One of the more-ridiculous refrains that is constantly heard is that "there is no accountability for X", where X is one of:
- Illegal invaders raping or murdering our citizens.
- Jab and mask mandates, particularly when it comes to children or threats to your basic ability to earn a living.
- "Bathroom and locker room choice" for people who cannot be bothered to look between their legs to determine their sex.
- Flat-out illegal collusion including "price-by-insurance-carried" only after service is performed, which I remind you has been illegal for over 100 years in the form of 15 USC Chapter 1, confirmed to apply not once but twice by the USSC, in respect to medical services in the United States.
- "I want you to panic" - Greta Thunberg. Nations did. Last winter people had property destroyed in Texas and a few died as a direct consequence. Coal plants were shut down and natural gas pipeline pumps that ran on the gas in the pipe were replaced with electric ones. No renewable power, no electricity and no gas pressure either.
And more, of course.
The assertion that no accountability is available for such rampant violations of both law and reason are false.
There is in fact unlimited accountability that can be brought to bear on each and every individual responsible for said mandates and policies, whether they be politicians, corporate officers, directors, HR personnel, teachers, Superintendents, School board members or even just your direct boss.
That accountability -- and the responsibility to apply it as required -- rests with you.
It's simply a matter of mathematics -- and your fear which they deliberately cultivate. You may be enraged if your daughter is raped in a school restroom by a trans "boy" who decided he's a girl only long enough to get in there, then suddenly "he's a boy again" because he used his boy parts to commit the rape, didn't he? Obviously said person was fully aware of his actual sex -- and your school and government coddled what was clearly mental illness and depravity which is direct reason that your daughter was raped.
Let's not forget that our federal government has threatened to "prosecute" parents who are enraged that a girl was raped as a direct consequence of the local, state and federal government's decision to pander to said selective claim of being "trans" which evaporated at the instant the instrument of rape, a penis, came out of the pants.
Anyone with two IQ points to rub together knows that said "trans" claiming person was 100% full of crap and was not in any way actually of the belief they were or are a girl. A girl has no use for a penis and thus if there is one currently physically attached an actual trans girl would find it useless for any sexual purpose whatsoever, including of course a felony criminal purpose. In short you put a criminal's "comfort" and intentional lie in front of the victim's safety.
This was not an accident ladies and gentlemen it was intentional so take a bow as to the outcome you permitted exactly as you would by handing a full can of gasoline and a lighter to an arsonist.
Of course you cannot in "polite" company point any of this out today but truth has nothing to do with politics, consensus, or democracy. It is true irrespective of how many people believe it, just as a falsehood is false no matter how many people believe it. Indeed something that is false can be believed by 100% of the people and it does not become not-false as a consequence of the number of believers.
That masks are worthless to deter respiratory pathogens has been proved through more than 40 years of scientific study. Indeed said devices are of dubious value for bacterial respiratory pathogens which are many, many times larger in size. That original study demonstrating that masks were of no value even with every single user being a highly-trained medical professional was attempted to be falsified more than a dozen times in the ensuing years and not once was statistically-valid refutation obtained. Yet today, 40 years hence, this lie remains promoted and repeated by medical providers all over the world. I remind you that Semmelweis demonstrated that contamination of the hands was largely responsible for obstetrical transmission of disease, not "evil spirits", and he was literally drummed out of medicine and driven insane by those who claimed he was not only wrong he was a heretic and agent of the Devil besides. The truth, however, was not changed to a lie by the near-unanimous claims of the medical profession. Today we do not doubt that microbial contamination from one infected entity or item to a non-infected entity is how disease transmission occurs but that did not "become" true when it was medically accepted; it was always true.
That the current jabs are not vaccines is not in question; it is truth. The government has changed the definition of a "vaccine" but you cannot change something that is false into something that is true by making a claim that it is so. A vaccine is a preparation that causes or mimics actual infection but is either attenuated or killed so that it will not harm you. The current "clot shots" are genetic programming designed to alter the core processes of your cells. That the intended outcome of this is to produce an immune response protective against a pathogen does not change the fact that they are not vaccines and that we have discovered the direct result of said programming is pathogenic is not in scientific question either; it is, and is almost-certainly responsible for all the adverse effects of same. A therapy alters the core processes of your cells to combat a disease; every drug in the pharmacy does this in one form or another. Whether said reprogramming is good, bad, effective or not isn't the question; it is the claim that such constitutes a "vaccine" that is medically and scientifically false, and no matter how many people believe it, whether that number is zero or 100% of the population does not change the falsity of the statement.
That there has never been a successful vaccine -- an actual vaccine -- against a coronavirus in man or beast is also fact. That is not due to the lack of attempt; there have been many attempts. All have ended in failure; either the protection is non-durable and thus becomes a "required subscription" or worse, it turns on the inoculated individual member of the population and potentiates illness, severely injuring or killing them. Attempting to force that model on the human population through lies or worse, mandates, marks every person involved in advocating or attempting to impose same worthy of immediate imprisonment or even execution as they are wild-eyed extortionists at best or even mass-murdering psychotic criminals.
That every respiratory pandemic in history has progressed into an endemic disease is scientific fact. If it was not, even once, every single one of us would not exist because somewhere before our birth humans would have all been dead. Yet here we are, which is scientific proof that any claim that Covid-19 would not follow the same pattern absent our intervention was and is false. That is not to say that certain pathogens haven't been worse than others; there have, of course. But the trend toward endemicity and immunity from serious outcome via infection or the mimicry of actual infection, not genetic engineering which only now exists as possible, is fact. Thus my commentary, which I have repeated relentlessly: We are all going to get this thing, there's nothing we can do about that, and we ought to work on personal resistance to serious outcomes which we know we can have positive impact upon. Indeed, were Covid-19 to have occurred prior to our obsession with obesity and "healthy at any size" it is probable that 99% of those who have died from it in the US would have successfully fought it off and it would have been less serious than seasonal influenza.
Your propensity to commit suicide whether through booze, drugs or alleged "food" does not and must never compel me to act in any form or fashion. I may pity you and blithely allow that whatever alleged "good" you think you get from that is personal choice but the risk thereof is also your personal choice. I know people who drink in amounts I believe are excessive and in fact two people in my social circle over the years are dead from having done so but its not my place to ban production of beer because they might see me drink one and want six; it is their decision and if you hold freedom to have any value then consenting adults are free to do as they wish in that regard. The vast majority of those dead as a result of Covid-19 infection made themselves wildly more-likely to die -- by a factor of 10, 100 or even a thousand or more. That some people had a run of bad luck and became more-vulnerable changes nothing; I am not responsible for that either as I did not cause said bad luck.
You are facing monstrous heating bills this winter because you consented to and many of you repeated a lie. You allowed coal-fired power plants to be shut down when they are perfectly capable of providing all the power you need. Texas got a small taste of their stupidity in reliance on "renewables" which have never been defensible on a thermodynamic perspective as a replacement and never will be due to physics. I remind you that physics does not present suggestions, it is in fact a system of natural laws you cannot alter. Ten years ago I put forward a means to address our energy requirements that was viable on both physics and capacity to execute. While it had the virtue of also reducing carbon emissions that was not the goal and in fact did not inform my position in any way; stability and sustainability were the first, second, third and last mandate, as they must be if you intend to have a stable, growing economy since behind every unit of economic output is a unit of energy. We instead turned off reliable sources and promoted unreliable, expensive ones. Last winter the screwing impacted a relatively short period of time and a relatively-confined area of the nation. This winter it may well be worse as we've continued down the road of stupidity and the embracing of lies. People like Greta are either ignorant of the relationship between energy and the economy and thus are unqualified in the first instance to speak on the matter or intend to slaughter you. We are talking about people who deliberately advocated for and acted to destroy perfectly-functional electrical generating and gas pipeline infrastructure in favor of unreliable "replacements" that were directly responsible for both severe property damage and death -- and will be again.
Likewise you are facing supply shortages and sky high inflation because of lies. It is a fact that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomena. You sucked off Donald Trump when Covid hit and went along with a lie -- that the government could pay you to sit at home and suck down bong hits without causing ruinous inflation, and that you could shut down business and commerce without destroying supply chains that would take months, even years to restart and clear. Having done that you let Biden continue to sell lies. Whether Democrat or Republican you refused to demand that stop, despite hundreds of years of economic history proving that these policies would be ruinous as not one single example exists through recorded history of their application not having said ruinous outcome.
So what of accountability?
What prevents you from demanding same and enforcing accountability right here, right now?
Only one thing: Your repeated refusal to accept truth and refuse lies.
It is the truth that there more than 100 ordinary citizens for each one of those who would oppress within any area of government. You grossly outnumber them and, provided you are willing to use surprise it is impossible for them to escape your imposition of accountability.
It is the truth that all claimed "law" rests on the preposition that 99+% of the population voluntarily consents. It is mathematically impossible to imprison any more than a tiny fraction of the population; we imprison more than any other nation on a percentage basis and have increased that by more than five times since 1971 yet even so less than 1% of our population is in fact in jail or prison. The threat to lock you up or worse is empty the moment even a few percent of the population decides it is.
It is the truth that about 4,000 bank robberies are committed each year in the US. If 1% of the population committed just one bank robbery each per year that would be over 3 million bank robberies, nearly a thousand times more, and it would be impossible to stop said "crimes"; that specific law would instantly cease to be enforceable.
It is the truth that everyone dies exactly once and that at the moment another person acts in such a fashion you are convinced you will be dead as a consequence of their action there is no punishment that can be leveled against you should you decide to personally impose accountability for that act upon them. Once you accept that you are dead you can only make the situation better by your actions from that instant forward in time. Failure from that point in time forward has no price yet success has a reward.
The Jews were exterminated in Germany because they bought into the lie that they could be compelled and essentially 100% of them believed that lie. They were not compelled to disarm and in fact consented. Once you go too far down the road of consent you can't change your mind and meaningfully impact the outcome but that does not change the essential nature of what happened or why. Had the Jews decided, as soon as the persecution started, to go hunt down a Nazi Party member's family and burn their home, or simply to make sure some of those who came on the early raids never returned to their wife and kids until that crap ceased it would have stopped. There were simply too many Jews and not enough Nazis, particularly if they acted individually without coordination as detecting who's going to do so in advance becomes impossible. Yes, some would have died but that beats all of them dying, doesn't it? If you wait until there's a machine gun pointed at you or you've been routed into a camp and are now awaiting your turn in the shower you waited too long. Note that few who espouse Never Forget take the next step and by refusing to do so they embrace and espouse lies rather than the truth: You can stop an incipient event of this sort but you must do so well before the boxcars show up -- and exactly never is the correct action to stop such an event "harsh language" or "voting."
A Girl in Iowa was murdered because you let the illegal invaders in and to this day you allow them to stay. That is also why a woman was raped on the train in Philadelphia by another illegal invader. You are responsible for both that murder and the recent rape because it has always been and is today within your power to compel every single one of those people to leave this nation. You can do so via peaceful means or not but I remind you that******is not peaceful and as such your refusal to so-insist means you are either a coward or co-conspirator in that violence as you are unwilling to demand the politicians, businesspeople and police eject these people under pain of very bad things happening to them, and since you refused to do that said woman had a very bad thing happen to her. That Mollie Tibbetts' parents excused the slaughter of their own daughter and refused to demand the expulsion of every single illegal invader from this nation is one of the most outrageous things I have witnessed as an adult. Mollie is dead and this victim was raped because you all consented to these monsters being given effective pardons for their original crime of illegally entering the country instead of insisting they leave now. For a gallon of milk that is a dime cheaper you sold those victims -- and that's a fact.
You have allowed your children to be muzzled and deprived of human interaction for more than a year and a half; this has extended to deliberately harming or even destroying their education over that period of time. This is despite our scientific knowledge that the current respiratory viral threat almost never kills or seriously harms our youth. Yes, there are exceptions but said exceptions are more-rare than RSV, Influenza or a whole host of other maladies and events that harm children. In short you did this and allow it to continue to this day, as the CDC's Walensky has now made clear they intend to never drop because you are scared, not for them but for yourself. Rather than take responsibility for your own vulnerability such that it may be, whether great or small, you laid it off on those who through physical size and mental immaturity are unable to defend themselves against your aggression. Now you are sitting by silently while the government and business propose to jab persons with an unproven technology that we know does not prevent infection when said persons are, on a statistical basis, effectively never seriously harmed by the virus itself. This is in stark contrast to inoculations such as for measles which in fact does kill kids. Your refusal to demand this stop and enforce said demand by whatever means are necessary if you are a parent of said child marks you as a child exploiter and abuser and that makes clear you are a monster.
You allowed over one hundred thousand Americans to be deprived of the care and comfort of their loved ones for months when nursing homes were locked down and other care denied. You can't make those people whole or repay them because they're dead; you took the last months and weeks of their lives away from them and turned them into prisoners despite them committing no offense whatsoever. You are monsters for allowing this to occur.
The simple fact of the matter is that there is no means to force the population to consent to any law, provided even a tiny percentage, well under 10% and in fact in virtually every case less than one percent, are willing to make it ridiculously and personally expensive in wealth or treasure for those who would impose same upon society. The premise that one must be "organized" to resist is false and is promoted by those who want you to get into the boxcar. Indeed organization is where tyranny flows from, whether corporately or from government. It is the tool of the tyrant who can infiltrate or misdirect organization and is thwarted by unorganized individuals of like mind as there is no way to know in advance of their action who said persons are. Witness the "Tea Party" which was infiltrated and destroyed within months by turning what was a legitimate point of protest -- "Taxed Enough Already" -- into guns, gays and God at which point it just became another right-wing nutjob snake-handling congregation to be ignored, attacked, and ultimately faded off into obscurity.
What if, instead, five or ten percent of the people who were imbued with refusing had decided that whatever they were aggrieved about was going to stop? The word "should" that so many spineless, worthless so-called "conservatives" espouse on this issue or that becomes banished and is replaced with SHALL. What option does government have if there is a general strike, picket line or even embargo around the means of production and delivery? Witness Italy where it is happening now. The media is ignoring this on purpose because they know damned well that it can trivially spread worldwide -- including right here in the United States. What does government do in response? Shoot? That's a losing proposition and they know it as once you demonstrate that you will shoot the homes and businesses of all sympathizers of the government position may as well paint targets on their front doors, assuming the people are willing to exact accountability.
If you want to know why Southwest and others are threatening but, when faced with even a few percent of those who say "**** You" they back off this is why. They're still trying to be too cute by half as you have not sent the message that you will destroy them corporately and personally unless they cut it out entirely and in fact make clear that there will never be another instance in threat or deed. Thus the attempt to thread the needle: They know damned well that a hungry man or woman who they just dispossessed has no reason to be nice and even if a couple of percent of the population decides they will exact accountability then the imposing entity loses.
There are those who say "well, but the Karens outnumber us!" That doesn't matter. Again, the basic reality of life in any modern society is that well more than 99% of the people must agree to voluntarily comply with any law, not 50.1%. There is simply no means of meaningful enforcement beyond that point if the dissenters are willing to make those on the other side pay personally.
Witness the medical scam over the last 30+ years, all of it illegal under 15 USC Chapter 1, and twice being ruled illegal by the USSC. Yet it continues daily. Why? Because you let it continue. The day even 1 or 2% of the population decides to exact accountability if the law is not followed it ends and so does your impoverishment, suffering and death at their hands.
The Reeeeeeing Karen cannot force compliance -- she must deal with the reality that only via effectively-universal consent does policy advance just as you must, begrudgingly or otherwise, acknowledge the same thing. The point of agreement is never 50.1% if either side of the debate is willing to exact accountability on a personal level -- as soon as one side takes that position and means it the point of agreement that must be reached shifts to 99% or better.
It is simply a matter of mathematics and mathematics is, like physics, a function of laws, not suggestions.
You have all the power -- every bit of it -- as soon as you decide to assert it and refuse repression.
Use it in accordance with what the Founding Fathers put forward -- for good, not evil -- but do not believe for a second that the differentiation between good and evil comes as a result of consent to evil and lies. It does not, as both Mollie Tibbetts and the woman on the train in Philadelphia, along with countless others including virtually every child in this nation, has discovered the hard way.