Labels

Monday, November 4, 2019

What is the fate of the American empire? - By John Dale Dunn


Is America another doomed empire?  Can we avoid the decline and demise of empire that has been the pattern of the past?  John Bagot Glubb, English scholar and former soldier, provides a historical analysis of the life history of empires (great nations) that is sobering and cautionary in a monograph, "The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival," published in Blackwood Magazine in 1976. 
Glubb, as a historicist, devotes his long essay to a study of patterns of empires that he defines as great or superpowers in history, from the Assyrian in 859–612 B.C. to Britain, 1700–1950 A.D.  Glubb asserts that "(a) in spite of accidents of fortune and the apparent circumstances of the human race at different epochs, the periods of duration of different empires at varied epochs show a remarkable similarity. (b) immense changes in the technology of transport or in methods of warfare do not seem to affect the life expectation an empire."  He says technical changes affect only the size and shape of an empire.
Can we make America great again, or are we doomed?  Let's take a look at what Glubb found to be characteristic of great nations in decline, bound for failure.  First, a little about the school of Historicism that asserts that human behavior is best studied as history.  It's straightforward — study humans to understand humans.  Study human social and political groups to understand them.  
Hegelian Historicism is the name given to Historicism posited by Georg W.F. Hegel, who asserted that societies are defined and determined by their history — that knowledge of the history of a society or political entity is essential, that history reveals human activities and provides insight into human individual and group motivations and reactions.  Hegel also built his famous dialectic on Historicism — the pattern of action, reaction, and resolution that he labeled thesis/antithesis/synthesis.  When studying the human condition, the dialectic certainly is useful, and proper study of history is essential.  Hegel said the discipline of philosophy is really the study of the history of philosophy. 
Karl Popper, respected philosopher of science, pointed out that Historicism may imply determinism, but free will is in play, and individuals, societies, nations can choose well to their advantage and avoid self-destructive choices and behavior.  We'd better.  
John Bagot Glubb was the classic Brit, born in 1897, son of a British Royal Engineers officer, commissioned in the Royal Engineers in April 1915, served in WWI, was wounded three times, then volunteered for service in Iraq as a regular officer but resigned his commission and went to work as an administrator in the Iraq government.  In 1930, he signed a contract to work for Jordan (then called Transjordan), and from 1939 to 1956, he commanded the famous Jordan Arab Legion (actually the Jordanian Army).  After he retired with the honorific Middle Eastern title Glubb Pasha, he wrote many books and essays and was a widely traveled lecturer because of his erudition, scholarship, and personal experiences in the Middle East. 
Glubb, in the monograph that is our point of discussion, undertook to demonstrate his hypothesis and the evidence that supports his assertion that empires pass through the following ages: Pioneers, Conquests, Commerce, Affluence, Intellect, Decadence.
The Age of Decadence he portrays as "marked by: Defensiveness, Pessimism, Materialism, Frivolity, An Influx of Foreigners, The Welfare State and Weakening of Religion."
Glubb Pasha posits that "[d]ecadence is due to: Too long a period of wealth and power-Selfishness-Love of Money-The loss of a sense of duty."
He points out that the way empires crash and burn varies because it is usually brought about by external forces. 
Glubb's detailing of the character of a nation or empire in the various stages is compelling — he nails so many things down, and his essay is a rollicking good time at only 24 pages long.  Even those who hate long papers will find this very to read — Glubb has a talent to write, and his subject is important to you and to me.  The survival of our country is the consideration.
Glubb's essay is pertinent because the Age of Decadence is upon us.  Glubb makes the case that empires run out of gas because of internal decline and decadence.  The typical life expectancy of empires, according to Glubb, is 250 years — about ten generations.  Without a change in direction, America will become another casualty to the process — a lesser player, suffering the "used to be" syndrome.   
John Dale Dunn, M.D., J.D. is an emergency and corrections physician amd inactive attorney in Brownwood, Texas.

Friday, November 1, 2019

China, USA, Prosperity, Morality and the Learned Elders of Wye – connecting more dots!

As regular visitors have learned over the last 4 years and as I state on my website, almost all of the 5000+ posts here do not address the daily wizzing contests between Dems and Pubs, DaLeft and DaBigCon. The reason is simple – these are sideshows intentionally designed to distract us from the real shakers and movers who affect the much larger and impactful picture. It is not that we pay no attention to the dailies – there just is no point in repeating what is already available from many other sources.

Today, an item caught my attention - China pushes higher 'moral quality' for its citizens. As usual, Vox Day summed it up best, but before we get to it, he mentioned a term I had only heard in passing – Learned Elders of Wye. So, to the research engine - Questions of survival - - Shmuel Rosner Jun 23, 2006 – on which Vox Day commented (2014): I thought this 2006 article on Haaretz by Shmuel Rosner concerning a conference discussing the survival of the Jewish people was intriguing, both for what it suggested in terms of what the future holds in store for America as well as what it implied about the Jewish perception of the transience of their relationship with America

I also found another Vox Day item (2016) on this same subject: The end of Jewish rule - Vox Day comments on Minnesota election

Before anyone asks how China – not a Christian nation – can achieve morality, you have to read this - Those Who Have Never Heard- Romans 2:12-16 — OnePassion Ministries – it would be especially meaningful for those Christians and Conservatives who believe in American Exceptionalism (AE) – as if it is some magic potion which overcomes all our transgressions as a nation – both external and internal! BTW – AE is a fraud – many articles to read!

Now to the coup de grĂ¢ce: As for those who have been predicting China's collapse due to various economic and demographic indicators, that is a failure to grasp the causal relationship between societal wealth and morality. It is the latter that precedes the former; while there are certainly challenges and structural weaknesses that threaten the stability and well-being of both great societies, the Chinese elite is most likely going to be able to deal successfully with them. The US elite, both foreign and native, is obviously not. – Vox Day

Vox Popoli: Ascendancy vs degeneracy (China vs USA)


In case you still haven't accepted that China is going to surpass the United States as the leading global power before the middle of the 21st century yet, consider the difference between the moral trajectory of the two societies.

From budgeting for rural weddings to dressing appropriately and avoiding online porn, China's Communist Party has issued new guidelines to improve the "moral quality" of its citizens. Officials have released several sets of guidelines this week alongside a secretive conclave of high-ranking officials in Beijing which discusses the country's future direction.

On Sunday the government published its "Outline for the Implementation of Citizen Moral Construction in the New Era" -- which advises readers how to use the internet, raise children, celebrate public holidays and behave while travelling abroad.

The guidelines from the Central Commission for Guiding Cultural and Ethical Progress calls for building "Chinese spirit, Chinese values, and Chinese power".

The texts urge citizens to avoid pornography and vulgarity online, and follow correct etiquette when raising the flag or singing the national anthem.

Public institutions like libraries and youth centres must carry out "targeted moral education" to improve people's ideological awareness and moral standards, according to the rules.

The guideline also stresses patriotism and loyalty to the motherland.

"People who have a servile attitude to foreign countries, damage national dignity and sell national interests must be disciplined according to the law," it says.

Translation: The Chinese leadership is well aware of the long-term program of the Learned Elders of Wye to jump from the United States to China when the former empire collapses and have no intention of allowing them to run that program of subversion and economic ascendancy through invasion and moral inversion to the disadvantage of their nation.

It is more than a little ironic that where Christians failed to heed the warnings of Jesus Christ and the Apostle Paul, Confucians - and they are Confucians, not Communists, no matter what they officially happen to call themselves - are aware of the danger of permitting a foreign nation to invade and invert their society. Even more impressive, instead of waiting passively for the next attack, they have launched a systematic campaign to seize the strongholds of their long-term rivals and enemies.

As for those who have been predicting China's collapse due to various economic and demographic indicators, that is a failure to grasp the causal relationship between societal wealth and morality. It is the latter that precedes the former; while there are certainly challenges and structural weaknesses that threaten the stability and well-being of both great societies, the Chinese elite is most likely going to be able to deal successfully with them. The US elite, both foreign and native, is obviously not.


Those Who Have Never Heard- Romans 2:12-16 — OnePassion Ministries

Transcripts
The following are sermons and messages Dr. Steven J. Lawson delivered through various the books of the Bible. The transcripts and audio of these sermons have been provided for your enjoyment. Please use these sermons to dig deeper into God's Word as your faith is strengthened. We constantly updating with new transcripts as they are completed, thank you for your patience.
For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish without the Law, and all who have sinned under the Law will be judged by the Law; for it is not the hearers of the Law who are just before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified. For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus (Romans 2:12-16).

As I teach and preach the word of God, certain questions inevitably are raised. Among those most frequently asked is: What about those who have never heard the gospel?  How do they stand before God? Will God grade them on a curve? Will God judge them in comparison to a moderated standard of morality? Will God measure them by others in their culture? If they are religious and sincere, can that gain them acceptance with God?

Inevitably, as I talk to unbelievers, these same questions seem to always be present. Today’s study in Romans will be helpful for us, because it will equip us to better interact with to others about those who have never heard the gospel. Romans 2:12-16 is the signature text in the Bible on this controversial subject. We are going to use these verses to walk through the book of Romans, seeing how God deals with those who have never heard the gospel
   
The testimony of Scripture is clear that all unconverted people are under the wrath of God. Paul writes, "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness" (Romans 1:18). This is true, not only of those who have heard the gospel and rejected it, but of those who have never heard the gospel. They are deservedly under the wrath of God. The verb "is revealed" is in the present tense. This means that at this very moment, wherever an unbeliever is on the earth – whether he has heard the gospel or not – he is already under divine wrath. Every person is either a believer in Christ, or under divine wrath. There is not another category in which someone could find themselves. There is no middle ground.
  
All people have received general revelation from God, which makes them without excuse before Him. Paul makes this very clear, "because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them" (Romans 1:19). God has revealed Himself to every person on earth with general revelation, which gives the definite knowledge that God exists. General revelation also tells us something about what God is like. "For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse" (Romans 1:20). Every person on earth, whether they have heard the gospel or not, is directly accountable to God, being without excuse. They know that there is a God, whether they admit it or not.

Any critically thinking person can look at creation and realize that there must be a Creator. This is proven by the simple truism, “Out of nothing, nothing comes.” If there is something created, that presupposes and necessitates that there was an original first cause, an uncreated entity. That uncreated entity is none other than God Himself.

The Creator's thumbprints are all over what He has made. Anyone can look around at creation and clearly see what God is like. Creation testifies that God is awesome. He is powerful. He is orderly. He is perfect. We have already talked about this, but we need to remind ourselves, as we begin our investigation of Romans 2:12-16, that all unbelievers everywhere are under divine wrath because of their sin.

With this as a backdrop, let us consider the case that Paul makes against those who are without the Law. That is, they have never heard the truth of the gospel. What can be said about them?

I. They Have Sinned Without the Law (2:12a)

First, this passage tells us that even those without the Law have sinned. It is crystal clear, "For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish" (verse 12). Those who have never heard the gospel are not innocent. Neither are they found to be righteous before God. They are sinners who have rebelled against God, and who are in defiance against Him. Like those who have heard the gospel and have refused it, they nevertheless have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

“Sin” (hamartia) means ‘to miss the mark.’ It is the idea of an archer aiming his bow and arrow at a target, firing it, but missing the mark. This is what sin is. It is failing to hit the mark of God's perfect holiness with one’s life. Such people are not in a state of innocence, but are unrighteous.

II. They Will Perish Without The Law (2:12b-13)

Second, all who are without the Law will perish. "For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish without the Law" (2:12). The word “also” is very important, because it indicates whether you have the Law or whether you do not have the Law.

Without the gospel, you are going to perish. “Perish” (apollymi) refers to eternal destruction, eternal punishment, and eternal damnation. This is a very strong statement. It does not say that they will be saved. It says they will perish without the Law. According to 1 Corinthians 1:18, they are already perishing right now. They are self-destructing by their own life lived without God. They are like a cheap sweater that is unraveling as they live their life. 

Doers Will Be Justified
Verse 13 is an explanation of the end of verse 12. Law. Paul says, at the end of verse 12, "All who have sinned under the Law will be judged by the Law." This refers to Jews who have received the moral law from God. It has been passed down from generation to generation, read in the synagogue and memorized. They are “under the Law,” meaning they have the Law and are directly accountable to the Law. They have sinned and will be judged by the standard that is in the Law.

Verse 13 begins with the word “for,” which means it is an explanation of the end of verse 12. "For it is not the hearers of the Law who are just before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified" (verse 13). This does not mean that there are people who can keep the Law, obey the Law, and therefore be justified by God. The whole book of Romans makes it crystal clear that would be a wrong interpretation of what Paul is saying. Even in the context of the passage, verse 13 is talking about those who keep the Law but are not justified by keeping the Law.

Verse 13 is saying that if you are more than a hearer of the Law, if you are a repenter and a believer in Jesus Christ, who is presented in the gospel, then you will immediately begin to live in obedience to the Law of God. Just because you have the Law does not mean that you are right with God. You have to be a doer of the Law to prove that you are right with God.

The Obedience of Faith
Paul has already established this truth at the very outset of the book of Romans. In Romans 1:5, he talks about the obedience of faith, which means the obedience that comes from faith or the obedience that is produced by faith. All true faith is an obedient faith. There is no such thing as faith that is disobedient. All true saving faith produces obedience. James 2 is also abundantly clear on this matter. Obedience is a very important fruit of salvation. Faith is the root, obedience is the fruit. It is a cause and effect.

Even Jesus says, "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father" (Matthew 7:21). Verse 13 is addressing those who have repented of their sins and have true, genuine, saving faith in Jesus Christ as presented in the gospel. They are known as doers of the Law, and they alone are justified by God.

Those who do not obey the Law are unconverted. They may be religious, but they are lost. We would say today that they are lost church members, unconverted religious people who have a form of godliness, but deny the power thereof. They are those who have sinned under the Law and they are judged by the Law.

III. They Instinctively Know To Do The Law (2:14)

Third, they instinctively know what is in the moral law of God. When we come to verse 14, we come back to Paul’s original argument, which is found in the first part of verse 12. These are those who are without the Law, who have not received special revelation, who have never heard the gospel. "For when the Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves" (verse 14).

They instinctively and intuitively know the difference between right and wrong. This is not referring to the ceremonial law and the civil law. It is referring to the moral law of God contained in the Ten Commandments. They instinctively know they should honor their parents. They instinctively know they should not steal. They instinctively know they should tell the truth. They instinctively know that they should love other people and show compassion to others. They instinctively know it, because God has written it upon their hearts.

IV. They Have the Law Written In Their Heart (2:15a)

Fourth, as we come to verse 15, we see that God has written the Law upon their hearts. Paul writes, “in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts” (verse 15). Those without the Law instinctively know to do what is in the Law, because God has written it upon their heart. The invisible finger of God has written His Law upon the tablet of every human heart. It is a limited knowledge of the Law, not enough to be saved, but it is enough to condemn. Because God has written the Law upon the tablet of their heart, they are held accountable to God for the choices that they make.

As we will see, they are held accountable before God, not just for their deeds, but for their very thoughts, conscience, and secrets within them. Verse 15 shows that they are accountable to God for the Law that is within them. They are not off the hook or in no man's land. They are not without accountability to God.

As a quick footnote, those who have the Law do have a stricter accountability to God, because they have a greater light. Those without the Law, that only have the Law written upon their heart, have a lesser accountability, but nevertheless, it is an accountability. The Bible is clear that it would be better to have never heard the truth than to hear the truth and reject it.

V. TheY Have an Accusing Conscience (2:15b)

Fifth, they have a conscience that bears witness to them of right and wrong. "And if they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness" (verse 15). Their conscience is giving a clear and strong testimony regarding what is right and what is wrong.

Every person on earth has a conscience. A conscience is that which instinctively tells you when you have crossed the line and violated the Law, or when you have kept the Law. Your conscience is like a smoke alarm that goes off in the middle of the night that wakes you up and alerts you when something is wrong. Your conscience is like feeling pain in your body when you have broken your ankle. You need to know that you have broken something, and pain is your friend because it tells you that something is broken. That is the roll of the conscience.

The Strength of Your Conscience
Your conscience may be clean, your conscience may be guilty, your conscience may be weak, your conscience may be strong. It just depends upon how many stop signs you have been running as the Law of God is telling you, "Stop, stop, stop." There comes a point where the conscience becomes seared, as with a hot iron, and it no longer feels what it once felt. There is now no moral restraint, there are no brakes in the car, and you speed down the highway of sin. That is a seared conscience.

But as you humble yourself and keep the Law, that strengthens your conscience. You become more sensitive to even the little things. I have people who will call me after I have had a conversation with them and say, “Would you please forgive me? I should not have said this or that.” I may not even be aware anything wrong took place. It is because their conscience is so sensitive, because they have been walking in the truth and walking with the Lord.

For other people, it would take a sledgehammer across the forehead for them to even ponder the thought that what they are saying might be blasphemous. They have worn the brakes off their car, because they have been plowing through their conscience until they have little to no conscience left. They openly bring their sin out of the closet, they do not hide it anymore. They proudly tell people of the sin they have been doing. Earlier, they had enough moral restraint to hide it, but now there is no longer that shame. They now flaunt their sin.
   
The inner thoughts of those without the Law are accusing them of their sin. The Scripture says, “their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them” (verse 15). Their thoughts are both accusing and defending them. Their thoughts are connected to their conscience, and their conscience is bearing witness of their thoughts, accusing them of wrong doing. It is bringing conviction and pressing down.

They feel a sense of guilt, which is telling them that they need to get right, because something is wrong. There is a false guilt, but there is also a true guilt. Guilt is one way you know that you have violated your conscience. Your conscience is connected to the Law of God written upon your heart. This person without the Law, this person who has never heard special revelation, has a conscience that is accusing them before God.

"Or else defending them." Every so often they help old ladies across the street. Every so often they fold the laundry for their mother. Every so often they do some right things. But they are also doing that which the Law written in their heart forbids. They think they are doing good things, but those good things will not save them from condemnation. It only takes one sin to stand guilty before God.

VI. They Will Be Judged By God (2:16)

Sixth, even those without the Law will stand on the last day before God. This passage says, “on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus” (verse 16). There will not be a reprieve or stay of judgment for those who have never heard the gospel. There will be no settling out of court for those without the knowledge of the gospel. They will have their day in court, where they will stand before God.

When Paul refers to “on the day,” he addresses that final day at the end of time. He already addressed this day in Romans 2:5. The day is so dramatic and graphic that Paul only needs to refer to it as the great day looking on the horizon. He writes, "Because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God" (verse 5). This is the day of judgment. Those who have never heard, those who are without the Law, will still stand before God on that last day.
   
They will no only appear, but will be weighed in the balances by God. On that day, they will be weighed against the standard of the Law written on their heart. Please note, this does not say they will be saved, but they will be judged. Paul writes, “on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge" (verse 16). There will not be a different standard for those who have not heard. They will be judged by the gospel.

The gospel includes not only the message of salvation, but also the message of condemnation. The truth of the good news necessitates the truth of the bad news. There can be no good news if there is not the corresponding bad news. The bad news of the gospel is found in Romans 1:18 through 3:20. It is the foundation upon which the gospel is built. The bad news of condemnation is inseparably bound together with the good news of salvation. These two can never be separated.

The believing sinner has to be saved from something. He cannot only be saved unto something. The truth is, he is saved from the wrath of God and condemnation. Paul writes that “on that last day they will be judged according to my gospel” (verse 16), which is the gospel of Jesus Christ. The importance of this statement is the judgment will not be by the morality of others sinners, how they compare to other people. They will not be judged on the curve to see if they have done more good than bad. They will be judged by the gospel, and the gospel commands that all men everywhere repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.
  
Those without the Law will nevertheless be judged by God. I have already alluded to this, but in here it could not be any more clear. Paul writes, "God will judge" (verse 16). This does not say they will be saved or pardoned by God. Nor does this say that they will be given a second chance by God. Rather, Paul maintains that they will be judged by God. Those without the Law will be strictly judged in accordance to the Law written upon their heart.
  
Those without the Law will have their secrets exposed and judged. Paul asserts, "God will judge the secrets of men" (verse 16). It is not just their deeds that will be made subject to divine judgment. Far more exposing and condemning, it is their secret thoughts that will be brought out into the open and condemned. Who could possibly stand innocent and acquitted before God when their secret thoughts are made known before God? Paul confirmed, "Their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them" (verse 15). What will be on trial goes deeper than just their actions that violate the Law of God written on their heart. It is their attitudes, their motives, their hidden thoughts, their selfish ambitions, revenge, anger, and hatred. All of that will come out into the open before God on the last day. The evidence will be overwhelming for those who are without the Law.

Those who are without the Law will still be judged through Christ Jesus. At the end of verse 16, Paul says that those without the Law will be judged “through Christ Jesus." The truth is that God has given all judgment to His Son. It is before the Son of God that every person without Christ will stand. In John 5:22 it says that God has appointed all judgment to His Son. In Revelation 20, at the great white throne judgment, Him who sat upon that throne is Jesus Christ. It will be before Jesus Christ Himself that all without the Law will stand.

Conclusion

As we conclude our look at these verses, we see that even those without the Law are under sin and its curse. Paul will conclude the larger section in which this passage is found, "For we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin" ) Romans 3:9). The “Greeks” refers to those without the Law. Despite being without this special revelation, they nevertheless are under sin. Therefore, they are under the curse of the Law, which is eternal death or the second death. The Bible says, "For the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23). Even those without the Law are still under this curse. If they die without Christ, they have no other recourse but to pay this penalty in hell forever.
  
All mankind has Adam's original sin imputed to them. This includes those who have never heard the gospel. Paul teaches, "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned" (Romans 5:12). When Adam disobeyed God, his original sin was charged to the account of every person who would ever be conceived in the womb of a woman. Again, this includes even those without the Law.

The mere fact that infants die in the womb confirms that Adam's sin has already been imputed to every person. Otherwise, there could never be death in the womb. Even the infants of those who have never heard the gospel are not immune to death.

Over six thousand years ago, Adam's sin was charged to every person who would ever be conceived in their mother's womb. If that sin was not imputed to that child in the mother's womb at the moment of conception, that child would never die. This is why there are miscarriages.

Through Adam's one act of disobedience, the many were made sinners. That includes not only those who are under the Law, but also those who are without the Law. Every person who enters into this world already has Adam's sin charged against them. This puts them in a state of death at the moment of their conception.

As a result, those who have never heard or read the Law are in desperate need to have the gospel preached to them. Paul writes, "How will they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how will they believe in Him whom they have not heard? And how will they hear without a preacher?" (Romans 10:14). That is a rhetorical question, and the obvious answer is they cannot. No one can call upon Him in who they have not believed. You cannot believe in that which you have not heard. The answer is they cannot hear unless someone tells them. No one can be saved without hearing the gospel. Whether it is a pastor, a parent, or a businessman bearing witness of the gospel, someone must share the good news if others are to be saved.

Paul continues, "How will they preach unless they are sent? Just as it is written, ‘How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news of good things!’… So faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ" (Romans 10:15,17). This is why we must be resolutely committed to the cause of gospel preaching, one-on-one witnessing, and world evangelism.

You do not have to go to the other side of the world to meet people who have never heard the gospel truth. You can just walk across the street and meet people who have never heard the good news of Jesus Christ. There are many in churches who have never heard the truth. In these places, church is show time, it is entertainment, or it is dead ritual and empty routine. You do not have to go to Africa, China, or India to find people who have never heard the truth. They live right where you are, and they remain in need of the pure, simple, saving gospel message.

What Paul addresses in Romans 2:12-16 is talking about the vast majority of people on planet earth. This is not describing a small pocket of people. There are billions of people in the world today who are without the Law. Untold numbers have never heard the saving gospel of Jesus Christ. Nevertheless, they have the Law written upon their heart. Consequently, their heart is accusing them, that they have sinned and fallen short of God’s perfect standard. They will stand before God at the judgment on the last day, just like every other unbeliever. At that time, all of their secrets, their thoughts, ambitions, lusts, and motives will be brought out into the open. The entire record of their lives will be made known. It will be Jesus Christ before whom they will stand. In that day, they will have no self-defense whatsoever to give. The only hope they have is in this world now, for us to take the gospel to them while they are still alive.

Those who have never heard the gospel are not just on the other side of the earth. They are in your zip code. They work in your office. They marry into your family. They live in your neighborhood. They think they have to work their way to heaven. They think they have to say Hail Mary's to get to heaven. They think that they have to go to church a certain number of times and do good to certain people in order to meet a standard in which they will find acceptance with God. They are still on the treadmill of self-righteousness and have no concept of the saving grace of God. It is our responsibility to share the gospel with these people.
© 2019 Steven J. Lawson

http://www.onepassionministries.org/transcripts/2017/11/28/those-who-have-never-heard-romans-212-16

China pushes higher 'moral quality' for its citizens


Beijing (AFP) - From budgeting for rural weddings to dressing appropriately and avoiding online porn, China's Communist Party has issued new guidelines to improve the "moral quality" of its citizens.
Officials have released several sets of guidelines this week alongside a secretive conclave of high-ranking officials in Beijing which discusses the country's future direction.
On Sunday the government published its "Outline for the Implementation of Citizen Moral Construction in the New Era" -- which advises readers how to use the internet, raise children, celebrate public holidays and behave while travelling abroad.
The guidelines from the Central Commission for Guiding Cultural and Ethical Progress calls for building "Chinese spirit, Chinese values, and Chinese power".
The texts urge citizens to avoid pornography and vulgarity online, and follow correct etiquette when raising the flag or singing the national anthem.
Public institutions like libraries and youth centres must carry out "targeted moral education" to improve people's ideological awareness and moral standards, according to the rules.
The guideline also stresses patriotism and loyalty to the motherland.
"People who have a servile attitude to foreign countries, damage national dignity and sell national interests must be disciplined according to the law," it says.
- 'Bad customs' -
A separate set of behavioural guidelines published this week targeted China's rural areas, and urged local governments to weed out "bad customs".
These included abuse of the elderly as well as the practice of extravagant weddings and funerals, according to Zhang Zhiyong, an official from the commission.
Zhang said the most important thing for "rural civility" is the construction and improvement of ideology and morality.
"We must strengthen marital education for young people, and put to full use the Communist Youth League, women's federations, and other group organisations," said Zhang.
State broadcaster CCTV said that the custom to spend a lot on weddings and provide a house and gifts for a new bride -- often beyond the means or poorer rural families -- was "putting pressure on unmarried males".
China's decades-long one-child policy has resulted in a massive gender gap, and Beijing is anxious about the potential social impact of millions of unmarried men in the countryside.
Zhang called for official organisations to be more closely involved in the lives of rural villagers.
The rules were published as Beijing holds The Fourth Plenum of the Party's Central Committee, a closed-door meeting of high-ranking officials where the country's roadmap and future direction is discussed.
Beijing produced a list of 58 national "moral models" who exemplify patriotism and "lofty morality" for the celebration of China's 70th national holiday on October 1.
The latest round of moral guidelines update an earlier set published in 2001.
"Money-worship, hedonism, and extreme individualism have grown," according to the 2001 guidelines.
Eighteen years later, the refreshed guidelines listed the same offences -- and described them as "still outstanding".

Vox Popoli: Protocols of the Learned Elders of Wye


I thought this 2006 article on Haaretz by Shmuel Rosner concerning a conference discussing the survival of the Jewish people was intriguing, both for what it suggested in terms of what the future holds in store for America as well as what it implied about the Jewish perception of the transience of their relationship with America:
Two groups of Jews gathered together last weekend at Wye Plantation, Maryland for a long discussion on the situation of the Jewish people. The first group, which met Wednesday and Thursday, consisted of the heads of 15 Jewish organizations such as the Presidents' Conference, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations, the American Jewish Committee and others. In the second group were the "thinkers," as the organizers termed them: Natan Sharansky from Israel, Charles Krauthammer from The Washington Post, former Canadian justice minister Irwin Cotler, former Jewish Agency head Sallai Meridor and many others....

The fear expressed that "a real decline of the West, particularly the United States, would have dramatic consequences for the Jewish people," also led to controversy. Brandeis University president Jehuda Reinharz agreed that this type of decline can be expected "in the coming two decades" - but Stuart Eisenstadt was less emphatic about it. He believes the United States will remain the leading power. In all events, it was agreed the Jews "should strengthen cultural links with non-Western civilizations, particularly China and also India," powers that are on the ascent. This is not a question of preference or closeness; it is a question of survival, of readiness for the future.

I am very curious to know if there was any recognition that the observed decline of the West has any connection to a number of the policies that these organizations have supported for the last 50+ years? I also wonder why the targeted non-Western civilizations which are supposedly on the ascent, (raising some real questions about the participating economists given the ongoing Chinese meltdown), would be interested in stronger cultural links given the questionable consequences of those cultural links on the United States. The Indians might be amenable, but Chinese history suggests that the Han wouldn't even blink before taking actions that would make Hitler look like a Righteous Gentile.

As an East Asian Studies major who is neither philo- nor antisemitic, I suggest the Elders of Wye might want to seriously rethink the potential of China as a safe landing place. Japan and Korea, too, are likely out.

The article tends to leave one with the unfortunate impression of rats congregating in order to contemplate the right time to leave a sinking ship. Or, to use a less ominous metaphor, magical golden geese who graciously convey manifold benefits and blessings on those with the courtesy to accept them discussing the right time to stop laying eggs and fly away before being greedily dissected. But regardless of whether one considers those discussing the timing of their exit as rats or golden geese. the mere fact that they are discussing the imminent sinking of the ship should be of no small concern to those who happen to be aboard it.

And before any philosemites feel led to cry holocaust, try to keep in mind that I didn't forge the freaking article. If there is some non-pejorative way to view these discussions by a group of people actively making ready for an incipient American decline, by all means, feel free to share your interpretation. Regardless, it would be hard to deny that the conference participants do not see themselves as being a part of the American people.


Questions of survival - - Shmuel Rosner Jun 23, 2006 12:00 AM - Israel News | Haaretz.com

Pushing aside competition and even hostility, Jewish leaders sat together last weekend for the first time and discussed what they agree is the unclear future of their people.

WASHINGTON - The following disparity tells us more about human nature than about the future of the Jewish world: The executive branch - the heads of the large Jewish organizations, on the whole - are optimistic and believe Judaism has a glowing future, while the intellectuals and thinkers are much more pessimistic and insist on mentioning the pitfalls and obstacles the coming years hold in store. Those who are entrusted with carrying out affairs must be convinced there is a point to what they do - and what is the point if there is no future?

Two groups of Jews gathered together last weekend at Wye Plantation, Maryland for a long discussion on the situation of the Jewish people. The first group, which met Wednesday and Thursday, consisted of the heads of 15 Jewish organizations such as the Presidents' Conference, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations, the American Jewish Committee and others. In the second group were the "thinkers," as the organizers termed them: Natan Sharansky from Israel, Charles Krauthammer from The Washington Post, former Canadian justice minister Irwin Cotler, former Jewish Agency head Sallai Meridor and many others.

The Institute for Policy Planning of the Jewish People had organized this gathering. It had a somewhat ambitious aim - a strategic debate about the future of the Jewish people. In actuality, it focused on three issues: the challenge posed by Islam, the situation in Israel, and the weighty question of whether the Jewish people are on the rise or on the wane.

Their conclusions, in brief: The future is unclear. And in greater detail: There are many risks, and it is time to roll up our sleeves. The institute and its heads - Dennis Ross, Prof. Yehezkel Dror, Avi Gil, Avinoam Bar-Yosef - are already doing their homework.

One of the papers that was prepared in advance and presented to the participants in the conferences was that written by Dr. Shalom Wald. He chose 14 well-known historians, from Thucydides to Gibbon, Spangler, Toynbee and Kennedy, and examined their theories concerning the circumstances in which civilizations flourish or collapse. Then he tried to examine how these theories can be applied to the context of the Jewish people.

Several of his conclusions provoked disagreement. For example: "Getting all Jews into the same shape and country, even if it is Israel, as recently advocated by an Israeli [writer, A.B. Yehoshua - S.R.] is not the best survival strategy." Some of the Israeli participants did not like that idea. Granting official legitimacy to the Diaspora would be a mistake, Meridor said, according to some of those who participated. That would be the end of Zionism as we know it.

The fear expressed that "a real decline of the West, particularly the United States, would have dramatic consequences for the Jewish people," also led to controversy. Brandeis University president Jehuda Reinharz agreed that this type of decline can be expected "in the coming two decades" - but Stuart Eisenstadt was less emphatic about it. He believes the United States will remain the leading power. In all events, it was agreed the Jews "should strengthen cultural links with non-Western civilizations, particularly China and also India," powers that are on the ascent. This is not a question of preference or closeness; it is a question of survival, of readiness for the future. How should this be done? That will have to be the topic of discussion in the next gatherings already being planned.

Working together

Abraham Foxman of the ADL says he came to the conference full of skepticism but left satisfied at its conclusion. That was the feeling of most of those who participated in the first gathering. They agree about one thing: The very gathering itself is the achievement. It is the first time the heads of Jewish organizations have sat down round the same table and sought ways to cooperate, pushing aside the competition, suspicions and sometimes even latent hostility. "If there were barriers in the beginning, they were removed," says Malcolm Hoenlein of the Presidents' Conference. "There is a commitment to continue working together," says Rabbi Tzvi Weinreb of the Orthodox Union. It also was possible to sit at the same table without provoking conflicts. One of the participants said Weinre b, an Orthodox rabbi, had no problem calling the Reform rabbi, David Ellenson, up to the Torah - even though President Moshe Katsav refuses to attach the title of "rabbi" to his name.

However, on the substance of the agreement to "work together" there are various opinions. Some of the participants believe it was agreed that a mechanism would be set up for "joint work in the future" while others told Haaretz that "not too much came out of it." Nevertheless, they managed to define aims and goals. First and foremost - investing in education for the young generation. The philanthropist Michael Steinhardt put great emphasis on this point, as well as on "lowering the price of Jewish life" in America. This means lowering the price of access to synagogues, Jewish schools, cultural centers and other activities.

Last year the institute held similar strategic conferences, but with slightly different participants. Then, too, in general, agreement was reached on more than a few topics. For example, that it was necessary to draw those on the fringes of Jewish civilization inward. This year, at the opening of the meeting, Bar-Yosef, the institute's director, presented a general report on the situation of the Jewish people. One sentence from that survey can sum up the results of that agreement better than any other - "The Jewish people: worldwide zero growth."

The better-known historians mentioned in Wald's review, particularly the earlier ones, also agreed for the most part that "the Jews will survive as a people and civilization." But there was nevertheless one who dissented - Oswald Spangler. What kept the Jews together as a people, he stated, was "magic consensus" but, he added, this is vanishing with the years. The Jews of the Western world have assimilated into general Western culture and will disappear with it. The Jews will disappear from a historical perspective; that is inevitable, he said.

There were several interesting arguments. One was over whether the Jews of America have to worry about the social welfare of the Jews of Israel. The Americans said yes - "All Jews are responsible for one another." The Israelis said no way; leave the social problems in Israel for us to deal with. Yisrael Maimon, the government representative, proposed a partnership with the Americans in technology, education, "brain investments." But the improvement of the lot of the poor, he said, must be left to the Israeli government.

Prof. Dror also stressed the importance of investing in improving the situation of education in Israel. One of the central aims he presented was "to develop Israel into a learning-knowledge society." Those present discussed the level of the universities in Israel and some of them even proposed the level of at least one of these institutions be raised sufficiently to attract students from abroad in higher numbers.

Reinharz of Brandeis is among those who are concerned about the situation of Jewish education. The main conclusion from the conference, he told Haaretz, was that Jewish education "is the most important element both in Israel and in the Diaspora." But an important corollary of this is that "it would be worthwhile thinking about education that is carried out in coordination." He terms this a "core curriculum" - that is, a study program whose basic content would be taught to every Jew no matter where he or she is.

Real challenge

That is a real challenge, but its difficulty can be clearly seen: Who will decide on the program, who will provide the contents, how will they be agreed upon? Israel has many urgent problems, Reinharz says, and it is hard to see how it will find time to seriously deal with the future of the Jewish people. Other participants were of the opinion that the proposal would lead to quarrels and disputes.

Reinharz: "Let us say we have decided there are certain chapters of the Bible that every Jew must know - how exactly will we decide which chapters these should be? Every decision of this sort takes into account values, and there will be tremendous differences of opinion between the preferences presented by the Israelis and those the Jews of the Diaspora would like, as well as divergences of opinion between the different streams of Judaism. The Reform Jews will want to stress universal and humane prophesies while the Orthodox will want to focus on particular prophesies."

The Jewish schools in America are currently undergoing renewed popularity. An almost 30 percent growth in the number of those registering - but those, as Bar-Yosef pointed out, are "mostly those who are already affiliated." The schools have to become a center of attraction for others as well.

And in all events, the question must be asked - what do these schools teach? Reinharz is concerned that the Jews of the Diaspora do not know enough about Israel. In the Jewish schools today, they concentrate on studying the prayer book and stories from the Bible, with less emphasis on history. He feels pupils both in Israel and the Diaspora should study the history of Zionism and the State of Israel more thoroughly.

https://www.haaretz.com/1.4920795