The U.S.Government repeatedly says that “Iran is the top state-sponsor of terrorism,” but on 9 June 2017, I did a study titled “All Islamic Terrorism Is Perpetrated by Fundamentalist Sunnis, Except Terrorism Against Israel”, listing and analyzing the 54 most prominent terrorist-Islamic incidents worldwide, and it opened, “My examination of 54 prominent international examples of what U.S. President Donald Trump is presumably referring to when he uses his often-repeated but never defined phrase “radical Islamic terrorism” indicates that it is exclusively a phenomenon that is financed by the U.S. government’s Sunni fundamentalist royal Arab ‘allies’ and their subordinates, and not at all by ]Shiite] Iran or its allies or any Shiites at all. Each of the perpetrators was either funded by those royals, or else inspired by the organizations, such as Al Qaeda and ISIS, that those royals fund, and which are often also armed by U.S.-made weapons that were funded by those royals. In other words: the U.S. government is allied with the perpetrators.”
Friday, May 1, 2026
Trump Imposes Israel’s Demands Above America’s Needs. - LewRockwell
All Islamic Terrorism Is Perpetrated by Fundamentalist Sunnis, | (And aided and abetted by American IGNORANCE of who their 'allies' are! - Cl)
My examination of 54 prominent international examples of what U.S. President Donald Trump is presumably referring to when he uses his often-repeated but never defined phrase “radical Islamic terrorism” indicates that it is exclusively a phenomenon that is financed by the U.S. government’s Sunni fundamentalist royal Arab ‘allies’ and their subordinates, and not at all by Iran or its allies or any Shiites at all. Each of the perpetrators was either funded by those royals, or else inspired by the organizations, such as Al Qaeda and ISIS, that those royals fund, and which are often also armed by U.S.-made weapons that were funded by those royals. In other words: the U.S. government is allied with the perpetrators.
Another Big, Beautiful Hoax - (There is no one better at PERSPECTIVE - while entertaining you at the same time - than DJ - NONE!)
A few nights ago, there was a third attempt on the life of President Donald Trump. Well, at least that’s what was reported. Even more so than on the first two occasions, there was an unmistakable theatrical aspect to it. Bad theater. Ed Wood style theater. Think Reefer Madness. Think nuclear activated dinosaurs crushing big cities.
There are many reasons to doubt this dubious story. Why did UFC president Dana White describe a gunman in the building as “fucking awesome?” How about that hot Israeli influencer who shared a generous selfie of her protruding breasts at the scene? Well, as we’ve noted at other questionable events, fear is erased when it’s time for a really cool selfie. The lovely young Zionist did offer the observation that there “was, like, no security at all.” Others would say similar things. Odd, isn’t it, that when the most controversial president of modern times decides to finally attend the White House Correspondents Dinner, that security wasn’t ramped up? Why not on orange alert, to rekindle memories of the post-9/11 “terrorism” barometer? As even loyal Fox News reported, “Attendees at the White House Correspondents' Dinner raised concerns about security at the venue, describing inconsistent screening before the shooting occurred.” A German journalist stated that “there was no security screening.”
Reprogramming the Tumor Microenvironment: The Metabolic and Immunologic Trap
For decades, cancer therapy has focused almost exclusively on the tumor cell—its mutations, its proliferation rate, its vulnerabilities to cytotoxic insult. Yet this view is incomplete. Cancer is not a collection of isolated malignant cells; it is an ecosystem. The tumor exists within, and actively reshapes, a complex microenvironment composed of immune cells, stromal elements, vasculature, extracellular matrix, and metabolic gradients. This tumor microenvironment (TME) is not a passive bystander—it is an active participant in tumor growth, immune evasion, and therapeutic resistance.
At the same time, the immune system—arguably the most powerful anticancer mechanism we possess—is frequently suppressed, misdirected, or metabolically paralyzed in patients with cancer. Modern immunotherapy has demonstrated that when properly activated, the immune system can induce durable remissions. However, the majority of patients fail to respond. The reason is increasingly clear: the immune system does not fail in isolation—it fails within a hostile metabolic and inflammatory microenvironment engineered by the tumor.
This is where the metabolic approach fundamentally diverges from conventional oncology. Repurposed drugs and nutraceuticals do not simply target tumor cells; they reshape the terrain in which those cells exist. They modulate immune function, normalize aberrant signaling pathways, and disrupt the protective niche of the TME. In doing so, they transform an immunosuppressive ecosystem into one that is hostile to cancer and permissive to immune-mediated clearance......
Conclusion
Cancer is not simply a genetic disease—it is a metabolic and immunologic disorder embedded within a dysfunctional microenvironment. Treating the tumor in isolation is insufficient. To achieve meaningful and durable responses, we must treat the ecosystem.
Repurposed drugs and nutraceuticals offer a powerful means of doing so. By targeting multiple axes simultaneously, they dismantle the metabolic–immune trap that protects the tumor. They restore immune competence, normalize the microenvironment, and create conditions in which the body’s own defenses can function effectively.
This is not an alternative to conventional therapy—it is a necessary evolution. The future of oncology lies not in choosing between approaches, but in integrating them into a coherent, systems-based strategy.
And that begins by recognizing a simple but transformative truth:
to defeat cancer, we must treat the terrain, not just the tumor.
Prayer - by bionic mosquito - A Christian Hall
For this access to be available to the disciples, certain conditions must be met: they must abide in Jesus; His words must abide in them; they must bring forth good fruit. To this last point, it suggests that their prayers should be tied to their mission.
Jesus spoke often about “My name.” for example, receive a little child in “My name”; do a miracle in “My name”; give a cup of water in “My name.” Often in the Bible, “name” is a synonym for the bearer. We see in the Gospels that the name of Jesus has miraculous power within itself:
Luke 10: 17 Then the seventy returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name.”
Jesus also cautions not to take this idea too far. His name is not a magic formula or incantation:
Matthew 7: 21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’
Yet, for His disciples – and especially after Jesus’s death and Resurrection – the name of Jesus offered special power. There are many accounts of miracles performed in Jesus’s name in the book of Acts: for example, in the name of Jesus Christ, rise up and walk.
Soldiers Stop Caring About Survival After Prolonged Warfare - (DaSynagogue of Satan's plan works - especially with DaChurch in deep sleep! - CL)
A report from Ukraine’s own military ombudsman now admits that after just 40 days on the front lines, soldiers reach a point where they “stop caring whether they survive,” which is not a sign of resilience but psychological collapse. That is what happens when human beings are fed into a machine that has no exit......
Wars reach a turning point when the cost in human life begins to exceed the capacity of the state to sustain it, and the signs of that threshold are now clearly visible. Forced mobilization, inability to rotate troops, and collapsing morale are not isolated issues, they are indicators that the system is under extreme strain.
What is unfolding is not a short-term crisis but the continuation of a cycle that is accelerating, and once it reaches this stage, history shows it rarely de-escalates on its own.
The Holocaust Wars, by Jorge Besada - The Unz Review
Originally published by Paul Eisen. Republished here with additional preface and hyperlinks.
Preface to this re-published edition by Jorge Besada.
The great comedian-critic George Carlin astutely mentioned: “You don’t need a formal conspiracy when interests converge.” The “fog of war”, with its understandable hatreds, violence, rumors, exaggerations, and vengeful or noble lies, causes many people’s “interests converge” in a manner where atrocity myths easily arise. For example, during WWI rumors-exaggerations-lies created the myth that Germans were bestial “Huns” who would bayonet and chop off the hands of Belgian babies. This was such a big deal at the time that, as historian Thomas Fleming writes: “Clarence Darrow, the famously iconoclastic American lawyer…went to France later in 1915 and searched in vain for a single eyewitness who could confirm even one of the…stories.”
A more recent example is the 40-beheaded babies myth that quickly emerged during the initial months of the “October 7th” (2023) Israeli-Hamas war based primarily on the lies-exaggerations of one Israeli soldier (s ee the excellent “Atrocity Inc” documentary by Max Blumenthal, and ‘What Really Happened on October 7’ by Double Down News). Just like Soviet bureaucrats would seldom admit failure, or having gone along with lies-exaggerations, neither would Netanyahu issue an apology for spreading such a horrible lie-myth. Furthermore, much of the destruction of property and life during the early days of the war was due, not to some maniacal non-homo sapiens Hamas fighters purposely massacring people as if they were WWI German Huns, but by the ‘fog of war’ as Israeli soldiers with powerful weapons caused much destruction, including of their own via the so-called Hannibal directive to prevent the capturing of hostages. The famed Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard admitted in a conversation: “…the bulk of the damage in Gaza was caused by our soldiers…All that destruction you see was caused primarily by our soldiers…This is what I heard all across the board. By people from platoon, company, battalion, brigade, divisional commanders.” Yet in January 2025, the Israeli government passed a law which states: “Anyone who says or writes things denying the October 7 massacre[while ‘expressing sympathy’ for Hamas]…will be sentenced to five years in jail.”
The book “The First Holocaust: The Surprising Origin of the Six-Million Figure” documents how there were over 200 articles since 1850 mentioning the plight, peril, annihilation, extermination, etc. of 6 million Jews, before the allegedly real mass-gassings-Holocaust even began. Naive thinkers erroneously see this as proof that “The Jews” are malicious liars because they do not understand how harassment of Jews for centuries has created ‘fog of war’-like conditions that have understandably shaped Jewish culture to be more susceptible to creating and spreading such myths.