Using more recent data from China of the coronavirus’ infection and death rates than the Indian scientists had, “Moon of Alabama” concludes that the “pandemic” has reached its peak and will be over within a month.
If so, then Jon Rappoport was correct in the beginning that coronavirus was just another big scare hype.
Let’s hope that this is the case and that the coronavirus is a far less threat than ordinary flu. Nevertheless, such a happy outcome still leaves us with a lot of puzzling questions. Here are a few of them:
1. Why such an enormous effort by the Chinese government using draconian quarantine measures affecting millions of people and multi-country halts of travel to and from China over a threat far less serious than ordinary flu?
2. Why is there a rush to develop a vaccine?
3. Why the expert predictions of a worldwide pandemic?
4. Why did the virus originate in a Chinese city known to have labs for the study of dangerous viruses?
5. Why do the scare viruses originate in China—SARS, swine flu, bird flue, coronavirus?
6. Why did the team of scientists in India find elements of HIV in the coronavirus genome that is believed to raise the infectious potential, a finding, if correct, implies the engineering of a bioterror weapon?
The scientists might be wrong, but they are not presenting a conspiracy theory. They published their paper provisionally in order to get input from other scientists. I have no idea whether their findings will be validated, and whatever we are told, we might never know. If the virus proves to be bioengineered, the Chinese government will know whether something they did escaped. If they are not responsible for the virus, they will perceive an attack on them by the US. This type of information would confirm Chinese suspicions:
“Research conducted by the Pentagon, and DARPA specifically, has continually raised concerns, not just in the field of bioweapons and biotechnology, but also in the fields of nanotechnology, robotics and several others. DARPA, for instance, has been developing a series of unsettling research projects that ranges from microchips that can create and delete memories from the human brain to voting machine software that is rife with problems.
“Now, as fear regarding the current coronavirus outbreak begins to peak, companies with direct ties to DARPA have been tasked with developing its vaccine, the long-term human and environmental impacts of which are unknown and will remain unknown by the time the vaccine is expected to go to market in a few weeks time.
“Furthermore, DARPA and the Pentagon’s past history with bioweapons and their more recent experiments on genetic alteration and extinction technologies as well as bats and coronaviruses in proximity to China have been largely left out of the narrative, despite the information being publicly available. Also left out of the media narrative have been the direct ties of both the USAMRIID and DARPA-partnered Duke University to the city of Wuhan, including its Institute of Medical Virology.
“Though much about the origins of the coronavirus outbreak remains unknown, the U.S. military’s ties to the aforementioned research studies and research institutions are worth detailing as such research — while justified in the name of “national security” — has the frightening potential to result in unintended, yet world-altering consequences. The lack of transparency about this research, such as DARPA’s decision to classify its controversial genetic extinction research and the technology’s use as a weapon of war, compounds these concerns. While it is important to avoid reckless speculation as much as possible, it is the opinion of this author that the information in this report is in the public interest and that readers should use this information to reach their own conclusions about the topics discussed herein.”
If the Indian scientists’ findings are correct, we should expect them to be shouted down by government supported scientists. To save their careers, they would have to acknowledge a mistake in their research. If the virus were a US manufactured one, China would have the same incentive to coverup the fact as Washington, because otherwise the consequence would be war, for which China is not ready.
There are other concerns. For example, concurrent with the announcement of the new virus there were accusations that the Chinese virus lab was responsible for the pandemic threat and might even have released it purposely on its own population. Moon of Alabama is correct to call this a conspiracy theory. It is a conspiracy theory to discredit the Chinese government with the Chinese population and the rest of the world. The Chinese government has no interest in harming the Chinese economy and discrediting itself with a population that it is trying to rule without a harsh hand, but Washington has an interest in ruining the Chinese.
I think it is a good thing that the question whether coronavirus is an engineered virus came up. There are a number of secret high security labs around the world doing scary things. As Whitney Webb writes, “The lack of transparency about this research, such as DARPA’s decision to classify its controversial genetic extinction research and the technology’s use as a weapon of war, compounds these concerns.” There is a treaty—or was as Washington might have pulled out of it like it has the arms control agreements with the Russians—that supposedly prevents countries from making bioweapons. However, whether they are making the weapons or not, they are doing research that could quickly be weaponized.
Perhaps it would be a good thing if there were a worldwide public discussion whether the benefit of the research is greater than the risk of a deadly pandemic. The lack of transparency makes mischief possible. Remember the anthrax letters in the wake of 9/11 that turned out to contain a version of anthrax available only in a US government lab. To cover this up, the letters were blamed on a dead man who had no motive to send the letters and no access to the anthrax. Something as dangerous as bioengineered pathogens require plenty of transparency.
There is no reason scientists should be permitted to investigate whatever they want. Think for a minute, what is the good of nuclear weapons? Perhaps if Earth were invaded by hightech Aliens, thermonuclear weapons could be a defense. Perhaps if an astroid is on collision course with Earth, nuclear missiles could shatter it into small pieces that would burn up in the atmosphere or into smaller pieces that would do less damage. What else are nuclear weapons good for but to bring us Armageddon?
A lot of thought is needed also about robotics and artificial intelligence. Robots such as those that can withstand deep underwater pressures and radiation are useful. But robots that displace people can leave humans unemployed and without purpose. And do we really want machines as smart or smarter than humans or weaponized?
The challenges of these technologies can be very interesting to scientists, but the unintended and ignored consequences can be horrific.
An obvious question is: If people with white skin cannot use certain words or long-established expressions, cannot read, study, or teach certain subjects that some believe are offensive, and cannot organize or segregate themselves as others are permitted to do, why can scientists and governments study and manufacture things that could terminate life itself? This makes no sense. If we do not begin to make better sense soon, conspiracy theories are going to become very real.
We cannot rely on the ethics and morality of governments. They have neither. Consider the US and its European vassals. For 20 years they have bombed, invaded, murdered, and ravaged seven countries, destroying them in whole or part, all on the basis of transparent lies. And nothing is done about it. Indeed, the murderous process continues.
Based on these transparent lies, President George W. Bush violated the US Constitution and held indefinitely American citizens on suspicion alone, and President Obama violated due process by executing US citizens on suspicion alone.
Neither were impeached. Congress, the judiciary, and the public accepted this shredding of the US Constitution and stepped into a police state. When there is no honest media to protect the people, government transparency becomes even more critical.
Since 2009, the US government has overthrown governments in Honduras, Ukraine, Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina, reversed the reform process in Ecuador, temporarily overthrew Chevez in Venezuela and continues to try to overthrow his successor Maduro. Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Russia, and China remain on Washington’s list of countries to be overthrown.
This extraordinary arrogance is easily capable of using a false flag engineered pathogen to produce termoil within a country that collapses a government. For this reason, the transparency of research is of the upmost importance.