Read full text: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=252937
| <p>Trump's Administration <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_65" target="_blank" rel="noopener">has finally taken notice of Rule 65(c)</a> when it comes to Federal Courts.</p><br><blockquote><br><p>(c) market-ticker.org |
Thus where is Pam Bondi with immediate emergency filings against all of the existing injunctions already issued demanding that security be posted up and computed in said public filing and, if there is any delay or refusal by the judges involved to do so taking an immediate emergency appeal as far as necessary including to the Supreme Court which, given the actual language in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a slam-dunk and immediate win? No, demanding this only on a forward basis for future filings is not enough -- force the movants in all the existing injunctions to either post up security or dissolve the injunctions and TROs.If our government expects we, the ordinary civilians, to adhere to and comply with the law they had better do so themselves especially when various parts of the government go to war legally with each other.