In this article, I’m putting together several pieces I wrote in years past, to reveal scandals on a scale most people have never considered.
Why? Because the credibility of information
you’re getting now, from government agencies, about COVID, is connected to the
credibility of information you’ve received from the same government agencies in
years gone by.
If
they lied to you then—in mind-boggling ways—there is no reason to think they’re
telling the truth now.
Buckle
up.
SCANDAL
ONE: In 2013, Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British
Medical Journal), revealed this monstrosity.
As
Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are
taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only
a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.
This
means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu
have no flu virus in their bodies.
So
they don’t have the flu.
Therefore,
even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly
prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.
The
vaccine couldn’t possibly work.
The
vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here’s
the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines
by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
“…even
the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild
influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a
small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to
do with influenza. Every
year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US.
Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.
“…It’s
no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they
can’t.”
Because
most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.
So
even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the
short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.
But the mainstream press can’t report any
of this.
It would topple the flu-treatment money
machine. It would topple public health agencies.
SCANDAL
TWO: Widely reported in the press, health authorities admit the
seasonal flu vaccine may be only 10% effective in a given year.
But
of course, they urge you to take the vaccine anyway.
Why is this vaccine ineffective?
Because it’s made using chicken eggs, and researchers have discovered that the
flu virus—which is placed in the vaccine—mutates in chicken eggs.
Therefore, by the time a person takes
the flu shot, he’s not being protected against this year’s seasonal flu virus.
He’s being protected against a mutated virus that isn’t causing the flu this
year.
This
is the conventional explanation. If you think it’s the whole story, I have
condos for sale on the moon.
You
see, vaccines have been made using chicken eggs…for the past 70 years.
Oops.
That
would mean the flu vaccine has been ineffective for decades.
Healthline.com:
“The majority of flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, a method of vaccine
development that’s been used for 70 years.”
SCANDAL
THREE: In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online)
published another shocking Peter Doshi report, which created tremors through
the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where “the experts” used to
tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.
Here
is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than
science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):
“[According
to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777
of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases
was the flu virus positively identified.”
Boom.
You see, the CDC created one overall
category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this?
Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications
stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has
a number of causes.
But even worse, in all the flu and
pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of
an influenza virus.
Therefore,
the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of
influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
Doshi
continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979
and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257
to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.
This
death toll is obviously far lower than the old parroted 36,000 figure.
However,
when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the
flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.
In other words, it’s all promotion and
hype.
“Well,
uh, we used to say that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US.
But actually, all we can prove is about 20 deaths. However, we can’t admit
that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole
campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same
effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of
upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”
SCANDAL
FOUR: The so-called Swine Flu pandemic of 2009. This one is a real
eye-opener. The CDC was caught with its pants down.
Swine
Flu was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to
take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?
The
problem was, the CDC was concealing a very dirty secret.
At
the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on the
Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting
cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its
unchecked spread.
Understand
that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.
What
was the Agency up to?
Here
is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
Rappoport:
In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You
discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control,
ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in
America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without
having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of
yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?
Attkisson:
The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through
our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu
cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine
Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the
story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most
original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to
stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no
[CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories
pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original,
new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck
of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that
many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that
may not have been necessary.
–—end
of interview excerpt—–
It was routine for doctors all over America
to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the
“most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly,
those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of
flu.
That was the big secret. That’s what the
CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers.
That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.
But
it gets even worse.
Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s
findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic,
decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much
bigger one.
Here,
from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14
million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million —
came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine
Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).
Are
your eyeballs popping? They should be.
In
the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America,
because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients
shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.
There
is no Swine Flu epidemic.
Then,
the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.
SCANDAL
FIVE: This one involves a vaccine manufacturer. It goes back to at least
2016, and it keeps unfolding.
—The
Philippines, where drug giant Sanofi’s Dengvaxia, was given to prevent Dengue
Fever. Sanofi is facing enormous pushback from government officials, who
stopped the national vaccination campaign, after thousands of children already
received the shot.
The
issue? Safety.
FiercePharma:
“The Philippines stopped vaccinations shortly after the company warned that
Dengvaxia can cause more serious infections in those who previously hadn’t had
exposure to the virus. The country also kicked off a probe and plans legal
action, according to health secretary Francisco Duque.”
Did
you get that? The company (Sanofi) itself warned that vaccine might not be
safe.
FiercePharma:
“…the [Philippine] Department of Health didn’t heed warnings from an advisory
group of doctors and pharmacologists, who concluded early last year that the
vaccine’s safety and efficacy were unproven.”
My,
my.
But
let’s dig even deeper. Sanofi saying is saying the vaccine might be dangerous
for those who haven’t been exposed to the Dengue virus before getting the shot.
What on Earth does that mean?
It
means a child who had naturally come in contact with the virus would have
developed his own antibodies to it. And later, those antibodies would protect
him against the Dengue virus IN THE VACCINE. Otherwise, the virus in the
vaccine could give him a case of Dengue or cause some other form of damage.
This is saying, “If a child is ALREADY
immune to Dengue Fever, because his immune system has successfully dealt with
the virus, then the vaccine won’t damage him.”
And THAT is saying, “If the child has
naturally developed an immunity to Dengue, then the vaccine, WHICH HE DOESN’T
NEED, won’t harm him.”
Of
course, the press isn’t getting the picture. If any reporters are seeing the
light, they’re keeping their mouths shut. The scandal is too big and too crazy.
Between
the lines, a vaccine company is admitting their vaccine is only safe for
children who don’t need it.
A
tree just fell in the forest. Who heard it?
Mainstream
reporters don’t want to uncover the true meaning of vaccine scandals.
Therefore, they cultivate ignorance as a defense against admitting their own
unconscionable bias. And that’s the essence of their own mental “vaccine,”
which works very well. For them.
These five scandals, as boggling as
they are, are just a brief sampling from the recent history of governments and
pharma.
History matters.
The titanic load of nonsense and lies
about COVID now being dropped on the population is one more chapter of business
as usual:
In 2019, a new and unique coronavirus
was discovered through the application of proper scientific procedures. LIE.
The diagnostic test (PCR) is dependable
and highly accurate. LIE.
The case numbers and deaths numbers are
accurate and meaningful. LIE.
The containment measures are effective.
LIE.
The destruction of national economies,
through lockdowns, is necessary. LIE.
In
over 150 articles, I’ve provided evidence to support the assertion that these
are all egregious lies.
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a
candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of
California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose
of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer
Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing
articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon
has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and
creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews
emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine
emails here.
