When we had schools, Americans learned about the French
Revolution, mostly as a peasant uprising against the king. The storming of
the Bastille is usually characterized as the riff-raff reaching their breaking
point and taking control of a the dungeon the king used to imprison his
political opponents. While the fortress was a symbol of royal authority,
it was hardly a tool of royal oppression. The Bastille, when it was stormed,
had just seven prisoners. There were four forgers, two lunatics and one
degenerate aristocrat inside.
The truth is, the French Revolution was a cosmopolitan
affair, led by men who were educated and well off, relative to the peasantry.
The Jacobin Club was not for hod carriers and sewer workers. It was
lawyers and academics. These were the men who had internalized the ideas of the
Enlightenment and began to think about the political framework that should
spring from those ideas. Of course, it was centered in Paris, which was where
the cognitive elites were centered. These were urban revolutionaries.
That does not mean the countryside had no role in things. It’s
just that the waves of change radiated out from Paris.The key insight of the
Jacobins was to send representatives out into the smaller towns and cities to
organize radicals and incite rebellion. It was a stroke of genius that has been
copied by radicals and revolutionaries ever since. Many rural peasants welcomed
the revolution as it meant some degree of freedom and the redistribution of
lands seized from the Church and aristocracy.
As is always the case with radicalism, they went too far and
were soon alienating the people they claimed to champion. The Civil
Constitution of the Clergy was passed on July 12, 1790, requiring all clerics
to swear allegiance to the French government. The radicals could get away
with seizing Church lands, but when they seized the priesthood, the people in
the countryside began to resist. The Church was the center of rural life and
the foundation of French rural traditional. The radicals were now making war on
this.
Imagine you’re living in a farming community and government
officials show up and haul away your parish priest because he refuses to swear
an oath to the state. Further, those government agents closed the local
churches. It would be a lot like the state coming in and telling the
Christian baker that they had to celebrate gay marriage and pay for
their employee’s abortions. Imagine the government one day saying that
your mother and father’s life is no different than two men sharing rent and a
bed. Crazy.
The revolt in the Vendée region, on the west coast of
France, began with the March 1793 conscription requiring Vendeans to fill
their quota of 300,000 men for the army. The enraged populace took up arms and
quickly formed a Catholic Army. What started as a demand for reopening the
churches and getting their priests back, turned into a Royalist counter
rebellion against the Republic. Initially, the Republicans were caught
off-guard and the rebels enjoyed some success, even though their army was
ill-equipped.
The Republic got its bearings and sent a 45,000 man army to
suppress the rebellion and by the fall of that year the rebel army was
defeated. The Committee for Public Safety decided that beating the army was not
enough and opted for pacification. Whether or not the word “genocide” is
appropriate is debatable. Some estimates put the death toll at 400,000 for
a population of 800,000. Then there was the “scorched earth” policy of
raising the homes of anyone suspected of being a rebel, which was anyone who
owned a home.
The War in the Vendée is interesting for a
number of reasons, but one important lesson is the fervor of those protecting
their way of life is no match for the zeal of the Utopian fanatic building
his paradise. The romantic rustics of the countryside were beaten by the
savvy fanatics of Paris. It was not just the numbers or the resources. The
people of the Vendée were people defending the limits of human conduct,
while the Committee For Public Safety was limited only by its imagination. They
would do anything to reach the promised land.
Another important lesson is the savagery of Louis
Marie Turreau, the French officer sent by the Committee for Public Safety to
pacify the region, was the result of righteous enthusiasm for his task. The
radicals were murdering their enemies not as a means to end but as an end in
itself. For the radical, murder becomes a sacrament. When Turreau inquired
about the limits of what he could do to pacify the region, the answer from
the committee was “eliminate the brigands to the last man, there is your
duty.”
This is something to keep in mind when thinking about the
present crisis. The revolt that put Trump in office is a revolt of the
provincials. Plenty of Trump voters went to college or have office work. It’s
not the old class divide. It is the new class divide. The revolution over the
last 25 years has been led by a cosmopolitan elite, based in the coastal cities
of America. These are the people dreaming up gay marriage and
transgenders, not because they make any sense, but because they offend the
sensible provincials out in the suburbs.
It’s
comforting to think that the pendulum is swinging back toward normalcy, but it
could simply be a rearguard action. The radicals running the American
“republic” are no less bloodthirsty and malevolent than those who
razed the Vendée. They may not unleash genocidal infernal columns on the suburbs, but they
are plenty enthusiastic about importing hordes of foreign peasants to wreak havoc on the people. They
are also smart and savvy, masters of the tools of power. But most of all,
they have no sense of restraint.
Reprinted
from The Z-Man
Blog.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/05/no_author/american-vendee/http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=10311
