Labels

Saturday, September 19, 2026

Evolutionary Innumeracy - Vox Popoli

 In which Dennis McCarthy calls me out for failing to address his challenge to my PZ argument. And he’s right, I didn’t even bother to address the one he pointed out because it was so obviously wrong and I had already pointed out in the book that genetic drift is far too slow to ever fill in the gap that natural selection couldn’t. Hence my point about having addressed “every single relevant point”. What Dennis did on the challenge that I ignored was to apply Kimura’s substitution equation to the question of fixations over time while omitting Kimura’s equation for mean time to fixation for a neutral mutation.

So, I will rectify that failure now. To put it in terms everyone should be able to understand, he pointed to the speed limit sign to determine how fast the car was going instead of looking at the speedometer. I didn’t see any reason to respond to that; no biologist or population geneticist would ever suggest that genetic drift is actually faster than natural or sexual selection.

VD: Economists, mathematicians, and physicists are inordinately skeptical about evolution, because they all understand the math that the biologists don’t. Every single one who bothers to looks into it ends up dismissing it pretty quickly. Darwin was innumerate, by his own admission. Dawkins is observably innumerate. And the Wistar Symposium demonstrated that the very best and most influential evolutionists simply can’t comprehend the math involved.....


https://voxday.net/2026/09/14/evolutionary-innumeracy/ 

The City Is Not London—How Babylon's Temple Banks Built the Financial System

 "Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors." — Matthew 6:12

When we look into antiquity, we tend to see primitive people. But ancient Babylon (c. 2000–539 BCE) and our world today are not that far apart.

Full text:
https://wendywilliamson.substack.com/p/the-city-is-not-london 

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Israel Did 9/11 - by π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π˜Ύπ™„π™π™„π™•π™€π™‰ - When will the U.S. invade Israel?


Nearly half of the $40 trillion in national debt has gone to wars of choice for Israel, and paying interest on the debt created for those wars, plus managing programs for illegals invited into the country by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.  The United States is not “occupied.” It was conquered at least 113 years ago.

I know, I know. That subtitle is like asking ‘when will bears stop shitting in the woods?’ But sometimes bears shit in meadows, or on mesas, or on people’s lawns. Hell, I wasn’t even going to write this piece, but it was hard to hide my disgust at reading so many lies about 9/11 this past week from Kosher Con Inc rags like Ziohedge to the corporate septic distillers pumping Israeli stillage, so I felt compelled to purge that disgust here.

Here’s the score, Good Citizens: Generation Z isn’t playing these kosher atrocity propaganda and fantasy history games that normies have played for seventy years. Change is coming fast, and the parasite is panicking because it must secure new hosts before that change arrives.

https://thegoodcitizen.live/p/israel-did-911?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=510806&post_id=213042150&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email 


It’s been 25 years since Israel committed an act of terror on U.S. soil against what would quickly become its full-time host proxy empire, West Israel. I no longer distinguish between the two nations. Once you see how the parasite controls the host from within, there is no point in making any effort to distinguish the host from the parasite. And so, to assume the CIA and Mossad aren’t the same is to ignore the timeline of events that has most of the world living under the criminal system of das kosher boot. Or, rather, unter dem koscheren Stiefel.

The majority of Americans still cannot fathom this simple concept of a total takeover from within, as psychological persuasion (propaganda), indoctrination, and the wonders of pharmacology have kept them on their kosher plantation, loving their masters. The takeover wouldn’t have been possible without first coopting Christianity with silly, beneficial Zionist created denominations that pervert Biblical history, and always depicting themselves as the world’s greatest victims deserving of incessant sympathy to keep their grift humming along.


Biologists are Retarded - Vox Popoli

 Mr. Matsumoto clearly groks the fullness of the fundamental problem with biology: biologists are functionally innumerate. They simply aren’t capable, and they have never been capable, of understanding the math that is required for them to make any sense of their own science.

Most of the apparent reasonableness of The Modern Creation Myth rests on people’s inability to understand Size and the scale of the things Science is actually talking about. Once you actually grok it… once numbers stop being simply “Big” and you start to understand how small some “Big” numbers can be in comparison to others…

The whole notion that we evolved from random processes just completely falls apart.

Completely......


https://voxday.net/2026/09/13/biologists-are-retarded/ 

....Current best estimates put the age of the universe at around 14 billion years, which, compared to infinity, might as well be a microsecond. If you understand the actual statistics behind the claim, you understand that even the most generous cosmology gives you nowhere near the amount of time or space necessary to make the formation of even one cell by random chance remotely plausible.

That is a fact.

I’m telling you a mathematical fact.

It can’t happen. The creation of life by random chance could simply never occur.

There is a reason that economists are inordinately inclined to be dubious about evolution. And that reason is this: we comprehend large numbers. For all the flaws of our field, and believe me, they are many, there isn’t a single economist who is impressed by a biologist waving his hand and summoning “millions and billions of years” or dramatically declaring that 600,000 generations is but “an eyeblink” in the context of geological time.

We work in trillions, bitch.

So waving your hand and imagining that the mere evocation of ONE MILLION YEARS allows sufficient time for anything and everything to happen not only doesn’t impress us, it confirms our original impression that you are actually retarded. I mean, when your core argument is, quite literally, an Austin Powers joke about inflation in a 1997 movie, you should probably consider the very high degree of probability that your entire hypothesis is not only ill-founded, but obviously wrong.

Evolution by natural selection never happened because it is mathematically impossible. And if you don’t accept that, it is only because you don’t understand the relevant math.

DISCUSS ON SG

Random - by Yoshi Matsumoto - Holy is He Who Wrestles

 

Preamble

No two randomly shuffled decks of the standard 52 playing cards have ever turned up in the same order, ever, in the history of the universe.

Never.

Not even once.

It is basically a mathematical certainty that this is true.

Modern people like to talk a lot about Infinity.

Maybe you’ve noticed?

It’s a recurring conceit in fiction, for example. Infinity is the theme of countless “smart” YouTube videos. For a certain class of person, it’s become something of a pastime to wax philosophic about the “infinite number of numbers” between 1 and 2. There’s a whole type of guy out there who enjoys bringing up pi and talking about how its digits never stop, or other numbers like it, e for example, or The Golden Ratio. 


https://substack.com/home/post/p-209652225 

See, everyone is talking out their ass.

“When the universe was a few minutes old it was incredibly dense and very hot. So much so you see that hydrogen could fuse into helium and then, a few million years after that, all the hydrogen and helium became stars and then after a billion or so years those stars made all the heavier elements and then…”

Fuck off.

Like, seriously.

Be real for a second here because there is zero damn chance that you know what happened “when the universe was a few minutes old.”

Zero.

Probability Weasel - Vox Popoli

 An evolutionist’s summary of Richard Dawkins’s famous Weasel program, which is still very popular among the innumerate for its explicative proof of the viability of evolution:

In 1986, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins set out to dispel such misunderstandings by implementing a computer program that works—in Dawkins’ own words—like this:


https://voxday.net/2026/09/12/probability-weasel/ 

..Let’s choose N to be 100 (one hundred offspring per generation) and P to be 5%, as in Dawkins original experiment. How many generations would it take until we finally reach “METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL”? Just guess a number, I’ll wait here…

Answer: about 50 generations!

In other words, the program theoretically explains how evolution can achieve fixation within 50 generations. Therefore, the transformation from proto-chimp to human is… well, the math still doesn’t work given the 410 million base pair gap, but we can’t expect a famous biologist to understand long division. The important point that the concept makes sense to the innumerate. Although, obviously, it doesn’t make sense, since as the usual critique correctly points out, the target phrase is known from the start, which is not the case in the evolutionary context.

But never mind that. I am not interested in the usual critique, since the distinction between known and unknown ends is far too abstract for the evolutionists, who have completely failed to comprehend the significance of that distinction for the last 40 years. Let’s try something else, something more simple and basic that even the most determined Neo-Darwinist should be able to grasp: the limits of reproduction.........

It’s Too Late for Regrets - by Vox Day - Sigma Game - Women are lamenting the male response to decades of feminism

 There are words that can never be taken back. There are psychological scars, once inflicted, that are never going to heal. And there are societal developments, decades in the making, that cannot be easily reverted.

Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back.

So many men have retreated from intimacy, hiding behind firewalls, filters and curated personas, dabbling and scrolling. We miss you.....


https://sigmagame.substack.com/p/its-too-late-for-regrets?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2265630&post_id=215363001&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email 

....This article should not be taken as a sign that women are finally getting it. The author is a divorced 54-year old professional observer who has the experience, the context, and the perception to make sense of what she is seeing take place around her. I would bet that not a single one of the women at the four other tables even noticed the near-complete absence of men at the restaurant.

And men should not be glad that women are finally experiencing the inevitable consequences of their terrible collective decisions. They were always inevitable, but they are catastrophic, for men, for women, and for civilized society.

The reality is that men are, and have always been, entirely capable of entertaining and occupying themselves. They don’t need women to have a good time, and they don’t need women in order to survive, aside from the obvious reproductive aspect. Women, on the other hand, need others to entertain them and give them purpose, and they specifically need men if they wish to live in anything better than grass huts without indoor plumbing or running water.

But far too many women have accepted the insane creed of feminism, and in doing so, have rendered themselves worse than useless to men. Every aspect of feminism is harmful to both men and to civilized society. There is literally nothing good that has come from even the most defensible and popular elements of feminism; educating women has proven to be one of the most destructive and insidious policies ever discovered.

Providing a college education to a woman is akin to handing a loaded gun to a toddler. Nothing good will come of it and there is a reasonable chance that it will destroy her life. The only real purpose of female attendance at university was to help them meet and marry college-educated men, and such is the counterproductive essence of feminism that it has already destroyed that one positive element.

There is no debating or arguing this, except on abstract grounds. Every single empirical element, every single observable consequence, ranges from bad to catastrophic. I strongly suspect that if anyone ever does the research, it will be discovered that for a society, encouraging higher education for women is more dysgenic than encouraging incestuous marriages.

  • 14.3% - born 1975-1979 childless at 35 no college

  • 34.4% - born 1985-1989 childless at 35 college degree

At the current rate of decline, we can calculate that 58 percent of the college-educated women born between 2005 and 2009 will never have children. But the trends actually suggest it may be worse than that.

I fully understand that this concept is absolutely anathema to the vast majority of women and probably a reasonable majority of men. But the only thing that matters is if it is true or not. And the problem that the middle-aged woman noticed in a Chicago restaurant has been decades in the making, and we’re only beginning to see some of the catastrophic consequences that will have to play out before enough people are going to be desperate enough to permit them to be addressed.

So this, too, shall pass. But it’s going to take a catastrophic collapse before civilized society will have a foundation strong enough to support it.