Andrew Klavan's first thoughts on rebuilding conservatism:
The
conservative movement has collapsed and is in ruins. Its vehicle for political
expression, the Republican Party, is now in the hands of an authoritarian
nationalist who has never read the Constitution and does not believe in free
expression, free trade or the separation of powers. Its central vehicle for
expression in the news media is in disarray as Fox News becomes embroiled in
scandal. Even its defenders on talk radio and in the blogosphere are severely
at odds as they are forced to choose whether to defend Trump as the lesser of
two evils or to stand fast with the founding fathers against both terrible
sides.
The conservative movement has collapsed
and lies in ruins. And it has done so due to the deceit and dishonesty of
conservative commentators like Andrew Klavan, who apparently feel the need to
make provably false statements about everyone from Donald Trump to the Founding
Fathers.
Let's look at the three false statements in this one diagnostic paragraph alone:
Let's look at the three false statements in this one diagnostic paragraph alone:
1.
Donald Trump is not an authoritarian.
2.
Fox News has never been a central vehicle for expressing
conservative views. It has, rather, pushed neoconnery as nominal conservatism
while serving as a politically moderate alternative to the hard progressivism
of the ABCNNBCBS cabal.
3.
The Founding Fathers believed in trade protectionism and a white
America. Whether he gives a damn about the US Constitution or not, Donald Trump
has as much or more in common with the Founding Fathers as the conservative
movement does. The Constitution exists only to safeguard the unalienable rights
of white Americans who are the posterity of the Founding Fathers, that is its
sole purpose.
Now let's look at Klavan's proposal for
rebuilding conservatism, which strangely enough, he provides without ever
considering just why the movement is in ruins.
1.
There is no substitute for victory. A political philosophy should be an
outgrowth of moral values but it is not a moral value in itself. Its purpose is
not to be good; its purpose is to be as good as it can be and still win power.
A Christian may count it a victory when he is devoured by lions for his faith,
but a conservative who is repeatedly devoured by the opposition in elections is
just a self-satisfied schmuck. I am completely opposed to those — like Ross
Douthat and Reihan Salam — who essentially argue that conservatives must
win by becoming watered-down liberals. But clearly, the methods by which we
have been selling our philosophy to the voters have not just failed but failed
utterly, and we should rethink them.
True enough, and yet Klavan observably
knows so little about the history of conservatism in America that he doesn't
understand that conservatives have never had a philosophy proper. He obviously
hasn't read Russell Kirk, anyhow. That's why they can't sell conservatism to
anyone anymore; it doesn't even exist as a coherent self-contained philosophy.
Conservatives have never been much more than philosophical parasites on the
Left. Klavan should read Cuckservative; if nothing else it would
bring him up to speed on the intellectual inadequacies of conservatism.
2.
Win what minority types we can with the truth. The opposition likes to point
out that too many conservatives are white men. They're right — but only because
blacks and women have been successfully sold a destructive bill of goods in
leftist racialism and feminism. The facts are: black people are not oppressed
by the police, women are not underpaid for the same work, white privilege is a
destructive and racist myth, and true freedom means people you don't like are
going to say things you disagree with in ways you find offensive. These are
hard sayings but they need to be said, and they don't need to be said by
conservatives to other conservatives, they need to be said by conservatives to
blacks, women and sexual off-beats of all stripes. The Democrats have co-opted
these people with destructive lies that make their lives worse. We can't win
them back by jumping on that bandwagon. We need to proudly, unapologetically
(and politely) tell it like it is — to them, in their neighborhoods and
organizations. We won't win a lot of them. Not at first. But facts have a way
of getting through over time — if you speak them courageously without being a
jackass about it.
This is remarkable. And it's a tactic
doomed to failure; conservatives like Klavan can't win anyone with the truth
for the obvious reason that they don't know the truth. They
religiously subscribe to the idiotic lie of the Proposition Nation and they
attempt to win over minorities that will never, ever, be won over in
significant percentages by the alien ideals of 18th century whites. Klavan
can't explain historical anomalies that puncture his precious Ellis Island myth
like the 1790 Naturalization Act, which means he can't tell it like it is
because he doesn't actually know what it is.
The alternative is that he does know what it is and he is knowingly deceiving his fellow conservatives. But I will give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he is merely ignorant.
The alternative is that he does know what it is and he is knowingly deceiving his fellow conservatives. But I will give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he is merely ignorant.
3.
Fight the culture wars in the culture. The culture wars are problematical
because too often conservatives come across as anti-freedom or bigoted. That
makes victory tough. I feel passionately about some cultural issues and
indifferent to others, but I believe all of them should be fought on a cultural
and informational level rather than a political one. For instance, I believe
that abortion is the taking of a human life and that government therefore has a
right to forbid it. But just speaking bluntly and honestly, I don't think I can
win that fight in the political arena right now. Happily, the truth may do what
politics cannot. The truth is on my side and the more the truth gets out about
what abortion looks like, how it's done, and who the people who support it are,
the more the public will know that it is unacceptable. Then we can win
politically. As for sex issues, I confess I care not at all about other
people's sexuality (I'm so deeply immersed in my own), but I do care very
deeply about religious liberty and the freedom not to participate in what you
abhor. That's a fight we can win and we should argue it everywhere as a freedom
issue.
Correct
concept, inept execution. Winning the culture war is
NOT getting the truth out. It is rhetorically convincing others what the truth
is. This is why the arts are the most vitally important battleground in the
cultural war.
4.
Some class occasionally would be nice. Conservatives have been all but banned
from universities, the news media and show business. In response, we formed our
own media in blogs, talk radio and Fox. Those are great venues for informing
our own, but we could use some outreach to open-minded Democrats. I've wasted
too much breath trying to convince conservatives that art is good and can
change the world over time. They just won't believe me. But could we maybe
agree that screaming at people and calling them evil and talking like a
belligerent loudmouth know-it-all is not always the best way to bring them over
to your side? No, huh. Well, it was just a thought.
For
fuck's sake. He's another hapless tone
policeman. This is why the Alt Right is going to win; because we don't give a
quantum of a damn about "class". Someone once told me the important
thing was "to win with grace and style". No, the important
thing is to win, even if you have to get bloody and dirty in the
process.Klavan, like a good conservative, is far more interested in
going down to noble defeat and surrendering while wearing a nice clean uniform
than he is with winning.
It
very much looks to me right now as if Trump is going to lose this election on
pure incompetence and mean spirit. That might actually make it easier for
conservatives to regroup in the ruins of the Republican Party. If he wins, we
may need a new party of our own. But whichever way things go, I think we need
to open a discussion about how conservatives can not only remain conservative
but also win elections in modern America.
Is he even watching the political conventions? This sort of
wishful thinking is why no one should bother paying any attention to a
cuckservative like Klavan now or in the future. Conservatism is dying. Its diseased
remnants are flocking to the progressives, as we always knew they would. And we
watch them go with dry eyes and a grim smile, because we don't need a bunch of
useless cucks and moderates who were always happier shooting at their own side
than the enemy.
I have never been a conservative. I will never be a conservative. I am delighted to see the conservative movement crumbling into dust. Conservatives conserve nothing, accomplish nothing, and stand for nothing. They will not defend the Church, they will not defend America, and they will not defend the West.
The Alt Right will. Join us, if you have the steel.
I have never been a conservative. I will never be a conservative. I am delighted to see the conservative movement crumbling into dust. Conservatives conserve nothing, accomplish nothing, and stand for nothing. They will not defend the Church, they will not defend America, and they will not defend the West.
The Alt Right will. Join us, if you have the steel.
