The Deep State is somewhat of a misnomer. A more appropriate appellation is the Demon State, because these people worship, are assisted by, and in some cases are possessed by, literal demons.
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
- Ephesians 6:12
In any event, whatever is coming, whether this is the end of the War on Populism or just the beginning of a new, more dramatic phase of it, the next two months are going to be exciting. So, go grab your popcorn, or your AR-15, and your mask, or full-body anti-virus bubble suit (which you might want to have retrofitted with Kevlar), and sit back and enjoy the show!
The original source of this article is Docs4opendebate
We,
Belgian doctors and health professionals, wish to express our serious concern
about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the
outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We call on politicians to be independently
and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory
implementation of corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts
are represented without any form of censorship. After the initial panic surrounding covid-19, the objective
facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical
justification for any emergency policy anymore.
The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes
more damage than it does any good.
We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our
normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil
liberties.
Buy
New $99.99(as of 05:50 EDT - Details)
‘A cure
must not be worse than the problem’ is a thesis that is more relevant than ever
in the current situation. We note, however, that
the collateral damage now being caused to the population will have a greater
impact in the short and long term on all sections of the population than the
number of people now being safeguarded from corona. In our opinion, the
current corona measures and the strict penalties for non-compliance with them
are contrary to the values formulated by the Belgian Supreme Health Council,
which, until recently, as the health authority, has always ensured quality
medicine in our country: “Science – Expertise – Quality – Impartiality –
Independence – Transparency”. 1
We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures that are
not sufficiently scientifically based, unilaterally directed, and that there is
not enough space in the media for an open debate in which different views and
opinions are heard. In addition, each municipality and province now has the
authorisation to add its own measures, whether well-founded or not.
Moreover, the strict repressive policy
on corona strongly contrasts with the government’s minimal policy when it comes
to disease prevention, strengthening our own immune system through a healthy
lifestyle, optimal care with attention for the individual and investment in
care personnel.2
The
concept of health
In
1948, the WHO defined health as follows: ‘Health is a state of complete
physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or
other physical impairment’.3
Health,
therefore, is a broad concept that goes beyond the physical and also relates to
the emotional and social well-being of the individual. Belgium also has a duty,
from the point of view of subscribing to fundamental human rights, to include
these human rights in its decision-making when it comes to measures taken in
the context of public health. 4
The current global measures taken to combat SARS-CoV-2 violate
to a large extent this view of health and human rights. Measures include
compulsory wearing of a mask (also in open air and during sporting activities,
and in some municipalities even when there are no other people in the
vicinity), physical distancing, social isolation, compulsory quarantine for
some groups and hygiene measures.
The predicted pandemic with millions of
deaths
At the beginning of the
pandemic, the measures were understandable and widely supported, even if there
were differences in implementation in the countries around us. The WHO
originally predicted a pandemic that would claim 3.4% victims, in other words
millions of deaths, and a highly contagious virus for which no treatment or
vaccine was available. This would put unprecedented pressure on the
intensive care units (ICUs) of our hospitals.
This led to a global alarm
situation, never seen in the history of mankind: “flatten the curve” was
represented by a lockdown that shut down the entire society and economy and
quarantined healthy people. Social distancing became the new normal in
anticipation of a rescue vaccine.
The facts about covid-19
Gradually, the alarm bell was sounded
from many sources: the objective facts showed a completely different
reality. 5 6
The course of
covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a flu
season. As every year, we see a mix of flu viruses following the curve: first
the rhinoviruses, then the influenza A and B viruses, followed by the
coronaviruses. There is nothing different from what we normally see.
The use of the non-specific PCR test, which
produces many false positives, showed an exponential picture. This test
was rushed through with an emergency procedure and was never seriously
self-tested. The creator expressly warned that this test was intended for
research and not for diagnostics.7
The PCR test works with
cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified
each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old virus
genomes) can possibly result in false positives.8
Buy
New $14.99(as of 05:50 EDT - Details)
The
test does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample. A real viral
infection means a massive presence of viruses, the so-called virus load. If
someone tests positive, this does not mean that that person is actually
clinically infected, is ill or is going to become ill. Koch’s postulate was not
fulfilled (“The pure agent found in a patient with complaints can provoke the
same complaints in a healthy person”).
Since a positive PCR test does not
automatically indicate active infection or infectivity, this does not justify
the social measures taken, which are based solely on these tests. 9 10
Lockdown.
If we compare the waves of infection in countries with
strict lockdown policies to countries that did not impose lockdowns (Sweden,
Iceland …), we see similar curves. So there is no link between the
imposed lockdown and the course of the infection. Lockdown has not led to a
lower mortality rate.
If we
look at the date of application of the imposed lockdowns we see that the
lockdowns were set after the peak was already over and the number of cases
decreasing. The drop was therefore not the result of the taken measures. 11
As every year, it seems that climatic conditions (weather,
temperature and humidity) and growing immunity are more likely to reduce the
wave of infection.
Our immune system
For thousands of years, the
human body has been exposed daily to moisture and droplets containing
infectious microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi).
Buy
New $14.99(as of 05:50 EDT - Details)
The
penetration of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced defence
mechanism – the immune system. A strong immune system relies on normal daily
exposure to these microbial influences. Overly hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our
immunity. 12 13 Only people with a weak or faulty immune
system should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distancing.
Influenza will re-emerge in
the autumn (in combination with covid-19) and a possible decrease in natural
resilience may lead to further casualties.
Our immune system consists of
two parts: a congenital, non-specific immune system and an adaptive immune
system.
The non-specific
immune system forms a first barrier: skin, saliva, gastric juice,
intestinal mucus, vibratory hair cells, commensal flora, … and prevents the
attachment of micro-organisms to tissue.
If they do attach,
macrophages can cause the microorganisms to be encapsulated and destroyed.
The adaptive immune
system consists of mucosal immunity (IgA antibodies, mainly
produced by cells in the intestines and lung epithelium), cellular immunity
(T-cell activation), which can be generated in contact with foreign substances
or microorganisms, and humoral immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the
B cells).
Recent research shows that
both systems are highly entangled.
It appears that most people already
have a congenital or general immunity to e.g. influenza and other viruses. This
is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was
quarantined because of a few passengers who died of Covid-19. Most of the
passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission on the
ship. However, 75% did not appear to be infected. So even in this high-risk
group, the majority are resistant to the virus.Buy
New $63.71(as of 05:50 EDT - Details)
A
study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralise the coronavirus by
mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T-cells), while experiencing few or no
symptoms 14.
Researchers
found up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4+T cells in a non-infected
population, suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold (corona) viruses.15
Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity
because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus.
The antibody formation (IgM and
IgG) by B-cells only occupies a relatively small part of our immune system.
This may explain why, with an antibody percentage of 5-10%, there may be a
group immunity anyway. The
efficacy of vaccines is assessed precisely on the basis of whether or not we
have these antibodies. This is a misrepresentation.
Most people who test positive
(PCR) have no complaints. Their immune system is strong enough. Strengthening
natural immunity is a much more logical approach. Prevention is an important, insufficiently highlighted
pillar: healthy, full-fledged nutrition, exercise in fresh air, without a mask,
stress reduction and nourishing emotional and social contacts.
Consequences of social isolation on
physical and mental health
Social
isolation and economic damage led to an increase in depression, anxiety,
suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse.16
Studies have shown that the more social
and emotional commitments people have, the more resistant they are to viruses.
It is much more likely that isolation and quarantine have fatal
consequences. 17
The
isolation measures have also led to physical inactivity in many older people
due to their being forced to stay indoors. However, sufficient exercise has a
positive effect on cognitive functioning, reducing depressive complaints and
anxiety and improving physical health, energy levels, well-being and, in
general, quality of life.18
Fear, persistent stress and loneliness
induced by social distancing have a proven negative influence on psychological
and general health. 19
A
highly contagious virus with millions of deaths without any treatment?
Mortality
turned out to be many times lower than expected and close to that of a normal
seasonal flu (0.2%). 20
The number of registered corona deaths therefore still seems to
be overestimated.
There is a difference between death by corona and death with corona. Humans are
often carriers of multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria at the
same time. Taking into account the fact that most people who developed serious
symptoms suffered from additional pathology, one cannot simply conclude that
the corona-infection was the cause of death. This was mostly not taken into
account in the statistics.
The most vulnerable
groups can be clearly identified. The vast majority of
deceased patients were 80 years of age or older. The majority (70%) of the
deceased, younger than 70 years, had an underlying disorder, such as
cardiovascular suffering, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease or obesity.
The vast majority of infected persons (>98%) did not or hardly became ill or
recovered spontaneously.
Meanwhile, there is an
affordable, safe and efficient therapy available for those who
do show severe symptoms of disease in the form of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine),
zinc and AZT (azithromycin). Rapidly applied this therapy leads to recovery and
often prevents hospitalisation. Hardly anyone has to die now.
This
effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues
in the field with impressive results. This contrasts sharply with the theoretical
criticism (insufficient substantiation by double-blind studies) which in some
countries (e.g. the Netherlands) has even led to a ban on this therapy. A
meta-analysis in The Lancet, which could not demonstrate an effect of HCQ, was
withdrawn. The primary data sources used proved to be unreliable and 2 out of 3
authors were in conflict of interest. However, most of the guidelines based on
this study remained unchanged … 48 49
We have serious questions about this state of affairs.
In the US, a group of doctors in the field, who see patients on a daily basis,
united in “America’s Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference which has
been watched millions of times.21 51
French Prof Didier Raoult of the Institut d’Infectiologie de
Marseille (IHU) also presented this promising combination therapy as early as
April. Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured many patients in his practice with HCQ and
zinc, called on colleagues in a petition for freedom of therapy.22
The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up
in Switzerland: mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.23
From
the distressing media images of ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome)
where people were suffocating and given artificial respiration in agony, we now
know that this was caused by an exaggerated immune response with intravascular
coagulation in the pulmonary blood vessels. The administration of blood
thinners and dexamethasone and the avoidance of artificial ventilation, which
was found to cause additional damage to lung tissue, means that this dreaded
complication, too, is virtually not fatal anymore. 47
It is therefore not a killer virus, but a well-treatable
condition.
Propagation
Spreading
occurs by drip infection (only for patients who cough or sneeze) and aerosols
in closed, unventilated rooms. Contamination is therefore not possible in the open air. Contact
tracing and epidemiological studies show that healthy people (or positively
tested asymptomatic carriers) are virtually unable to transmit the virus.
Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk. 24 25
Transfer via objects (e.g. money, shopping or shopping trolleys)
has not been scientifically proven.26 27 28
All this seriously calls into question the whole policy of
social distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people – there is no
scientific basis for this.
Masks
Oral
masks belong in contexts where contacts with proven at-risk groups or people
with upper respiratory complaints take place, and in a medical context/hospital-retirement
home setting. They reduce the risk of droplet infection by sneezing or
coughing. Oral masks in
healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral
infections. 29 30 31
Wearing a mask is not without side
effects. 32 33 Oxygen deficiency (headache, nausea,
fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs fairly quickly, an effect similar to
altitude sickness. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches,
sinus problems, respiratory problems and hyperventilation due to wearing masks.
In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism
which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of an increased transmission
of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.34
Our
Labour Code (Codex 6) refers to a CO2 content (ventilation in workplaces) of
900 ppm, maximum 1200 ppm in special circumstances. After wearing a mask for
one minute, this toxic limit is considerably exceeded to values that are three
to four times higher than these maximum values. Anyone who wears a mask is
therefore in an extreme poorly ventilated room. 35
Inappropriate
use of masks without a comprehensive medical cardio-pulmonary test file is
therefore not recommended by recognised safety specialists for workers.
Hospitals have a sterile environment in their operating rooms where staff wear
masks and there is precise regulation of humidity / temperature with
appropriately monitored oxygen flow to compensate for this, thus meeting strict
safety standards. 36
A second corona wave?
A
second wave is now being discussed in Belgium, with a further tightening of the
measures as a result. However, closer examination of Sciensano’s figures
(latest report of 3 September 2020)37 shows
that, although there has been an increase in the number of infections since
mid-July, there was no increase in hospital admissions or deaths at that time.
It is therefore not a second wave of corona, but a so-called “case chemistry”
due to an increased number of tests. 50
The number of hospital admissions or deaths showed a shortlasting minimal
increase in recent weeks, but in interpreting it, we must take into account the
recent heatwave. In addition, the vast majority of the victims are still in the
population group >75 years.
This indicates that the proportion of the measures taken in relation to the
working population and young people is disproportionate to the intended
objectives.
The vast majority of the
positively tested “infected” persons are in the age group of the active
population, which does not develop any or merely limited symptoms, due to a
well-functioning immune system.
So nothing has changed – the peak is over.
Strengthening
a prevention policy
The
corona measures form a striking contrast to the minimal policy pursued by the
government until now, when it comes to well-founded measures with proven health
benefits such as the sugar tax, the ban on (e-)cigarettes and making healthy
food, exercise and social support networks financially attractive and widely
accessible. It is a missed opportunity for a better prevention policy that
could have brought about a change in mentality in all sections of the
population with clear results in terms of public health. At present, only 3% of the
health care budget goes to prevention. 2
The
Hippocratic Oath
As a doctor, we took the
Hippocratic Oath:
“I will above all care for my patients, promote their health and alleviate
their suffering”.
“I will inform my patients
correctly.”
“Even under pressure, I will not
use my medical knowledge for practices that are against humanity.”
The current measures force us to act against this oath.
Other health professionals have a similar code.
The ‘primum non nocere’,
which every doctor and health professional assumes, is also undermined by the
current measures and by the prospect of the possible introduction of a
generalised vaccine, which is not subject to extensive prior testing.
Vaccine
Survey studies on influenza vaccinations
show that in 10 years we have only succeeded three times in developing a
vaccine with an efficiency rate of more than 50%. Vaccinating our elderly
appears to be inefficient. Over 75 years of age, the efficacy is almost
non-existent.38
Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as we also
see every year in the case of the influenza virus, a vaccine is at most a
temporary solution, which requires new vaccines each time afterwards. An
untested vaccine, which is implemented by emergency procedure and for which the
manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm, raises
serious questions. 39 40 We do
not wish to use our patients as guinea pigs.
On a global scale, 700 000 cases of damage or death are expected as a result of
the vaccine.41
If 95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free, the
risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible.
The role of the media and the official
communication plan
Over the past few months, newspaper, radio and TV makers seemed to stand
almost uncritically behind the panel of experts and the government, there,
where it is precisely the press that should be critical and prevent one-sided
governmental communication. This has led to a public communication in our news
media, that was more like propaganda than objective reporting.
In our opinion, it is the task of journalism to bring news as objectively
and neutrally as possible, aimed at finding the truth and critically
controlling power, with dissenting experts also being given a forum in which to
express themselves.
This view is supported by the journalistic
codes of ethics.42
The official story that a lockdown was necessary, that this was the only
possible solution, and that everyone stood behind this lockdown, made it
difficult for people with a different view, as well as experts, to express a
different opinion.
Alternative opinions were ignored or ridiculed. We have not seen open
debates in the media, where different views could be expressed.
We
were also surprised by the many videos and articles by many scientific experts
and authorities, which were and are still being removed from social media. We
feel that this does not fit in with a free, democratic constitutional state,
all the more so as it leads to tunnel vision. This policy also has a paralysing
effect and feeds fear and concern in society. In this context, we reject
the intention of censorship of dissidents in the European Union! 43
The way in which Covid-19 has
been portrayed by politicians and the media has not done the situation any good
either. War terms were popular and warlike language was not lacking. There has
often been mention of a ‘war’ with an ‘invisible enemy’ who has to be
‘defeated’. The use in the media of phrases such as ‘care heroes in the front
line’ and ‘corona victims’ has further fuelled fear, as has the idea that we
are globally dealing with a ‘killer virus’.
The relentless bombardment with figures, that were unleashed on the
population day after day, hour after hour, without interpreting those figures,
without comparing them to flu deaths in other years, without comparing them to
deaths from other causes, has induced a real psychosis of fear in the
population. This is not information, this is manipulation.
We
deplore the role of the WHO in this, which has called for the infodemic (i.e.
all divergent opinions from the official discourse, including by experts with
different views) to be silenced by an unprecedented media censorship.43 44
We urgently call on the media
to take their responsibilities here!
We demand an open debate in
which all experts are heard.
Emergency
law versus Human Rights
The general principle of good
governance calls for the proportionality of government decisions to be weighed
up in the light of the Higher Legal Standards: any interference by government
must comply with the fundamental rights as protected in the European Convention
on Human Rights (ECHR). Interference by public authorities is only permitted in
crisis situations. In other words, discretionary decisions must be
proportionate to an absolute necessity.
The
measures currently taken concern interference in the exercise of, among other
things, the right to respect of private and family life, freedom of thought,
conscience and religion, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly and
association, the right to education, etc., and must therefore comply with
fundamental rights as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights
(ECHR).
For example, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the ECHR, interference with the
right to private and family life is permissible only if the measures are
necessary in the interests of national security, public safety, the economic
well-being of the country, the protection of public order and the prevention of
criminal offences, the protection of health or the protection of the rights and
freedoms of others, the regulatory text on which the interference is based must
be sufficiently clear, foreseeable and proportionate to the objectives pursued.45
The predicted pandemic of
millions of deaths seemed to respond to these crisis conditions, leading to the
establishment of an emergency government. Now that the objective facts show
something completely different, the condition of inability to act otherwise (no
time to evaluate thoroughly if there is an emergency) is no longer in place.
Covid-19 is not a cold virus, but a well treatable condition with a mortality
rate comparable to the seasonal flu. In other words, there is no longer an
insurmountable obstacle to public health.
There is no state of emergency.
Immense damage caused by the current
policies
An
open discussion on corona measures means that, in addition to the years of life
gained by corona patients, we must also take into account other factors
affecting the health of the entire population. These include damage in the
psychosocial domain (increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family
violence and child abuse)16 and economic damage.
If we take this collateral
damage into account, the current policy is out of all proportion, the
proverbial use of a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
We find it shocking that the
government is invoking health as a reason for the emergency law.
As doctors and health professionals, in the face of a virus which, in
terms of its harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility, approaches the
seasonal influenza, we can only reject these extremely disproportionate
measures.
Distribution of this letter
We would like to make a public appeal to our professional associations
and fellow carers to give their opinion on the current measures.
We draw attention to and call for an open discussion in which carers
can and dare to speak out.
With this open letter, we send out the signal that progress on the same
footing does more harm than good, and call on politicians to inform themselves
independently and critically about the available evidence – including that from
experts with different views, as long as it is based on sound science – when
rolling out a policy, with the aim of promoting optimum health.
With concern, hope and in a personal capacity.
1. https://www.health.belgium.be/nl/wie-zijn-we#Missie
3. https://www.who.int/about/who-we-are/constitution
4. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health
5. https://swprs.org/feiten-over-covid19/
7. https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-multiplex-rt-qpcr-kit-277854-457.htm
8. President
John Magufuli of Tanzania: “Even Papaya and Goats are Corona positive” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=207HuOxltvI
9. Open
letter by biochemist Drs Mario Ortiz Martinez to the Dutch chamber https://www.gentechvrij.nl/2020/08/15/foute-interpretatie/
10.
Interview with Drs Mario Ortiz Martinez https://troo.tube/videos/watch/6ed900eb-7459-4a1b-93fd-b393069f4fcd?fbclid=IwAR1XrullC2qopJjgFxEgbSTBvh-4ZCuJa1VxkHTXEtYMEyGG3DsNwUdaatY
11.
https://infekt.ch/2020/04/sind-wir-tatsaechlich-im-blindflug/
12.
Lambrecht, B., Hammad, H. The immunology of the allergy epidemic
and the hygiene hypothesis. Nat Immunol 18, 1076–1083
(2017). https://www.nature.com/articles/ni.3829
13.
Sharvan Sehrawat, Barry T. Rouse, Does the hygiene hypothesis apply
to COVID-19 susceptibility?, Microbes and Infection, 2020, ISSN
1286-4579, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.07.002
15.
https://www.hpdetijd.nl/2020-08-11/9-manieren-om-corona-te-voorkomen/
16.
Feys, F., Brokken, S., & De Peuter, S. (2020, May 22).
Risk-benefit and cost-utility analysis for COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium: the
impact on mental health and wellbeing. https://psyarxiv.com/xczb3/
17.
Kompanje, 2020
18.
Conn, Hafdahl en Brown,
2009; Martinsen 2008; Yau, 2008
20.
https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/#overall-mortality
23.
https://zelfzorgcovid19.nl/statistieken-zwitserland-met-hcq-zonder-hcq-met-hcq-leveren-het-bewijs/
29.
29. Contradictory statements by our virologists https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K9xfmkMsvM
31.
Security expert Tammy K. Herrema Clark https://youtu.be/TgDm_maAglM
33.
https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/
35.
https://werk.belgie.be/nl/nieuws/nieuwe-regels-voor-de-kwaliteit-van-de-binnenlucht-werklokalen
36.
https://kavlaanderen.blogspot.com/2020/07/als-maskers-niet-werken-waarom-dragen.html
37.
https://covid-19.sciensano.be/sites/default/files/Covid19/Meest%20recente%20update.pdf
38.
Haralambieva, I.H. et al., 2015. The impact of immunosenescence
on humoral immune response variation after influenza A/H1N1 vaccination in
older subjects. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26044074/
39.
Global vaccine safety summit WHO 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXXDLGKmPg
40.
No liability manufacturers vaccines https://m.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20200804_95956456?fbclid=IwAR0IgiA-6sNVQvE8rMC6O5Gq5xhOulbcN1BhdI7Rw-7eq_pRtJDCxde6SQI
42.
Journalistic code https://www.rvdj.be/node/63
43.
Disinformation related to COVID-19 approaches European
Commission EurLex, juni 2020 (this
file will not damage your computer)
44.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30461-X/fulltext
45.
http://www.raadvst-consetat.be/dbx/adviezen/67142.pdf#search=67.142
48.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext
49.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext
50.
There is no revival of the pandemic, but a so-called casedemic
due to more testing.
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/crucial-viewing-understanding-covid-19-casedemic1
51.
https://docs4opendebate.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/white-paper-on-hcq-from-AFD.pdf
Copyright © Docs4opendebate