Both Bloomberg Markets and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) agree: Minnesota’s 2016 unfunded pension liability for state and municipal employees (including most teachers) has well exceeded the $100 billion-dollar mark. ALEC says the fifty states have an accumulated shortfall of $6 Trillion. And that’s just for pensions. There are other retirement benefits like healthcare that are unfunded, too but I will save that bad news for another day.
Bloomberg put the number at about , and now ALEC has released its . ALEC did not include the St. Paul Teachers fund because it is still technically “independent” of the state (the fund, which takes over $10 million in cash aid from state taxpayers every year admits to an unfunded liability of about $585,000; when calculated with a more reasonable risk rate, the shortfall is $1.7 million).
Given that the pension funds only admit to an unfunded liability for 2016 of about $18 billion, it is clear that the disagreement over how to calculate pension liabilities rages on unabated—and that we are not even having the same debate! (And, for you pension geeks, that GASB 67 and 68 have not had the impact reformers had hoped for.)
ALEC used the actuarial figures reported by the pension funds but applied a more realistic risk rate to calculate the liabilities. I spoke to the author at ALEC this morning.
In case you are tempted to reject the ALEC report as the work of the “evil Koch brothers,” the ALEC report followed best practices recommended by the Blue Ribbon Panel on Public Pensions by the , the Mercatus Center and other well-regarded pension experts. The ALEC report used the U.S. Treasury bond rate of about 2.14% to calculate the liabilities (called a “risk” rate) instead of rates ranging from 7.55-8.5% used by Minnesota’s pension funds.
What if for sake of argument, we split the difference and said the unfunded liability was about $60 billion? (I think $18 billion should, as well, but it has not thus far.)
Would that get the attention of voters, public employees, legislators? I think the government union executives from AFSCME, SEIU and the AFL-CIO already know the math but they are keeping their members in the dark. It is too hard to explain and everyone is hoping they will be long gone before the pension tsunami hits. Who wants to admit that the state has failed to properly manage these pension funds?
The 2017 valuations are just starting to appear on the pension commission website. So, while the legislative session is still a few months away, the pension funds and commission are busy preparing for what will surely be another very tough conversation around the health of these very important funds. And whatever they come up with will not move the needle. Until we stop digging a hole by moving new employees to defined contribution plans, the rate at which the liability grows will just increase.
I will do my duty and testify once again that this is the biggest financial problem the state faces that no one knows about—and the hardest thing we will ever fix. The police union will once again line up behind the testifiers as if to say, “don’t do anything to mess with my pension.”
Why is this so darned important and arguably the biggest failure of state government ever? Because over 11% of Minnesotans–real people who have worked for government, or work for government now—are counting on these pensions. As you can see below, Minnesota has failed to make the annual payments as a matter of course for more than a decade. (Chart is from my pension publication.)
(Link to website for chart)
With every paycheck, public employees faithfully hand over a percentage of their pay, and taxpayers match or exceed that contribution. Both parties should be able to trust that the pension funds, employers and the State of Minnesota, have wisely set the right contribution rates, actually paid the full contribution each year (see above) and prudently invested the funds so when retirement finally comes, teachers, cops and the rest of our state and municipal workforce have the pension they were promised.
If that were the case, we would not have an unfunded liability no matter how you cut it.