Thanks to the work of smart and hardworking (non-mainstream)
journalists, we can peek just a bit over the horizon and see where the story of
the weaponization of the FBI via a senior-level cabal is going from
here. I use the word "story" deliberately, because that is
the way public opinion forms itself on major political affairs. The
progressives in the media and politics have long understood
this. The cast of the story is now set, and some dramatic plot
points have been identified. The ending hasn't been written yet, of
course, but the villains are identifying themselves or being exposed, and some
of the heroes are emerging. We are on the cusp of a drama much
bigger than Watergate breaking open, and its story elements are compelling.
In the calm before the storm breaks, the mainstream media and the
Democrat attack squad from the House Intel committee [i] are in the midst of utterly discrediting
themselves. Once the story breaks into the open, indictments will
be handed down, and the witnesses, hostile and cooperating, will
be heard in hearings and in court. They have worked together to
cover up and distract from the story, but the truth will out, and now it is
becoming clear how that will happen.
The fake controversy over the ten-page Schiff memo is keeping the
morale of the #resistance crowd up, but Schiff himself will go down in history
as the guy who kicked sand in the eyes of the
investigators. All that media effort in pushing the phony narrative
of Russia collusion will make them into dupes and laughingstocks, once the
solid evidence is brought to light that a conspiracy to push that phony narrative
was run with key members of the Clinton machine working hand in glove with the
cabal.
Sharyl
Attkisson has done us a great favor in identifying the dramatis
personae who formed the FBI "secret society" that protected
Hillary and spied on Trump. She has organized a chart depicting the
senior-level personnel changes at the Justice Department during the campaign,
the Russia probe, and the Clinton email probe, highlighting in yellow the
individuals James Comey appointed.
In the space of a year, as the presidential campaigns got rolling
in the fall of 2015, James Comey moved his team into top positions in the
intelligence and counterintelligence apparatus of the FBI. That's
where the surveillance capacity exists. Thanks to the efforts of
Chairman Devin Nunes of the House Intel Committee and Senators Grassley and
Graham, we have the basic story already outlined and have received the first
installment of the plot: the issuance of the FISA warrants on the basis of a
fiction pushed by the Clinton campaign.
Disclosure of some of the lovebird texts of Peter Strzok and Lisa
Page already has provided plenty of drama – romance, secrets, hatred, and a
break-up text calling off the affair – and there are more texts to
come. Strzok's firing from the Mueller special counsel's team was
the first manifestation of the cabal being busted, and last week's flurry of
senior-level FBI officials departing is another sign that insiders know that
the jig is up.
Meanwhile, our own Clarice
Feldman presents evidence that the guilty plea of General Michael
Flynn, the pre-eminent scalp hanging from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's
belt, may be thrown out of court when he appears for sentencing by Judge Emmet
Sullivan, following the mysterious recusal of Judge Rudolph Contreras and the
equally or even more mysterious request by Mueller to delay
sentencing. Something's up, and it is big.
The forthcoming Department of Justice inspector general's report,
believed to be slated for next month, is a wild card. With a staff
of 250, I.G. Michael Horowitz should have uncovered much, and Horowitz has
a sterling reputation. But then again, so did James Comey at one
point. Lots of people putatively on our side have vouched for
Horowitz, but we don't know the scope of the report, nor do we know what
evidence of corruption will be presented.
However, a game-changer is about to drop. Last
Saturday, we got the first indirect, inferential evidence of a major revelation
on its way: there is an informant from among the cast of characters Sharyl
Attkisson highlighted in yellow, a canary singing to save himself.
This mystery figure is the man who, a number of observers noticed,
has never been mentioned as the information has dripped out of the
FBI. His name is Bill Priestap, and he was brought in by James Comey
as assistant director of the FBI, Counterintelligence Division, in December
2015.
Preistap's identity as the DOJ's informant was inadvertently and
indirectly confirmed Saturday night by Chris Stewart, a member of the Nunes
committee, under informed and targeted questioning by Judge Jeanine Pirro, a
former prosecutor and skilled courtroom interrogator.
Watch below as she blindsides Stewart with Priestap's name, he
deflects the question, and then she circles back in, softening him up by
saying, "I don't like that I haven't heard of him." Then
she went in for the kill, laying out the way Comey "threw him under the
bus" (more on that later from Sundance) and then says, "The fact that
we haven't heard from Priestap tells me that he's cooperating with someone
or...what?"
Poor Stewart, an honest man, then gives away the game by
responding, "Well, look, I'm gonna be careful because I'm not sure what we
can say on this, and believe me, I don't want to be the headline when Chris
Stewart reveals a bunch of sensitive or classified
information[.]" Okay, he didn't say, Yes, Priestap's a
cooperating witness, but it's clear to me that such an inference is
justified.
Sundance of Conservative
Treehouse has a brilliant analysis that should be read in its entirety
laying out why Priestap is the songbird.
His analysis of the moment Comey "threw him under the
bus" is persuasive:
On March 20th 2017 congressional
testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform
congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in
July 2016.
FBI Director Comey said he did not tell
congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald
Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so. *Very
important detail.*
I cannot emphasize this enough. *VERY* important detail.
Again, notice how Comey doesn't use Priestap's actual name, but refers to his
position and title. Again, watch [Prompted]
... At that moment, that very specific
moment during that March 20th hearing, anyone who watches these hearings
closely could see FBI Director James Comey was attempting to create his own
exit from being ensnared in the consequences from the wiretapping and surveillance
operation of candidate Trump, President-elect Trump, and eventually President
Donald Trump.
In essence, Bill Priestap was James
Comey's fall guy. We knew it at the time that Bill Priestap would
likely see this the same way. The guy would have too much to lose by
allowing James Comey to set him up.
Immediately there was motive for Bill Priestap to flip and become
the primary source to reveal the hidden machinations. Why should he
take the fall for the operation when there were multiple people around the
upper-levels of leadership who carried out the operation[?]
Already, despite the mainstream media's best effort, half of the
public now believes that senior law enforcement officials broke the law to
hinder the Trump presidency, according to Rasmussen. A
grand narrative of breathtaking conspiracy and corruption awaits us as the
biggest political scandal in American history unfolds. The story now
has a face and a narrator named Priestap, even though his information can't yet
be revealed. All in good tine, but preferably before November.
Link to website
for videos:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/02/fbigate_the_outlines_of_the_story_are_coming_into_focus.html
