Repatriation or war - take your choice!

 https://voxday.net/2025/08/26/nigel-farage-is-a-fraud/ 

And then get started on the incompatible so-called “legals”. Multiculturalism has failed. Multiracialism has failed. There are no “nations of immigrants”. And there is no such thing as an “idea nation”.

There are two choices left. Mass repatriations based on race and religion or war. That’s it. And we’re in this ugly situation thanks to all the evil people, the stupid people, and the nice people who bought into the ridiculous Clown World rhetoric.

Bob Carr on the Australian Jewish Lobby – The Occidental Observer

 OnePath (5:47):  As you know, in the United States, lobbying groups like AIPAC hold big sway over politicians through donations and funded trips to Israel. You have previously spoken about a similar influence of the Israeli lobby here in Australia. Based on your experience and knowledge, how deep is this influence, and should Australians be concerned?

Carr:  I think Australians should be concerned.  I have said, and I am recorded as having said, that the Israeli lobby—I believe the [term] ‘Jewish-Israeli Lobby’ is more accurate, because that is the term used by AIJAC [Australia Israel and Jewish Affairs Council]—the Jewish-Israeli Lobby in Australia is a foreign influence operation.  It is designed to place Israel’s interests above Australia’s in its foreign policy.  No one else has such a well-funded operation. No one else, no other country, has an operation with offices in every Australian capital city.  No one else organizes donations to try to raise their influence, like the Jewish Lobby in Australia does.

Now, this is simply a fact of life, and I recorded it in my diary as Foreign Minister, and it has never been contradicted.  …

And the model for the Jewish Lobby is what happens in the United States.  If any member of Congress or the Senate expresses a view criticizing Israel or sympathizing with the Palestinian cause, you can guarantee that someone will receive funding from pro-Israel supporters to run against them in the next primary  And the person they find to run against the incumbent, he might be someone who has never expressed a view about Israel and Palestine, but there will be a well-funded opponent.

Now, I remember years ago, I had a meeting with someone from the Jewish Lobby in Washington who spelled this out to us.  He explained to us… For a group of us, who were considered supporters of Israel, as we were at that time, this is how they operate.  And if there is anyone, even in a remote Rocky Mountain state, or in a state with an insignificant population like Montana, any member of Congress who departs from the pro-Israel line can be guaranteed of having a well-funded opponent in the primary elections.

Full ext:

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2025/08/25/bob-carr-on-the-australian-jewish-lobby/ 

All in all, a remarkable interview, one not likely to get much coverage in the US or Europe.  Carr comes across as a man who, after decades of trying to understand and compromise with the Jewish community, finally figured out, at age 77, that they are largely incorrigible liars, manipulators, and exploiters of human suffering for their own benefit.  Those of us who have spent years studying the Jewish Question are not surprised in the least, but it is encouraging to see that at least one major political figure is now willing to speak some words of truth.

Naturally, I take this as good news.  It certainly seems as if, for the Jews, the wheels are coming off the buggy.  And not just in one nation, but rather, for the first time in history, in the whole world—at once.  This could spell a radical, large-scale shift in non-Jewish and White attitudes toward Jews in general.  There is reason for hope.

Remember, if there is one lesson from history, it is this: It’s not “the Zionists,” not “the Israelis,” not “the globalists”…it’s the Jews.  And their time is quickly coming to an end.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, is the author or editor of some three dozen books on the Jews, Judaism, and the Jewish Question.  All his books can be found at www.clemensandblair.com.  See also his personal website, www.thomasdaltonphd.com.

Diversity in Holland - Vox Popoli - (How long will it take for Western Civilization to do the OBVIOUS? - CL)

 Someone needs to remind these idiot women protesting the murder of a Dutch girl that they don’t need to “reclaim the night”, they need to reclaim their country and repatriate all the refugees, asylum seekers, and third-worlders to their homelands.

https://voxday.net/2025/08/25/diversity-in-holland/ 

Two observations about the attack:

• The attacker had already attacked two women and was free despite having been arrested for rape only four days prior.

• When the girl required police help, they were only 45 minutes away.

This sort of thing is never, ever, going to end so long as Arabs and Africans are permitted to invade and reside in Europe, because it happens all the time in their homelands. That’s a straightforward and undeniable fact, which is why repatriation is a cultural, societal, and moral imperative.

Multiculturalism is a lie, mass immigration is invasion, and different peoples will always have different cultural preferences and mores. And no amount of inversive Enlightenment values and faux moral posturing will ever change that.

A Lesson on Slavery for CNN - Paul Craig Roberts

 The saga of American slavery has more holes in it than the Zionist saga of the Holocaust.  

Recently President Trump wondered about the woke Smithsonian Institute’s fixation on slavery as if it was the principal problem the world faces today.  The liberal media had a hissy fit.  CNN rushed to do a program on slavery ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJSbGOyYlUY ), the woke rectification for which is multiculturalism and the replacement of the white racist population by people of color. This is the political agenda of the Democrat Party. To watch white people so determined to achieve their own destruction by voting Democrat is amazing.

The response made by those critical of CNN’s attack on white Americans was that slavery was a matter of the distant past, and we made amends for our responsibility in a civil war. 

What nonsense.  No American ever had any responsibility for slavery.  The black King of Dahomey did.

Here are the undeniable, indisputable, basic facts:

Over the course of history far more white people have been slaves than blacks.  Some of these white slaves were held by Romans and other conquerors in ancient times.  Most were held by people of color who raided Europe’s Mediterranean coast for slaves.  Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the US (1801-1809) had to send the US Navy and Marines to “the shores of Tripoli” to stop the North Africans from capturing American ships and enslaving their passengers and crews.

In the New World (Caribbean Islands, North and South America) European colonists found abundant resources but no labor force. British and European sea captains saw a business opportunity in purchasing slaves from the black King of Dahomey and selling them to the colonists as a labor force.  The black King of Dahomey conducted annual slave wars against other blacks and sold the surplus to Arabs and to European sea captains. 

No white colonist in what later became the United States ever enslaved a black person.  They purchased blacks already enslaved by the black King of Dahomey.

When the United States came into existence in the late 18th century, slavery was an inherited institution.  Slavery existed as the labor force for large agricultural plantations, the agri-businesses of  the time.  The plantations using slave labor did not enslave the slaves. They purchased already enslaved labor as no work force was available.......

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2025/08/25/a-lesson-on-slavery-for-cnn/ 

Vos: The Israelite Theocracy Was A Type And Shadow Of Heaven | The Heidelblog

 .....The laws under which Israel lived not merely had the divine sanction behind them in the general sense in which all law and order ultimately derives from God through general revelation by way of the conscience, but in the specific sense, that Jehovah had directly revealed the law. In other words Jehovah in person performed the task usually falling to a human king. And in the sequel also, Jehovah by supernatural interposition, when necessary, continued to act the role of King of the nation. This fact was so deeply embedded in the consciousness of the leaders of Israel that still in the time of Gideon and Samuel it was felt to forbid the setting up of a purely human kingdom. The union of the religious lordship and the national kingship in the one Person of Jehovah involved that among Israel civil and religious life were inextricably interwoven. If the union had happened to exist in any other person but God, a division of the two spheres of relationship might have been conceivable. The bond to God is so one and indivisible that no separation of the one from the other can be conceived. Hence the later prophetic condemnation of politics, not merely wicked politics, but politics per se, as derogatory to the royal prerogative of Jehovah.

https://heidelblog.net/2025/08/vos-the-israelite-theocracy-was-a-type-and-shadow-of-heaven/

Vos: The Israelite Theocracy Was A Type And Shadow Of Heaven Next we must consider the general organization of Israel that originated in this berith. This is usually designated as ‘the theocracy’. This name for it is not found in the Scriptures, although it admirably describes what the Biblical account represents Israel’s constitution to have been. Probably the term was coined by Josephus. He observes in regard to the governments of other nations ... heidelblog.net

 

The chief end for which Israel had been created was not to teach the world lessons in political economy, but in the midst of a world of paganism to teach true religion, even at the sacrifice of much secular propaganda and advantage.

Nor was it merely a question of teaching religion for the present world. A missionary institution the theocracy never was intended to be in its Old Testament state. The significance of the unique organization of Israel can be rightly measured only by remembering that the theocracy typified nothing short of the perfected kingdom of God, the consummate state of Heaven. In this ideal state there will be no longer any place for the distinction between church and state. The former will have absorbed the latter. In a rough way the principle involved was already apprehended by Josephus. In the passage introducing the word ‘theocracy’ he observes that Moses, by giving such a constitution to the Israelites, did not make religion a part of virtue, but made all other virtues to be a part of religion. The fusion between the two spheres of secular and religious life is strikingly expressed by the divine promise that Israel will be made ‘a kingdom of priests and an holy nation’ [Ex. 19:6]. As priests they are in, nay, constitute the kingdom.

Geerhardus Vos | Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2003), 124–26 (HT: @JimLincoln1517 on X).

The True Face of the Great Emancipator, by Jared Taylor - The Unz Review

 

Phillip W. Magness and Sebastian N. Page, Colonization After Emancipation: Lincoln and the Movement for Black Resettlement, University of Missouri Press, 2011, 164 pp., $28.00 (softcover)

Abraham Lincoln is revered as one of the greatest heroes of American history. His face is on Mount Rushmore and he has a magnificent memorial in Washington DC. There are more schools named for him than for George Washington. Seventeen American counties are named for him, and he has appeared on more than 30 different postage stamps (Washington has been on more than 60 and Ben Franklin on more than 40). His face is on the penny and the five-dollar bill.

Lincoln defeated the Confederacy, but today, he may well be even more admired as the “Great Emancipator” who freed the slaves. This makes Lincoln’s views of blacks a great embarrassment for historians. None can ignore his June 26, 1857 explanation of why he opposed admitting Kansas as a slave state:

There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races . . . . A separation of the races is the only perfect preventive of amalgamation, but as an immediate separation is impossible, the next best thing is to keep them apart where they are not already together.

This passage from his 1858 debate with Stephen Douglas is just as straightforward:

I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races — that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.

Lincoln thought slavery was immoral and should be abolished, but he believed that the only solution to the “negro problem” was racial separation. He was active in the Illinois branch of the American Colonization Society, founded in 1816, to “colonize” free blacks by sending them out of the United States.

It is well known that during the war, Lincoln actively looked for ways to colonize free blacks. In his first message to Congress, on December 3, 1861, he called for a budget to settle blacks outside the United States, and Congress voted $600,000 for this purpose. To put this into perspective, the entire federal budget the previous year had been a little over $60 million......

Full text:

https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/the-true-face-of-the-great-emancipator/ 

Whatever justification Lincoln may have had for going to war to preserve the Union, this book leaves no doubt about his views on race. As the authors write: “Lincoln sought an answer to the dominant question at the end of his presidency, the future of race relations in the United States.” In this, he showed great wisdom of a kind his successors have lacked. President Ulysses S. Grant negotiated a treaty to annex Santo Domingo (now the Dominican Republic), in part, to serve as a haven for American blacks. The treaty failed in the Senate in 1870, largely because many Senators did not want to absorb a mixed-race territory and feared that the flow of non-whites would be into the United States, not out.

America’s inability to solve “the dominant question” at the end of the war was a matter of will. Few whites would have disagreed with Lincoln when he told a delegation of blacks in 1862:

You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them, by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side.

We continue to suffer. We suffer worse than ever. Yet many Americans now deny their suffering and even claim that “diversity is our greatest strength.”

Time to Move On - Vox Popoli - (From women’s suffrage....CL)

 Ok, we tried women’s suffrage and discovered that their primary political concern is killing their own babies. Can we finally call this experiment failed and move on?

Indeed. The only question at this point is if the women’s suffrage experiment will be abandoned a) to prevent societal collapse or b) as a consequence of societal collapse.........

https://voxday.net/2025/08/24/time-to-move-on/

The statistical evidence is absolutely clear and undeniable. Sustainable human society is not compatible with the average young woman receiving more than nine years of education. Ironically, it may only be the inferior state of public schooling that has prevented US fertility rates from declining even more dramatically than they have.

The laws of social dynamics may not be as clear-cut as the laws of thermodynamics, and the effects of ignoring them may not be as immediate, but we now have decades of evidence demonstrating how ignoring them will prove every bit as catastrophic over time.