You simply can't argue with the data
There is a clear elevation of all-cause mortality in the 25-44 age bracket coinciding with Covid-19 showing up. There is also an elevation in the other age brackets, by the way.
All-cause is just that -- while some of this is undoubtedly Covid-19, policy-driven deaths are also in there. Suicides, ODs and similar were and are up materially over the 2019 numbers, and these are also in that figure. Dead is dead, I remind you; why is not material to either the dead person or their loved ones.
But what we do know, by simple comparison with other age brackets, is that most of it wasn't Covid. How do we know this? Because the winter of 2020 came and went, where a huge number of older people died as a result of Covid-19 and during most of it there were no jabs available to anyone. This age group saw a small -- measurable, but small -- bump during that time.
We thus know that Covid simply doesn't kill people in this age group all that frequently -- and, in fact, the mitigations killed far more people than the disease.
But then..... Joe Biden's administration and private employers started issuing threats: Take the jab or get fired.
And.... there were a lot of jabs given to people who would have otherwise not taken them, most of which came after the big summer spike of Delta cases.
There was an exact correlation in the rise of deaths with the threats.
Remember that Biden (and many others) crowed that threats work.
Well, they sure do work, by the data: Threats are deadly and they did in fact kill.
Is this proof that the jabs killed those people? No, but its damn good evidence.
What's worse, however, is that post the spike the death rate did not go back to baseline among this age group -- and now, it STILL hasn't.
In other words the intervention was worthless and might actually be enhancing infections since (1) you can only die once, (2) the >85 cohort IS seeing reduced mortality (they got hit hard prior, and once dead they no longer can die again) and the same is true, to a lesser-extent, in the 65+ group.
There is no net benefit if for a given number of jabs one person is killed by the jab and one person doesn't die from Covid. That's a net zero and the only valid means of computing public health benefit is a decrease in all-cause mortality.
Everyone of working age either got nothing or was harmed and worse, there is no follow-on benefit either as in these groups the mortality rate has not decreased compared to prior to jabs being available which, if they actually did reduce all-cause mortality, would be evident in the data.
This is now established; net-net on a broad societal basis they're worthless at best*.
Oh, and there's a very ugly correlation data set from Israel, the only nation that is deploying four jabs thus far. See if you can detect a problem that appears to advance radically in severity when jabs 3 and 4 are deployed.
Those private firm CEOs and others who issued these mandates must be held criminally and civilly accountable for these results. They are not shielded by the PREP Act.
Physicians, "public health" officials and politicians who pushed these jabs that have now proved to be worthless on a wide-scale, public-health basis must be utterly destroyed.
Prison and asset-stripping to their skivvies would, in fact, be a concession.
* Being worthless on a broad societal basis doesn't mean that on a case-by-case basis, in certain persons, they may not have benefit. Indeed they may and likely do for people in certain situations. But that does not translate, it is now proved, into society as a whole.
