The Imposed Diaper is the visible symbol of the
coerced submission of the thinking individual to an idea he finds foolish and
absurd; it is no different than making an adult suck his thumb – or put his
thumb in another place – as the price of being permitted to go out in public or
go into a place of business.
Jefferson wrote
that it is evil and tyrannical to force a man to furnish funds for the
propagation of ideas he despises.
Something far
more evil and tyrannical is afoot. Or rather, being forced onto people’s faces.
The Diaper.
The thing
itself is itself is merely sad. Its wearer – by choice – identifies himself as
a person easily scared or very neurotic. A person who believes that death – as
opposed to the cases! the cases! – is in the air rather than being transmitted
over the air.
And that
feelings prevent sickness.
If this person were thinking rather than feeling, he
would not wear a dirty bandana over his face nor be calmed by the sight of
others so attired. He would wear at least an N100 mask/respirator – something
that is actually effective at “stopping the spread” . . . but which also
costs a great deal more than a dirty bandana or a throw-away face condom.
Apparently, his
life – and granny’s – isn’t worth the $25 or so it takes to buy an N100 or
better device. Plus the goggles. Mustn’t forget them . . . assuming this
isn’t about feelings.
But of course, it
is about spreading submission – to an idea – by participating in a ritual.
By making
everyone look the same the impression is conveyed that they think the same.
Which serves to legitimize this sameness.
It also serves
another, more despicable purpose. That being to make the thinking feel – by
looking – foolish. When he knows better.
Precisely
because he does know better. He must be made to submit in order to make it
clear that they can make him.
To break him,
in other words.
The Imposed
Diaper is the visible symbol of the coerced submission of the thinking
individual to an idea he finds foolish and absurd; it is no different than
making an adult suck his thumb – or put his thumb in another place – as the
price of being permitted to go out in public or go into a place of business.
It is done for
the same reason that the gunnery sergeant in Full Metal Jacket made Private
Pyle stand on his footlocker with a donut in his mouth except that gunny
actually meant well in that he was trying to teach Private Pyle to be a good
soldier.
Forced
Diapering is about teaching people to be good slaves. We aren’t in boot camp.
But we are very possibly headed toward concentration camps and if you think
that’s a bit much, consider previous examples of people who were made to wear
pieces of cloth. If you don’t want to go there, don’t put on the cloth now.
It is nothing
like being expected to wear a shirt and shoes in order to be served – a fatuity
put forth by some perhaps well-intended but not well-thinking defenders of
property rights. Neither a shirt nor shoes are absurd, for openers. Nor the trappings
of membership in what amounts to a religious movement one doesn’t want to join.
The absurdity of the thing carries with it a malevolent
thing, which is the coerced pretending that it isn’t absurd. Which it obviously
would be if people were left to to not Diaper because many who do think
wouldn’t. This would increase the visibility of the absurd – and thereby make
the absurd uncomfortable.
Which might
prompt them to think rather than feel. To conquer their fear, spread over the
air with a virulence the virus has never even fractionally approached.
Precisely what
cannot be allowed to happen.
By forcing all to Diaper, the fear is maintained by making
it appear reasonable. After
all, everyone looks afraid. Surely there must a be reason to be afraid. The
effect on children and young adults must be especially severe – and damaging.
The sight of
the occasional Undiapered becomes a source of anger rather than a reproach. He
is a danger – and it is true. A danger to the feelings of the fractured. The
feeling that the fractured might look foolish.
That they’ve
been had.
Which tends to
make people mad – at those who conned them.
And that is why the con cannot be exposed – by making sure
no one’s face is exposed. It explains the sudden, factually inexplicable push
to get every American’s face behind a Diaper at just the moment when the facts
would otherwise reveal the absurdity of forcing a Diaper on the gesichter of
every person.
It is no different
in principle than being compelled to put on an armband. The
idea being to make it appear that everyone is part of the movement; and to
isolate demoralize – and identity – those who aren’t part of it.
That is the danger of the Diapering at Gunpoint.
Because that is precisely where it will lead.
.Got a question about cars,
Libertarian politics – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send
’em in!
If you like what you’ve found
here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the
wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal,
our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2020/08/03/in-your-face/
