Although the statistical evidence is rapidly turning into hard physical evidence of ballot fraud, it's still useful to continue noting the statistical anomalies and how strongly they indicate that there is no shortage of fraud to find by refining the statistical case against Biden:
2. OUTPERFORMANCE VS. OBAMA
3. BIDEN-ONLY BALLOTS
4. ABSENCE OF MAIL-IN VOTE VETTING
The statistical case, in isolation, does not prove fraud. But the confluence of highly unlikely results does, emphatically, paint of picture of utter improbability.
Any one of these four factors alone would cast intense doubt upon election results.
Put all four together, and the result is a seemingly impossible statistical perfect storm.
And it is wildly ironic that the self-styled "party of science" that relies so heavily upon statistics for "proof" of racism and income inequality to turn around and reject the idea that statistics are a reasonable basis to justify further investigations into ballot fraud.