Prompted by a discussion at this post…
Stayton July 5, 2016 at 7:56 AM
I would even venture to argue that large-scale war is part of
their scheme as a means of periodic depopulation (as was the case in World Wars
I and II). They need enough productive people to fund their wealth, but they
also know that too many people become difficult to control.
Black Flag July 5, 2016 at 2:10 PM
I’d say if depopulation is
the goal, familial destruction has been far more effective. Encourage
abortions, provide free abortion on demand, make “not being a mother” a trend
and an aspiration, feminize the men, make the women masculine, turn the youth
into a pack of shrieking simpletons that don’t have the mental faculties to
relate to another human being outside of social media, thus destroying the
dynamic of the building blocks that make relationships that foster healthy
balanced children, or any children at all.
bionic mosquito July 5, 2016 at 7:45 PM
If they want to reduce the population meaningfully, it will have
to be via a means that a) will leave them alive, and b) leave the planet
inhabitable. They may have a way to do this, I don’t know.
I think I have been barking up the wrong tree on this whole
depopulation-by-the-elite thing. Not about my view that they won’t risk
it through major war, but that it isn’t…well, let me explain.
Black Flag offers one
part of the answer (and he further develops his thoughts here). The family is
being neutered; men are being neutered. Feminism, transgenderism, lesbian
and gay, safe spaces – these have all grown a pair. Further, white men
are the one group against whom discrimination is not only acceptable but legal and required. And this is the twist I
would add to Black Flag’s comment – the “white men” part (and I will come to
why I find this important shortly).
I find the second
part here, via Pat Buchanan. To make a long
story short, the population in the west is shrinking – or, more precisely, the
population of white inhabitants in the west is shrinking; in percentage terms
for sure, and in absolute numbers in some cases. Low birth rates combined
with non-European (and subsidized by the government) immigration.
The third part I find
in Murray Rothbard and Ralph Raico. It has to do
with classical liberalism as the one political philosophy geared toward freedom
and peace and geared away from centralized control and governance. In
other words, the one political philosophy that runs contrary to elite designs.
Politically
speaking, all that the elite wish to crush can be found
in this philosophy; all that we wish to protect from the elite can be found in
this philosophy. No other social / political philosophy is a
threat; every other social / political philosophy can be made to serve their
ends.
This third part has an important (and politically incorrect but
factually accurate) addendum: it is a political philosophy born and developed
(almost exclusively) by white Anglo-Saxon (at least nominally) Christian
males. It is a philosophy that has taken root (again, almost exclusively)
in countries that were developed by white Anglo-Saxon (again, at least
nominally) Christian males.
I must clarify: in no way do I suggest that all white males are
Rothbardian. However, I do suggest that throughout the west almost all
are believers that “we are free,” and have at least some idea that this is the
way it should be. They may not realize it, but it is classical liberalism that is driving many toward
Brexit and Trump and the like. If classical liberalism has entered the
DNA anywhere to any extent, it is in the west.
So where am I headed?
The elite neither want to nor need to reduce the
population. They only need to reduce the population that has bred and developed
(and still somewhere inside holds onto) this idea of classical
liberalism. The elite doesn’t care about the neutering the
male patriarch or destroying the family or furthering Cultural Marxism or
subsidizing third-world immigration in Africa or the Middle East or China.
They only care about this in the west. Why? To ask the question is to
answer it, I am afraid.
Throughout the west, everything is done to eliminate the white male
figure and his traditional role in society. “But wait,” you shout, “The
elite are all white males also!”
This is true. But like
the kings and nobles of Europe – a handful of “royal” families is enough to
continue breeding and ensure that their stock
continues. A few thousand families are more than sufficient, I
suspect. They attend the same schools and send their children to the same
schools; they run in the same circles.
There is no
broad depopulation scheme – why kill the sheep? There is only this: the
destruction of the caretakers of classical liberal thought.
