I
could be writing every week about Sweden. Every day. Every hour. For reasons
that will be analyzed by historians for a long, long time – provided the
Western world doesn't become so thoroughly Islamized that the possibility of
objective historical scrutiny is utterly obliterated – the Swedes have chosen a
path of cultural and societal suicide that puts all other countries in the
shade.
For
anyone curious about self-destructive psychopathologies, it is a grimly
fascinating phenomenon. Why, of all places, Sweden? How can a Swedish woman
raped by an illegal Muslim immigrant be so bursting with racial guilt that she
hesitates to report the crime to the police for fear that her report might lead
to her rapist's punishment or deportation? Or, more generally, because news of
the offense might result in an increase in “Islamophobia?"
This
is the kind of madness that's going on in Sweden now. More than any other
country in Europe, it has a government and a media that are in denial about the
truth, a legal system that punishes those who dare to tell the truth, and a
people who have been brainwashed for decades with the vile lie that they have a
moral obligation to hand their country over to hostile, despotic strangers from
far away.
No,
Sweden isn't North Korea. The ugly news does get out, one way or another. Some
of it, anyway. It's just that, with extremely rare exceptions, the important
facts about the nation's disastrous Islamization don't find their way into the
country's own mainstream media. On the contrary, Sweden's major TV, radio, and
print outlets are notorious for the fidelity with which they parrot the
government line and omit or whitewash uncomfortable news developments.
No,
if you're looking for the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth
about most of the nasty stuff going on in Sweden these days, you're better off
checking out Swedish websites such as Avpixlat and Fria
Tider, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, and
two Norwegian sites: document.no and rights.no,
the latter being the site of the organization Human Rights Service.
I've
previously quoted a March
11 Jyllands-Posten editorial that spelled out the
Swedish situation quite frankly: what should “most worry Sweden's neighbors,”
the Danish editors wrote, is the Swedes' “unwillingness to openly and honestly
discuss the government-approved multicultural idyll. ... In the long run, the
mendacity that characterizes the Swedish debate cannot be maintained. The
discrepancy between the official, idealized version of Sweden, 'the people's
home,' and the brutal reality that everyone can see has simply become too
great.”
Indeed.
This is a country where rapes by Muslim men are systematically ignored by the
authorities or responded to with minimal punishment. Routinely, Swedish courts
refuse to return these monsters – some of whom have repeatedly subjected small
boys and girls to violent sexual abuse – to their home countries for fear that
they'll be put in danger. In other words, Swedish judges care more about the
safety of foreign rapists than that of Swedish children.
(No
wonder U.S. News and World Report has just named Sweden the
best country in the world to be an immigrant. Yet another cockeyed ranking. The
proper question isn't which country is best for immigrants, but which country
has the most sensible immigration policy.)
It's
a country where even prominent Swedish feminists – fanatical boosters of
multiculturalism – are now moving out of Muslim-heavy
neighborhoods not only because of the Muslim rapists but
because of the Muslim “morality police,” who are less concerned with monitoring
rapists than with controlling women's conduct. (One such feminist organized
“coffee shop meetings” with Muslim male community leaders in an attempt to
resolve the situation, but gave up.)
It's
a country where the government rolls out the red carpet for returning ISIS
members, giving them special benefits, in hopes that they'll see the light and
put down their weapons.
It's
a country where, while Muslim rapists and terrorists are forgiven, critics of
immigrant conduct are punished. In May, a 70-year-old woman in Dalarna, Sweden,
was arrested for
writing on Facebook in 2015 about immigrants who “set cars on fire and urinate
and defecate in the streets.” (She faces up to four years in prison.)
No
surprise, then, that on July 7, Jyllands-Posten reported that the
Swedish government plans to alter the nation's Constitution in such a way as to
give itself the power to limit online free speech about precisely these
ticklish matters. Among other things, wrote Jyllands-Posten, it
will become illegal “for certain websites to publicize information about
private persons' ethnicity or conviction of crimes.”
Of
course: the best way to address the ever-rising tide of Muslim criminality is
to close down every last media outlet that reports honestly about it. The
mainstream Swedish media are already playing ball; it's just a few recalcitrant
websites that need to be scrubbed clean. Presumably the next step will be to
block access in Sweden to Jyllands-Posten and other foreign
news sources that tell Swedes the truth about what's going on within their own
borders.
Then
everything will be just perfect, no? And what are the chances that no matter
how much Sweden tightens its already alarming (if currently tacit) limits on
freedom of speech, Reporters without Borders will keep Sweden at its ridiculous
#2 spot on the World Press Freedom Index?
