“The Lung,” Second Edition, 2014:
“Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to subcellular structures…enabling
their ready incorporation into biological systems.”
A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional
vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very
troubling and previously unreported fact:
The vaccines are heavily contaminated with
a variety of nanoparticles.
Many of the particles are metals.
We’re talking about traditional vaccines,
such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.
To
begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating
nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:
International
Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari
“The
analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non
biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the
Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation
represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a
vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it
is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes
(e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines…”
Are
the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the
contamination is intentional?
“The
quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical
compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither
biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can
induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection
time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember
that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism
and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects
different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”
“After
being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay
around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they can also be
carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be
their final destination…As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that
small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of
those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due
to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles
capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible
not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell
nuclei and interact with the DNA…”
“In
some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and
the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues…”
“Given
the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse
effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and
have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants
are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar
quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small
organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles…could heavily
impair the muscle functionality…”
“We
come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the
vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental contamination caused
by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations
detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any
material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring,
for example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they
should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more
in particular those meant for infants.”
This 2017 study opens up a whole new
field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.
Such
particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.
Many
legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate vaccines
and force them on the population. But these contaminating nanoparticles are not
vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend the right of the State to
inject them.
Here
is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and
compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated. Take a deep breath
and buckle up:
“…further
presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies
(ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases [all 44
vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the
package of the product…”
“…single
particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (less than 100nm) and
aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron,
Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and
Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”
“…the
particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the
samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix,
Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa,
Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec,
Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”
“…particles
of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten,
Calcium chloride).”
“…singular
debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”
“Some
metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified.
Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif,
Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate
kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or
Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth
(Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears
in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in
25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a
biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria.
As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a
nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The nano-bio-interaction
generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce
adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.”
“…examples
of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite
entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec… of stainless steel (Iron,
Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix…Similar
aggregates, though in different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or
cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature.”
I’m
sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing problems are
“rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other medical lies.
“I’d
like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a
plate, can you inject it?”
Several
vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:
Are
some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?
Does
the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY lead to
dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?
New
nano-technology is already being employed to create several vaccines—supposedly
“improving effectiveness.” In fact, the coming COVID-19 vaccine may be a
nano-type. Does this manufacturing process carry with it the unavoidable effect
of unleashing a hurricane of nanoparticle contaminants?
How many
cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of
nanoparticle contamination?
And finally, where are these
contaminated vaccines manufactured? The above study did not attempt to discover
this. It was outside the scope of the research. It’s common knowledge that, for
example, in the case of the US, vaccines or their components, are, in many
instances, not produced domestically. Where does this put control of safety?
In, say, China, where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals
connected to contamination of products?
The vaccine establishment does not show
the slightest interest in answering any of these questions. They are busy
pretending the questions don’t exist.
Trusting the establishment would be
suicidal.
Reprinted
with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
Jon Rappoport runs No More Fake News. The author of an explosive
collection, The Matrix Revealed, Jon was a candidate for a
US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA
Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe.
Copyright © Jon Rappoport
