Friday, Dec. 15, marks the anniversary of the day our
young nation ratified the Bill of Rights in 1791.
Given the national discussion in recent days over
whether the government may compel
speech from an ordinary baker, now is an especially good time to consider
the very first words of our charter document: “Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof.”
Many today mistakenly interpret these religion clauses
to mean something like, “Americans are tolerant of private religious conduct.”
But mere “toleration” of “private” religious conduct was precisely what James
Madison, a primary author of the Bill of Rights, was careful to avoid. He
favored the protection of robust freedom.
Madison’s commitment to religious freedom in public
may have begun when he reviewed the proposed Virginia Declaration of Rights in
1776. That document suggested “all men should enjoy the fullest toleration in
the exercise of religion.”
Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media.
But this can't be done alone. Find
out more >>
Yet years earlier, he had personally witnessed the
supposedly tolerant Colony of Virginia imprison Baptist ministers because their
beliefs were out of step with the predominantly Anglican colony. Such
religious “tolerance” sent minority ministers to jail.
More fundamentally, Madison recoiled at the notion
that exercise of religion was a gift from government to be merely “tolerated.”
He saw it rather as a hallmark of a free society—an unalienable right endowed
by a creator—that exists independent of government.
Many years after witnessing religious persecution in
Virginia, Madison chaired the House conference committee on the Bill of Rights.
In that role, he seized the opportunity to reject the language of toleration,
instead grounding his proposal for the First Amendment in the language of
individual liberty: “the civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious
belief or worship … nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any
manner, or on any pretext infringed.”
The states ratified a revised version of Madison’s
text as the First Amendment to our Constitution, and the first of our Bill of Rights. His
gift to the fledgling republic was to reject the notion that individual rights,
and pre-eminently religious liberty, were mere tokens bestowed by a beneficent
state, replacing that view with the remarkable notion that these rights are inseparable
from our humanity.
In other words, the right of every person to enjoy
religious liberty doesn’t exist just because the government says it does—and
any government that attempts to dictate otherwise risks illegitimacy.
That robust view of religious liberty served as a
foundation for the remainder of what would become our Bill of Rights.
On Sept. 25, 1789, Congress sent the proposed Bill of
Rights to the states for ratification. Two hundred and twenty-eight years
ago this month, the states ratified these guarantees of natural rights,
embedding them into the DNA of our nation.
America’s unique understanding of individual liberty
is captured in the first three words of the Constitution, to which the Bill of
Rights was appended: “We the people.”
From the preamble to the end of Article VII, the
Constitution outlines how these people would form “a more perfect union”
without abdicating their individual liberty to a monarch or a tyrant.
The governed gave their consent to lend some, but not
all, of their individual authority as human beings to a central
government. For instance, while they would remain free to defend
themselves individually, they would vest the authority for the collective
defense of the new nation to a government that could raise an army.
Thus, it is significant that after outlining the
positive rights of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of
government on matters ranging from taxation to foreign relations, the Bill of
Rights begins by negating the power of Congress—“Congress shall make no law …
”—and recognizing the inherent rights of the people.
The reason for this is simple, revolutionary, and
profound: Congress shall make no law because the people retain those rights
articulated in the Bill of Rights by virtue of their humanity.
While it was, and is, necessary to lend government a
limited amount of individual authority “to provide for the common defense” and
“to promote the general welfare,” we the people have never ceded the rights of
the free exercise of religion, speech, press, assembly, bearing of arms, due
process, and those rights preserved within the Bill of Rights.
This was, and is, revolutionary. No nation had ever
successfully undertaken to recognize, much less resolve, the tension between
individual liberty and government as America did with its Bill of Rights.
Yet, this tension is a delicate one whose safeguarding
demands vigilance and care. Madison was right to be wary of a government
that treats civil rights as government-issued. And, as the Colorado Civil
Rights Commission’s treatment of Jack Phillips makes clear, so must we.
The legacy of the Bill of Rights is this: What
government did not create, it can neither bestow nor confiscate.
Michael Berry is deputy general counsel and director
of military affairs for First Liberty Institute, a non-profit law firm
dedicated to defending religious freedom for all.
A Note for our Readers:
Trust in the mainstream media is at a historic low—and
rightfully so given the behavior of many journalists in Washington, D.C.
Ever since Donald Trump was elected president, it is
painfully clear that the mainstream media covers liberals glowingly and
conservatives critically.
Now journalists spread false, negative rumors about
President Trump before any evidence is even produced.
Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media.
That’s why The Daily Signal exists.
The Daily Signal’s mission is to give Americans the
real, unvarnished truth about what is happening in Washington and what must be
done to save our country.
Our dedicated team of more than 100 journalists and
policy experts rely on the financial support of patriots like you.
Your donation helps us fight for access to our
nation’s leaders and report the facts.
You deserve the truth about what’s going on in
Washington.
Please make a gift to support The Daily Signal.
