Labels

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

The Christian Foundation of Modern Science - DR. SARAH SALVIANDER (Link to website for slide show.)


Christianity is not only compatible with science, but was a major factor in the rise of modern science.

  1. 1. THE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION OF MODERN SCIENCE DR. SARAH SALVIANDER Defending Christianity October, 2017
  2. 2. Evolution is a fact! It’s a fact the way gravity is a fact! Arguing with atheists about science…
  3. 3. Fact: g = 9.8 m/s2 Which theory explains it? It’s a fact the way gravity is a fact!
  4. 4. Newtonian gravity General relativity
  5. 5. Aristotelian theory of gravity Le Sage's theory of gravitation Ritz's theory of gravitation Nordström's theory of gravitation Kaluza Klein theory Whitehead's theory of gravitation Brans–Dicke theory of gravity Induced gravity ƒ(R) gravity Horndeski theory Supergravity String theory Modified Newtonian dynamics Self-creation cosmology theory of gravity Loop quantum gravity Nonsymmetric gravitational theory Conformal gravity Tensor–vector–scalar gravity Gravity as an entropic force Superfluid vacuum theory of gravity Chameleon theory Pressuron theory
  6. 6. ” “ WHAT IS SCIENCE? Henri Poincaré, mathematician and physicist Science is built up of facts, as a house is built of stones; but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house.
  7. 7. WHAT IS SCIENCE? Not just a collection of facts Not just explanations A system of knowledge held together by a way of thinking That way of thinking is the philosophy of science
  8. 8. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE o is the search for truth about the material universe o follows the scientific method o follows all of the evidence o is based on faith in natural laws Everything else is elaboration and details.
  9. 9. THE POWER OF SCIENCE
  10. 10. THE POWER OF SCIENCE
  11. 11. SCIENCE VS. RELIGION? Science and religion are fundamentally incompatible… Vic Stenger, physicist
  12. 12. SCIENCE VS. RELIGION? As the centuries go by religion has less and less room to exist and perform its obscurantist interference with the search for truth. Richard Dawkins, biologist
  13. 13. SCIENCE VS. RELIGION? The conflict between religion and science is inherent and (very nearly) zero-sum. …the maintenance of religious dogma always comes at the expense of science. Sam Harris, neuroscientist
  14. 14. ORIGIN OF MODERN SCIENCE It is indisputable that modern science emerged in the seventeenth century in Western Europe and nowhere else. “ ”Edward Grant, historian
  15. 15. MODERN SCIENCE EMERGED IN CHRISTIAN EUROPE Not in spite of Christian faith... ...because of it.
  16. 16. BRIEF HISTORY OF SCIENCE WHEN WHO WHAT DAWN OF MAN Everyone Rudimentary technology, astronomy 3rd MILLENIUM BC Predynastic Egyptians Math (numerals, calculations) … Indians Math 2nd MILLENIUM BC Mesopotamians Math, astronomy Ancient Egyptians Empiricism 7th CENTURY BC Pre-Socratic Greeks Thales, “father of science” … Indians Brahmagupta, concept of zero 5/6th CENTURY BC Indians Trigonometry, algebra
  17. 17. BRIEF HISTORY OF SCIENCE WHEN WHO WHAT … Ancient Greeks Pythagorus, atomism, astronomy 4th CENTURY BC Classical Greeks Plato, Aristotle, deductive reasoning, empiricism, pre-physics, cosmology
  18. 18. BRIEF HISTORY OF SCIENCE 4th CENTURY BC Classical Greeks Plato, Aristotle, deductive reasoning, empiricism, pre-physics, cosmology Laid the foundation for modern science: o Deductive reasoning o Observation and induction Explosion in pre-scientific advances o Anatomy o Astronomy o Botany o Mathematics o Zoology
  19. 19. BRIEF HISTORY OF SCIENCE WHEN WHO WHAT … Ancient Greeks Pythagorus, atomism, astronomy 4th CENTURY BC Classical Greeks Plato, Aristotle, deductive reasoning, empiricism, pre-physics, cosmology 4th CENTURY BC+ Chinese Astronomy 3rd/4th CENTURY BC Hellenistic Greeks Euclid, Archimedes 3rd CENTURY BC Hellenistic Greeks Aristarchus, heliocentrism (rejected) ?-1st CENTURY BC Chinese Decimals, negative and fractional 2nd CENTURY BC ROME CONQUERS GREECE
  20. 20. BRIEF HISTORY OF SCIENCE WHEN WHO WHAT 2nd CENTURY Greco-Egyptian Ptolemy, consolidated geocentric cosmology 3rd – 9th CENTURY Greeks Astronomy, algebra, medicine, anatomy (Platonic) Arabs Medicine, mathematics, astronomy, alchemy (Aristotelian) 10th CENTURY Persians/Arabs Optics 11th CENTURY Arabs Optics, medicine Everyone Supernova 1054 observation Chinese Geomorphology 12th CENTURY Arabs Gravitation, precursors to Newton’s laws, mechanics
  21. 21. BRIEF HISTORY OF SCIENCE WHEN WHO WHAT 13th CENTURY Western Europeans Robert Grosseteste, Roger Bacon, the scientific method Establishment of universities, paper mills 14th CENTURY Western Europeans Occam’s Razor, Oxford Calculators, mechanics, refraction 15th CENTURY Western Europeans Spring-driven clocks Movable type, Gutenberg Bible 16th CENTURY Western Europeans Copernicus, Brahe 17th CENTURY Western Europeans SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
  22. 22. ARISTOTLE AND THE CHURCH o Early Church fathers like Augustine were influenced by Plato o Aristotelian philosophy came from Christians in the Middle East ~12th century o Scholasticism o Thomas Aquinas most influential promoter of Aristotelianism in the Church
  23. 23. PLATO VS. ARISTOTLE PLATO o Mystic o Inductive reasoning o Spiritual more real than physical o Senses are unreliable for perceiving truth o Perfect forms; crude copies o Form is static o Math is highest form of thinking o Minimal scientific contribution ARISTOTLE o Logician o Deductive reasoning o Authenticity of everyday world o Senses are necessary to perceive truth o Objects are form + matter o Change is inevitable o Separated math and science o Highly influential in science
  24. 24. MEDIEVAL PRE-SCIENCE AND MATH o Aristotle and the Church o Neo-Platonic crisis CHRISTIANITY SCIENCE Logic, realism Mathematics
  25. 25. Greeks Romans 1200 AD Scientific Revolution Industrial Revolution Modern Civilization 400 BC 500 AD 1620 AD 1760 AD 1900 AD Medieval Europe COMPLEXITY à SCIENCE?
  26. 26. COMPLEXITY à SCIENCE? Human need to understand our place in the world More complex societies need greater depth of understanding Does complexity necessarily lead to science?
  27. 27. WHY DIDN’T OTHERS CULTURES INVENT SCIENCE? Some were insufficiently advanced. However… Greeks o Philosophically advanced o Didn’t invent science Babylonians, Romans, Chinese o Technologically advanced o Didn’t invent science Arabs o Intellectually advanced o Didn’t invent science
  28. 28. WHY DIDN’T OTHERS CULTURES INVENT SCIENCE? Science is the study of nature, and the possibility of science depends on your attitude toward nature
  29. 29. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is not real Pantheism and idealism: o Individuality and separateness are an illusion o Everything is an appearance of some absolute “One”
  30. 30. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is real o God made everything o The world and everything in it is real o They can be studied philosophically and experimentally
  31. 31. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is denigrated o Material world associated with evil o The material is denigrated o Slaves did all the labor while the upper classes pursued “higher things” à Major reason Greeks did not invent science
  32. 32. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is good o “And God saw that it was good” o Church defended a high view of the material world as God’s creation o Respect for craftsmen o Dignity in work, including scientific work
  33. 33. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is good “I give you thanks, Creator and God, that you have given me this joy in thy creation, and I rejoice in the works of your hands. See I have now completed the work to which I was called. In it I have used all the talents you have lent to my spirit.” Kepler’s spontaneous notebook prayer
  34. 34. ” “ SCIENCE AS TRUE WORSHIP …[Newton’s intensity was] a measure of his devotion to God. For Newton, “To be constantly engaged in studying and probing into God’s actions was true worship.” This idea defined the seventeenth- century scientist, and in many cases, the scientists doubled as theologians. Mitch Stokes, Isaac Newton
  35. 35. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is deified Pantheism and idealism: o Nature is the abode of gods or emanation of God’s own essence o Pagan man “lives in an enchanted forest” alive with spirits, sprites, and demons; focus is on appeasing or warding them off o Nature is sacred
  36. 36. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is a creation o Nature is good, but not a god o It is merely a creation, not a deity o De-deification of nature was a crucial step toward science
  37. 37. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is arbitrary Paganism: o A multitude of immanent gods who are personifications of natural phenomena o Arbitrary and capricious
  38. 38. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is ordered o Nature was created by God o God is trustworthy o Creation is regular, ordered, dependable
  39. 39. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is alive Paganism: o Nature is alive and operates through mysterious forces
  40. 40. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is ordered o The world is the creation of a Law-Giver o It is governed by laws; God is the “legislator” of natural laws
  41. 41. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is crude Greek paganism: o The world was structured by a lesser god who struggled against stubborn matter o Material world is rough, imperfect copy of Forms and Ideas o Mathematics is in the realm of the divine, separate from the material world
  42. 42. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is precise o God is sovereign o The universe is precisely what God intends it to be Kepler’s stubborn refusal to ignore a discrepancy à Kepler’s laws
  43. 43. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is inscrutable Paganism: o If there is any order in nature, it was not ordained by a rational being o It is inscrutable by human minds
  44. 44. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is knowable o Science arose from the leap of faith that the universe is ordered by God and knowable by rational minds o Faith comes from the belief that humans are made in the image of God o Humans are endowed with the gift of reason
  45. 45. Science is different to all the other systems of thought… because you don’t need faith in it. You can check that it works. Brian Cox, physicist SCIENCE DEVOID OF FAITH?
  46. 46. Science is different to all the other systems of thought… because you don’t need faith in it. You can check that it works. Brian Cox, physicist SCIENCE DEVOID OF FAITH?
  47. 47. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature need not be tested Aristotelianism: o Once an object’s purpose has been determined, we can deduce everything else we need to know about it o No need to test o Inspired by geometry
  48. 48. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature must be tested o Voluntarism vs. scholasticism o God’s freedom to impose his will in the world o God could have created any sort of world o Inspired experimentation o God is not constrained by Forms, but by his own nature
  49. 49. NON-CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature must be conformed to Animism and pantheism: o The divine is immanent o Humans should try to know nature only to conform and adapt to it
  50. 50. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS Nature is for the glory of God and the benefit of mankind o We are made in God’s image o Our kinship is with God, not nature o We are free to manipulate God’s creation intellectually and with experimentation o 17th century Protestant ideal: studying nature was a duty imposed by God
  51. 51. CHRISTIAN ASSUMPTIONS AND IDEALS o Nature is real o Nature is good o Nature is a creation o Nature is orderly o Nature is lawful o Nature is precise / mathematical o Nature is knowable o Nature must be tested o Nature is for the glory of God and the benefit of mankind o Time is linear
  52. 52. MEDIEVAL PRE-SCIENCE AND MATH o Aristotle and the Church o Neo-Platonic crisis CHRISTIANITY SCIENCE Logic, realism Mathematics
  53. 53. SCIENCE VS. RELIGION? The conflict between religion and science is inherent and (very nearly) zero-sum. The success of science often comes at the expense of religious dogma; the maintenance of religious dogma always comes at the expense of science. Sam Harris, neuroscientist
  54. 54. John Philoponus Bede the Venerable Rabanus Maurus Leo the Mathematician Hunayn ibn Ishaq Pope Sylvester II Hermann of Reichenau Hugh of Saint Victor William of Conches Hildegard of Bingen Robert Grosseteste Pope John XXI Albertus Magnus Roger Bacon Theodoric of Freiberg Thomas Bradwardine William of Ockham Jean Buridan Nicephorus Gregoras Nicole Oresme Nicholas of Cusa Otto Brunfels Nicolaus Copernicus Michael Servetus Michael Stifel William Turner Ignazio Danti Bartholomaeus Pitiscus John Napier Johannes Kepler Galileo Galilei Laurentius Gothus Marin Mersenne René Descartes Pierre Gassendi Anton Maria of Rheita Blaise Pascal Isaac Barrow Juan Lobkowitz Seth Ward Robert Boyle John Wallis John Ray Gottfried Leibniz Isaac Newton Colin Maclaurin Stephen Hales Thomas Bayes Firmin Abauzit Emanuel Swedenborg Carolus Linnaeus Leonhard Euler Maria Gaetana Agnesi Joseph Priestley Isaac Milner Samuel Vince
  55. 55. Linthus Gregory Bernhard Bolzano William Buckland Agustin-Louis Cauchy Lars Levi Laestadius George Boole Edward Hitchcock William Whewell Michael Faraday Charles Babbage Adam Sedgwick Temple Chevallier John Bachman Robert Main James Clerk Maxwell Andrew Pritchard Arnold Henry Guyot Gregor Mendel Philip Henry Gosse Asa Gray Francesco Faà di Bruno Julian Tenison Woods James Prescott Joule Heinrich Hertz James Dwight Dana Louis Pasteur George Jackson Mivart Armand David George Stokes George Salmon Henry Baker Tristram Lord Kelvin Pierre Duhem Georg Cantor Henrietta Swan Leavitt Dmitri Egorov Mihajlo Idvorski Pupin Pavel Florensky Agnes Giberne J. J. Thomson John Ambrose Fleming Max Planck Edward Arthur Milne Robert Millikan Charles Stine E. T. Whittaker Arthur Compton Ronald Fisher Georges Lemaître Otto Hahn David Lack Charles Coulson George R. Price Theodosius Dobzhansky Werner Heisenberg
  56. 56. Michael Polanyi Henry Eyring Sewall Wright William G. Pollard Aldert van der Ziel Mary Celine Fasenmyer John Eccles Carlos Chagas Filho Sir Robert Boyd Richard Smalley Mariano Artigas Arthur Peacocke C. F. von Weizsäcker Stanley Jaki Allan Sandage Charles Hard Townes Ian Barbour Freeman Dyson Richard H. Bube Antonino Zichichi John Polkinghorne Owen Gingerich John T. Houghton Russell Stannard R. J. Berry Gerhard Ertl Michał Heller Robert Griffiths Ghilean Prance Donald Knuth George Frances Rayner Ellis Colin Humphreys John Suppe Eric Priest Christopher Isham Henry F. Schaefer, III Joel Primack Robert T. Bakker Joan Roughgarden William D. Philips Kenneth R. Miller Francis Collins Noella Marcillino Simon Conway Morris John D. Barrow Denis Alexander Don Page Stephen Barr Brian Kobilka Karl W. Giberson Martin Nowak John Lennox Jennifer Wiseman Ard Louis Larry Wall Justin L. Barrett
  57. 57. ARCHITECTS OF THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION Rodney Stark surveyed 52 scientists key to the Scientific Revolution o 50 Christian o 1 unknown o 1 atheist Of the 50: o 60% “devout” o 40% “conventional”
  58. 58. Scientific method Copernican revolution Empiricism and mathematics in science United the heavens and earth, gravity, calculus Relativity Quantum revolution Big bang theory
  59. 59. Scientific method Copernican revolution Empiricism and mathematics in science United the heavens and earth, gravity, calculus Quantum revolution Relativity Big bang theory
  60. 60. SCIENCE VS. RELIGION? The significance and joy in my science comes in those occasional moments of discovering something new and saying to myself, 'So that's how God did it.' My goal is to understand a little corner of God's plan. Fritz Schaefer, Quantum chemist
  61. 61. SCIENCE VS. RELIGION? I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science. Wernher von Braun Rocket scientist
  62. 62. SCIENCE VS. RELIGION? It seems to me that when confronted with the marvels of life and the universe, one must ask why and not just how. The only possible answers are religious. Arthur Schawlow Physicist (Nobel laureate) I find a need for God in the universe and in my own life.
  63. 63. SUMMARY o Modern science arose in 17th century Christian Europe and nowhere else o Greek philosophy + Christian theology à science o Science arose because of Christianity, not in spite of it o 96% of the architects of the Scientific Revolution were Christian o Christians need to embrace science as one of the blessings of their religion