Labels

Friday, February 20, 2026

The Real European Crisis: Population – The Occidental Observer

Full text: https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2026/02/20/the-real-european-crisis-population/ 

Toward a Real Solution

Our liberal, leftist media have a clear message for Italy, and indeed for the West: Non-White foreigners are needed, they are good for your economy and society, and they are inevitable, so get used to it. And if you don’t like that idea, then the “demographic crisis” of population decline will destroy your country. This is absolute nonsense, on multiple grounds, as I have tried to show.

How about a real solution? (A) Recognize that actual population decline is good and necessary, because virtually every European (and Western) nation has outstripped its carrying capacity. Virtually every nation needs a lot fewer people and a lot more wilderness, if it is to prosper in the future.

(B) Non-White immigrants do much more harm than good, on several levels: they are generally less educated, less intelligent, poorer, sicker, and less law-abiding; they bring with them different values and different belief systems that are incompatible with traditional Western society—in other words, they are unassimilable and their presence will lead to societies divided by race and religion.[8] For their good and ours, they need to stay put.

(C) The US and Europe need to actively plan to slowly and careful reduce national populations while at the same time restoring their traditional demographics. Success on both counts would set the stage for a century-long boom in culture, economy, and social development.

Above I looked at Europe in some detail, but let me close with the U.S.. Currently at 330 million, America is, like virtually all Western nations, living far beyond that which is sustainable. We are rapidly destroying our national ecosystem, depleting natural resources, obliterating native wildlife, and thus setting the stage for ecological catastrophe. We need a plan to put around 1 billion acres into protected wilderness status (about half of the nation), and to live sustainably on the other half. This demands a national population reduction from 330 million to around 150 million—more than a 50% decrease.

If 150 million seems extreme, I would remind readers that this was precisely the US population in the year 1950. There are many Americans alive today who remember a population of 150 million. And I would guess, fondly so. Seriously—who would argue that the US was not in better shape in the year 1950 than in 2026?

As an indigenous White European nation, the United States could start by encouraging the emigration of our large non-White population, which would take us a very long way toward our goal. At present, we have about 62 million Latinos, 40 million Blacks, 20 million Asians, and at least 20 million mixed race or other ethnicities (including Jews). This comes to around 140 million people, ready to return home. If all opted to leave, that in itself brings us down to 190 million—and not far from our goal.

Imagine, if you will, a different America in the year 2100:  A nation with vast open spaces, diverse and thriving wildlife, clear-running waters everywhere, and vibrant and healthy soil. A nation of 150 million Whites with little ethnic or racial diversity and hence no racial strife. A unified nation—a United States—with common origins, common values, and common goals, working together for the collective welfare. It need not be simply a vision; it can be a reality.

David Skrbina, PhD, is a former professor of philosophy from the University of Michigan, Dearborn. He is the author or editor of a dozen books, including The Jesus Hoax (2nd ed., 2024), The Metaphysics of Technology (Routledge, 2015), and Panpsychism in the West (MIT Press, 2017).

More Teaching About Israel As Victim, by Philip Giraldi - The Unz Review

 Mandatory holocaust and antisemitism courses become required in public schools

Full text:
https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/more-teaching-about-israel-as-victim/ 

Of Two Minds - Small Business in the TINA Economy: Competing for the Scraps

 https://www.oftwominds.com/blogfeb26/small-biz-TINA2-26.html?fullweb=1 


We're constantly assured an economy where the gains follow an extraordinarily asymmetric power-law distribution is a wondrous engine of sustainable growth that benefits everyone, but the facts don't support this fairy-tale PR promoted by the winners to placate those losing ground.

This distribution of the gains to the few and the costs to the many is not inevitable, it was the direct result of policy choices made by our political class in response to the money and lobbying funded by the few to increase their share of the economy's gains by any means available.
The avalanche analogy is apt: the snowpack looks stable because the melting is hidden from view. But when a critical point that cannot be predicted is reached, the mountainside gives way. While the top 10% who manage the TINA Economy are fixated on their ballooning stock market wealth, the bottom 90% of households and small enterprises are melting away. Some day that might actually have consequences.

Most Science is Fake - Vox Popoli

 A little preliminary of the sort of thing you’re going to see in HARDCODED when it comes out in April

64% Of Psychology Turned Out To Be Garbage

The warning signs had been there for decades. People just weren’t listening......


https://voxday.net/2026/02/20/most-science-is-fake/ 

...Nearly two-thirds of published findings—the research that shaped TED Talks and bestsellers and Jennifer’s Saturday brunches—couldn’t be reproduced when someone else tried.

Meehl and Ioannidis had called it. The field that studies human behavior discovered that most of what it “knew” about human behavior might be wrong.

As bad as it is in the field of psychology, it’s even worse in a number of other scientific fields. And the institutional incentives are such that it can only continue to get worse in all of them.

DISCUSS ON SG

Veriphysics: The Treatise 019 - Vox Popoli

 A philosophy requires a name, something that is more than an identifying label, something that serves to describe its essential orientation. The word should be memorable, pronounceable, and meaningful. It should capture the philosophy’s core insight and clearly distinguish the framework from its rivals. In addition to its identity, it also requires an objective and a foundation.

Veriphysics was chosen as the name for this new philosophy because unlike classical philosophy, which is focused on knowledge, metaphysics which examines the nature of reality, Scholasticism which combines the classical tradition with Christian theology, and Enlightenment philosophy, which claims to be established on reason but is based upon the hidden knowledge known as gnosis, veriphysics is focused solely on truth, or veritas. Every aspect of veriphysics is meant to explore and expand the concept of truth to the greatest extent possible, through every path that is capable to leading to some aspect of the singular, core, and underlying Truth.....


https://voxday.net/2026/02/20/veriphysics-the-treatise/ 

...The objective of veriphysics also carries a connotation of elevation in the political sense, of dominance, of supremacy, and of the correct ordering of intellectual and social life. This connotation is intentional. Veriphysics necessarily means that an orientation toward the truth must order society and intellect, that the pursuit of truth is not one value among many but the architectonic value that makes all the others coherent and meaningful. A civilization that abandons truth as a fundamental objective does not cannot achieve either neutrality or progress, it instead assures chaos, manipulation, and degeneration.

Veriphysics is a necessary goal for the humanist, because the societal pursuit of truth is a precondition of human flourishing.

You can now buy the complete Veriphysics: The Treatise at Amazon in both Kindle and audiobook formats if you’d like to read ahead or have it available as a reference. Thanks to many of the readers here, it is presently a #1 bestseller in both Epistemology and Metaphysics.

The Infamous: A Review - Vox Popoli

 https://voxday.net/2026/02/19/the-infamous-a-review/ 

Scorched and Salted reviews The Mathematics of Evolution:

Years ago, I stumbled onto the blog Vox Popoli by Vox Day. I don’t remember what led me there. I do remember the feeling of not knowing what I was looking at.

It was refreshing.

A break from the incoherent, exhausting noise of the mainstream.

There was an internal cohesion to his writing — an insistence on definitions, on first principles, on following arguments to their conclusion.

Not playing fast and loose with language and logic.

What really puzzled me came later, when I tried spreading the word.

I tried sharing his work — articles, books, videos — expecting others to recognize its merit as I had.

Many dismissed him outright.

Some refused to engage with the material and instead labelled him:

Bigot.
Racist.
Homophobe.

I waited for the showering of compliments to end — to see if the arguments would ever be addressed.

I’m still waiting…

Read the whole thing there. Ironically, the most significant aspect of those two books may not be the way in which they have demolished everything from natural selection as the origin of the species to neutral theory, but rather, the way that the way the evolutionary defenders reacted to the arguments contained in them led directly to the development of the triveritan method of investigating logical, mathematical, and scientific claims more rigorously than any previous epistemological method customarily permits.

Why Deltas Fail in Leadership - by Vox Day - Sigma Game

 A man laments the SSH rank of his new boss:

For probably the first time in my life I’ve worked under a delta leader for an extended period of time. He’s a good dude and lacks any leadership chops. I hate it, and I see why it creates resentment.

If you’re a delta put in a leadership position, try to adopt the attitude “I will tear someone’s throat out, internal or external, for the sake of my guys”.

Inaction when your team is getting screwed is a one-way bullet train to be hated.

Now, I’m not privy to any of the details, but on the basis of what we know about Delta strengths and weaknesses, I think there are probably three problems compounding each other here:

  • Delta narcissism

  • Delta passiveness

  • Delta conflict-avoidance

Deltas always struggle in management and leadership positions because they don’t take personal interest or accountability in their subordinates or the situations faced by those subordinates. It’s not as if they try to set them up to fail, but that’s not infrequently the result.


https://sigmagame.substack.com/p/why-deltas-fail-in-leadership?publication_id=2265630&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=y7h5a&utm_medium=email