(The first interesting observation - while both China and DaUS have corruption - only DaUS has made it normal and legal - so much for Judeo-Christian ethics, eh? - CL)
The first of these posts began by setting forth the author’s position in very clear terms:
After a year of observing the utter criminality and inhumanity of Israel’s actions in the Middle East, I have decided to investigate the origins of its dark national/racial/religious ethos from historical documents.
There seems to be numerous sources to draw insights from and there are many interesting analytical perspectives one can take, including –
- The relationship between the decline of the west and the rise of the jews in western political establishment, especially in the US
- The complete convergence of Zionism and neoconservatism to the point they are now interchangeable concepts
- The roles played by the jews in the increasing militarism and jingoism in the west
- The surprising (maybe not so surprising) similarities and parallel of Zionist ideologies and actions with the Nazis
One interesting piece of historical records seems a good place to start to understand Judaism and Zionism – the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
As an outside observer completely free from generations of our own ideological conditioning, the author simply went through numerous elements of that notorious early twentieth century document and noted how many of these seemed eerily similar to exactly what had taken place in the West since that time, especially with regard to the successful political strategies followed by its very powerful Jewish and Zionist minorities.
And although the third, shorter post had a much more innocuous title, some of the simple observations it contained were just as explosive. Although many Westerners might share his view that the economic doctrines promoted by the University of Chicago have inflicted huge damage upon America and the rest of the West, no one of any respectability would have dared to describe the ethnic dimension as Hua so freely did:
It promotes a fundamentalist free market concept, featuring privatization, deregulation, and formation of trusts.
The resultant financialization of the economy directly led to deindustrialization and a crumbling of manufacturing and the real production and consumption economy.
It gave birth to popular business practices such as asset-light strategy, offshoring and outsourcing which have hollowed out the productive economy.
The current US economic system is a rentier oligarchic system where financial parasites feed on the real economy and will eventually subsume it.
This economic system has led to unprecedented wealth gap and societal polarization.
– On the political front, long time University of Chicago political scientist Leo Strauss was the intellectual godfather of neoconservatism ideology.
The ideology promotes hegemonic imperial designs based on militarism, racial supremacy, and fervent Zionism. The neocons have adopted an Israel-first expansionist foreign policy coupled with aggressive military postures across the world.
The neocons are directly responsible for the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East. These wars have cost taxpayers over $7 trillion, estimated by Brown University’s Watson School.
Interestingly Leo Strauss studied in Germany under Carl Schmitt, the chief Nazi legal scholar and political theorist.
Strauss’ students at the University of Chicago include some of the most renowned neocons such as Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, and Samuel Huntington who invented the Clash of Civilization concept to justify the hawkish US military expansionism.
The hardline neocon support of Israeli genocide in Gaza and Lebanon has destroyed US reputation, making a mockery of its hypocritical advocacy of human rights and freedom.
Interestingly, both Milton Friedman and Leo Strauss are Jewish. Most of the neoliberal free market economists and neoconservative foreign policy makers are also Jewish.
These include Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Paul Krugman, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle, Paul Bremer, Douglas Feith, Madeleine Albright, Robert Kagan, Irving Kristol, Victoria Nuland.
Collectively, these Jewish economic and foreign policy makers have done great damage to the world.
The intellectual takeover of the University of Chicago by the Jews is a reflection of the Jewish takeover of the US. This takeover is leading to the bankruptcy of the US economic and political systems.
The parasites have won and will consume the host.
The Wikipedia page for the Protocols of the Elders of Zion runs 10,000 words with a multitude of references and notes, and as might be expected it provides a very establishmentarian view of that controversial topic. The Protocols are described as a work of stark antisemitic lunacy, only taken seriously by the ignorant and the deranged, but the introductory section closes by quoting a scholar who characterized that document as “probably the most influential work of antisemitism ever written.” I think that the vast majority of today’s mainstream Westerners would hold views very similar to those of the Wikipedia article, being totally at odds with the posts published by the Chinese author.
However, as I explained in a 2018 article, Western views had actually been very different a century ago. In the aftermath of the successful Bolshevik Revolution, whose leadership was overwhelmingly Jewish, the Protocols soon became one of the most widely published documents in history, with the contents endorsed by the august Times of London, the world’s most influential media outlet.
A decade of exhaustive archival research by Prof. Joseph Bendersky, a mainstream Holocaust historian, revealed that America’s entire national security establishment also took the Protocols very seriously at the time, believing that the document accurately described the conspiratorial and subversive plans of organized Jewish groups, who constituted a deadly threat to Western civilization. The private correspondence of some of those leading American officials demonstrated that they still retained those views as late as the 1970s.
During the 1920s, billionaire Henry Ford ranked as our greatest industrialist, an international hero of towering reputation, and he also endorsed the Protocols, which he excerpted and discussed in the Dearborn Independent, a newspaper he established that achieved America’s largest national circulation. Ford played a central role in creating the American middle class, while the Chinese writer argued that the economic policies advanced by so many American Jews have now reversed that great achievement and largely destroyed that same middle class.
Hua explained that he had been prompted to investigate the Protocols after witnessing the unending scenes of horror that had been inflicted upon the Middle East over the last year by the Zionist Jews of Israel, and I found this explanation quite plausible. Indeed, since October 2023, I have repeatedly suggested that such international reactions might be the most important long-term consequence of the bloody Israel/Gaza conflict, for example doing so in the closing paragraphs of a May 2024 article:
Several months ago a young military serviceman named Aaron Bushnell from a strongly Christian background became so distraught at his country’s active involvement in what he regarded as the supreme crime of genocide that he set himself on fire and died in an act of protest, an event certainly without precedent in American history and extraordinarily rare elsewhere in the world. Although the story quickly vanished from our own media, the coverage on global social media was enormous, and may have lasting consequences.
After discussing that tragic incident, I went on to suggest that the dire fate of Gaza’s Palestinians might ultimately be seen as having played a similar role. Their deaths may have now suddenly revealed America’s long-concealed rulers both to our own people and to the rest of the world…
For similar reasons, I think that the tens of thousands of dead Gazans did not lose their lives in vain. Instead, their martyrdom has dominated the global media for the last five months, conclusively revealing to the entire world the moral bankruptcy of the international system that had condemned them to their fate.
Probably hundreds of millions of people worldwide have now begun asking themselves questions that they never would have previously considered. I suspect that those responsible for the destruction of Gaza may come to rue the day when they helped open doors that they may eventually wish had been kept tightly shut.
