — the purpose of this empire was to fulfill Daniel’s prophecy and the restoration of the Israelites held in Babylonian captivity to their homeland in Judea.
Once Israel was restored in Jerusalem, all prophecy relating to the Persian Empire was completed — this empire was already in decline prior to the time when Alexander the Great finally conquered it in 334 BC.
But the final nail in the coffin of Persia — and the original Aryan people who occupied the land — occurred when the Muslim Arabs invaded — aided and abetted by the Jews there— in the 7th century AD.
In typical Jewish fashion, the Jews repaid the Persians for freeing them from their Babylonian captivity and restoring them to Jerusalem by turning around and helping the Arabs invade on conquer Persia.
One Jewish historian — Bernard Lewis — claims that although Persia was conquered by Arab Muslims, it was “Islamized but not Arabized” — implying that somehow the conquered Aryans remained separate and distinct racially from the Arabs — which seems inconceivable to maintain over the last 1,500 years occupying the same land.
We can see in Europe today how quickly the native British, French and English peoples are being Arabized — with the most common birth name in those countries being “Mohammed” — and inter-racial children becoming quite common after only one generation.
While Lewis freely admits that our knowledge of the ancient Persians comes not from Iranian sources but rather from the Greeks and “the Jews” — a lapse we’d expect only if today’s Persians are not the same people as the original Persians.
Lewis also points out the many Persian influences on the German language — to show the connection between the ancient Persian Aryans and the Germanic people — but one look at modern “Persians” in Iran we can see that they are not racially similar to the Aryan Germans — they are clearly mixed with Arab blood.
Note that according to Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, the term “arab” or “arabia” derives from:
“…ereb (1 Kings 10:15), (with the article prefix), {eh’-reb}; from arab; the web (or transverse threads of cloth); also a mixture, (or mongrel race) — Arabia, mingled people, mixed (multitude)”
In other words, any “prophecies” coming out of the mouths of Jewish rabbis today concerning Persia as modern Iran are merely self-serving ways for the Jews to manipulate gullible Christians into believing that supporting an American war against Iran is somehow pleasing to God.
The Jewish plan for America is to utterly destroy it — bankrupt the economy through usury, taxes, and uncontrolled spending — exhaust the military in an endless “war against terror” during which all existential “threats” to Israel will be defeated — and flood America with the Third World — fulfilling the Kalergi Plan — which will replace the aging White population — euthanized by their deadly vaccines — while destroying the younger population through race mixing.
And the Jews will rule over the ashes.
At least that’s their plan — not a “conspiracy theory” — as Rabbi Abarron Haviv explained at the World Jewish Congress Summit in 2011,
“The homogeneity of European nations is fundamentally against the interests of the Jewish people. We are at a critical turning point in history. The West is becoming more and more racially diverse, and soon the White race will be forced into submission. The future of the West is that of an ethnically diverse melting pot, where the evil divisions of race and white supremacy no longer reign. This is all thanks to the tremendous power of our social movements and institutions. This great change will be catalyzed by Muslim settlement. From the land of Israel, Jews will forever be a light unto the new mono racial world as guaranteed by God.”
Or just allow Israeli Prime Minister, Bibi Netanyahu explain the Jewish plans for America:
“If we get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. So it does not matter what you do, America is a golden calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world’s biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it is the will of God and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again and again and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.”
—Bibi Netanyahu, 1990 recorded conversation with an Israeli spy working in America