I warned everyone.
Now even CNN is on it, although they (like SAGE) think we're smarter than nature -- and
evolution.
They
write that some variants that have emerged over the past few months "show
a reduced susceptibility to vaccine-acquired immunity, though none appears to
escape entirely."
But they
caution that these variants emerged "before vaccination was
widespread," and that "as vaccines become more
widespread, the transmission advantage gained by a virus that can evade
vaccine-acquired immunity will increase."
In a word: Duh.
I know I've been banging on this drum since Covid-19
started but it is no-less important today, especially in the
context of holding people accountable for killing several
hundred thousand Americans and the economic destruction they
brought upon the nation.
To be sterilizing a
vaccine must prevent infection. Since you
never get infected you never replicate the virus and thus do
not shed it. If you do not shed it the potential path of
the viral life-cycle for that particular infection ends with you and thus you
cannot pass on or cause a mutation. You
are sterile against that disease; from the
point of view of the virus you are a lifeless rock. Among
commonly-used sterilizing vaccines are MMR (measles, mumps
and rubella), Varicella (chicken pox), OPV (oral polio) and others. The
only time that such a vaccine fails is when you do not build immunity (such as
due to immune compromise.) This is extremely rare and
the protection from such vaccines tends to be either decades-long or lifetime.
A vaccine that is not sterilizing permits
the virus to infect you and replicate and as a result you can
infect others. Technically it is not a
vaccine at all (which by definition prevents infection);
it is a prophylactic therapy. Such a
"vaccine" instead acts to reduce or eliminate
symptomatic disease. You don't know you're sick and you don't get
sick. You don't go to the hospital and you don't die.
Unfortunately since you don't know you're sick but are
infected and the virus is both replicating in you and shedding you
are more-likely to spread the infection to others. All of
the current Covid jabs are in this category and so is, for that matter
IPV (injected polio vaccine -- the original Salk discovery.)
During the
original vaccine trials in the summer and fall of 2020 they deliberately
did not test any of the recipients for asymptomatic infections.
Only a person who developed a significant illness was tested. This
has continued post roll-out with the CDC specifying that a
close contact of a known case who was vaccinated did not need
to quarantine or be tested until and unless they became
symptomatic. They knew damn well, in other words, that the jabs were not sterilizing
but did not want that data up for public debate because then those who have
read history would be likely to make the connection to the present day and thus
they did their level best to hide it. That has now blown up in
their face with it being conclusively known that
jabbed people in fact not only get infected but spread the virus to others.
The problem with
non-sterilizing vaccines is simply this: There is no safe means of
mass-use of non-sterilizing vaccines so long as
transmission within the community does or is likely to exist.
Ever.
There are no
exceptions.
This was known to public health officials and
virologists seventy years ago and is why the
United States used both IPV (injected polio vaccine) and OPV
(oral polio vaccine) in sequence for polio until the 1990s. OPV produced sterilizing immunity
but IPV did not. OPV had a very small (but non-zero,
about 1 in a million) risk of causing polio because it was a
codon-deoptimized live virus which, on rare occasion, would
mutate back to its virulent form in the human body. So
to mitigate that risk you got IPV first in the US (to
prevent systemic infection; this was non-sterilizing),
then OPV which is sterilizing -- that is, it prevents not only
getting sick from polio but also replicating and shedding
the virus, thus giving it to others along with preventing the promotion of
mutations that WILL eventually escape the vaccine.
Had we done with
polio what we're doing now with Covid -- IPV (non-sterilizing) use only with
virus circulating in the United States -- it is very likely the virus
would have mutated, escaped the vaccine and killed
millions in America. Every
single so-called expert knows damn well why we didn't do that
with polio and how dangerous it is to attempt it. Indeed where polio
still circulates but money is scarce they use OPV only (which
is sterilizing) and accept the risk of the rare but possible
active case it can cause for this exact reason.
Again: This is
not a "new idea"; it was in fact the only rational path of
action and known decades ago, forming the very basis of our polio
vaccination strategy. This combination strategy was
necessary for polio but not for measles, for example, as the
measles vaccine is sterilizing.
ONLY A STERILIZING VACCINE IS SAFE TO
USE ON A MASS POPULATION BASIS WHEN A PARTICULAR PATHOGEN IS CIRCULATING IN THE
ENVIRONMENT.
THIS IS NOT THEORY -- IT IS DECADES-OLD
KNOWN MEDICAL FACT.
In addition natural
infection with Covid-19 is sterilizing. Being infected and
recovering conserves the nasal and respiratory mucosal response which
is where the virus enters the body. Natural infection also conveys both "N"
(nucleocapsid) and "S" (spike) antibody knowledge and T-cell
recognition but the "N" knowledge is much stronger as
coronaviruses have evolved to evade the immune system with the "S"
portion through millions of years. This is why they can infect you in the
first place. The "S" portion undergoes mutation at a
quite-rapid rate while the "N" portion is conserved.
It was thus expected that prior infection would lead to
durable (years to decades) of resistance and indeed that's exactly what we have
found thus far. Indeed in a small study it was found that this
recognition extended to the bone marrow in a large
percentage of cases and in those people is likely to confer decades-long if
not lifetime protection. This is not
true for "S" induced immunity as it wanes rapidly
and, far worse that is where the mutation is taking place and thus where
escape risk lies.
It was
acceptable to issue EUAs for potentially non-sterilizing jabs to be used only by very high-risk individuals --
such as those in nursing homes -- with the understanding that they will fail to
provide anywhere close to complete protection and might, over time potentiate worse outcomes.
But with actual informed consent and on a limited, not population-wide
basis,
that was defensible. This, of course, leaves aside the adverse event risk
-- which we also know is much higher in these jabs, by a factor of 100x or
more, than we have ever tolerated in any mass-use shot before.
It was ridiculously and grossly negligent entering
into the territory of depraved indifference to mass-vaccinate
the population with non-sterilizing jabs. We knew very early on that eradicating
Covid-19 was impossible; there are animal reservoirs, specifically felines (of
all sorts), ferrets and likely others (now believed to include deer.)
We have never eradicated rabies and never
will for this reason; as long as there are animal reservoirs you
cannot eradicate a virus as it always has a host and a means of transmission
outside of human control.
As such
there was never, and will never be, a safe means to use non-sterilizing
vaccines against this virus or any other coronavirus and the more jabs we
deliver and attempt to compel the use of the worse the problem will get.
Eventually we are very likely to get a
mutation that entirely evades the jabs. That mutation will be caused
by those who are jabbed since they are the only ones placing
such mutational pressure on the virus. An unvaccinated person who gets
infected places no such mutational pressure on the virus where a vaccinated
person not only does they provide the exact pathway that virologists use
to intentionally select for more-transmissible, virile or both mutations --
serial passage through cells that does not kill the host.
What is potentially
worse is that there is a developing body of evidence that those who previously
had Covid and then get vaccinated may destroy their "N"
protein recognition by doing so, ruining their previous
nearly-perfect immunity. That we did not specifically prove that this did
not happen before giving these shots to anyone with prior
infection is outrageous.
While the data on this is quite thin at present that there
is a higher breakthrough rate in persons with
prior infection than those who were infected but did not get
vaccinated is what the data currently shows, which strongly implies
that vaccination after
infection actually screws you.
The people who did all of this did so intentionally either
by willful blindness or worse, with actual knowledge -- and the so-called
"public health" authorities who continue to push this instead
of banning it are intentionally doing
so as well. Vander**** is just one example of this insanity but hardly
alone -- Johns Hopkins, Harvard, Mayo, Cleveland -- they all know this
is true, never mind the researchers at Ft. Detrick, the CDC and NIH.
Until and unless
we prove a vaccine against Covid (or anything else that is
circulating) is sterilizing it cannot be
safely used on a mass-population basis. That's the beginning and end of
the discussion. There are no exceptions,
ever, period. This was not even attempted to
be demonstrated in the summer and fall 2020 Covid vaccine trials as
the time period was too short to do so. We now know,
factually that in fact there are zero sterilizing
and effective options among the vaccines in use -- whether here in the US or
otherwise.
The only means to
combat a pathogen absent sterilizing vaccination is to hit
infections early and hard with whatever you have for the purpose of reducing
viral load so as to produce durable, sterilizing immunity via
infection. If you reduce viral load you reduce both the risk
of pathology seriously injuring or killing the infected person and
also reduce the forward transmission rate, Rt, of said virus.
Only
sterilizing immunity cuts off mutation and exerting mutational pressure via non-sterilizing vaccines not only promotes mutation by removing the
signal an infected person has to self-isolate and reduce transmission risk
(since you don't feel ill) it nudges the virus toward codons that will escape the
protection in whole or part.
In small groups
of particularly high risk a non-sterilizing vaccine may be worth it but any use
of one raises the risk of mutational escape and thus while attempting
to protect that small group you may screw others. Attempting to
accurately determine who "deserves" to get protected while someone
else gets screwed is a discussion that damn well ought to take place out in
public as it is the public at large that is the recipient of
the screwing if it occurs!
There remains a
risk that drug resistance may arise which is why multi-drug regimes are
important. As an example HCQ+Ivermectin which was
formally registered as a trial and then never actually run, is
(among other options) one such potential approach.
When it comes to
respiratory viruses as was the case with polio you
need immunity via whatever source to take hold at
the point of both entry and emission by an infected person.
This is why OPV worked on a sterilizing basis for polio
where IPV did not. IPV was injected; OPV was consumed. As a result
OPV produced mucosal immunity in the gut and thus
prevented both colonization and
forward transmission. IPV, on the other hand,
prevented symptomatic disease in the person immunized but
did not express sufficiently in the gut
mucosa to prevent infection, shedding and transmission.
THE SAME
APPLIES HERE WITH THE COVID JABS AND FOR THIS REASON THEY ARE AND ALWAYS WILL
BE DANGEROUS, PROMOTING MUTATION AND ULTIMATELY VIRAL ESCAPE.
If you get Covid and beat it since the
point of entry is your respiratory mucosa you have strong and
broad resistance focused there. That's sterilizing in more
than 9 out of 10 persons and far more-durable than jab-based immunity
as well. That is what the data tells us.
It is wildly superior to
a non-sterilizing vaccine because you are not only very unlikely to get the
virus again you are also nearly-certain to be unable to infect
anyone else if you do. This and only this is
what cuts off mutational pressure.
It's too late now; we're
stuck with the stupid, particularly
all the screaming harpies who went out and got jabbed despite being at
very low risk of serious outcomes themselves, turning themselves
into literal gain-of-function labs for the virus. If
you took the jab, in short, unless you were at very high risk
and thus it was justified on a personal mitigation basis you
are, in fact, part of the body of individuals
that are placing evolutionary pressure on the virus to evolve and
ultimately evade the protection and screw not just others but you as
well.
Those who are
claiming "well, I got jabbed, I got infected, but it would have been
much worse if I didn't get jabbed" are the worst of the
psychotics. First, the majority of Covid-19 infections
are asymptomatic according to the CDC itself. Indeed they claim at
least six people get infected for each detected infection.
You may well have moved yourself from "I sneezed" to "I got
pretty damned sick" by taking the shot. You don't
know. But worse is
that by taking the jab and then getting infected anyway you
have now not just become a potential mutational
factory you are one of the people causing what will ultimately
become viral escape and the screwing of yourself and others because by definition if
you got sick after vaccination the virus got into your system, it has now
proved whatever occurred in you evaded the protection you had and then
was emitted back out where others can catch it from you after that evasion took
place.
You were either the mutational factory
or an intermediate host that screws the next person you share the love with!
Not only did your
protection against fail but, much worse, it's possible that
said screwing will be enhanced by whatever
residual antibody titer you may have since binding antibodies, if present (and
which you intentionally put into your system) will still be
present. Even more-seriously you put the spike protein and thus the
antibody response not in your nose and throat but in your blood
vessels and other organs where they can cause the exact disease
progression that occurs when Covid-19 kills people. If you get a "break
though" infection I hope you have your d-Dimer levels
immediately checked because if not you may be a walking heart attack
or stroke somewhere in the not-so-distant future with no other
warning as a direct result of intentionally loading your body full of
"protection" in the wrong place.
This, and
only this, is why I will not consent to such a jab under any
circumstances until and unless there is hard science showing that a
sterilizing option exists. That one, assuming the risk profile is reasonable, is one I
might consider. Said jab today does not exist anywhere in the United States and
I'm unaware of any scientific work showing that any of the current jabs are sterilizing
irrespective of where they are manufactured and sold.
Without
sterilizing immunization against this disease the only sane approach
is to attempt to interdict the progress of disease at first
suspicion and evidence of infection instead.
I am capable
of reading both history and scientific papers, I know I'm right, the CDC, NIH,
Vander****, Mayo, Cleveland and Johns Hopkins also knew for decades that
I'm right and they have either all turned what formerly were scientific
organizations into politically-driven soy-boy pieces of worthless and even
harmful crap or, much worse, they're deliberately lying.
If you were among
the conned the only remaining question is what are you going to do with and to
those who conned you?
Stay tuned for
the next exciting episode of "You're ****ed, fool."
